Alternative LOS Methodologies Purpose The Broward Complete Streets - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

alternative los methodologies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Alternative LOS Methodologies Purpose The Broward Complete Streets - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Patrice Gillespie Smith, MCRP, MPPM Stewart Robertson, PE Anamarie Garces, MPH Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Urban Health Partnerships, Inc. Alternative LOS Methodologies Purpose The Broward Complete Streets Guidelines emphasize the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Patrice Gillespie Smith, MCRP, MPPM Anamarie Garces, MPH Urban Health Partnerships, Inc. Stewart Robertson, PE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Alternative LOS Methodologies

Purpose

 The Broward Complete Streets Guidelines emphasize the

limitations of the traditional level of service (LOS) tool

 Considers quality of service for only automobiles

 Identify a tool that:

 Is appropriate for Broward County  Reflects all users

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Alternative LOS Methodologies

 2009 FDOT Q/LOS Handbook

 LOS evaluated for Auto, Bike, Ped, and Transit  Implemented by LOSPLAN software program

 NCHRP Report 616 – Multimodal Level of

Service Analysis for Urban Streets

 LOS evaluated for Auto, Bike, Ped, and Transit  Implemented by CompleteStreetLOS software

program

 Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010)

 LOS evaluated for Auto, Bike, Ped, and Transit  Implemented by HCS 2010 software program

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tools and Software Packages

 LOSPLAN

 Uses adopted models from

2009 FDOT Q/LOS Handbook

 LOS given for Auto, Bike,

Ped, and Transit

 Can show interaction

between modes

 Free download

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Tools and Software Packages

 HCS 2010

 Uses HCM 2010

models

 LOS given for Auto,

Bike, Ped, and Transit

 Can show interaction

between modes

 $2000 per license

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tools and Software Packages

 CompleteStreetsLOS

 Uses NHCRP 616 models  LOS given for Auto,

Bike, Ped, and Transit

 Can show interaction

between modes

 $1850 per license

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tools and Software Packages

 MMLOS Toolkit

 Includes applicability, advantages, shortcomings, and data/software

requirements for 16 LOS methods

 Not an actual computing tool

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tools and Software Packages

 HPE’s Walkability Index

 Walkability score sheet used

to calculate pedestrian score and LOS

 Based on ten walkability

criteria relating to the roadway’s geometry, motor vehicle speeds, land use mix, pedestrian features, etc.

 Does not assess other modes  Free download of score

sheet

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tools and Software Packages

 Walk Score

 Walkability score

assigned bases on distance to amenities

 Does not assess

  • ther modes

 Free location score

search online or through app

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Tools and Software Packages

 WalkoBot by Walkonomics

 Uses public data about a street’s

features to assess walkability on a score of 0-5 stars

 Based on 8 key factors including

safety, ease of crossing the street, quality of sidewalks, aesthetic quality, and crime rates

 Does not assess other modes  Free location score search online

  • r through app

 Results not available for

locations within Broward County

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Proposed Identified Tool

LOSPLAN 2012

 Provides LOS grades for the four main modes of

transportation

 Demonstrates the interaction between the four modes  Shows the effects of different design features on each mode  Utilizes the accepted State of Florida methodologies  Includes updated 2010 HCM automobile methodology  Available free of charge

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Next Steps

 Two demonstration projects on two corridors  Using proposed identified tool: LOSPLAN 2012

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Thank you for assisting us in Transforming Our Community’s Health (TOUCH)!

www.browardcompletestreets.org

patrice@urbanhs.com

This publication was supported by the Cooperative Agreement Award Number U58DP003661-01 from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention.