Another family of Steiner triple systems without almost parallel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

another family of steiner triple systems without almost
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Another family of Steiner triple systems without almost parallel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Another family of Steiner triple systems without almost parallel classes Daniel Horsley (Monash University) Joint work with Darryn Bryant (University of Queensland) Steiner triple systems Steiner triple systems Steiner triple systems Steiner


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Another family of Steiner triple systems without almost parallel classes

Daniel Horsley (Monash University) Joint work with Darryn Bryant (University of Queensland)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Steiner triple systems

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Steiner triple systems

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Steiner triple systems

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Steiner triple systems

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Steiner triple systems

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Steiner triple systems

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Steiner triple systems

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Steiner triple systems

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Steiner triple systems

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Steiner triple systems

An STS(7)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Steiner triple systems

An STS(7) Theorem (Kirkman 1847) An STS(v) exists if and only if v ≥ 1 and v ≡ 1 or 3 (mod 6).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Parallel classes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Parallel classes

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Parallel classes

An STS(9)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Parallel classes

An STS(9)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Parallel classes

An STS(9) with a PC

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Almost parallel classes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Almost parallel classes

An STS(13)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Almost parallel classes

An STS(13)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Almost parallel classes

An STS(13) with an APC

slide-22
SLIDE 22

What’s known: small orders

slide-23
SLIDE 23

What’s known: small orders

◮ The unique STS(7) has no APC.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

What’s known: small orders

◮ The unique STS(7) has no APC. ◮ The unique STS(9) has a PC.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What’s known: small orders

◮ The unique STS(7) has no APC. ◮ The unique STS(9) has a PC. ◮ Both STS(13)s have an APC.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What’s known: small orders

◮ The unique STS(7) has no APC. ◮ The unique STS(9) has a PC. ◮ Both STS(13)s have an APC. ◮ All but 10 of the 80 STS(15)s have PCs.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What’s known: small orders

◮ The unique STS(7) has no APC. ◮ The unique STS(9) has a PC. ◮ Both STS(13)s have an APC. ◮ All but 10 of the 80 STS(15)s have PCs. ◮ All but 2 of the 11, 084, 874, 829 STS(19)s have an APC. (Colbourn et al.)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

What’s known: small orders

◮ The unique STS(7) has no APC. ◮ The unique STS(9) has a PC. ◮ Both STS(13)s have an APC. ◮ All but 10 of the 80 STS(15)s have PCs. ◮ All but 2 of the 11, 084, 874, 829 STS(19)s have an APC. (Colbourn et al.) ◮ 12 STS(21)s are known to have no parallel class. (Mathon, Rosa)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

What’s guessed

slide-30
SLIDE 30

What’s guessed

Conjecture (Mathon, Rosa) There is an STS(v) with no PC for all v ≡ 3 (mod 6) except v = 3, 9. Conjecture (Rosa, Colbourn) There is an STS(v) with no APC for all v ≡ 1 (mod 6) except v = 13.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

What’s guessed

Conjecture (Mathon, Rosa) There is an STS(v) with no PC for all v ≡ 3 (mod 6) except v = 3, 9. Conjecture (Rosa, Colbourn) There is an STS(v) with no APC for all v ≡ 1 (mod 6) except v = 13. No example is known of an STS which does not contain a set of ⌊ v

3⌋ − 1

disjoint triples.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

What’s known: in general

slide-33
SLIDE 33

What’s known: in general

v ≡ 3 (mod 6)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

What’s known: in general

v ≡ 3 (mod 6) No infinite family of STSs of order 3 (mod 6) without PCs is known.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

What’s known: in general

v ≡ 3 (mod 6) No infinite family of STSs of order 3 (mod 6) without PCs is known. v ≡ 1 (mod 6)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

What’s known: in general

v ≡ 3 (mod 6) No infinite family of STSs of order 3 (mod 6) without PCs is known. v ≡ 1 (mod 6) Theorem (Wilson, 1992) For each odd n there is an STS(2n − 1) with no almost parallel class.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

What’s known: in general

v ≡ 3 (mod 6) No infinite family of STSs of order 3 (mod 6) without PCs is known. v ≡ 1 (mod 6) Theorem (Wilson, 1992) For each odd n there is an STS(2n − 1) with no almost parallel class.

Wilson’s examples are projective triple systems.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

What’s known: in general

v ≡ 3 (mod 6) No infinite family of STSs of order 3 (mod 6) without PCs is known. v ≡ 1 (mod 6) Theorem (Wilson, 1992) For each odd n there is an STS(2n − 1) with no almost parallel class.

Wilson’s examples are projective triple systems.

Theorem (Bryant, Horsley) For each n there is an STS(2(3n) + 1) with no almost parallel class.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Affine triple systems

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n).

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

Note that:

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

Note that:

◮ Each triple adds to zero. ◮ The whole point set adds to zero.

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

Note that:

◮ Each triple adds to zero. ◮ The whole point set adds to zero.

1-dimensional subspaces have the form {0, a, 2a}.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Affine triple systems

◮ An STS(3n). ◮ Points are Z3 × · · · × Z3. ◮ Triples are the 1-dimensional subspaces and their translates.

The affine STS(9):

0,0 0,1 0,2 1,0 1,1 1,2 2,0 2,1 2,2

Note that:

◮ Each triple adds to zero. ◮ The whole point set adds to zero.

1-dimensional subspaces have the form {0, a, 2a}. Translates of these have the form {b, a + b, 2a + b}.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Our Proof

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0)

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC.

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

b b

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

b b

Adding the labels of the black vertices:

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

b b

Adding the labels of the black vertices: 0 + · · · + 0

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

b b

Adding the labels of the black vertices: 0 + · · · + 0 = 2

  • x∈Z3×···×Z3

x

  • − a − 2b
slide-80
SLIDE 80

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

b b

Adding the labels of the black vertices: 0 + · · · + 0 = 2

  • x∈Z3×···×Z3

x

  • − a − 2b

0 = 0 − a − 2b

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

b b

Adding the labels of the black vertices: 0 + · · · + 0 = 2

  • x∈Z3×···×Z3

x

  • − a − 2b

0 = 0 − a − 2b a = b

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Our Proof

Affine STS(3n)

(2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) (2, . . . , 2) (0, . . . , 0) ∞

STS(2(3n) + 1)

Suppose this STS has an APC. The missing vertex must be in the subsystem.

a

So one triple in the APC contains ∞.

b b

Adding the labels of the black vertices: 0 + · · · + 0 = 2

  • x∈Z3×···×Z3

x

  • − a − 2b

0 = 0 − a − 2b a = b Contradiction.

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Our Results

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Our Results

Theorem For each n there is an STS(2(3n) + 1) with no almost parallel class.

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Our Results

Theorem For each n there is an STS(2(3n) + 1) with no almost parallel class. Theorem If q, n and d are integers with 1 ≤ d ≤ n such that both q and qd − 1 are prime powers, then there exists a (qn(qd − 1) + 1, qd, n−1

d−1

  • q)-design

with no almost parallel class.

slide-86
SLIDE 86

The End