Applying the Northeast Regional Multi-Pollutant Policy Analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

applying the northeast regional multi pollutant policy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Applying the Northeast Regional Multi-Pollutant Policy Analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Applying the Northeast Regional Multi-Pollutant Policy Analysis Framework to New York John Graham NYSERDA EMEP Meeting Albany, NY October 14, 2009 Acknowledgements NESCAUM NYSDEC Jason Rudokas Bob Bielawa Leah Weiss


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Applying the Northeast Regional Multi-Pollutant Policy Analysis Framework to New York

John Graham NYSERDA EMEP Meeting Albany, NY ● October 14, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

2

Acknowledgements

NESCAUM

  • Jason Rudokas
  • Leah Weiss
  • John Graham
  • Huiyan Yang
  • Kathleen Fahey
  • Gary Kleiman
  • Praveen Amar

NYSERDA

  • Sandi Meier
  • Ted Lawrence
  • Carl Mas

NYSDEC

  • Bob Bielawa
  • Ona Papageorgiou
  • David Gardner
  • Scott Griffin
  • Kevin Civerolo
  • Carlos Mancilla
  • Kevin Watz
  • Rob Sliwinski
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

3

Presentation Outline

  • Motivation for proposal and Multi-Pollutant

planning in the Northeast

  • Overview of project: objectives, scope, tasks,

and deliverables

  • Discussion of multi-pollutant framework: its

application, advantages and limitations

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

4

Motivation for Multi-pollutant Planning

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

NYSERDA’s Interest: Improved Energy and Environmental Modeling, including Multi-pollutant Control Strategies

  • Enhance representation of EGUs and associated

emissions

  • Improve links between models
  • Improve representation of new generation technologies,

renewables, energy-efficiency technologies, combined heat & power, and emission control technologies

  • Model impacts of achieving proposed EE and

renewables targets

  • Model multi-pollutant strategies to evaluate program

interactions and ability to meet environmental goals

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

NESCAUM’s Planning Approach

  • Traditional Approach

– State-based data collection (disparate sources, similar methods) occurs first, then combined into regional emissions inventories for SIP modeling purposes – “Grown” inventories rely on IPM model (covering power sector

  • nly), historical trends, and

growth factors – Difficult to change growth assumptions once locked into IPM and inventories – Analyzes one or two projection years; results in emissions and air quality changes as metrics

  • NE-MARKAL Energy-

Environment model Approach

– Develop regional inventories based on national (DOE), state, and local databases; then state- specific refinement and vetting

  • ccurs

– Modeled evolution of technology needed to satisfy demand and policy constraints; these growth assumptions provided by the model are vetted with states and can be easily modified to reflect state- specific conditions – Complete evolution over 30 year period with costs, technologies, and emissions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

7

Project Overview

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

8

Project Goals:

  • To identify a suite of strategies that will

simultaneously be able to make significant progress toward ozone, PM, mercury, acid deposition, and climate goals

  • To use NESCAUM’s Multi-pollutant Policy

Analysis Framework (MPAF) to develop a solid basis for these strategies from the perspectives of the economy, technological evolution, the environment, and other public health endpoints

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

9

Project Policy Objectives

  • Build institutional capacity at NYSDEC to use

MPAF

– Identify policy challenges and capacity building needs, host workshop and document results

  • Work with NYSDEC to identify & address cross-

sector pollutant interactions and trade-offs

– Iterative and coordinated process -- strategies must be identified, tailored and refined

  • Serve as model for replication in broader NE

– Assist with NYSERDA on outreach activities: work with PAC/present at EMEP, outreach to EPA, NACAA. OTC, MARAMA, and academic audiences, publish in peer-reviewed literature

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

10

Tasks

  • Identify environmental targets
  • Identify key strategies
  • Represent goals and strategies in model, and

document reference scenario and assumptions

  • Employ MPAF
  • Final Report
  • Technology Transfer
  • Public Outreach
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

11

Environmental Goals

  • Climate Change
  • Attain All NAAQS
  • Toxics
  • Reduce critical load exceedences
  • Improve visibility
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Celebrating 40 Years in Support of Clean Air for the Northeast

12

Strategies

  • Renewables (30% by 2015)
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Appliance Standards (Energy Star)
  • Transportation

– Increased efficiency in light/heavy duty vehicles – New fuels (ethanol, electricity)

  • CHP and Industrial Sector Efficiency
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

NESCAUM’s Multi-Pollutant Policy Analysis Framework (MPAF)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

NESCAUM’s Multi-Pollutant Policy Analysis Framework

NE-MARKAL Energy Model

Evolution of Energy System

12-State REMI Economic Model expenditures Key Economic Indicators CMAQ Air Quality Model Wet/Dry Deposition Ambient Concentrations BenMAP

Health Benefits Assessment

Health Effects Incidence and Cost/Benefit Goals & Policies

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

NE-MARKAL: Energy Model as Centerpiece

Today’s Energy System

Oil Refining Uranium Natural Gas Oil Coal Renewables Electricity Generation Industry Industry Commercial Residential Automobiles

Source: EPA ORD

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

NE-MARKAL: Energy Model as Centerpiece

Source: EPA ORD

Uranium Fossil Fuels

Oil

Refining & Processing H2 Generation Clean Energy Biomass Combustion Nuclear Power Gasification Renewable Resources Carbon Sequestration

Industry Commercial Residential Automobiles

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Advantages to Using NE-MARKAL

  • Quick and relatively inexpensive to run
  • Transparent to review
  • Detailed and versatile framework

– Multi-pollutant and Multi-Sector – Analysis of a wide range of climate, air quality and energy strategies

  • Single or multiple strategy analysis
  • Single state or entire northeast region
  • Linked to other models – REMI, CMAQ, BenMAP
  • Integrated air quality and energy planning
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

NE-MARKAL Caveats

  • While expansive in its coverage, it does not

provide perfect representation of all sectors and technologies

  • Should be used for comparative policy

analysis

  • Is not an energy dispatch forecast tool
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

THANK YOU!

– John Graham

  • jgraham@nescaum.org (617-259-2023)