and when
play

and When Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management | Oklahoma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

N-Rich Strips, How and When Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management | Oklahoma State University 25 min Getting N right for the Year Mobile Nutrients N Yield and Environment Driven!! Make determinations based off Environment and


  1. N-Rich Strips, How and When Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management | Oklahoma State University 25 min

  2. Getting N right for the Year • Mobile Nutrients N • Yield and Environment Driven!! • Make determinations based off Environment and Plant measured in Season • Wheat 1.3 lbs N bu -1 • Corn .75 lbs N bu -1

  3. Yield and Nitrogen Rate 120 Yield (bu ac-1) Economical Opt N Rate 100 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

  4. Reference Strips • Are Very Visual.. • Consider 0 N

  5. How, When, Where • Applicator and Source, BFY. • Ideal minimum size: • Width 10’ Length 300’ • Rates: 40 – 80 lbs N ac. above the field rate. CR-2277 Applying Nitrogen-Rich Strips

  6. Applicators

  7. How, When, Where • When: • Pre-plant / Pre emerge • 30 days Post • Prior to green-up. • Where: • Every Field | Zone | Cultivar • Representative area CR-2277 Applying Nitrogen-Rich Strips

  8. N-Rich Strip layouts N N RS RS N-Rich Strip N N RS RS

  9. Sensors get Get a Rate

  10. SBNRC NUE.okstate.edu • No Specific Time to Sense • Needs Planting Date and Sensing Date • Determines Response • Predicts Yield • Provides an accurate N Rate. PSS-2278 Using the GreenSeeker Handheld Sensor and Sensor-Based Nitrogen Rate Calculator

  11. Farmer Practice SBNRC 2009 Location Nrate Yield Protein NUE Nrate Yield Protein NUE 39 23 11.91 0.18 48 26 12.08 0.22 Site 1 36 53 13.51 0.65 49 54 13.68 0.54 Site 2 84 39 0.00 39 33 0.00 Site 3 60 52 11.69 0.28 24 44 10.66 0.12 Site 4 60 59 14.42 0.02 7 61 14.54 0.72 Site 5 60 66 11.69 0.35 38 62 10.83 0.25 Site 6 33 29 10.15 0.20 59 37 10.20 0.26 Site 7 28 42 10.26 0.48 59 48 11.12 0.41 Site 8 Averages 50 45 11.95 0.27 41 46 11.87 0.31 2010 Location Nrate Yield Protein NUE Nrate Yield Protein NUE 160 63 15.16 0.10 23 62 13.05 0.06 Site 1 60 39 12.48 0.19 49 40 12.60 0.27 Site 2 60 40 12.20 0.41 72 42 11.86 0.35 Site 3 50 91 13.57 0.12 34 91 14.25 0.39 Site 4 40 65 10.89 0.08 48 67 11.06 0.13 Site 5 50 45 15.05 0.02 12 46 14.59 0.07 Site 6 Averages 70 57 13.22 0.15 40 58 12.90 0.21 Total 59 50 12.54 0.22 40 51 12.35 0.27

  12. Regional GreenSeeker Grain Yields - 2005 Check Farmer practice N-Rich GreenSeeker 200 180 Grain Yield (bu/ac) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Afton Gore Pauls Valley Webbers Falls 1 Webbers Falls 2 Choctaw County Fort Gibson Pittsburg County Quapaw South Coffeyville

  13. Regional GreenSeeker Grain Yields - 2005 Check Farmer practice N-Rich GreenSeeker 350 300 250 Profit ($/ac) 200 150 100 50 0 Afton Gore Pauls Valley Webbers Falls 1 Webbers Falls 2 Choctaw County Fort Gibson Pittsburg County Quapaw South Coffeyville

  14. Comparison of Sensor Based N Rec’s to Soil Test Based Rec’s, 2006 -2008 Manhattan 2006 160 155 60 33 33 27 0 Partridge 2006 48 32 42 57 55 -13 2 Tribune 2006 130 128 30 24 15 15 9 Manhattan 2007 111 109 130 98 105 25 -7 Partridge 2007 77 70 40 15 20 20 -5 Tribune 2007 71 79 54 0 0 54 0 Manhattan 2008 151 128 77 45 45 32 0 Ottawa 2008 58 64 56 55 60 -4 -5 Partridge 2008 140 123 41 30 15 26 15 Average 22.2 0.9

  15. Average Wheat Performance 100 NS 90 80 Farme GS 7% less N with GS r 70 Practic 60 Farme GS e r 50 Practic 40 e 30 20 10 0 Grain Yield, bu/ac GS 30 N Rate Applied, lb/ac Courtesy Wade Thomason VT

  16. Average Corn Performance NS 160 140 Farme Sensor r 120 21 % less N with GS 100 Practic Farmer e 80 Sensor Practic 60 e 40 20 0 Sidedress N, lb/ac Grain Yield, bu/ac Courtesy Wade Thomason VT

  17. 2010 Percent N Reduced Average Reduction = 25% Percent decrease in side-dress rate from farmer practice to GreenSeeker 60% Side-dress N reduction (%) 51% 50% 44% 40% 31% 30% 20% 18% 20% 10% 6% 5% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Site N reduction with equal yields.

  18. Clemson • Our work has shown that compared to uniform rate applications the SVNA system has the potential to reduce N usage by 30 to 70% in cotton, corn and wheat productions.

  19. On-the Go

  20. End Game Zone by Response

  21. Thank you!!! Please fill out the Survey Brian Arnall 373 Ag Hall 405-744-1722 b.arnall@okstate.edu www.npk.okstate.edu Twitter: @OSU_NPK www.Facebook/ OSUNPK YouTube Channel : OSUNPK Blog : OSUNPK.com www.Aglandlease.info

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend