Analytical Methods For Diesel Particulate Matter(DPM) Igor Levin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

analytical methods for diesel particulate matter dpm igor
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Analytical Methods For Diesel Particulate Matter(DPM) Igor Levin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Analytical Methods For Diesel Particulate Matter(DPM) Igor Levin OHAO - Fall Symposium October 24 th 2013 Toronto, Ontario Acknowledgements Occupational Hygiene Association of Ontario. CANMET, Sudbury Laboratory. Sunset Laboratory


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Analytical Methods For Diesel Particulate Matter(DPM)

Igor Levin OHAO - Fall Symposium October 24th 2013 Toronto, Ontario

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Acknowledgements

  • Occupational Hygiene Association of Ontario.
  • CANMET, Sudbury Laboratory.
  • Sunset Laboratory Inc.
  • National Research Council of Canada.
  • Concord Analytical coworkers.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Analytical Services since 1997

  • Respirable Quartz on Ag membrane filters by XRD

(Equivalent to NIOSH 7500).

  • Metals by ICP (NIOSH 7300).
  • Diesel Particulate Matter (NIOSH 5040).

Accredited by Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) to ISO 17025 for specific tests including NIOSH 5040.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) is a complex aggregate of solid and liquid

  • material. Its origin is carbonaceous particles generated in the engine cylinder

during combustion. The primary carbon particles form larger agglomerates and combine with several other, both organic and inorganic, components of diesel

  • exhaust. Generally , DPM is divided into three basic fractions.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The actual composition of DPM will depend on the particular engine and its load and speed conditions. “Wet” particulates can contain up to 60% of the hydrocarbon fraction (SOF), while “dry ” particulates are comprised mostly of dry carbon.

DPM

Solids

Dry carbon particles, commonly known as soot.

SOF

Heavy hydrocarbons

adsorbed and condensed on the carbon particles, called Soluble Organic Fraction.

SO4

Sulfate fraction, hydrated sulfuric acid.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Available DPM Analytical Methods

Respirable Combustible Dust (RCD) – Gravimetric Thermal-Optical Carbon Analysis (NIOSH 5040)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Respirable Combustible Dust (RCD) Analysis

Sampling:

  • Filter media: 25mm, 0.8 micron Silver

Membrane filter.

  • Flow Rate: 1.7 L/min
  • Cyclone
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Respirable Combustible Dust (RCD) Analysis

  • Sampled filter is weighed and

dust weight is determined.

  • Filter is transferred to a metal

tray.

  • Tray is placed in muffle furnace at

400₀C for minimum 90 minutes. The ashing temperature and the catalytic action of the silver membrane filter combine to make the carbon-based dust react with Oxygen.

  • The mass loss on ashing is

considered to be the mass of RCD.

  • Limit of Detection: 0.05 mg
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Respirable Combustible Dust (RCD) Analysis

Advantages

  • Simple
  • Economical
  • Resp. Quartz and RCD can be

done on the same filter. Disadvantages

  • Non Selective
  • Inadequate for compliance

monitoring at lower limits of exposure.

  • Carbon based mineral dust

interference.

  • Sulfide minerals dusts

interference.

  • Problems with DPM overloaded

filters.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Thermal-Optical Carbon Analysis (NIOSH 5040)

  • Principle of Analysis:

Two-phase heating of sample with measurement of combustion gases.

  • Low Limit of Detection:

– OC = 0.002 mg – EC = 0.002 mg Equipment:

Lab OC-EC Aerosol Analyzer by Sunset Laboratory Inc.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Description Tissuquartz Filters

Filter Media Pure Quartz, no binder Typical Thickness 432 μm Typical Filter Weight 508 mg/cm2 Typical Water Flow Rate 0.35 bar (35kPa, 5 psi) 220 mL/min/cm2 Typical Air Flow Rate 0.7 bar ( 70 kPa, 10 psi) 73 mL/min/cm2 Maximum Operating Temperature - Air 1093 ₀C (2000 ₀F) Typical Aerosol Retention ** 99.90 % PH in Boiled water Extract 6.5 – 7.5

**Following ASTM D 2986-95A 0.3μm (DOP) at 32 L/min/100cm2 filter media.

Filter media for DPM sampling

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Support pad choices (as per NIOSH 5040)

  • Cellulose:

High OC blanks

  • Stainless steel screen:

Expensive, Potential OC contamination during cleaning.

  • Pre-fired 37mm quartz fiber

filter: Low OC blanks, 0.006-0.014 mg. Pre-fired quartz fiber filter, 37 mm, in a standard three piece holder.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Diesel Particulate Matter Cassette with Precision-jeweled Impactor.

  • Screens out respirable particles > 1.0 µm.

Particles less than 1.0 µm are collected

  • n the filter.
  • Filter diameter: 37mm
  • Sampled area diameter : 32 mm
  • Sampled area: 8.04 cm2
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Collection of submicron particulates only eliminates mineral dusts interference

Source: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/workshops/dieselelko2007/3a-Petrie.pdf

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Filter diameter: 37 mm Sampled area diameter : 33mm Sampled area: 8.55 cm2

Single punch : 1.5 cm2 2nd Punch

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Filters are arranged in

  • rder of an increasing

concentration of Elemental Carbon (EC) < 0.002mg – 0.278 mg

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Schematic of thermal-optical instrument (V= valve) for determination of OC and EC in diesel particulate exhaust and other carbonaceous aerosols.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Instrument Calibration

10 μL of 1% or 0.5% of Sucrose (sugar) solution is deposited on a pre-fired 1.5 cm2 quartz fiber punch and dried for 10 minutes under a heating lamp.

