Antoine Kremer Antoine Kremer France France Recipient of the 2006 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

antoine kremer antoine kremer
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Antoine Kremer Antoine Kremer France France Recipient of the 2006 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Antoine Kremer Antoine Kremer France France Recipient of the 2006 Marcus Wallenberg Recipient of the 2006 Marcus Wallenberg Prize Prize UNDERSTANDING GENETIC DIVERSITY, A PILLAR FOR INTEGRATED SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Antoine KREMER


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Antoine Kremer

France

Antoine Kremer

France

Recipient of the 2006 Marcus Wallenberg Prize Recipient of the 2006 Marcus Wallenberg Prize

slide-2
SLIDE 2

UNDERSTANDING GENETIC DIVERSITY, A PILLAR FOR INTEGRATED SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT

Antoine KREMER INRA UMR BIOGECO SYMPOSIUM Stockholm, September 29th 2006

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1

WHAT IS GENETIC DIVERSITY ?

2

HOW DOES GENETIC DIVERSITY BUILD UP ?

3

HOW CAN GENETIC DIVERSITY BE IMPLEMENTED IN FOREST MANAGEMENT ?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1

WHAT IS GENETIC DIVERSITY ?

DNA PROTEINS PHENOTYPES A T G C

http://www.p450.kvl.dk/gallery/

slide-5
SLIDE 5

GENETIC DIVERSITY IN TREES DNA level

2 4 6 8 10

Human Glycine max L. Merr. Pinus radiata Pinus pinaster Pinus taeda Arabidopsis thaliana Beta vulgaris Quercus petraea Zea mais Pseudotsuga menziesii

πm x 10-3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

GENETIC DIVERSITY IN TREES Protein level Quercus petraea 0.265 Picea 0.219 Pseudotsuga 0.201 Eucalyptus 0.187 Quercus 0.186 Populus 0.177 Pinus 0.157 Alnus 0.145 Plants 0.104 Invertebrates 0.100 Vertebrates 0.079 Homo sapiens 0.060

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WHY ARE TREES SO DIVERSE ? THEORETICAL EXPECTATIONS

Lower mutation rates Large populations High gene flow

2

HOW DOES IT BUILD UP ?

Lifetime of a tree species ≈ 50 Million years TREES ACCUMULATE DIVERSITY !! They do not lose it

slide-8
SLIDE 8

UNDERSTANDING DIVERSITY IN EUROPEAN TREES: RECENT RESULTS GEOGRAPHY VS HISTORY ? NATURAL PROCESSES VS HUMAN INTERFERENCES ? PACE OF EVOLUTION

slide-9
SLIDE 9

GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPE DURING MILANKOVITCH CYCLES Maximum glacial Interglacial periods Glacial periods ≈ 100 000 Years Interglacial periods ≈ 20 000 Years

slide-10
SLIDE 10

OAK GLACIAL REFUGIA INFERRED FROM POLLEN DEPOSITS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LESSONS AND RESULTS FROM PANEUROPEAN INVESTIGATIONS REFUGIAL IMPRINTS : Northern vs Southern populations GENETIC ISOLATION OF REFUGIA: East- West differentiation COLONIZATION DYNAMICS GEOGRAPHIC BARRIERS: Alps, Carpathians

slide-12
SLIDE 12

22 species

28

25 forests

CYTOFOR REFUGIAL IMPRINTS : Northern vs Southern populations

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fraxinus excelsior

GENETIC ISOLATION OF REFUGIA: East- West differentiation CpDNA diversity in Fraxinus excelsior (Ash)

Heuertz et al, 2004 Molecular Ecology 13:11, 3437-3452

slide-14
SLIDE 14

MIGRATION SPEED INFERRED FROM POLLEN DEPOSITS COLONIZATION DYNAMICS

Birks, Journal of Biogeography 1986,16:533-540

Brewer et al. 2002 156: 5-26

slide-15
SLIDE 15

COLONIZATION DYNAMICS

  • 1. Diffusion
  • 1. Diffusion

dispersion law = N(0, sd1 = 250 m) speed = 100 meters/year

2.

  • 2. Diffusion + dispersion

Diffusion + dispersion at at long distances long distances

law= N(0, sd1= 250 m) + 5*10-6 N(0, sd2=50 km) speed= 400 meters/year

Le Corre et al. 1997 Genet Res 69:117-125

slide-16
SLIDE 16

COLONIZATION DYNAMICS

Petit et al. 2002 Forest Ecology & Management 156: 115-129

Founder effects detected by the distribution of cpDNA Oak haplotypes in France

slide-17
SLIDE 17

GEOGRAPHIC BARRIERS: Alps, Pyrénées, Carpathians

Simulation of recolonization

Le Corre, 1997

slide-18
SLIDE 18

40% of simulations 25% of simulations

Le Corre, 1997

Magri et al, 2006 New Phytologist, 171: 199-221

Petit et al, 2002, Forest Ecology & Management 156: 5-26

OAKS BEECH

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PACE OF EVOLUTION

PHENOTYPES A T G C DNA

http://www.p450.kvl. dk/gallery/

PROTEINS RAPID SINCE TIME OF INSTALLATION SLOW SINCE LAST GLACIATION

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PACE OF EVOLUTION in Sessile oak

Early populations Late populations

CpDNA variation in Q. petraea Bud burst variation in

  • Q. petraea

Ducousso et al. 1996: Ann. Sci. For. 53:775-782

Petit et al. 2002 Forest Ecology & Management 156: 115-129

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PACE OF EVOLUTION in Norway spruce

8000 BP 7000 BP 6000 BP 5000 BP 4000 BP 3000 BP 2000 BP 1000 BP Aujourd’hui 56 N° 66 N° Hannerz et al. 2000 Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15:313 56 N° 66 N° 66 N° 56 N°

slide-22
SLIDE 22

3

GENETIC DIVERSITY AND FOREST MANAGEMENT

ECONOMICAL VALUE EVOLUTIONARY VALUE IDENTITY VALUE BENEFIT FITNESS PASSPORT DATA DNA PROTEINS PHENOTYPES

PATRIMONIAL SUSTAINABILITY ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY

slide-23
SLIDE 23

3

GENETIC DIVERSITY AND FOREST MANAGEMENT

ECONOMICAL VALUE EVOLUTIONARY VALUE IDENTITY VALUE BENEFIT FITNESS PASSPORT DATA DNA

? ?

PROTEINS

? ?

PHENOTYPES

?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

P1 P2 P3

X X X

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 10 20 30 40 50 60 calendar year width (mm)

3 2 1

EVOLUTION OF RING WIDTH IN BREEDING POPULATIONS OF MARITIME PINE

Bouffier et al, 2006 in prep

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Relationship heterozygosity – Adaptation in beech

INTRA TREE DIVERSITY: INDIVIDUAL HETEROZYGOSITY INCREASE ADAPTABILITY TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Relationship heterozygosity – Adaptation in beech

Altitude Ha Tolerant Ha Sensitive 1 230-250 25.4 22.6 2 450-500 28.9 22.6 3 550-600 24.2 19.5 4 850-900 28.3 20.3 5 810-830 31.4 27.4 6 770-870 27.7 22.4 1 3 4 5 6 2

14 to 17 isozyme loci Müller-Starck G. 1988 in « Genetic effects of air pollutants in forest tree populations » p 127-141

slide-27
SLIDE 27

MOLECULAR FINGERPRINTING

Certification Diagnostic Regulations

Fingerprinting of living tissues Fingerprinting of wood Fingerprinting of fossil remains

slide-28
SLIDE 28

DETECTING NON-INDIGENOUS MATERIAL

Petit et al. 2002 Forest Ecology & Management 156: 115-129

slide-29
SLIDE 29

IDENTIFICATION OF NON-INDIGENOUS MATERIAL

3 km Parcelle 9231

= 3 trees

slide-30
SLIDE 30

MOLECULAR TRACEABILITY MOLECULAR TRACEABILITY

Certification Combatting illegal logging

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CONCLUSIONS HIGH LEVELS OF DIVERSITY, PROMOTING RAPID EVOLUTION STRONG HISTORICAL IMPRINTS ON NEUTRAL DIVERSITY- LIMITED HUMAN INTERFERENCES EXPECTED CHANGES DUE TO INCREASED ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS