Ass ssessi essing ng Sk Skin in Dose se in th the Field eld - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ass ssessi essing ng sk skin in dose se in th the field
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ass ssessi essing ng Sk Skin in Dose se in th the Field eld - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

C ORVALLIS A USTIN S EATTLE Ass ssessi essing ng Sk Skin in Dose se in th the Field eld from m Ra Radionuclide dionuclide Cont ntaminatio amination n on th the Bo Body Rolan and d Benk nke, PhD, , CHP Director of Business


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Ass ssessi essing ng Sk Skin in Dose se in th the Field eld from m Ra Radionuclide dionuclide Cont ntaminatio amination n on th the Bo Body

Rolan and d Benk nke, PhD, , CHP Director of Business Development roland.benke@rcdsoftware.com

29th Annual National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference Dose Assessment Series, April 4, 2019, Orlando, FL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Radiological Contamination Screening

  • Labor intensive
  • Common to many

incidents

2

  • Significant concern to
  • Public
  • Emergency workers
  • Medical care providers
  • Important to incident response
slide-3
SLIDE 3

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Overarching Questions & Motivation

  • Handling high activity sources without shielding

is dangerous, but what’s the potential for skin damage from intentional or uncontrolled radioactive material dispersal into the atmosphere?

  • What count rates from contamination are a

medical concern for skin damage?

  • What new software features would provide the

greatest benefits to responders in the field? 3

?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Potential: Rapid assessment software for contaminated skin, clothing, & wounds

Potential to Fill Current Gap

  • Contamination surveys yield
  • instrument count rate*
  • not dose rate
  • VARSKIN computer code
  • calculates skin dose
  • 30 years of U.S. NRC development
  • Dose rate much better for
  • triage
  • justifying medical treatment

4

*Convertible to radionuclide activity per unit area if radionuclide identity & radionuclide-specific instrument calibration are known in the field

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Potential: Rapid assessment software for contaminated skin, clothing, & wounds

RCD―Leader in Skin Dosimetry

  • Experts in software development
  • C, C++, C#, FORTRAN
  • Python, Java, JavaScript, JSON
  • HTML, CSS, React, React Native, PHP
  • MATLAB, LabView, Unix shell, VHDL

5

  • VARSKIN computer code
  • developed by Dr. Hamby’s group over the last 10 years
  • maintained by Renaissance Code Development (RCD)
  • Potential fieldable smart phone app for skin dose
slide-6
SLIDE 6

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Technical Objective: Skin Dose Rate

Conversion for Instrument Count Rate 6

  • Necessary to quantify off-axis

detection efficiency because larger contaminated areas imply greater off-axis contributions to instrument count rate

  • RCD demonstrates the solution by
  • developing survey meter efficiencies for large contaminated areas from

point measurements of instrument count rate

  • calculating skin doses with VARSKIN
slide-7
SLIDE 7

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

VARSKIN Background

  • Developed for hot particles and contamination on or near skin
  • Shallow dose equivalent for highest contiguous 10 cm2 or other areas
  • Electron (beta) and photon (gamma) dose modeling
  • Select source geometry as point, disk, cylinder, sphere, or slab
  • Air gap and multiple cover layers above skin allowed
  • Planar disk source selected to address varying areas of

contamination in this assessment (i.e., skin curvature not modeled)

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

8

90Sr/90Y source

Method Summary & Example Measurement Data

  • Calculated detection efficiency over

center of uniformly contaminated area from radial point measurements

  • 90Sr/90Y areal detection efficiency
  • 24% for 1 cm2 source
  • 18% for 10 cm2 source
  • 4.4% for 100 cm2 source
  • 0.45% for 1000 cm2 source
  • Applied planar disk source geometry
  • Merged (1) VARSKIN skin doses per

unit areal contamination and (2) contamination concentration necessary to induce a meter reading

  • f 100,000 cpm
  • Compared skin dose rates

for various scenarios

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

9 5

  • Same radionuclide plotted,

different encapsulation, very different efficiency

  • Source encapsulation significantly

attenuates electrons (beta particles)

  • Vertical air gap of 1.3 cm
  • Investigation continued with thin foil

sources for better representation of contamination on skin and clothing

Important to Include Electrons

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Investigated Contamination Size

10

Point-like 1 cm2 Medium 100 cm2 Small 10 cm2 Large 1000 cm2

  • Factor of 2 to 3 influence on skin dose rate from contamination

size for same instrument count rate

  • Skin dose rate for highest contiguous 10 cm2 exposed
slide-11
SLIDE 11

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

  • Emission characteristics influenced skin dose rate by factor of 3 to 6

for same instrument count rate

  • Strontium-90/Yttrium-90 (90Sr/90Y), electron
  • n (beta)

a) emissions

  • Cesium-137/Barium-137m (137Cs/137mBa), phot
  • tons
  • ns (gamma

mma) ) & electrons

  • ns (beta)

a)

  • Priority given to Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) threats
  • Point-like, small, medium, and large contamination sizes considered

Investigated Two Radionuclides

11

RDD threat sources

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Investigated Contamination on Clothing versus Skin Deposition

12

  • Cotton clothing reduced skin

dose rate by factor of 2 to 4 for same count rate

  • 0.4 mm cotton (0.036 g cm-2)
  • Point-like, small, medium, and

large contamination sizes considered

Above each point the instrument reads 100,000 cpm. Will skin dose be a concern … for both, for one, for neither?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Conclusions of this Preliminary Assessment

13

  • Emergency guidance suggests 100,000 cpm* as a screening threshold for

further medical evaluation (CRCPD Handbook)

  • Conversion factor for skin dose rate at the screening threshold
  • Less than 0.009

009 Gy Gy h-1 per r 100,0 0,000 00 cpm

  • Not more than 0.002

002 Gy Gy h-1 per r 100,0 0,000 00 cpm for most scenarios

  • Deterministic effects to unbroken skin expected at skin doses of 2 − 3 Gy
  • Sufficient time exists for self-decontamination or monitored decontamination

at community reception centers to prevent skin damage

  • Irradiation damage to unbroken skin appears less critical for medical

intervention at this screening threshold

  • Potential radionuclide uptake & internal doses justify further evaluation

*Much lower levels are recommended for broken skin and contaminated wounds

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Is there interest in field software to convert survey count rates from contamination on the body to skin dose rate

  • r effective dose rate?

VARSKIN Status & Prospects

  • VARSKIN currently calculates skin dose rate from

radionuclide activity and geometric inputs

  • We show how VARSKIN could be modified to produce

skin dose rates from survey count rates in the field

  • Recall upper value 0.009 Gy h-1 to skin per 100,000 cpm*
  • Factor varied by more than an order of magnitude in this study
  • Single value could be useful for triage

14

*Screening threshold for electrons (beta) & photons (gamma); lower levels apply to alpha particles

?

Feedback requested:

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CORVALLIS AUSTIN SEATTLE

Potential: Rapid assessment software for contaminated skin, clothing, & wounds

What features are most wanted?

  • Current survey equipment does not provide

dose rates from contamination on the body

  • Psychosomatic issues cannot be ignored,

despite ruling out serious skin damage

  • Dose rates can be calculated, but is it better

to emphasize GM pancake probes or other survey instruments during initial screening?

  • Contaminated wounds require much less

radioactivity to become medically significant

  • REAC/TS implements contaminated

wound modeling per NCRP Report 156

  • What field software features

do you want?

15