WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
and the Lifecourse 20 th June 2017 2pm-5.30pm WHERL is funded by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
and the Lifecourse 20 th June 2017 2pm-5.30pm WHERL is funded by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Wellbeing, Health, Retirement and the Lifecourse 20 th June 2017 2pm-5.30pm WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant. Welcome from
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Welcome from Chair Norma Cohen PPI Governor
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Report Introduction Karen Glaser Principal Investigator
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
WHERL is a three-year research project investigating ageing, work and health across the lifecourse Report Introduction Karen Glaser Principal Investigator
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
WHERL is one of the Extended Working Lives Consortia Grants funded by the:
- Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
- Medical Research Council (MRC)
... through the Lifelong Health and Wellbeing (LLHW) programme. Our funding (£1.22m) was invested in making a significant contribution to
- ur understanding of how inequalities across the lifecourse relate to paid
work in later life in the UK (ES/LS002825/1)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Today we will share the highlights of our project’s findings covering three major areas:
- i) a comprehensive assessment of lifecourse determinants and
consequences for health and wellbeing of working up to and beyond state pension age;
- ii) an evaluation of whether (and how) these relationships have changed
for different cohorts and over time; and
- iii) modelling of the financial consequences of working up to and beyond
state pension age for those with different lifecourse trajectories.
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
WHERL is led by the Institute of Gerontology at King’s College London in partnership with:
- Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College London
- Epidemiology & Public Health at University College London
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health at University of Toronto
- Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing (MICRA),
University of Manchester
- Pensions Policy Institute
- Age UK
- UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Work and Family Histories (Chapter 1)
Laurie M Corna
King’s College London
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
- Using Optimal Matching Analysis, we summarised detailed data on
labour market spells from ages 16-54 and 16-state pension age
- Individuals who share common experiences were grouped together with
the help of synthetic sequences
1. Mostly full-time throughout 16-54 2. Mostly non-employed throughout 16-54 3. Full-time, very early exit (at 49) 4. Family carer to part-time (Medium break: 7 years) 5. Family carer to full-time (Long break: 12 years) 6. Family carer throughout 7. Mostly part-time throughout
Summarising Life History Data
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Observed individuals 16 17 18 19 20 … 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 1 FT FT FT FT FT … FT FT FT FT FT FT FT 2 FT FT FT FT FT … FT FT FT FT FT NW NW 3 FT FT FT NW NW … PT PT PT PT PT PT PT 4 FT FT FT FT NW … PT PT PT NW NW NW NW … Synthetic histories 16 17 18 19 20 … 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 FTT FT FT FT FT FT … FT FT FT FT FT FT FT FT-NW-PT FT FT FT FT NW … PT PT PT PT PT PT PT
Two example synthetic histories depicted here are Full-time throughout (FTT) and Family care to part-time work (FT-NW-PT). Four observed individual histories:
Matching individuals to their nearest synthetic history
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 1: Labour market histories at age 55 and over, men and women born 1920-49
Mostly full-time 83% Full-time very early exit 13% Other 4%
Men
Mostly full-time 20% Mostly non- employed 10% Full-time very early exit 9% Family carer to part-time (medium break: 7 years) 18% Family carer to full-time (long break: 12 years) 16% Mostly family carer 20% Mostly part-time 8%
Women
Source: BHPS
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 2: Labour market histories up to State Pension Age: Men aged 65 and over and women aged 60 and over, born 1916-46
Mostly full-time throughout 49% Mostly non- employed throughout 4% Full-time, very early exit 9% Full-time, early exit 30% Later start, early exit 8%
Men 16-64
Mostly full-time throughou t 26% Mostly non- employed/ family carer throughou t 22% Weak attachmen t, very early exit 6% Family carer to part-time (long break: 16 years) 13% Family carer to part-time (short break: 4 years) 11% Family carer to full-time (medium break: 9 years) 17% Mostly part-time throughou t 5%
Women 16-59
Source: ELSA wave 3 2006/07
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Box 3. Birth cohorts compared across the three data sources
Data Women Birth cohort Age in 2017 Retirement Survey (1988/1989) 1924-1933 84-93 BHPS (1999/00) 1934-1943 74-83 ELSA wave 4 (2008/09) 1944-1953 64-73
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 3: Changes in labour market histories by cohort, men aged 60-69 and women aged 55-64
92% 69% 69% >1% 2% 4% 4% 21% 13% 4% 9% 14% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1919-28 1929-38 1939-48
Men 16-59
Later start, early exit Full-time, very early exit Mostly non-employed throughout Mostly full-time throughout 19% 18% 24% 6% 8% 6% 7% 9% 7% 25% 21% 25% 15% 17% 16% 22% 18% 11% 7% 8% 10% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1924-33 1934-43 1944-53
Women 16-54
Mostly part-time Mostly family carer Family carer to full-time (medium break: 12 years) Family carer to part-time (medium break: 7 years) Full-time, very early exit Mostly non-employed throughout
Source: 1988/89 RS; 1999/00 BHPS; 2008/09 ELSA wave 4
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Fertility Histories
1. No children 2. One early (about 23) 3. One later (about 36) 4. Two early (about 24) 5. Later large(about 30) 6. Early large (about 22)
Marital Histories
1. Never married 2. Long-term married 3. Marriage ends early
Family Histories
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 5: Changes in parental histories by cohort, men aged 60- 69 and women aged 55-64
21% 20% 18% 11% 8% 9% 17% 12% 20% 23% 29% 30% 18% 13% 8% 10% 18% 16% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1919-28 1929-38 1939-48
Men 16-59
No children in household 1 child early 1 child later 1-2 children early 1-3 children later Early large family 17% 13% 14% 14% 12% 13% 10% 8% 9% 29% 33% 35% 10% 5% 11% 21% 29% 19% 1924-33 1934-43 1944-53
Women 16-54
Source: 1988/89 RS; 1999/00 BHPS; 2008/09 ELSA wave 4
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
- Summaries of detailed labour market histories across the lifecourse reveal the complexity
- f men and women’s lives
- Men who started work later, but who left the labour market at around age 60, were more
likely to be socio-economically advantaged
- Cohort comparisons revealed that working full-time throughout the lifecourse has
become less common among men; changes in women’s labour market histories are less marked
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Work Family Histories and Retirement (Chapter 2)
Karen Glaser
King’s College London
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
At ages 60-69:
- 57% were mostly out of
the LM
- Just over 10% followed a
pattern involving work beyond SPA
- One-third left the LM at
SPA
Out of labour
market 57%
Full-time to
64 Out of labour market 65+ 27%
Full-time to
67 Out of labour market 68+ 10% Part-time to 64 Out of labour market 65+ 6%
Men’s patterns, 60-69
Source: BHPS/UKHLS
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
At ages 55-64:
- 46% were mostly out
- f the LM
- 20% followed a pattern
involving work (FT or PT) beyond SPA
- 25% exit the LM at
their SPA
Out of labour market 46% Part-time to 59 Out of labour market 60+ 11% Full-time to 59 Out of labour market 60+ 14% Part-time throughout 9% Full-time throughout 12% Part-time to 57 Out of labour market 58+ 5% Full-time to 57 Out of labour market 58+ 4%
Women's patterns, 55-64
Source: BHPS/UKHLS
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 8: Predictors of working full-time past State Pension Age for women relative to those non-employed aged 55-64, 1937-50 cohort
Source: BHPS/UKHLS
1 2 3 4 5 6
Born in 1940s Own with mortgage Post-secondary education Good self-rated health Relative Risk
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 9: Being in paid work more likely for the better educated and the healthier among men
Odds ratio of being in paid work at ages 60-69 by having children late, partner not in paid work, own home but with a mortgage and fair/poor health after taking into account other socio-economic characteristics.
