and market structure
play

and Market Structure: A Case Study of the Agricultural - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Endogenous R&D Investment and Market Structure: A Case Study of the Agricultural Biotechnology Sector Benjamin C. Anderson Ian M. Sheldon Contact Information: anderson.1423@osu.edu This project was supported by the AFRI of the


  1. Endogenous R&D Investment and Market Structure: A Case Study of the Agricultural Biotechnology Sector Benjamin C. Anderson† Ian M. Sheldon • † Contact Information: anderson.1423@osu.edu • This project was supported by the AFRI of the NIFA at the USDA. Grant # 2008-35400-18704.

  2. Motivation • Why agricultural biotechnology? – Young (dynamic) industry – Property rights – Increasing importance in global agriculture • Why an endogenous fixed cost (EFC) model? – Product quality and sunk investments in R&D – Levels of industry concentration bounded away from perfect competition

  3. Research Questions • Is the agricultural biotechnology industry, specifically the GM corn seed industry, characterized by an EFC-type model? • How is this analysis relevant to: – Past consolidation activity – Current discussions on anticompetitive actions – Implications on future sector growth

  4. The Agricultural Biotechnology Sector • The seed industry before biotechnology – Innovation, IPRs, and patenting – Mendelian genetics and hybridization • Consolidation and concentration: the first generation of commercialized GM crops • Subsequent generations and renewed concerns of concentration

  5. Data • R&D Concentration – APHIS Field Trial Data on applications (6697) for the release of GM crops (1990-2010) – Dates, phenotypes/genotypes, states – Petitions for deregulation (heterogeneity) • Market Size – NASS Acreage Reports (1996-2010) – “Adoption of Genetically-Engineered Crops”, ERS data product (2000-2010)

  6. Market Definition • Share of total corn acres planted • Share of corn acres planted to total cropland • Herbicide Use – % of corn acres treated – Intensity of application (lb/acre) • Pesticide Use – % of corn acres treated – Intensity of application (lb/acre)

  7. Market Definition Figure 3: Core and Fringe Regions of the US Corn Belt (Regional Share of Total Corn Acres Planted) Northeast North (0.2%) %) “Fringe” (20.6%) Mid-Atlantic (4.2%) “Core” West East (29.5%) (3.4%) West “Fringe” “Fringe” (15.2%) (19.1%) Appalachia (2.2%) Southern Southeast Plains Legend (1.6%) (4.0%) ( - ): Regional Share of US Corn Acres Planted (2010) Source: Authors’ calculations from NASS 2010 Acreage Report.

  8. Empirical Model • Sutton (1991, 1998) – Ellickson (2007), Berry and Waldfogel (2006), Marin and Siotis (2007), Dick (2007) 𝐷 1 ≥ 𝑏 0 • Theoretical prediction: 𝛾 ∗ ∙ ℎ 𝑙 0 • Empirical model: 𝛾 1 𝑜 ℎ + 𝜁 𝑗 , 𝐷 𝑗 = 𝛾 0 + ln 𝑇 𝐺 0 𝜒 – where 𝜁−𝜈 , 𝜒 , 𝜀 > 0 . 𝐺 𝜁 = 1 − exp − 𝜀

  9. Concluding Remarks • Supportive evidence for agricultural biotechnology being characterized by EFC • Going forward: – Refining markets – Estimating model accounting for specific product traits – Comparison with other GM seed industry markets (soybeans/cotton)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend