Outline Introduction Status of Northeast China Status of Northeast - - PDF document

outline
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Outline Introduction Status of Northeast China Status of Northeast - - PDF document

Control of Soil Erosion: Practices and Strategies for Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Northeast China Xiaobing Liu, Ph. D Professor of Plant and Soil Sci. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology Northeast Institute of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Control of Soil Erosion:

Practices and Strategies for Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Northeast China

Xiaobing Liu, Ph. D Professor of Plant and Soil Sci.

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin, 150081 PR China

Outline

  • Introduction
  • Status of Northeast China
  • Status of Northeast China
  • Current scenario of water erosion
  • Negative impacts of soil erosion
  • Practices and strategies for soil

erosion control erosion control

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Importance of Soil

  • Living, dynamic, precious, natural resource
  • Supports life
  • Decomposes waste
  • Stores heat
  • Exchanges gases
  • Home to macro and micro-organisms

Home to macro and micro organisms

  • Material for construction, medicine , and art
  • Cannot be replaced in the short-term

Soil Problems from Agriculture

  • Limited amount of soil for growing food
  • Limited amount of soil for growing food
  • Can be

– Eroded – Polluted – Destroyed

  • 11% vegetative area
  • 38% cultivated area
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Soil and Soil erosion

  • Soil erosion accounts for 82% of human-
  • Soil erosion accounts for 82% of human-

induced soil degradation, affecting 1,643 million hectares

  • -- Oldeman, 1994
  • 24 billion tons of topsoil lost annually,

equivalent to 9 6 million hectares of land equivalent to 9.6 million hectares of land

  • -- Bakker, 1990

Soil and Soil Erosion

  • Soil erosion is the top

environmental issue in China

  • --- Liu & Yan, 2009
  • Yield suppression has been a

serious problem threatening the future sustainability of the future sustainability of agriculture in NE China

  • --- Liu, 2004
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Importance of Northeast China

  • Three Provinces and

part of Inner Mongolia

  • Total land acreage

1.24 million km2 13% of China

  • Cultivated land

0 243 illi k

2

0.243 million km2 14.1% of China

Bread basket of China

  • Total grain production

76 billion kg in 2007

  • - 15.1% of China total
  • Corn: 31%
  • Soybean: 56%
  • Rice: 9.6%
  • - 43% of Japonica rice

in China

  • Commodity grain
  • - 1/3 of China
  • - 1/3 of China
  • Commodity percentage

60%

  • Feed 216 million urban

residents annually

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Figure 1 Grain per capita in China and Northeast China

  • Soil erosion mostly from water erosion

Current scenario of water erosion

  • Total water erosion of 177,000km2

– 50% in Hei-long-jiang – 23% in eastern Inner Mongolia – 17.2% in Liao-ning 9 8% i Ji li – 9.8% in Ji-lin

  • 17.2% of the total area
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Distribution of water erosion area and erosion severity classes from different province Majority of the area in the range of slight class

6 0 0 0 0 S li h t

Eroded area (km2)

2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 S lig h t M o d e ra te S e ve re V e ry s e ve re E x tre m e

A re a

H e ilo n g jia n g J ilin L ia o n in g E a s t o f In n e r M o n g o lia 1 0 0 0 0

Changes of soil erosion area in typical Black soil region

  • f Hei-long-jiang province

4 0 0 0 0 1 9 5 0 s 1 9 8 0 s 2 0 0 0

Eroded Area (km

2)

1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Erosion area expanding with slow rates with increased intensity

T o ta l W a te r S lig h t M o d e ra te V e ry s e ve re

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Gully density changes from the area of 118,736 km2 in Hei-long-jiang

Number, length of gullies in typical black soil region

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Positive trend since 1985

  • Ji-Lin and Liao-Ning
  • Ji-Lin and Liao-Ning

Provinces

  • Annual declining rate of

1.8% in Ji-Lin – 60.7%-slight 31 4% d t – 31.4%-moderate – 7.9%-severe

Changes of water erosion since 1980s in Ji-lin province(km2)

2 5 0 0 0 V e ry s e ve re

Eroded area (km

2)

1 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 V e ry s e ve re M o d e ra te S lig h t W a te r e ro s io n

Decline rate 1.8%

1 9 8 5 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0

E

5 0 0 0

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Negative impacts of erosion

S il l i

  • Soil loss severe in

summit, followed by shoulder and back slope

  • Contents of clay

particles were greater than sand particles in summit,

rticles proportion (w/w, %)

20 30 40 50 60 70

SOM (W/W, %)

2 7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 >0.01mm <0.01mm SOM

particles in summit, shoulder or back slope

  • -Yan & Tang,

2005

Summit Back slope Shoulder Foot slope Toe slope Par

10 20 2.5 2.6 2.7

Changes of soil properties

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Changes of soil enzymes

Changes of soil microorganism

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Changes of thickness in top soil layer

  • 44 cm in 1982
  • 44 cm in 1982
  • 30 cm accounted for 41% in 2002
  • 18-24 cm in 3-5 ° sloping farmland
  • 12-15 cm in 5-8 ° sloping farmland

Erosion rate and soil loss

  • 1.3 mm/a in 3-5° sloping farmland
  • 2.2 mm/a in 5-8° sloping farmland

2.2 mm/a in 5 8 sloping farmland

  • Soil Loss
  • -- 78t/ hm2·a in 5° sloping farmland
  • -- 221t/ hm2·a. in 15°sloping farmland
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Harmful effect of soil erosion on topsoil layer

  • 23000 km2 of sloping farmlands will be
  • 23000 km of sloping farmlands will be

removed within 100-200 years

  • 30,500 km2 of sloping farmlands will be

removed within 50-100 years

  • 5,600 km2 of sloping farmlands will be

removed within 50 years removed within 50 years.

Trend of soil erosion

  • Expected to increase with increase in
  • Expected to increase with increase in
  • -- slope steepness
  • -- slope length
  • As a result of
  • -- respective increase in velocity
  • -- volume of surface runoff
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Changes of soil organic matter

  • Soils with less than 2% SOC are considered
  • Soils with less than 2% SOC are considered

erodible

  • --- Evans, R. 1980
  • Soil erodibility decreases linearly with

increasing SOC over 0-10% V R P t l 1981

  • --- Voroney, R.P et al. 1981

Soil organic matter before reclamation

  • 8-10% in Hei-long-jiang Province

8 10% in Hei long jiang Province

  • 5-6% in Ji-lin Province
  • Examination on four fields with different cultivation

histories in Hei-long-jiang Province

Uncultivated soil 5-year cultivation 14-year cultivation 50-year cultivation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

  • n (g/kg)

40 50

0-17 (q) 18-32 (l) 33-43 (q) Soil Depth (cm)

Soil Organic Carbo 10 20 30 40 Years of Cultivation 5 14 50

Average SOC loss per year

  • 2300 kg/ha between 0 to 5 years

2300 kg/ha between 0 to 5 years

  • 950 kg/ha between 5 to 14 years
  • 290 kg/ha between 14 to 50 years

The latter corresponds to the release of approximately 380 ton CO2 ha-1 to the atmosphere. The rapid reduction of SOC for the initial soil disturbance by cultivation and a relatively gradual loss later.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

(g/cm3) 1.2 1.4 1.6

0-17 (q) 18-32 (l) 33-43 (q) Soil Depth (cm)

Soil Bulk Density 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Years of Cultivation 5 14 50 0.0 0.2 /kg) 40 CEC (Cmol(+)/ 10 20 30 Years of Cultivation

5 14 50

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Soil organic carbon (SOC) after cultivation in the black soil area of Heilongjiang province

30%

90g kg-1 63g kg-1 48.6g kg-1

46% 53% 56.8%

Annual declining rate 0.5%

40 20 80 100

38.9g kg-1

Impact on crop productivity

  • Severity

Yield kg/ha Soil thickness

SOM%

  • Severity Yield kg/ha Soil thickness

SOM% slight 2625 30 cm 3-4 moderate 1688 20 cm 2-3 severe 1125 12 cm 1-2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Impact on crop productivity

  • Soybean was reduced

b 5 0% 8 9% 36 7% by 5.0%, 8.9%, 36.7%, 52.6% at the 5, 10, 20, and 30 cm topsoil removal rates.

  • Significant yield

reduction at 10, 20 and 30 cm topsoil removal

  • No significant

Fertilizer Fertilizer and Manure Yield (t ha-1) 1 0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

g differences between non-eroded soil and 5 cm topsoil removal

  • ---Sui et al, 2009

Depth (cm) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0.5 1.0

Practices and strategies for soil erosion control

  • Basin tillage
  • Contour tillage
  • Rat tunnel tillage
  • Conservation tillage
  • Terraces and strip cultivation
  • Fertilization and manure
  • Fertilization and manure
  • Government policies
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Soil tillage

  • Tillage operations control the soil

Tillage operations control the soil environment by altering the soil geometry

  • -- Alvare, C.Z. and R. Alvarez, 2000
  • Ridge cultivation along the slope with less

input results in

  • -- destruction of granular particle structure
  • -- soil compaction
  • -- low water storage
  • -- low surface hydraulic conductivity

Basin tillage

  • As early as 1940s, Chinese

y researchers had found the importance of basin tillage in reducing runoff and increasing crop yield.

  • Applicable to farmlands with

slope degree over 6°.

