analysis of data recorded by a gem lptpc
play

Analysis of data recorded by a GEM LPTPC Martin Ljunggren on behalf - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Analysis of data recorded by a GEM LPTPC Martin Ljunggren on behalf of the LCTPC Collaboration June 11, 2011 1 / 18 Outline The Large Prototype TPC with GEM readout Readout electronics Track reconstruction Distortion correction


  1. Analysis of data recorded by a GEM LPTPC Martin Ljunggren on behalf of the LCTPC Collaboration June 11, 2011 1 / 18

  2. Outline ◮ The Large Prototype TPC with GEM readout ◮ Readout electronics ◮ Track reconstruction ◮ Distortion correction ◮ Spatial resolution ◮ Momentum resolution 2 / 18

  3. GEMs and pad plane ◮ 5152 pads, approximately 1x5 mm, organized in 28 rows ◮ A GEM-foil consists of 5 µ m Cu-layers separated by 100 µ m of insulating material ◮ Hole size: 70 µ m ◮ Pitch: 140 µ m ◮ 360V between Cu-layers ◮ Two GEM foils give a gain of about 10 4 ◮ “T2K-gas”: 95% Ar , 3% CF 4 , 2% isobutane 3 / 18

  4. Instrumentation Y (mm) 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -200 -100 0 100 200 X (mm) Figure: The instrumented region of the pad planes (black) 4 / 18

  5. Readout electronics PCA16: ◮ 16 channel preamplifier and shaper ◮ Modified version of PASA-chip from ALICE. ◮ Programmable gain, shaping and decay time. ALTRO: ◮ Originally developed for ALICE. ◮ Sampling at 20 MHz ◮ Pedestal subtraction and zero suppression ◮ Capable of storing 1024 10 bit ADC samples. Next step: Integration of preamplifier and ADC into one chip (S-ALTRO). 5 / 18

  6. Due to the large number of readout channels and the small space available on the pad modules, the electronics had to be connected with 30 cm long Kapton R � cables. 6 / 18

  7. Event display Figure: Typical event without magnetic field. Drift distance: 5 cm Figure: Typical event with magnetic field. Drift distance: 10 cm 7 / 18

  8. Track reconstruction Voltage [ADC units] 500 400 300 200 100 0 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 t [time samples] Figure: Left : Typical pulse. Right : Typical track. ◮ Time is reconstructed as the voltage weighted average of the five samples around the peak. ◮ Adjacent pulses are grouped into clusters where coordinates P Q i y i are determined by e.g. y = P Q i where Q i is the charge of the pulse and y i is the corresponding y-coordinate of the pad. ◮ For tracking, a simple track reconstruction algorithm was used. 8 / 18

  9. Residuals Entries 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Residuals [mm] Figure: Upper : Magnified event display. Lower : Residuals integrated over the full track length from 10000 tracks with 7 cm drift length and B=0T, σ ≈ 0 . 31 mm for a Gaussian core accounting for 95% of the total area. Distortion correcions have been applied. 9 / 18

  10. Distortions If the residuals are plotted against pad row, they should line up around zero. However: Entries 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Residuals [mm] Figure: Left : Residuals for 10000 tracks vs pad row for B=1T and drift length of 10 cm. Right : Residuals integrated over the full track length using 10000 tracks from the same run 10 / 18

  11. After corrections Corrected using Millipede, see “A new method for the high-precision alignment of track detectors”, Volker Blobel Entries 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Residuals [mm] Entries 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Residuals [mm] Figure: Left :Residuals for 10000 tracks vs pad row for B=0T and drift length of 5 cm (upper) and B=1T and drift length of 10 cm (lower) Right : Residuals integrated over the full track length using 10000 tracks from the same run, σ ≈ 0 . 16 mm (upper) and σ ≈ 0 . 077 mm (lower) for a Gaussian core accounting for 95% of the total area 11 / 18

  12. Resolution in bend plane χ χ 2 2 / ndf / ndf 308.3 / 8 308.3 / 8 ± ± p0 p0 0.00349 0.00349 4.965e-05 4.965e-05 0.03 ] ± ± 2 p1 p1 1.563e-05 1.563e-05 2.634e-07 2.634e-07 [mm 2 0.025 y σ 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 100 200 300 400 500 Drift Length [mm] Figure: Measured resolution for different drift lengths. The line crosses the y-axis at 0 . 00349 mm 2 which corresponds to an intrinsic resolution of σ y (0) = 59 . 1 ± 0 . 4 µ m. 12 / 18

  13. Comparison with theoretical predictions. Figure: Predicted resolution for different magnetic field strengths and slightly different conditions. Also shown are the points measured experimentally (shown in prev. slide) 1 . 1K. Ackermann et.al. Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A623:141-143,2010 13 / 18

  14. Resolution in Z χ χ 2 2 / ndf / ndf 6.266 / 2 6.266 / 2 ± ± p0 p0 0.04144 0.04144 0.0003385 0.0003385 ] 2 0.09 [mm ± ± p1 p1 7.327e-05 7.327e-05 1.811e-06 1.811e-06 0.08 2 z σ 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 Shaping times 120 ns 0.03 90 ns 60 ns 0.02 30 ns 0.01 50 100 150 200 250 300 Drift Length [mm] Figure: Measured resolution in the z-direction for different drift lengths and shaping times. The best results are obtained with a shaping time of 60ns. Extrapolating the fitted line to half the drift length of the final TPC gives 346 ± 9 µ m which is well below the desired resolution of 500 µ m. An extrapolation to the full drift length (2.15 m) gives 446 ± 9 µ m, still below the goal resolution. 14 / 18

  15. Momentum measurements ◮ p ≈ 0 . 3 B · R ◮ σ (1 / p ) ≈ 9 . 2 · 10 − 3 ± 0 . 0002 GeV − 1 ◮ The track fit includes all points along a reconstructed track. Figure: Measured track momenta (left) and 1/p-distribution (right) at a drift length of 15 cm. ◮ The momentum resolution has been calculated from a gaussian fit to the peak covering 42% of the total area. ◮ However, the momentum spread of the beam is ≈ 5% which gives σ (1 / p ) ≈ 0 . 01 GeV − 1 at 5 GeV, and therefore the measured width is fully consistent with the beam spread. 15 / 18

  16. Theoretical momentum resolution � ◮ Gl¨ uckstern’s formula: δ ( 1 720 σ y P T ) = 0 . 3 L 2 B N +4 ◮ N = 84, L ≈ 48 cm and B = 1 T. ◮ σ y ≈ 76 µ m (drift of 15 cm) gives σ (1 / p ) ≈ 3 · 10 − 3 GeV − 1 . 16 / 18

  17. Summary ◮ Test measurements with a TPC using GEM readout have been performed. ◮ Corrections for electric field distortions have been introduced using the Millepede software package. ◮ Results on spatial resolution show that σ y at zero drift is 59 . 1 ± 0 . 4 µ m and σ z at zero drift is 216 ± 7 µ m . ◮ Result on momentum resolution is σ (1 / p t ) ≈ 9 . 2 x 10 − 3 ± 0 . 0002 GeV − 1 at a drift length of 15 cm. The momentum spread of the beam is however non negligible. ◮ Theoretical estimation on momentum resolution at σ y ≈ 76 µ m gives σ (1 / p ) ≈ 3 · 10 − 3 GeV − 1 . ◮ Results on spatial resolution are consistent with the goals for the full size ILD TPC. 17 / 18

  18. Resolution ◮ Track parameters from fit gives too optimistic estimation of the resolution. ◮ Use geometric mean of widths of the distributions with investigated cluster included, σ inc , and excluded, σ exc , from fit respectively. 1 ◮ σ = √ σ inc · σ exc 1 D.C.Arogancia et.al. Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A602:403-414,2009 18 / 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend