ALRO ALROSA SA
In Investor stor Present sentation ation
13 December mber 2018 8
ALRO ALROSA SA In Investor stor Present sentation ation 13 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ALRO ALROSA SA In Investor stor Present sentation ation 13 December mber 2018 8 DISCLAIMER The below applies to the presentation (the Presentation) following this important notice, and you For notes: es: are therefore advised to
In Investor stor Present sentation ation
13 December mber 2018 8
DISCLAIMER
The below applies to the presentation (the “Presentation”) following this important notice, and you are therefore advised to read this important notice carefully before reading, accessing or making anyFor notes: es:
DIAMOND INDUSTRY – KEY DEMAND DRIVERS
personal luxury (annual growth 5%)
income Personal luxury market growth by region 2018E
260 1,171 495 190 71 50 41 41 23 Personal luxury Lux cars Hospitality Fine wines Fine food Fine art Designer furniture Jets & yachts Total 2018EGlobal luxury market breakdown in 2018E € bn
Source: Bain’s luxury goods worldwide market study (November 2018) Source: Company’s estimates, World Bank statistics 3% 5% 6% 9% 20% 0% Europe Americas Japan Rest of Asia China RoW Note: trends at constant exchange rates Source: Bain’s luxury goods worldwide market study (November 2018)Diamond jewelry sales are highly correlated with US’ GDP
Indexed diamond jewelry sales vs indexed US’ GDP (2011 = 100)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Indexed jewelery sales Indexed US' GDP 100Market size 32% 31% 8% 15% 9% 5%
+6% +5% % 2017-2018E growth at constant exchange ratesGLOBAL DIAMOND JEWELLERY MARKET GROWS BY 4%
4 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 4% 7% 4% 4% 4% US India China Other Total Base case scenario Optimistic scenariodemand in DM, and dynamic growth in EMs
enjoyed even stronger demand amid better consumer sentiment and a favorable macro environment World diamond jewellery sales grew by 4% annually
Diamond jewelry market, $ bn
Outlook for world diamond jewellery demand
CAGR 2016-2030F
Source: Company’s estimateslong-term are:
stage of adoption of bridal rings gifts tradition
class
MARKETING SPENDING OF THE INDUSTRY
5producers in 2015 supports the development of the diamond sector through promotion of reputation of diamonds
launched in the US (2016) and in India (2017)
and India)
for themselves is called “From Me, To Me”, launched in mid-September 2018
5 10 60 60 2016 2017 2018 Source: Company’s dataMarketing budget of the industry association growth
$ m
53% 6% 20% 21%India (from 2017) Asia Pacific ex. Japan (China from 2018) RoW
DPA marketing campaigns by region
% represents share of a region in global jewelry consumption
ROUGH DIAMOND PRICES*
6(high share of large stones in mix), and price index (like-for-like mix) growth of 5.2% YTD
price drivers (demonetization reform in India, Chinese policies) were accommodated by the market
price changeAverage realized price for ALROSA’s gem-quality rough diamonds
$/ct
Rough diamond price index is 5.2% in 9M’18 on lower stocks and continued demand growth
+21% +46% (20%) 0% +7% (14%) 0% +2% +2% +2% (1%) (1%) +2% +3% +1% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Source: ALROSA’s rough diamond price index under long-term agreement and spot sales Note: * ALORSA rough diamond prices and index of LFL mixALROSA’s gem-quality rough diamond prices are correlated with US’ GDP
Indexed ALROSA’s LFL diamond prices vs indexed US’ GDP (end of 2012 = 100)
EndGLOBAL ROUGH DIAMOND OUTPUT AND SALES
7 28% 28% 29% 32% 31% 28% 29% ~15 ~15 ~15 ~16 ~12 ~15 ~15 ~16 9.0 8.2 8.6 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 9M 2016 9M 2017 9M 2018 ALROSA Others9M 2018 on lower production from ALROSA (~3 m cts down y-o-y)
stronger prices Rough diamond sales demonstrates moderate recovery
$ bn
Output volumes
m ct
Sources: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018”, Company’s estimates 28% 28% 29% 32% 31% 28% 29% 26% 25% 128 123 128 130 125 127 126 151 147 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E ALROSA Other 27 % 25 % 111 108 9М 2017 9М 2018 Sources: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018”, Company’s estimatesMIDSTREAM STOCKS ARE BELOW 5Y AVERAGE
8destocking of small stones
rough in the midstream suggests no inventory overhang in the system Midstream rough and polished diamond inventories
$ bn
Note: data based on ALROSA’ and other diamond producers results with a market share totalling c. 74% in 2015-2017 41.5 39.5 41.3 42.6 40.3 41.0 41.8 40.1 Q4 2014 Q4 2015 Q4 2016 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018India polished diamond exports value (monthly)
$ m
Source: industry data, Morgan Stanley research 500 1 000 1 500 2 000 2 500 3 000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5-Yr Range 5-Yr Average 2018 2017LONG TERM SUPPLY TURNS NEGATIVE BY 2020
9 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 International (ALROSA) Orapa (De Beers) Nyurbinskaya (ALROSA) Catoca (ALROSA/Endiama/LLI Holding) Argyle (Rio Tinto) Ekati (DDC) Diavik (Rio Tinto/DDC) Jwaneng (De Beers) Venetia (De Beers) Jubilee (ALROSA) Udachnaya (ALROSA)products (brown diamonds with 80% price discount to standard gem- quality) ~70% of global rough diamond output controlled by BIG-3
m cts
Exploration periods of deposits
Sources: Company’s analysis, Kimberley Process statistics ALROSA 26% 22% De Beers 14% Rio Tinto Other 23% 7% DDC 5% Catoca Petra Diamonds 3% 151 m cts ~8 years – average exploration 80 115 150 150 125 2014 2017 2020F 2023F 2027F 2030F Gahcho Kue Grib Renard Argyle (brown color diamonds, average price is c. 20 $/ct ) Diavik Mir Source: diamond mining companies’ forecastWorld diamond production forecast
m cts
ABOUT ALROSA
10foundation for shareholder returns Financial results summary
$ bn
Loans and borrowings
$ m
Dividend payments
$ m
* FCF = operating cash flow less capex 277 317 204 275 1,145 666* 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.09* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 USD per share * based on FX rate as of 30.09.2018 3.7 4.6 4.6 3.9 1.9 2.6 2.2 2.1 0.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 52% 56% 47% 55% 2015 2016 2017 9M 2018 Revenue EBITDA Free cash flow EBITDA margin 3,951 3,119 2,781 1,374 1,494 559 1.8 1.2 1.8 0.9 0.9 0.5 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 30.09.2018 Net debt Net debt / EBITDA (USD)ALROSA: ASSETS GEOGRAPHY
11 Note: the amount of total resources, including reserves (according to JORC) are as of July 1, 2016Share of division in 2017 diamond production Geography of production assets
1,030 m ct
Total resources, including reserves653 m ct
Total reserves Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Arkhangelsk Region Russian Federation 93% 7% Angola ALROSA owns 32.8% of Catoca Ltd (Angola) Open-pit mining from 9 mines in 2017 Underground mining from 4 mines in 2017 Alluvial mining from alluvial deposits in 201753% 27% 20% Severalmaz
Arkhangelskaya pipe Karpinskogo-1 pipe7% 2.6
m ctAikhal Division
Aikhal UG mine Jubilee pipe Komsomolskaya pipe13.0
m ctNyurba Division
Nyurbinskaya pipe Botuobinskaya pipe Alluvial deposits7.7
m ct18% Mirny Division
International UG mine Alluvial deposits Mir UG mine*7.2
m ctUdachny Division
Udachny UG mine Zarnitsa pipe Zapolyarnaya Pipe (Verkhne-Munskoye deposit) Alluvial deposits3.8
m ctAlmazy Anabara & Nizhne-Lenskoye
Alluvial deposits5.2
m ct * production suspended in August 2017 as a result of the accident (incl. 2.8 mln ct from Mir pipe)33% 19% 10% 13%
HIGHEST QUALITY ASSETS
12 653 434 132 95 48 377 inferred resources ALROSA Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 36% 19% 16% 24% 47% 13% 25% 19% ALROSA Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 2014 2015 2016 2017 H1 2018cost/quality balance
realized price of gem-quality rough diamond is 160 $/ct
while grades at underground are higher by over 3x ALROSA operates largest reserves with long life of mine
m cts
ALROSA sustainably tops the ranks as one of the most profitable miner
EBIT margin, %
High profitability margin maintained even at the bottom of the cycle
$/ct
Total 2017 diamond production was 39.6 m ct Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018” Open-pit mines Alluvials 28 39 44 78 $180 $100 $60 $30 5Y av. realized price of gem-quality rough diamonds $176/ct $160/ct $136/ct max min Source: JORC as of 01 July 2016 (Micon), Company’s estimates 42 Aikhal UG mine International UG mine Udachny UG mine 2.5 21.1 3.7 8.0 1.6LOW COST PRODUCTION PLATFORM WITH MODERATE GROWTH
13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7delivering strong diamonds yields
volumes
pa (by 2019)
Range of average mined diamond grade (2017)
ct/t
8.0 21.1 1.6 2.5 3.7 Udachny UG mine 2017 diamond production 1.19 1.87 5.83 6.89 ~1 ct/t – average gradeALROSA’s diamond production to stabilize at 37-38 m carats
m ct
25.1 23.9 24.3 21.5 22.3 21.0 20.3 2.2 1.5 2.2 3.2 2.8 9.0 9.1 9.4 9.2 10.2 8.2 5.9 0.6 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.6 3.3 3.8 0.1 0.4 1.3 1.6 3.9 5.7 0.1 0.2 1.8 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018F 2019F Verkhne-Munskoye Udachny UG mine Severalmaz Jubilee pipe Mir UG mine (stopped from Aug'17) Other Note: detailed ALROSA’s production plan is disclosed in the Appendix (slide 28)36.9 36.2 38.3 37.4 39.6 36.6 ~37.5 – 38 Total
0.42 Alluvials International UG mine Aikhal UG mine Open-pit minesIMPROVED QUALITY OF SALES WITH 70% OF LONG TERM CLIENT BASE
ALROSA’s rough diamond sales channel breakdown
18% 64% 71% ~70% 72% 17% 12% 10-20% 10% 19% 17% 10-20% 2006-2008 2012-2014 2015-2016 2020F Tenders Spot sales Long-term contractsand price dynamic, e.g.:
sales and predictable prices during volatility on diamond market
Sorting of rough diamonds
26 sizes 16 shapes 5 clarity categories 8,013 classification positions
ALROSA’s geography of sales based on clients legal residences
number of long-term clients in 2018 49% 51% 17% 16% 11% 10% 10% 10% 6% 7% 2016 2017 Other China UAE Russia Israel India Belgium 4% 4% 3% 2% 3 634 colors
DIAMOND SALES STRUCTURE
15pf sales value
terms and c. 60% in value terms 2017 rough diamond sales structure by size and weight group
Note: excluding the foreign network of ALROSA, 1 GR = ~0,25 ctAllocation of rough diamond by quality
~30% ~2% ~70% ~98%
By volume (carats) By value (USD) Gem quality diamonds (>0.03 CT) Non-gem quality diamonds (<0.03 CT) 0.4% 8.8% 4.9% 36.9% 5.5% 14.0% 4.0% 5.4% 80.7% 34,8% 4.5% 0.1% By volume (carats) By value (USD) Powder less 3 GR (less ~0.75 CT) 3 GR (~0.75 CT) 4-6 GR (~1-1.5 CT) +1.8 CT +10.8 CTQ3 SALES
17 15 14 18 18 12 11 16 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018Q3 2018 Sales
m carats due to a drop in sales of small-size diamonds
sales 9M 2018 Sales
Diamond sales
m cts
Increase in diamond sales by value, 9M 2018
$ m
ALROSA's diamond inventories
m cts
Q3 OUTPUT
18q (up 10% y-o-y) to 17.2 m tonnes, due to a seasonal return to production at alluvial deposits (up 7.9 m tonnes)
tonne due to a seasonal return to production at alluvial deposits and a lower diamond grade at Nyurbinskaya pipe
to seasonal growth of production at alluvial deposits by 3.5 m carats. On top of that, the Nyurba Division’s deposits increased ore processing, and recently launched Udachny underground mine and Severalmaz gradually ramped up their production to design capacity Ore and sands processing
m tonnes
Diamond production
m cts
6.1 10.1 15.7 7.3 5.7 10.1 17.2 31.9 33.0 1.46 1.03 0.65 1.39 1.30 0.84 0.61 0.93 0.80 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Grade, carat/tonne 5.8 5.2 3.5 6.6 5.3 4.1 3.8 14.5 13.1 2.9 3.3 3.1 2.0 2.1 7.5 5.1 1.9 5.4 2,3 5,8 7.6 8.2 8.9 10.4 10.3 10.1 7.4 8.5 10.5 29.5 26.4 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Alluvials Underground Open pit 50% 19% 31% 36% 9% 55% Share, % Share, %KEY FINANCIALS IN Q3 & 9M
19 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.1 3.7 3.9 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 1.7 2.1 43% 52% 46% 44% 50% 58% 57% 47% 54% Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Revenue EBITDA EBITDA marginQ3 2018:
decreased (down 26% q-o-q)
better mix and cost control
9M 2018:
sales mix, offsetting a 9% drop in sales (incl. 12% of gem-quality)
and lower production costs
Superior profitability
$ bn
Strong Free Cash Flow generation
$ m
603 264 192 201 718 344 363 1,059 1,425 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Free Cash Flow = Operating Cash Flow minus Capex1.34 1.17 1.33 1.23 1.18 1.39 1.28 1.26
Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9M 2017 9M 2018COSTS DYNAMICS & STRUCTURE
* Costs – production costs + selling, general and administrative expenses + other operating income and expensesdecreased volume of run-of-mine ore
Key drivers:
headcount
and prices and mix changes (RUB1.1 bn of impact) and sale of gas assets (RUB1.2 bn of impact)
RUB1.4 bn: reduced exploration costs due to exploration restructuring (RUB0.6 bn of impact) and sale of gas assets
Division’ expenses and transfer of Almazy Anabara’ expenses to Q4 2018
administrative payroll
Per unit costs
RUB '000 / cu m
Total operating costs
RUB bn
20 32.5 30.5 9.3 10.2 9.5 8.5 7.3 7.5 11.0 11.1 10.5 10.7 11.1 10.7 16.7 14.9 6.5 5.2114.5 109.2
9M 2017 9M 2018 Exploration costs Mineral Extraction Tax (MET) SG&A expenses Movement of diamond inventory, ore and sands Other Services and transportation Materials costs Fuel and energy Wages, salaries and other staff costs (5%) Non-production costs Production costsQ3 PROFITABILITY
21Q3 2018 EBITDA declined to RUB40.0 bn (down 3% q-o-q) driven by:
diamonds
9M EBITDA was up by 29% to RUB129.1 bn driven by:
diamonds (down 12%)
Q3 EBITDA – key drivers
RUB bn
9M EBITDA – key drivers
RUB bn
Note: “Other” mainly includes changes in diamond and ore inventories, lower tariffs and higher electricity subsidies41.3 40.0 9.1 1.5 (17.5) 3.7 0.3 1.5
EBITDA Q2 2018 Сhanges in sales mix Сhanges in pricing Changes in sales volume Rouble devaluation Payroll reduction Other* EBITDA Q3 2018100.0 129.1 34.7 4.9 (21.8) 8.9 1.3 1.2
EBITDA 9М 2017 Сhanges in the sales mix Сhanges in pricing Changes in sales volume Rouble devaluation Payroll reduction Other* EBITDA 9М 2018 Note: “Other” mainly includes changes in diamond and ore inventoriesCAPEX TO STABILIZE AT BELOW RUB30 bn
22expansion capex (up RUB1.6 bn):
capex cycle peaked in 2018 Capex
RUB bn
Capex to stabilize
RUB bn
26.5 25.6 25.7 23.4 20.5 18.1 5.1 2.6 1.5 0.2 6.6 7.9 6.5 5.1 2.7 1.7 0.5 3.3 3.7 8.3 38.2 36.1 34.2 31.8 26.9 28.3 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E Verkhne- Munskoye Udachny mine Severalmaz Other85.7 106.4 129.1 (20.8) (3.3) (25.0) 5.7
40 21 18 20 46 28 32 80 106 6 6 7 9 5 7 9 18 21 35 16 12 12 41 21 24 62 86 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Operating cash flow Capital investments Free cash flow 23Free cash flow bridge
RUB bn EBITDA Changes in net working capital* Income tax Other Operating cash flow Capex Free cash flow
Operating cash flow and capex
RUB bn 23.6 32.4 40.0 (8.8) (0.8) (5.8) (1.0)
9M 2018 Q3 2018
Notes: * Changes in working capital include change in insurance reimbursement (+RUB6.3 bn in Q3 and +RUB7.6 bn in 9M) “Other” mainly includes pension plan contribution and FXQ3 FREE CASH FLOW DRIVERS
dividends of RUB38.6 bn payment
year)
Debt is down on deleveraging efforts and strong FCF generation
$ m
Strong liquidity position
$ m
4,217 3,496 3,057 2,344 1,621 1,312 3,951 3,119 2,781 1,374 1,494 559 1.9x 1.9x 1.7x 0.5x 0.7x 0.2x 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 30.09.2018 Total debt Net debt Net debt / EBITDA (RUB), x timesDebt repayment schedule
$ m
343 954 6 6 2 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Eurobonds Bank loans753 3,121 3,874
30.09.20189.8 10.6 13.1 12.5 10.4 4.2
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 9M 2018Changes in interest on loans and borrowings
RUB bn
Credit lines Cash and equivalentsLEVERAGE REMAINS BELOW TARGETED RANGE OF 0.5X TO 1.0X
1.0x 0.5x
NEW DIVIDEND POLICY
25 50% 35% 50% 50% 50% 75% 70% 26% 37% 59% 52% 70% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 Minimum level of dividends based on IFRS net income (new dividend policy) Payment ratio based on IFRS net income Payment ratio based on FCFdividend policy:
❶ Net debt / EBITDA < 0.0 – over 100% FCF ❷ Net debt / EBITDA: 0.0–1.0 – 70–100% FCF ❸ Net debt / EBITDA: 1.0–1.5 – 50–70% FCF
cash flow) Dividend pay-out ratios Dividend payment
$ m
277 317 204 275 1,145 666* 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.09* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 USD per share * based on FX rate as of 30.09.2018OUTLOOK
26Market outlook
Operating performance
37 (24) 6 86 (0.3) 13 38 4 2 10 (30) (62)
Net debt bridge
RUB bn
Drivers:
proceeds from disposals (RUB30 bn) to pay-down debt
to-date (2.1% of the authorised capital)
Net debt as at 31 December 2017 Free cash flow in H1 2018 Sale of gas assets Acquisition of quasi- treasury shares Other Net debt as at 30 June 2018 Free cash flow in Q3 2018 Acquisition of quasi- treasury shares Dividends paid Purchase of shares of ALROSA-Nyurba Other Net debt as at 30 September 2018
NET DEBT CHANGE
natural hedge against FX risks
exchange rate by +/- 1 RUB/USD leads to the following change in metrics:
Financial metrics breakdown by currency (9M 2018)
% of metric's total
93% 16% 26% 76% 94% 7% 84% 74% 23% 6% Revenue Cost of sales Capex Cash and cash equivalents Total debt RUB USDFX RATE
LAB-GROWN ROUGH DIAMONDS / SYNTHETICS
30Global production
m ct
~7K-10K ~2-4
Lab-grown rough diamonds Gem-quality diamonds Industrial diamonds~14 ~0.2-0.5
Natural diamonds Artificial diamondsgrowing crystals of diamond at high temperature (~1500
0C) andpressure (~50-70K atm.), diamonds are largely used in construction industry for abrasive qualities
depositing diamond from an ionized hydrocarbon gas atmosphere on a substrate heated to 600-700 0C by means of microwave radiation, stones are mostly used in high-tech, medical and jewelry manufacturing industries
diamond production and c. 3% of world rough diamond sales
~$4.0K ~$1.6K-$2.0K ~$0.3-$0.5
2008 … 2013 … 2018 Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018” Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018”Global sales
$ bn
Production cost of lab-grown rough diamond is gradually declining
$/ct G VS polished diamond
LAB-GROWN ROUGH DIAMONDS: FIVE FACTS
31Price of 1 carat polished diamond: natural VS synthetic
Round, VS clarity, F-H color
1. Lab-grown diamonds have essentially the same physical and chemical characteristics as natural diamonds, but they are not identical – they are easily detected since both HPHT and CVD methods leave growth marks and telltale signs that are distinctive of an artificially produced diamond 2. Lab-grown diamonds are produced in a matter of weeks, primarily in factories situated outside of the US, mostly in China, India and Singapore – the origin of the product is almost never disclosed 3. Retail prices continue to erode as the costs of production decline 4. The carbon emissions for a 1 carat synthetic diamond are similar to, and sometimes greater than, those for an equivalent natural diamond: the carbon emission per 1 polished carat of synthetic diamond produced in Singapore using the CVD is approximately 40% higher than for natural polished diamonds 5. 68% of US consumers believe that a lab-grown diamond is not a “real diamond”
Source: Paul Ziminskiy report “2018: The Year of the Lab-created Diamond” Source: Diamond Producers Association analysisCarbon emission CO2
Note: HPHT – High pressure, high temperature; CVD – Chemical Vapor Deposition Source: Diamond Producers Association materials $0,000 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Now Natural diamond prices Lab-grown diamond prices De Beer's Lightbox lab-grownd diamond price~40% greater carbon emission
Natural diamonds Lab-grown diamonds (CVD produced in Singapore) Mostly arising from the trucks use Most of manufacturers use electricity generated by fossil fuelALROSA’S PRODUCTION FORECAST
32 Type of mining Grade, ct/t Price per carat, $ Cash costs per carat, $ Diamond production forecast, ‘000 ct 2017 2017 2018F 2019F 2020F Aikhal Division Jubilee pipeKEY INVESTMENT PROJECTS
33Udachny underground mine Verkhne-Munskoe deposit (open pit mining) Mayskaya pipe (open pit mining) Production start 2014 2018 2025 Expected design capacity 2020 2019 2027 Expected life of mine 2040 2042 2039 Investment start date 2002 2015 2018 Total capex, RUB bn 63.9 63.0 14.4 Total capex invested, RUB bn 52.8 (81%) 16.2 (26%) 0.03 (0.2%) Target ore output, m tonnes pa 4.0 3.0 0.3 Diamond production, m carats pa 4.9 (2019F) 1.8 (2019F) 0.8 (2027F) Average grade, carats per tonne 1.52 (2019F) 0.6 (2019F) 2.87 (2027F) Total resources, m carats 212.6 38.4 13.9 Verkhne-Munskoe deposit Udachnaya pipe
ROUGH DIAMOND PRODUCTION IS DOMINATED BY FEW MINING COMPANIES WITH THE HIGHEST MARGINS ACROSS DIAMOND PIPELINE, WHERE ALROSA BENEFITS FROM LEADING MARKET SHARE OF 26%
34Diamond pipeline structure Major global diamond producers
Share in global production
Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018” 22‒24% 1‒3% 2‒4% 3‒11% 1‒3% Average operating margins Players Top 5 players control ~ 70%OUR PEOPLE
staff – according to PWC, ALROSA is a leader in this indicator among industry’s companies
where the main production facilities are located
Source: Company’s dataAge groups as of 2017
% of the total headcount
57% 24% 19%30-50 years > 50 years < 30 years
Total headcount as of the end of the year
000’ people
62% 62% 62% 63% 63% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37%40.3 40.7 40.2 37.2 36.4
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Women Men 87% 4% 4% 5%Yakutia Moscow Arkhangelsk Other
Territorial distribution of staff
% of the total headcount
35HEALTH AND SAFETY
stable at level RUB 39,000 since 2015 and totals RUB 1.1-1.4 bn per year
August which injured 13 miners
structure in H&S functions – the safety services were withdrawn from the supervision of divisions’ chief engineers and organized to report to Managing Director.
meetings to define the strategy)
to strategy implementation)
review any violations and develop remedial measures)
Source: Company’s dataIndependent management structure to insure industrial safety Health and safety costs
000’ RUB per 1 person 29.9 33.3 39.3 38.9 39.1 0.48 0.21 0.45 0.38 0.94
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LTIFRCEO
Deputy CEO for H&S Managing Director H&S Department Central Committee Managing Director’s Committee Division Committee Divisions’ directors H&S Services
Note: (1) number of lost time injuries per 1 m hours worked 36ENVIRONMENT AND ESG RATINGS
374.4 bn
mining companies in Russia”
reporting according to Transparency International-Russia research
use
Source: Company’s dataAre of annually disturbed land
ha
Financing of environmental activities
RUB bn 6.6 5.9 6.0 5.5 4.4
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017CO2 emissions
000’ t 1,414 1,080 571
2015 2016 2017530 460 465
2015 2016 2017ENERGY RESOURCES
38target level – 95%
meanwhile diamond production increased by 6% y-o-y
to excluding of the Heat and power supply company, which was removed from PJSC “ALROSA” structure starting from 01.01.2017 to subsidiary PTWS LLC
Note: 2017 numbers does not include the Heat and power supply company, which was removed from PJSC “ALROSA” structure starting from 01.01.2017 and became its subsidiary PTWS LLC Source: Company’s dataPer unit energy consumption
GJ/carat
Share of renewable energy consumption Water intake (production)
m m3 0.323 0.351 0.327
2015 2016 201712.5 11.3 4.9
2015 2016 201787%
Renewable energy consumption Other
GOVERNANCE
39dynamics
schemes (stock option program is one of the initiatives)
Source: Russian Institute of Directors, Company’s dataCorporate governance rating Supervisory Board composition
Number of members
7+ 7+ 7++ 7++ 8
2015 2016 2017 2018 Oct-2018 2 3 5 4 4 12 11 9 9 1015 15 15 15 15
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Other Executive directors Independent directorsMANAGEMENT TEAM IS FULLY COMMITTED TO DELIVER ON ALROSA’S DEVELOPMENT PLANS
40Operational Team Executive Team
CEO Sergey Ivanov Chief Executive OfficerSUPERVISORY BOARD OVERVIEW (1/2)
41 2 1 6 3 5 7 8 4SUPERVISORY BOARD OVERVIEW (2/2)
42 Evgenia Grigorieva Minister of Property and Land Relations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Sergey Ivanov Chief Executive Officer of ALROSA Dmitry Konov Member of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Management Board at SIBUR Holding Galina Makarova Independent director of the Supervisory Board, ALROSA Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nominated by: the Russian Federation Nominated by: the Russian Federation as an independent director Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) as an independent director Previously held positions include:DIAMOND DISCOVERIES
43 Source: Company’s estimatesDiscovery-to-production periods
Years Discovery and development of new kimberlite pipes are much more challenging now
1954-1956 1960 1969 1974-1975 1994 1996 2006 I II III Aikhal International Jubilee Botuobinskaya Nyurbinskaya Mayskaya Host rocks Sandstones Kimberlite pipes 60 m 9 m 80 m 70 m Year of discovery 9 7 6 6 6 4 4 Diavik Ekati Argyle Nyurbinskaya Catoca Finsch Orapa Development process Development process + dewateringdiscoveries and significant time required to ramp-up production
diamond mine
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF UNDERGROUND MINING IS FOSTERED BY BLOCK CAVING MINING METHOD
44 Backfilled production level Next production levelTraditional cut-and-fill mining
Mir underground mine International underground mine Aikhal underground mine Next production level Production levelBlock caving method
Udachny underground mineCut-and-fill mining method at Udachny underground mine would have required more than 330 thousand tons of cement a year (~ RUB 1 bn in current prices), which is an equivalent of total cement output in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
RESOURCES INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES ACCORDING TO JORC CODE AS OF JULY 1, 2016 (1/2)
45 Deposit Resource category Tonnage ('000 t) Resource grade (cpt) Contained diamonds ('000 cts) Udachny division Udachnaya Pipe Measured 13,646 1.16 15,812 Indicated 83,524 1.53 127,801 Inferred 53,991 1.28 68,978 Zarnitsa Pipe Indicated 27,131 0.25 6,858 Verkhne-Munskoe Deposit Indicated 46,914 0.65 30,616 Inferred 17,168 0.57 9,857 Alluvial deposits Indicated 2,447 0.49 599 Inferred 1,176 0.63 373 Aikhal division Jubilee Pipe Measured 18,420 0.86 15,815 Indicated 88,138 0.74 65,401 Inferred 57,821 0.63 36,352 Aikhal Pipe Measured 4,361 4.97 21,666 Indicated 690 3.14 2,168 Inferred 1,716 4.06 6,966 Komsomolskaya Pipe Indicated 3,943 0.38 1,494 Zaria Pipe Indicated 12,392 0.28 3,515 Inferred 27,347 0.13 3,583 Mirny division Mir Pipe Measured 20,104 3.71 74,521 Indicated 16,538 3.36 55,525 Inferred 1,072 3.11 3,339 International Pipe Measured 1,448 8.21 11,888 Indicated 3,544 8.71 30,848 Alluvial deposits Measured 17,509 0.39 3,379 Indicated 22,273 0.21 2,322 Inferred 440 0.40 88 Solur-Vostochnaya placer Indicated 5,982 1.97 5,903 Inferred 959 1.80 865RESOURCES INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES ACCORDING TO JORC CODE AS OF JULY 1, 2016 (2/2)
46 Deposit Resource category Tonnage ('000 t) Resource grade (cpt) Contained diamonds ('000 cts) Nyurba division Nyurbinskaya Pipe Measured 1,432 4.12 5,905 Indicated 7,095 4.32 30,623 Inferred 1,217 5.56 6,767 Botuobinskaya Pipe Measured 3,172 5.30 16,827 Indicated 10,139 5.90 59,814 Inferred 2,762 5.71 15,778 Maiskoye Kimberlite Body Indicated 1,231 6.03 7,426 Inferred 1,768 2.99 5,278 Alluvial deposits Measured 187 7.85 734 Indicated 6,897 4.67 16,094 Inferred 4,762 3.01 377 Lomonosov division (Severalmaz) Arkhangelskaya Pipe Measured 18,231 0.97 17,764 Indicated 29,689 1.08 32,184 Inferred 39,407 1.24 48,941 Karpinsky-1 Pipe Measured 6,971 1.08 7,501 Indicated 6,915 1.72 11,893 Inferred 8,615 1.16 9,993 Pionerskaya Pipe Indicated 58,330 0.47 27,530 Inferred 42,875 0.52 22,502 Lomonosov Pipe Indicated 32,523 0.50 16,230 Inferred 42,250 0.46 19,530 Almazy Anabara Indicated 38,160 1.33 25,373 Inferred 9,366 0.77 3,621 Nizhne-Lenskoye Indicated 10,793 0.57 3,075 Inferred 16,068 0.58 4,661 Total for ALROSA Group of Companies Measured 105,482 1.82 191,811 Indicated 515,285 1.09 563,291 Measured + Indicated 620,767 1.22 755,102 Inferred 330,779 0.83 274,629 Total 951,546 1.08 1,029,73124 Ozerk rkovska vskaya emb. Mosc scow 115184 Ru Russi sia
st@al @alrosa
.ru