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

NIOSH 5040 Protocol

Mode Temperature (₀C) Time (s)

He 310 80 He 475 60 He 615 60 He 870 90 He / O2 550 35 He / O2 625 45 He / O2 700 45 He / O2 775 45 He / O2 850 45 He / O2 890 110 Total Time = 615

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thermogram of Sucrose Standard 42.10 μg OC

He 2% O2 / He

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Calculated Results For Sucrose Standard 42.10 μg OC

slide-26
SLIDE 26

OC/ EC Split Point for Sucrose Standard 42.10 μg OC

He 2 % O2 / He OC/EC Split Point

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Thermogram Of The Sample Containing Organic, Elemental & Carbonate Carbon

He 2% O2 / He

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Calculated Results for a sample Containing Organic, Elemental & Carbonate Carbon

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Standard Operating Procedure

  • Wipe all the tools and Aluminum foil pad with Acetone.
  • Turn on the instrument computer.
  • Initiate Instrument software.
  • Set Gas flows
  • Light FID detector and wait 10 minutes.
  • Load Five blank 1.5cm2 punches into the oven.
  • Run “Clean” program .
slide-30
SLIDE 30

“Clean” program

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Place four pre-fired punches on

the standards tray Aluminum pad.

  • Pipette two 10 μL aliquots of

each 1% and 0.5% of Sucrose solutions (42.10 μg and 21.05 μg

  • f OC respectively).
  • Dry punches under a heating

lamp for 10 minutes.

Standard Operating Procedure

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Analyze blank punch using NIOSH

5040 protocol.

  • Analyze 42.10 μg Spike
  • Analyze samples

Standard Operating Procedure

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Quality Control

  • Daily QC checks

– Analyze cleaned blank punch. – Run alternatively 10μL of 0.5% and 1% Sucrose QC spikes every 8-10 samples.

  • Replicate Samples

– One replicate sample is analyzed for every 10 samples

  • Linearity Check

– Every six months Spikes of 10μL of 2%, 1%, 0.5% and 0.25% Sucrose are tested.

  • Dextrose QC spike

– New Sucrose reagent is tested with Dextrose solution to verify the integrity of the reagent.

  • Annually Round Robin 47 mm filter is analyzed by CASL, CANMET & Sunset

Laboratory.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Uncertainty

Parameter associated with the result of a measurement, that characterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurant (OC/EC /TC). About 400 pairs of data that had been taken over an extensive period

  • f time were analyzed by the method, kindly supplied by Dr. Paski to

CANMET laboratory. The data were divided into ranges, as shown in the table on the following slide. The uncertainties given by the instrument software provided by the manufacturer are: 0.2 μg /cm2 ± 5% for OC/EC and 0.3 μg /cm2 ± 5% for TC.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Uncertainty summary for 400 pairs of Analyzed filters

U- rel. at 95% confidence levels. Range (μg/ cm2) Range (mg) Organic Carbon (OC) U-rel. % Elemental Carbon (EC) U-rel. % Total Carbon (TC) U-rel. %

0.6 to 1.0 0.005 - 0.009 22 18 23 1 to 2 0.009 - 0.017 22 18 18 2 to 5 0.017 - 0.043 16 12 14 5 to 10 0.043 - 0.086 19 6 13 10 to 20 0.086 - 0.171 15 8 11 20 to 50 0.171 - 0.428 18 5 12 >50 > 0.428 _ _ 3

Filter diameter: 37 mm Sampled area diameter : 33mm Sampled area: 8.55 cm2

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Issues

  • Unknown filter media
  • Wet filters
  • Loose dust material
  • Low instrument load
  • DPM Overloaded filters

– Laser Radiation is almost fully absorbed by the EC. Split point can not be

determined accurately if the concentration of EC is greater than 25– 35 μg/cm2 (equivalent to 0.214 - 0.299 mg of EC on a 37 mm filter).

slide-37
SLIDE 37

NRC System for the absolute calibration of black carbon mass concentration measurement instruments

  • The SAE E-31 Aircraft

Exhaust Emissions Measurement Committee has specified an instrument calibration methodology and schedule whereby NIOSH 5040 EC measurements are used to calibrate BC mass concentration instruments.

  • NIOSH 5040 analysis

performed by Concord Analytical Services.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

CALIBRATION STABILITY/REPEATIBILITY

  • One LII 300 instrument was calibrated by Missouri University
  • f Science and Technology against NIOSH 5040 EC during a

previous measurement campaign. The calibration results are shown below.

  • Excellent agreement with calibrations performed by a

different team and using a different NIOSH 5040 analysis provider

  • No observable drift in the calibration over the one year period

between the first and last calibration.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

A-PRIDE 4 Pre-Test Correction Factor: 0.802 A-PRIDE 4 Post-Test Correction Factor: 0.798

slide-40
SLIDE 40

8540 Keele Street, Unit 38 Concord, Ontario L4K 2N2 Canada

Tel: 905-660-5171 Fax: 905-660-9474 Email: contact@concordanalytical.com www.concordanalytical.com