.0 .5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
1919-1928
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
1929-1938
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
1939-48
Source: 1988/89 RS; 1999/00 BHPS; 2008/09 ELSA wave 4
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 10: Probability of full-time work among three birth cohorts of women
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 55 58 60 61 64
1919-1928 Birth Cohort
Mostly full-time throughout /mostly family carer Mostly non-employed throughout Full-time, very early exit Family care to part-time (medium break : 7 years) /mostly part-time Family carer to full-time (medium break: 12 years) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 55 58 60 61 64
1929-1938 Birth Cohort
Mostly full-time throughout /mostly family carer Mostly non-employed throughout Full-time, very early exit Family care to part-time (medium break : 7 years) /mostly part-time Family carer to full-time (medium break: 12 years) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 55 58 60 61 64
1939-48 Birth Cohort
Mostly full-time throughout /mostly family carer Mostly non-employed throughout Full-time, very early exit Family care to part-time (medium break : 7 years) /mostly part-time Family carer to full-time (medium break: 12 years)
Source: 1988/89 RS; 1999/00 BHPS; 2008/09 ELSA wave 4
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chart 11: Unretirement more likely for the better educated and the healthier
Source: BHPS/UKHLS
Hazard ratio of unretirement by gender, education, own with a mortgage and fair/poor health after adding other demographic and socioeconomic variables to the model.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4
Female 1950-59 No Education Own with mortgage Fair or poor Hazard Ratio
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
- A large percentage of men and women are not in the labour market in the years leading
up to and following State Pension Age
- For men and women, strong prior labour market attachment and good health are key
predictors of working beyond State Pension Age
- In cohort comparisons, men and women between the ages of 60 and 69 (for men) and 55
and 64 (for women) from the youngest cohort were more likely to be in paid work relative to those from the older cohorts
- Across the period 1991 to 2015, retirement reversals were relatively common in the UK,
with one quarter of older adults unretiring within 15 years of first leaving the labour market and calling themselves ‘retired’
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
The Relationship Between Paid and Unpaid Work at Older Ages (Chapter 3)
Lawrence Sacco King’s College London
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
- 1. Examine longitudinal patterns of engagement in paid work,
volunteering, civic engagement, informal care and looking after the home in mid to later life (55-70).
- 2. Investigate how patterns of engagement differ according to
gender, socioeconomic and health characteristics.
Research Objectives
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Unpaid work: why does it matter?
- Informal care estimated value: £132 billion per year
(Buckner & Yeandle 2015)
- Volunteering value: £23.9 billion per year (ONS 2013)
Health Benefits:
Reduced mortality & depression Lower likelihood of disability Higher wellbeing
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
engagement pathways/group (age 55-70)
Conf 55/6 Conf 57/8 Conf … Conf 69/70
Stage 2: Longitudinal LCA models Configurations of engagement at ages 55/6, 57/8,…,69/70
Paid work Volunteering Informal care Civic engagement
Stage 1: cross-sectional LCA models
Housework
Two-stage approach
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Engagement groups
Paid and unpaid work pathways Proportion (%)
Group 1 - Workers 45 Group 2 – Mixed activities (Looking after the home) 44 Group 3 - Mixed activities (Volunteering) 11
N = 6,086
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Engagement groups
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69
Group 3 – Mixed activities (Volunteering), 11% Group 2 – Mixed activities (Looking after the home), 44% Group 1 – Paid workers, 45%
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Distribution of groups by gender
88% 8% 35% 12% 92% 65%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
- 1. Paid work
- 2. Mixed activities
(looking after the home)
- 3. Mixed activities
(volunteering)
Men Women
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Distribution of groups by socioeconomic characteristics
38% 23% 51% 33% 35% 30% 29% 42% 19%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
- 1. Paid work
- 2. M/a (looking
after the home)
- 3. M/a
(Volunteering)
Education
High Intermediate No qualification
39% 26% 53% 24% 26% 24% 37% 48% 23%
- 1. Paid work
- 2. M/a (looking
after the home)
- 3. M/a
(volunteering)
Occupational social class
Managerial Intermediate Routine, manual
82% 76% 87% 18% 24% 13%
- 1. Paid work
- 2. M/a (looking
after the home)
- 3. M/a
(volunteering)
Tenure
Homeowner Renting
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Distribution of groups by health at age 50/55
82% 72% 80% 18% 28% 20%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
- 1. Paid work
- 2. Mixed activities (looking
after the home)
- 3. Mixed activities
(volunteering)
No Yes (poor health)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
- Longer working lives may not be compatible with engagement in unpaid
work
- Within each group, full time paid work and unpaid activities do not seem to
be related.
- Prior labour market involvement and prior engagement in unpaid work may be driving
these differences
- Gender, socio-economic and health inequalities in engagement.
- Addressing gender inequalities in unpaid work carried out in the home may enable more
women to be in full-time employment for longer.
Conclusion & implications
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Working later and physical health (Chapter 4)
Amanda Sacker, Rebecca Benson, Wentian Lu
University College London
WHERL is an interdisciplinary consortium funded by the cross- research council Lifelong Health and Wellbeing (LLHW) programme under Extending Working Lives (ES/L002825/1)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Research questions
- What is the relationship between labour market
histories before State Pension Age and frailty trajectories in later life?
- Are the labour market histories of mothers linked to
differences in disability and mortality after State Pension Age?
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Main findings
- People’s health on reaching State Pension Age and beyond
depended on their labour market histories
– Leaving work before State Pension Age for those in poor health slowed down natural increases in frailty after retirement among men – Distinct periods that focus on work and family care were associated with a reduction in frailty after State Pension Age among women – Mothers’ labour market histories predicted their later life disability and mortality.
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
What is the relationship between labour market histories before State Pension Age and frailty trajectories in later life?
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
What is frailty?
- Frailty is a clinical syndrome among older adults associated with
numerous poor health outcomes including morbidity, incident disability, hospitalisation, institutionalisation and death
- The Frailty Index is a pointer of non-specific vulnerability for frailty in
- lder age by measuring the accumulation of a large number of
problems such as pain, chronic conditions, falls and fractures, and cognitive deficits
- The index ranges from 0-1 with higher scores indicating greater frailty
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Men’s predicted Frailty Index scores at age 65, independent
- f other social, demographic and economic influences
0.10 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 Mostly full-time throughout Mostly non- employed throughout Later start, early exit at around age 60 Full-time, early exit at around age 60 Full-time, very early exit at around age 49
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Men’s predicted Frailty Index scores at age 65, independent of
- ther social, demographic and economic influences
0.05 0.10 0.15 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 Age Mostly full-time throughout Mostly non-employed throughout Full-time, very early exit at around age 49 Full-time, early exit at around age 60 Later start, early exit at around age 60
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Women’s predicted Frailty Index scores at age 60, independent
- f other social demographic and economic influences
0.12 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16
Family carer to part- time (short break: 4 years) Family carer to full- time (medium break: 9 years) Family carer to part- time (long break: 16 years) Weak attachment, very early exit Mostly full-time throughout Mostly non- employed/family carer throughout Mostly part-time throughout
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Women’s predicted Frailty Index scores after age 60, independent
- f other social, demographic and economic influences
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 Age Family carer to part-time (short break: 4 years) Family carer to full-time (medium break: 9 years) Family carer to part-time (long break: 16 years) Weak attachment, very early exit Mostly full-time throughout
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Are the labour market histories of mothers linked to differences in disability and mortality after State Pension Age?
