The Seabee Gold Operation Paul Kremer Senior Exploration Geologist - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the seabee gold operation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Seabee Gold Operation Paul Kremer Senior Exploration Geologist - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Seabee Gold Operation Paul Kremer Senior Exploration Geologist Core Days May, 24-25, 2017 Cautionary Notes Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking information within the meaning of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Seabee Gold Operation

Paul Kremer – Senior Exploration Geologist

Core Days May, 24-25, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary Notes

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws and forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “assumes,” “intends,” “strategy,” “goals,” “objectives,” “potential,” “believes,” or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “might”

  • r “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms or similar expressions. These forward‐looking statements or information relate to, among other things: future production of gold; our planned

exploration activities at the Seabee Gold Operation and the Fisher project; the potential benefits to be derived from and the likelihood of exercising our option with respect to the Fisher project and entering into the joint venture; payments to be made to Eagle Plains Resources Ltd.; our anticipated exploration expenditures at the Seabee Gold Operation and the Fisher project; the price of gold; the effects of laws, regulations and government policies affecting our operations or potential future operations; future successful development of our projects; the sufficiency of our current working capital, anticipated operating cash flow or our ability to raise necessary funds; estimated production rates for gold; timing of production at the Seabee Gold Operation; ongoing or future development plans and capital replacement, improvement or remediation programs; the estimates of expected or anticipated economic returns from our mining projects; and our plans and expectations for our properties and operations. These forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied, including, without limitation, the following: uncertainty of production, development plans and cost estimates for the Seabee Gold Operation and our projects; our ability to replace Mineral Reserves; our ability to successfully integrate the acquisition

  • f Claude Resources; commodity price fluctuations; political or economic instability and unexpected regulatory changes; currency fluctuations; the possibility of future losses; general economic conditions; counterparty and market

risks related to the sale of our metals; uncertainty in the accuracy of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates and in our ability to extract mineralization profitably; differences in U.S. and Canadian practices for reporting Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources; lack of suitable infrastructure or damage to existing infrastructure; future development risks, including start-up delays and cost overruns; our ability to obtain adequate financing for further exploration and development programs and opportunities; uncertainty in acquiring additional commercially mineable mineral rights; delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with

  • ur permits; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and management; the impact of governmental regulations, including health, safety and environmental regulations, including increased costs and restrictions on
  • perations due to compliance with such regulations; reclamation and closure requirements for our mineral properties; unpredictable risks and hazards related to the development and operation of a mine or mineral property that

are beyond our control; indigenous peoples’ title claims and rights to consultation and accommodation may affect our existing operations as well as development projects and future acquisitions; failure to effectively manage our tailings facilities at the Seabee Gold Operation could negatively impact production; assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; claims and legal proceedings, including adverse rulings in litigation against us and/or

  • ur directors or officers; compliance with anti-corruption laws and internal controls, and increased regulatory compliance costs; complying with emerging climate change regulations and the impact of climate change; extreme

weather conditions may adversely impact production and profitability at the Seabee Gold Operation; uncertainties related to title to our mineral properties and the ability to obtain surface rights; the sufficiency of our insurance coverage; civil disobedience in the countries where our mineral properties are located; operational safety and security risks; actions required to be taken under human rights law; competition in the mining industry for mineral properties; shortage or poor quality of equipment or supplies; an event of default under our convertible notes may significantly reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business; failure to meet covenants under our senior secured revolving credit facility; conflicts of interest that could arise from certain of our directors’ involvement with other natural resource companies; information systems security threats; and those other various risks and uncertainties identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Information Form filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which may have been used. We cannot assure you that actual events, performance or results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements, and management’s assumptions may prove to be incorrect. Our forward-looking statements reflect current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date hereof and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. All references to “$” in this presentation are to Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. Qualified Persons Except as otherwise set out herein, the scientific and technical information contained in this presentation relating to the Seabee Gold Operation has been reviewed and approved by F. Carl Edmunds, P. Geo., a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 — Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and our employee. Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors This presentation includes Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources classification terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada and the Mineral Reserves and the Mineral Resources estimates are made in accordance with NI 43-101. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC set out in SEC Industry Guide 7. Consequently, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources information included in this presentation is not comparable to similar information that would generally be disclosed by domestic U.S. reporting companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC. Under SEC standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. In addition, the SEC’s disclosure standards normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “Measured Mineral Resources,” “Indicated Mineral Resources” or “Inferred Mineral Resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Trans Hudson Orogen

World’s largest Paleoproterozoic

  • rogenic belt

Records the formation and destruction of the Manikewan Ocean

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Manikewan Ocean 2.075 Ga Closure commenced ~1.92 Ga (formation of

  • ceanic arc terranes)

Accretion of oceanic arc terranes (Flin Flon – Glennie complex) Collision and amalgamation several cratonic blocks (Superior, Rae-Hearne, Sask) Corrigan et al., 2012

slide-5
SLIDE 5

From Bleeker and Hall, 2007

slide-6
SLIDE 6

From Perhsson et al., 2016

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pine Lake Greenstone Belt

Located in the northern Glennie Domain Arcuate belt of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks

  • Intruded by various suites of mafic to

felsic plutonic rocks Eastern margin truncated by the N-S Tabbernor Fault Zone

  • Extends to South Dakota (Homestake

mine) From Morelli and MacLachlan, 2012

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Silver Standard Saskatchewan Land Holdings

Seabee Gold Operation

  • 23,300 ha
  • 100% owned
  • 2 operating mines

Fisher and Truscott properties

(Press Release: Oct. 6th)

  • 33,400 ha
  • 4 yr option agreement with Eagle

Plains

  • ~$1 M of expenditures per year
  • Up to 80% earn-in

Amisk

  • 39,800 ha
  • 100% owned
  • Resource review
  • Planning for 2017 programs
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Seabee Gold Operation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mapped by Delaney (1986) and Delaney and Culter (1992) following a significant burn in the Santoy area Belt was subdivided into 2 distinct volcano-sedimentary assemblages

  • Assemblage A: dominantly

tholeiitic mafic to felsic volcanic rocks (~1.89 Ga)

  • Assemblage B: dominantly

calcalkaline volcaniclastic and sedimentary rocks (~1.85 Ga) Structurally overlain by the Porky Lake Group (siliciclastic sedimentary succession)

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Detailed geological mapping to refine and bolster our understanding of the belt

  • Laonil Lake Intrusive Complex
  • Santoy Mine Complex

Renewed Mapping Initiatives

McEwan, 2013 McEwan, 2012

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Geology of the Seabee Gold Property

Stuebing, 2015

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Stuebing, 2015

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Gold Environments

Laonil Lake Intrusive Complex Santoy Mine Complex Fisher Property Porky Lake structure Assemblage A/B contact zone

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Gold Environments – Laonil Lake Intrusive Complex

Differentiated UM to mafic intrusive rock, interpreted to be time correlative (~1.89 Ga) and genetically associated with mafic volcanic rocks of Assemblage A Characterized by heterogeneous strain distribution

  • Panels of relatively un-deformed

gabbroic rocks separated by narrow, zones of penetrative high strain

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Gold Environments – Laonil Lake Intrusive Complex

Preserved panels contain weakly developed regional planar and linear shape fabrics historically attributed to D2 deformation D2 fabric elements are crosscut by anastomosing ductile-brittle structures which host gold-bearing quartz veins

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Major Structures of Laonil Lake Intrusive Complex

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Identifying Seabee-parallel Shear zones

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2016 Surface Drilling – Herb West Target

HRB-16-007

  • 2,100 m drilled in 4 holes
  • Anomalous values intersected in each hole
  • Highlighted by 4.55 g/t over 5.22 metres in HRB-16-007: including 6.32 g/t over 2.72 m

250 m

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Herb West Intercept --- HRB-16-007

7.58 g/t over 1.72 m 4.15 g/t over 1.00 m 0.40 g/t over 1.00 m 4.12 g/t over 1.50 m 0.77 g/t over 0.50 m 0.84 g/t over 1.50 m 1.58 g/t over 0.50 m 0.02 g/t over 1.50 m 0.67 g/t over 1.50 m

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Seabee Mine Complex – Laonil Lake Intrusive Complex

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Outcrop Analogy to Seabee Camp

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Felsic Dykes

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Gold Environments

Laonil Lake Intrusive Complex Santoy Mine Complex Fisher Property Porky Lake structure Assemblage A/B contact zone

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Gold Environments – Santoy Mine Complex

Series of deposits trending along the Santoy shear zone Geology dominated by N-S trending doubly plunging folds

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Santoy Mine Complex

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Santoy Mine Complex – GAP Discovery

JOY-11-549

slide-32
SLIDE 32

HOLE ID FROM TO Grade (g/t) Width (m) Zone JOY-11-549 330.38 336.62 6.73 6.24 Gap C-Vein Incl. 330.38 331.88 18.19 1.50 Gap C-Vein And 335.35 336.62 11.48 1.27 Gap C-Vein

Santoy Mine Complex Cross-section

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Gap Zone C-Vein

JOY-11-549 Gap Zone Detail

A-Vein

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Santoy Gap JOY-11-549 Gap Intercept C-Vein

330.38 m 336.62 m

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Santoy Gap JOY-11-549 Gap Intercept A-Vein

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Santoy Mine Complex

  • Santoy Gap step-out hole (JOY-16-717) showed very good development of HW dyke structure to the Gap zone but no veining
  • Gap structure has stepped 100 m into the FW, possible that we overshot the ore-shoot – creates opportunity up-dip
  • Multiple hangingwall zones exist with sulphide and minor veining + alteration, however little for grade
  • Santoy 8A step-out hole (JOY-16-718) hit the zone directly down-plunge from expected ore-shoot
  • minor veining within 3.5 m wide alteration zone- Very similar to nearest 8A intercepts, narrow zone could simply be due to pinch &

swell along plunge – plenty of opportunity yet

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Santoy Gap – 2016 Down-plunge Drilling

HW structure Gap structure Gap Gap 691 690 717

Xsection – looking southeast

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Gap Down-plunge --- JOY-16-717

HW structure Gap structure Gap Gap 691 690 JOY-16-717

Long-section

slide-39
SLIDE 39

8A Down-plunge --- JOY-16-718

39

8A structure 692 HW structure

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Santoy Mine Complex - 5 years after Gap Discovery

  • Q3-2016 drilling highlights (Press Release: Nov. 7th)
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Fisher Property – the next chapter

Fisher Program

  • 33,000 Ha package that extends south
  • f the Santoy Mine Complex
  • Southern extension of the Santoy Shear

Zone GL FP

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Fisher Property – the next chapter

Fisher Program

  • Aggressive mapping and prospecting

programs focused near George Lake and Footprint Lake (GL & FP)

  • 1000 soil samples split between GL &

FP

  • 3,000 metre diamond drill program at GL

and FP GL FP

slide-43
SLIDE 43

New Airborne Magnetics – Pine Lake Greenstone Belt

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Potential Analogue to Santoy Shear Zone

4 km 5 km Fisher Property Santoy Mine Complex

slide-45
SLIDE 45

New Insights from Delaney’s Mapping

  • Delaney’s descriptions of Santoy 7

and 8 showings spurred further investigation into the area leading to discovery of over 1 Moz Au

  • Equal number of showings

described on the Fisher property suggestive of similar endowment

  • At least five showings (Au +/- Cpy)

can be linked to what may be the south extension of the Santoy shear zone

  • Detailed outcrop scale mapping of

showings with structural and lithogeochemistry data

Delaney, 1992

slide-46
SLIDE 46

New Insights from Delaney’s Mapping

  • Wek Showing
  • Mafic tuffs, cherts and rhyolite porphyry

with qtz veins containing Cpy, and Py

  • Vein traced for 22 metres from lake shore
  • Average vein width of 35 cm
  • 2 generations of quartz veining – at least
  • ne known to be auriferous
  • Photo-geological lineament study and

mapping (Taiga, 1990) showed relationship between lineaments and gold mineralization

  • Channel sample graded 13.8 g/t over

2.35 m wide shear zone including 25.6 g/t

  • ver 1.0 m
  • Best intercept: ddh 69-2: 42.5 g/t Au, 59

g/t Ag and 2.44% Cu over 0.9 m

Delaney, 1992

slide-47
SLIDE 47