  • The general practice is to build

a block to form a basin within the furrow at a certain distance along the ridge during growing season.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Basin tillage

  • The determination of block

distance is based on following equation: L = 165.49 θ-0.47 Where L is the maximum block distance, cm; θ is the slope degree.

  • The application of basin

increased yield 16-20% in corn and 15-23% in soybean with average net income of 741-775RMB/ha

  • - Yang et al., 1994

Contour tillage

  • The simplest measure

The simplest measure to control soil erosion by

  • - reduce runoff
  • - increase infiltration
  • - reduce soil loss
  • Best suitable for
  • Best suitable for

farmland with slope less than 10°

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Contour tillage Contour tillage

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Conservation tillage

Two alternative approaches for local farmers in controlling soil erosion and enhancing crop yield. √Reduced tillage with straw removal

  • ---maintains the ridges and crop stubble from

year to year, and uses deep-tillage in summer between the ridges to enhance water infiltration d h ld h t and hold much water. √ No tillage

  • ---entails cross-slope planting, and maintains

crop residues on the surface through the winter.

Conservation tillage

Annual average of surface runoff and sediment loss by different tillage Treatment Runoff Runoff Num. Sediment loss Sediment Loss Num Coefficient mm t km-2 % No tillage 3.7 9 23.2 5 0.78 Reduce tillage 48.5 14 2118.1 8 9.56 Conventional tillage 48.4 12 1357.2 11 9.9

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Conservation tillage

Annual average of economic return under NT, RT and CT treatments from 2007 to 2009 Treatment Crop Yield Input Output Benefit Kg/ha

  • -------- RMB Yuan ha-1 -------

No tillage Soy 2466a 1411 10425 9014a Reduce tillage Soy 2103b 1811 8509 6698b C till S 2143b 2071 8797 6726b

  • Conv. tillage

Soy 2143b 2071 8797 6726b No tillage Corn 9663a 1721 10249 8528a

Terraces and strip cultivation

  • Bench terraces have

been used for a conservation measures in China for

  • ver 2000 years
  • ver 2000 years
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Terraces and strip cultivation

  • The use of terraces in conserving soil erosion
  • The use of terraces in conserving soil erosion

was only applied in the past 20 years in Northeast China.

  • Beneficial effect of terrace
  • -- reduced bulk density by 0.12g/cm3

i d t t l it b 2 0 2 9%

  • -- increased total porosity by 2.0-2.9%
  • -- infiltration rate of 0.4mm/min.

Strip cultivation

  • Soil is prepared for planting along narrow strips,

with the intervening areas left undisturbed with the intervening areas left undisturbed.

  • Typically, 2-3 m of a perennial forage such as

alfalfa and 5 m crop strip.

  • Crop rotation is required and more effective.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Problems for Terraces and strip cultivation

  • The

ecological and economic benefit

  • f
  • The

ecological and economic benefit

  • f

terrace cultivation and strip cultivation is strongly affected by slope degree and terrace width.

  • The greater the slope the more labor needed,

and the wider the terrace, the more soil and the wider the terrace, the more soil removed.

A case study

Fertilization effects on crop productivity in eroded soil

  • How does the black soil erosion

and fertilization impact crop productions?

  • No quantitative data were recorded

in the area

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Experiment design

  • O cm 5 cm 10 cm 20 cm 30 cm surface soil
  • O cm, 5 cm,10 cm,20 cm, 30 cm surface soil

were removed.

Experiment design

  • 6° slope farmland

6 slope farmland in a typical Mollisols field

  • Fertilizer application:
  • -- NPK
  • -- NPK + manure

(15t/ha) ( )

  • Crop rotation
  • -- Soybean
  • -- Corn
slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Soybean seedlings

Corn growth at seedlings

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Corn growth at tasselling Soybean growth

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

10 20 30 10 20 30 NPK NPK+manure

Corn yield for NPK

100.0% 98.1% 95.3% 65 4%

80 100

65.4% 4.3%

20 40 60 80 F 0cm 5cm 10cm 20cm 30cm

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Corn yield for NPK+manure

100.0% 99.0% 81.3%

80 100

53.8% 26.3%

40 60 80 FM 20 0cm 5cm 10cm 20cm 30cm

100.0% 96.8% 96.9% 100

Soybean yield for NPK

66.8% 40.8% 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 F 10 20 0cm 5cm 10cm 20cm 30cm

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Soybean yield for NPK + manure

100.0% 93.3% 89.9% 78.9% 90 100 78.9% 54.9% 30 40 50 60 70 80

FM

10 20 0cm 5cm 10cm 20cm 30cm

Yield of soybean with soil removal

2005

ha-1)

2000 2500 3000 Fertilizer

  • Fert. + Manure

2006

.ha-1)

2000 2500

Yield (kg.h

500 1000 1500

Erosion Depth (cm)

5 10 20 30

Yield (kg.

500 1000 1500

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Yield of corn with soil removal

2005

a-1)

6000 8000 Fertilizer

  • Fert. + Manure

2006

.ha-1)

6000 8000

Yield (kg.ha

2000 4000 6000

Erosion Depth (cm)

5 10 20 30

Yield (kg.

2000 4000

1.2

0-5cm容重

Manure can reduce soil bulk density

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 lk density(g/cm 3)

F FM

0.2 Bu 0cm 5cm 10cm 20cm 30cm

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

  • Photosynthetic rate decreased with dark layer thinning
  • Manure application could increase photosynthetic rate

20

Soybean

umol/cm-2/s

12 14 16 18 F FM

Photosynthetic rate across investigation dates in soybean

The romved depth of soil layer

0cm 5cm 10cm 20cm 30cm 10 12

  • Photosynthetic rate decreased with dark layer thinning
  • Manure application could increase photosynthetic rate

30

Corn

umol/cm-2/s

10 15 20 25 F FM

The photosynthetic rate across investigation dates in maize

The removed depth of soil

0cm 5cm 10cm 20cm 30cm 5

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Removal effect on crop yield

  • Yield was substantially reduced by deep
  • Yield was substantially reduced by deep

topsoil removal.

  • Corn was more sensitive to erosion than

soybean.

  • Addition of cattle manure could

compensate the yield loss by erosion to a compensate the yield loss by erosion to a certain extent.

Government policies

The successful implementation

  • f

soil The successful implementation

  • f

soil conservation measures is only possible through a combination of scientific, socio- economic and political considerations.

  • --- Morgan, 2005
slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Programs and investment

2004, Water Resource in Northeast China. 00 , a e esou ce

  • eas C

a 2005, Investigation on Soil Erosion and Ecological Security in China 1.1 billion RMB Yuan by mechanical approaches before 2008 426 million RMB Yuan to improve slope farmland since 2008 to 2010 since 2008 to 2010 0.7 billion RMB to control soil erosion in watershed scale starting this year

Government policies

  • National Soil and Water Conservation law
  • nly prohibits slope land over 25° to be

reclaimed, and those under cultivation should be transformed into forest.

  • Since farmlands under different slope degree

need corresponding conservation measure, definite stipulation for land users to legally definite stipulation for land users to legally manage slope farmland needs enacted.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Government policies

  • Economic

compensation mechanism for eroded soils should be established, i.e. if farmers adopt soil control practices the government should provide payment.

  • Subsidies

such as terrace construction, ridge direction change seeds for plant strip ridge direction change, seeds for plant strip, labor resources should directly go to land users’ hand.

Summary

  • Northeast China is the bread basket of

China

  • 1/3 of China commodity grain is from the

region

  • Commodity percentage 60%

Commodity percentage 60%

  • Feed 216 million urban residents

annually

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Summary

  • Soil erosion is characterized as
  • -- water erosion

increase in Hei-long-jiang not in Ji-lin and Liao-ning Province

  • -- losses of top soil layer
  • -- decline in soil organic matter
  • -- reduction in soil biological activities

Summary

  • Soil erosion accounts for 17 2% of the

Soil erosion accounts for 17.2% of the total area

  • Hei-long-jiang has the most eroded area
  • Average annual declining rate of SOM

is 0.5%

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Summary

  • Increased bulk density reduced field water
  • Increased bulk density, reduced field water

capacity and infiltration rates are the main physical properties deteriorated in eroded soils

  • Increased fungi and decreased bacteria and

actinomyces as well as the soil enzymes actinomyces as well as the soil enzymes activities are the main biological characteristics

Summary

  • Cultivation reduced soil organic carbon
  • Cultivation reduced soil organic carbon

content, led to decline of CEC and increased soil compaction.

  • SOC declined sharply with a few years of

cultivation and then slowly afterwards cultivation and then slowly afterwards.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Summary

  • Bench terraces reduced bulk density increased

Bench terraces reduced bulk density, increased total porosity and infiltration rates.

  • Contour and basin tillage is the simplest measure

to control soil erosion.

  • Government polices and subsidies are urgently

needed.

Summary

Crop rotations with Crop rotations with

minimum tillage additions of manure and chemical fertilizers

  • r addition of wheat straw

Could be a viable method of

Maintaining SOC content Improving crop productivity in eroded soils

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Acknowledgements

  • Dr. Shahbaz Khan, Professor and Director of Water

, and Sustainable Development, UNESCO

  • Dr. Rahman Elfithri of the Symposium Coordinator
  • National Basic Research Program of China

(2007CB407203)

  • Grand Interdisciplinary Project for Agriculture from

CAS (KSCX1-09-09)