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Probability of mortality, 2006/07 to 2012, by work family history for mothers over 59 years old at baseline
11% 10% 8% 8% 6% 5% 4% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% Family carer to part-time (short break: 4 years) Family carer to full- time (medium break: 9 years) Family carer to part-time (long break: 16 years) Mostly full- time throughout Mostly part- time throughout Weak attachment, very early exit Mostly non- employed /family carer throughout
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Probability of disability by work family history group for ELSA mothers aged 59 years and older in wave 3, independent of social, demographic and economic influences
18% 18% 24% 29% 30% 36% 38%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Family carer to part-time (short break: Family carer to full-time (medium break: 9 years) Family carer to part-time (long break: 16 years) Mostly full- time throughout Mostly part- time throughout Weak attachment, very early exit Mostly non- employed /family carer throughout
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Summary
- Continuous full-time work until retirement age conferred no
long-term health benefits
- For men, leaving the labour market early, possibly in response
to poor health, appeared to prevent increases in frailty following retirement
- For women, taking some time off work for family care appeared
beneficial in the long-term
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Policy implications
- Labour market histories can be used to identify women at
risk of later life disability, allowing targeting of interventions
- Strategies that support breaks from paid work could offer a
healthier prospect for women with caring responsibilities
- For men in poor health, it might be beneficial in the longer
term to be able to leave paid employment before State Pension Age
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Working later and mental health (Chapter 5)
Robert Stewart, Gayan Perera
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Working later and mental health
Robert Stewart, Gayan Perera Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Questions
- What is the relationship between non-employment and
common mental disorder?
- Does it vary according to the reason for non-employment?
- Does it vary by age group?
- Has it varied over time (1993, 2000, 2007)?
- Is it related to particular CMD symptoms?
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Data resources
- British Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys
- 1993 survey – 10,108 aged 16-64; England, Wales, Scotland
- 2000 survey – 8,580 aged 16-74; England, Wales, Scotland
- 2007 survey – 7,403 aged 16+; England
- 2014 survey – data release imminent
- Common mental disorder ascertained using the revised Clinical Interview Schedule
(CIS-R)
- Identical items on demographics, function, employment status, healthcare use
- Data restrictions by age group and country for comparability
- Focus on 55-64 year age group initially
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Association between non-employment and CMD in 55-64 year olds
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Association between reason for non-employment and CMD in 55-64 year olds
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Prevalence (%) of CMD among employed and non-employed participants (all age groups)
Female Male
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Female Male
Prevalence (%) of CMD among employed and non-employed participants (all age groups)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Female Male
Prevalence (%) of CMD among employed and non-employed participants (all age groups)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Female Male
Prevalence (%) of CMD among employed and non-employed participants (all age groups)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Association between non-employment and CMD by age group
(adjusted for marital status, no. of children, education, social class, housing tenure, smoking status, physical health consultations, difficulties in ADL)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Associations between non-employment and CMD symptoms by age group (adjusted)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Association between non-employment and CMD in 65 to 74 year olds
(Model 1: Adjusted for age, gender and marital status; Model 2: Adjusted for Model 1+ education, social class, housing tenure; Model 3: Adjusted for Model 2+ smoking status, difficulties in ADL + seen a doctor in the past 12 months)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Association between non-employment and CMD subcomponents in 65 to 74 year olds (combined surveys)
(Model 1 adjusted for Age, gender and marital status, education, social class, housing tenure, Model 2 additionally adjusted for smoking status, difficulties in ADL, and contact with a doctor in the past 12 months)
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Conclusions
- Mental disorder commonest in non-employed people in any age group
– Particularly in men – Particularly if non-employment is due to short/long-term sickness
- Non-employment is more strongly associated with mental disorder in
more recent years
– Particularly in men – Awaiting 2014 data to confirm this
- Types of mental disorder symptoms associated with non-employment vary
across working age groups
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Pension Accumulation and Gender (Chapter 6)
Debora Price University of Manchester John Adams, Tim Pike Pensions Policy Institute
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Chapter Six: Pension accumulation and gender
- OMAs for recently retired cohorts: illustrative realistic life-courses
- We investigate how women with those lifecourses have fared and will
fare in accumulating pension income with economic and policy changes
- ver the decades they have been working, and now
- Method: the Pension Policy Institute (PPI) Individual Model [Pension
Income given in 2016 earnings terms]
- Three PPI Briefing Notes published
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Labour market histories Proportion of women aged 60-69 (cohorts born 1937-46) Mostly full-time throughout 27% Mostly non-employed throughout 17% Weak attachment, very early exit (at around age 49) 7% Family carer to PT work to SPA (long break: 16 yrs) 12% Family carer to PT work to SPA (short break: 4 yrs) 13% Family carer to FT work to SPA (medium break: 9 yrs) 18% Mostly part-time throughout (from about age 23) 6% Labour market histories of women aged 60-69, cohorts born 1937-46
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant. £122 £96 £90 £37 £22 £66 £179 £168 £165 £162 £162 £162
- £50
£0 £50 £100 £150 £200 £250 £300 £350 Man, full- time throughout No children, FT throughout 2 children (in 20s) but FT throughout 1 child, short break (4 yrs) then PT 2 children, long break (16 yrs) then PT 2 children, medium break (9 yrs) then FT
Private Pension State Pension Other/tax
£286 £227 £187 £202 £249 £256
Women
Median earners, income at age 66
Source: WHERL: The Wellbeing, Health, Retirement and the Lifecourse project Final Report, 2017
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant. £95 £122 £162 £73 £96 £126 £168 £179 £194 £162 £168 £179
- £50
£0 £50 £100 £150 £200 £250 £300 £350 £400
30th percentile Median earner 70th percentile 30th percentile Median earner 70th percentile
Private Pension State Pension Other/tax
£255 £288 £255 £232 £329 £285
Women Men
Full-time throughout, no children, income at age 66: 30th, 50th, 70th percentiles
Source: WHERL: The Wellbeing, Health, Retirement and the Lifecourse project Final Report, 2017
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant. £122 £122 £103 £96 £93 £51 £179 £191 £212 £168 £174 £186
- £50
£0 £50 £100 £150 £200 £250 £300 £350
Age 55 Age 60 Age 65 Age 55 Age 60 Age 65
Private Pension State Pension Other/tax
£285 £235 £259 £255 £298 £296
Women Men
Cohort differences, income age 66, median earners, full-time throughout, no children
Source: WHERL: The Wellbeing, Health, Retirement and the Lifecourse project Final Report, 2017
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
£22 £22 £12 £162 £159 £144 £0 £50 £100 £150 £200 Age 55 Age 60 Age 65 Private Pension State Pension Other/tax
£187 £160 £184
Women with two children, 4 year break then PT work, median earners, income age 66
Source: WHERL: The Wellbeing, Health, Retirement and the Lifecourse project Final Report, 2017
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Pension income (state and private) – median earner: Base projection Returns to work a year earlier Returns to work five years earlier Retires a year after SPA Retires 5 years after SPA (i.e. at 71) 16 year break followed by PT work to SPA 184 185 189 186 195 9 year break followed by FT work to SPA 228 231 241 231 248
Source: WHERL: The Wellbeing, Health, Retirement and the Lifecourse project Final Report, 2017
Number of days worked per week after returning from 16 year break from paid work, median earner, income at 66 1 2 3 4 5 Pension Income (state and private) 175 184 194 203 213 Percentage of income from private pension 7% 12% 16% 20% 24%
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
- So far, only about a quarter of women have had lifecourses approximating FT work,
this seems to be changing pretty slowly. Long gaps and PT work remain significant.
- Gender pay gaps and motherhood pay gaps remain critical issue for women’s
pensions; being in the paid workforce is insufficient for pension accumulation if you don’t earn enough
- PT work doesn’t build much pension, even at median earnings. Policies that focus on
supporting women (mothers, carers) into PT work may make little difference to pensions
- The abolition of Additional Pension impacts women’s ability to accumulate adequate
retirement income
- The State Pension will remain a critical component of women’s income and supporting
and maintaining it is vital to women’s later life wellbeing
Policy Implications
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Refreshment break
Seminar recommencing at 15.45
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Keynote Speaker Sir Steve Webb Royal London
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.
Panel Discussion
WHERL is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) through an Extended Working Lives Consortia Grant.