an approach for dynamic student modelling of learning
play

An Approach for Dynamic Student Modelling of Learning Styles Sabine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Approach for Dynamic Student Modelling of Learning Styles Sabine Graf Athabasca University, Canada Kinshuk Athabasca University, Canada Slide 1 Why modelling students learning styles? Benefits of knowing students learning


  1. An Approach for Dynamic Student Modelling of Learning Styles Sabine Graf Athabasca University, Canada Kinshuk Athabasca University, Canada Slide 1

  2. Why modelling students’ learning styles? • Benefits of knowing students’ learning styles: – Make students aware of their learning styles – Make teachers aware of their students’ learning styles – Basis for providing adaptivity based on learning styles Slide 2

  3. Types of Student Modelling • Collaborative vs. Automatic – Collaborative: asking students directly for feedback – Automatic: infering students’ characteristics from their behaviour and actions • Static vs. Dynamic – Static: once from a particular amount of data – Dynamic: frequently updating the student model based on new data Slide 3

  4. Aim of Research • Recent research deals with automatic & static student modelling of learning styles (e.g., Cha et al. 2006, Garcia et al. 2007, Graf et al. 2008) • Focus of this paper is on automatic & dynamic student modelling of learning styles • Concept is based on the Felder-Silverman learning styles model but can also be applied for other learning style models with similar structure after few revisions Slide 4

  5. Concept for Dynamic Student Modelling • We assume that certain amount of data is available (in the beginning very few) and that data are frequently added • A main issue is to frequently check whether the new information about students’ behaviour hints for revising the information stored in the student model • Two objectives: • The currently stored learning style should reflect the current learning style of students as good as possible  updating as soon as a revision can be done • Considering deviations of students’ behaviour and having as less as possible revisions which are then taken back shortly afterwards Slide 5

  6. More graphically … 1 1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 Learnign style Learning style 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 identified 0.4 0.4 stored 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Data points Data points Slide 6

  7. Concept for Dynamic Student Modelling • Step 1: Learning styles (data points d t ) have to be calculated based on students’ behaviour in the course at particular points of time t • Step 2: In order to consider deviations in students’ behaviour, the calculation of the current learning style is based on the means of the last A data points. However, one single data point should not have enough influence to force a revision Slide 7

  8. Concept for Dynamic Student Modelling • Step 3: Make decision on whether the currently stored learning style should be revised – Difference between stored learning style and average learning style from current and past data – Difference between currently identified learning style (d t ) and previously identified learning style (d t-1 ) – Compare difference between previously identified learning style (d t-1 ) and stored learning style as well as the difference between currently identified learning styles (d t ) and stored learning style t ∑ t − ∑ d d i   i x − 1 < = = − + = − + ≥ − − − > If AND AND NOT THEN i t A 1 i t A 1 d d 2 x L L x d L d L   − − t t s s  t 1 s t s  A 2 A Slide 8

  9. Verification of the Approach • Using data from 75 students from a course about object oriented modelling at a university in Austria • 1. Experiment: What is the best parameter setting? Amount of data points included in the calculation process of learning styles ( A ) 2 3 4 5 1/22 0.521 0.563 0.588 0.602 Accepted differ- learning styles (x) lated and stored ence bet. calcu- 1/11 0.640 0.656 0.645 0.617 2/11 0.615 0.584 0.558 0.532 Slide 9

  10. Verification of the Approach 2. Experiment: Verification of composition of the formula for deciding whether a revision is necessary (Are all three conditions necessary?) x=1/11, A=3 only first condition 0.646 first two conditions 0.642 all three conditions 0.656 Slide 10

  11. Conclusions and Future Work • Developed a concept for automatic & dynamic student modelling of learning styles that revises the learning styles stored in the student model frequently • Revisions are necessary, when learning styles change and if dynamic student modelling is used for improving and fine-tuning the information in the student model • Verified the concept with data from a course with 75 students • Future work: – Implementing the concept in an adaptive learning system Slide 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend