ALRO ALROSA SA In Investor stor Present sentation ation 13 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

alro alrosa sa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ALRO ALROSA SA In Investor stor Present sentation ation 13 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ALRO ALROSA SA In Investor stor Present sentation ation 13 December mber 2018 8 DISCLAIMER The below applies to the presentation (the Presentation) following this important notice, and you For notes: es: are therefore advised to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ALRO ALROSA SA

In Investor stor Present sentation ation

13 December mber 2018 8

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DISCLAIMER

The below applies to the presentation (the “Presentation”) following this important notice, and you are therefore advised to read this important notice carefully before reading, accessing or making any
  • ther use of this Presentation.
This Presentation contains statements about future events and expectations that are forward-looking
  • statements. Any statement herein (including, without limitation, a statement regarding our financial
position, strategy, management plans and future objectives) that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement that involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause ALROSA’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
  • statements. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results, and
no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. The information and opinions contained in this document are provided as at the date hereof (unless indicated otherwise) and are subject to change without notice. ALROSA assumes no obligation to update, supplement or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in factors affecting these statements. This Presentation does not constitute or form part of and should not be construed as, an offer to sell
  • r issue or the solicitation of an offer to buy or acquire any securities in any jurisdiction or an
inducement to enter into any investment activity. The contents hereof should not be construed as investment, legal, tax, accounting or other advice, and investors and prospective investors in securities
  • f any issuer mentioned herein are required to make their own independent investigation and
appraisal of the business and financial condition of such issuer and the nature of the securities and consult their own advisers as to legal, financial, tax and other related matters. This Presentation has not been independently verified. No representation or warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this Presentation. None of ALROSA nor any of its shareholders, directors, officers or employees, affiliates, advisors, representatives nor any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this Presentation or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. No reliance may be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the information contained in this Presentation or on its completeness, accuracy or fairness. This Presentation is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity that is a citizen or resident or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would require any registration or licensing within such jurisdiction. Persons in whose possession this Presentation and/or such information may come are required to inform themselves thereof and to
  • bserve such restrictions.
Some figures included in this Presentation have been subject to rounding adjustments. By reviewing and/or attending this Presentation you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the foregoing.

For notes: es:

slide-3
SLIDE 3 3

DIAMOND INDUSTRY – KEY DEMAND DRIVERS

  • Luxury market valued at c. €1,200 bn is steadily growing
  • Jewelry demand comprises 7% of global luxury market, and 31% of the

personal luxury (annual growth 5%)

  • Most dynamic growth is concentrated in Asia incl. Japan and China
  • Diamond jewelry consumption is correlated with USA GDP and disposable

income Personal luxury market growth by region 2018E

260 1,171 495 190 71 50 41 41 23 Personal luxury Lux cars Hospitality Fine wines Fine food Fine art Designer furniture Jets & yachts Total 2018E

Global luxury market breakdown in 2018E € bn

Source: Bain’s luxury goods worldwide market study (November 2018) Source: Company’s estimates, World Bank statistics 3% 5% 6% 9% 20% 0% Europe Americas Japan Rest of Asia China RoW Note: trends at constant exchange rates Source: Bain’s luxury goods worldwide market study (November 2018)

Diamond jewelry sales are highly correlated with US’ GDP

Indexed diamond jewelry sales vs indexed US’ GDP (2011 = 100)

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Indexed jewelery sales Indexed US' GDP 100

Market size 32% 31% 8% 15% 9% 5%

+6% +5% % 2017-2018E growth at constant exchange rates
slide-4
SLIDE 4 62 69 76 78 81 79 79 83 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

GLOBAL DIAMOND JEWELLERY MARKET GROWS BY 4%

4 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 4% 7% 4% 4% 4% US India China Other Total Base case scenario Optimistic scenario
  • Since 2010 diamond jewellery demand increased on average by 4%
  • … reaching a 10-year high level in 2017 at +5% yoy driven by steady

demand in DM, and dynamic growth in EMs

  • H1’18 diamond jewelry in key markets (N.America and Asia-Pacific)

enjoyed even stronger demand amid better consumer sentiment and a favorable macro environment World diamond jewellery sales grew by 4% annually

Diamond jewelry market, $ bn

Outlook for world diamond jewellery demand

CAGR 2016-2030F

Source: Company’s estimates
  • N. America, Asia-Pacific
region and India ~ 80% Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2017” (December 2017)
  • US, India and China key drivers for diamond jewellery demand in the

long-term are:

  • USA (50% total market): continued real disposable income growth
  • China: economic growth and expansion of the Chinese middle class, early

stage of adoption of bridal rings gifts tradition

  • India: the ongoing expansion of bridal diamond jewellery and the middle

class

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MARKETING SPENDING OF THE INDUSTRY

5
  • Diamond Producers Association (DPA) formed by 7 major diamond

producers in 2015 supports the development of the diamond sector through promotion of reputation of diamonds

  • Marketing campaigns with a tagline “Real is Rare. Real is a Diamond”

launched in the US (2016) and in India (2017)

  • DPA’s activities include:
  • paid advertisement on TV, internet, cinema, social networks
  • promotion in social media by social influencers
  • participation in industry events
  • work with industry and non-industry organizations
  • market surveys and research
  • In 2018 DPA’s activities expanded into China (while continued in the US

and India)

  • New marketing campaign addressed to women who purchase diamonds

for themselves is called “From Me, To Me”, launched in mid-September 2018

5 10 60 60 2016 2017 2018 Source: Company’s data

Marketing budget of the industry association growth

$ m

53% 6% 20% 21%
  • N. America (USA from 2016)

India (from 2017) Asia Pacific ex. Japan (China from 2018) RoW

DPA marketing campaigns by region

% represents share of a region in global jewelry consumption

slide-6
SLIDE 6 123 197 194 175 172 170 149 136 167 117 138 169 139 154 164 199 +60% (2%) (10%) (2%) (1%) (12%) (9%) +23% (21%) +18% 22% (18%) +11% +6% +21% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 9M 2018 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018

ROUGH DIAMOND PRICES*

6
  • 2018 recovery in average realized prices driven by better sales mix

(high share of large stones in mix), and price index (like-for-like mix) growth of 5.2% YTD

  • 9M 2018 prices of $167/ct a recovery to its 5Y average, as negative

price drivers (demonetization reform in India, Chinese policies) were accommodated by the market

price change

Average realized price for ALROSA’s gem-quality rough diamonds

$/ct

Rough diamond price index is 5.2% in 9M’18 on lower stocks and continued demand growth

+21% +46% (20%) 0% +7% (14%) 0% +2% +2% +2% (1%) (1%) +2% +3% +1% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Source: ALROSA’s rough diamond price index under long-term agreement and spot sales Note: * ALORSA rough diamond prices and index of LFL mix

ALROSA’s gem-quality rough diamond prices are correlated with US’ GDP

Indexed ALROSA’s LFL diamond prices vs indexed US’ GDP (end of 2012 = 100)

End
  • f 2012
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q3 2018 Indexed US' GDP Indexed ALROSA's prices 100 Chinese policies effect
slide-7
SLIDE 7

GLOBAL ROUGH DIAMOND OUTPUT AND SALES

7 28% 28% 29% 32% 31% 28% 29% ~15 ~15 ~15 ~16 ~12 ~15 ~15 ~16 9.0 8.2 8.6 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 9M 2016 9M 2017 9M 2018 ALROSA Others
  • Global output reached its peak levels in 2017, with a 3% decrease in

9M 2018 on lower production from ALROSA (~3 m cts down y-o-y)

  • Rough diamond sales follow trend of demand for diamond jewellery
  • 9M global diamond sales in USD increased 4% on demand recovery and

stronger prices Rough diamond sales demonstrates moderate recovery

$ bn

Output volumes

m ct

Sources: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018”, Company’s estimates 28% 28% 29% 32% 31% 28% 29% 26% 25% 128 123 128 130 125 127 126 151 147 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E ALROSA Other 27 % 25 % 111 108 9М 2017 9М 2018 Sources: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018”, Company’s estimates
slide-8
SLIDE 8

MIDSTREAM STOCKS ARE BELOW 5Y AVERAGE

8
  • Q3 midstream inventories dropped to a multi-year lows mainly on

destocking of small stones

  • Indian imports of rough were seasonally down; no excessive buying of

rough in the midstream suggests no inventory overhang in the system Midstream rough and polished diamond inventories

$ bn

Note: data based on ALROSA’ and other diamond producers results with a market share totalling c. 74% in 2015-2017 41.5 39.5 41.3 42.6 40.3 41.0 41.8 40.1 Q4 2014 Q4 2015 Q4 2016 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018

India polished diamond exports value (monthly)

$ m

Source: industry data, Morgan Stanley research 500 1 000 1 500 2 000 2 500 3 000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5-Yr Range 5-Yr Average 2018 2017
slide-9
SLIDE 9

LONG TERM SUPPLY TURNS NEGATIVE BY 2020

9 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 International (ALROSA) Orapa (De Beers) Nyurbinskaya (ALROSA) Catoca (ALROSA/Endiama/LLI Holding) Argyle (Rio Tinto) Ekati (DDC) Diavik (Rio Tinto/DDC) Jwaneng (De Beers) Venetia (De Beers) Jubilee (ALROSA) Udachnaya (ALROSA)
  • Supply is well consolidated with BIG-3 controlling 2/3 of global supply
  • Supply is quickly reacting to the demand deterioration
  • Lack of new “quick-to-develop” deposits and mines depletion
  • Significant decrease in supply is expected by 2020,
  • … with limited impact on the market due to sub-par quality of the

products (brown diamonds with 80% price discount to standard gem- quality) ~70% of global rough diamond output controlled by BIG-3

m cts

Exploration periods of deposits

Sources: Company’s analysis, Kimberley Process statistics ALROSA 26% 22% De Beers 14% Rio Tinto Other 23% 7% DDC 5% Catoca Petra Diamonds 3% 151 m cts ~8 years – average exploration 80 115 150 150 125 2014 2017 2020F 2023F 2027F 2030F Gahcho Kue Grib Renard Argyle (brown color diamonds, average price is c. 20 $/ct ) Diavik Mir Source: diamond mining companies’ forecast

World diamond production forecast

m cts

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ABOUT ALROSA

10
  • ~30% of rough diamond production globally
  • Largest reserves sufficient to support production for ~30 years
  • Competitive position on the global cost curve
  • Sustainably high profitability margins ~2x exceeding industry average
  • Strong FCF generation and balance sheet capability offer solid

foundation for shareholder returns Financial results summary

$ bn

Loans and borrowings

$ m

Dividend payments

$ m

* FCF = operating cash flow less capex 277 317 204 275 1,145 666* 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.09* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 USD per share * based on FX rate as of 30.09.2018 3.7 4.6 4.6 3.9 1.9 2.6 2.2 2.1 0.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 52% 56% 47% 55% 2015 2016 2017 9M 2018 Revenue EBITDA Free cash flow EBITDA margin 3,951 3,119 2,781 1,374 1,494 559 1.8 1.2 1.8 0.9 0.9 0.5 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 30.09.2018 Net debt Net debt / EBITDA (USD)
slide-11
SLIDE 11 In expansion mode

ALROSA: ASSETS GEOGRAPHY

11 Note: the amount of total resources, including reserves (according to JORC) are as of July 1, 2016

Share of division in 2017 diamond production Geography of production assets

1,030 m ct

Total resources, including reserves

653 m ct

Total reserves Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Arkhangelsk Region Russian Federation 93% 7% Angola ALROSA owns 32.8% of Catoca Ltd (Angola) Open-pit mining from 9 mines in 2017 Underground mining from 4 mines in 2017 Alluvial mining from alluvial deposits in 2017

53% 27% 20% Severalmaz

Arkhangelskaya pipe Karpinskogo-1 pipe

7% 2.6

m ct

Aikhal Division

Aikhal UG mine Jubilee pipe Komsomolskaya pipe

13.0

m ct

Nyurba Division

Nyurbinskaya pipe Botuobinskaya pipe Alluvial deposits

7.7

m ct

18% Mirny Division

International UG mine Alluvial deposits Mir UG mine*

7.2

m ct

Udachny Division

Udachny UG mine Zarnitsa pipe Zapolyarnaya Pipe (Verkhne-Munskoye deposit) Alluvial deposits

3.8

m ct

Almazy Anabara & Nizhne-Lenskoye

Alluvial deposits

5.2

m ct * production suspended in August 2017 as a result of the accident (incl. 2.8 mln ct from Mir pipe)

33% 19% 10% 13%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HIGHEST QUALITY ASSETS

12 653 434 132 95 48 377 inferred resources ALROSA Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 36% 19% 16% 24% 47% 13% 25% 19% ALROSA Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 2014 2015 2016 2017 H1 2018
  • ALROSA develops world’s largest reserves with the industry best

cost/quality balance

  • One of the lowest cost production at 44 $/ct while company’s average

realized price of gem-quality rough diamond is 160 $/ct

  • Cost of underground production per carat is close to open-pit mining

while grades at underground are higher by over 3x ALROSA operates largest reserves with long life of mine

m cts

ALROSA sustainably tops the ranks as one of the most profitable miner

EBIT margin, %

High profitability margin maintained even at the bottom of the cycle

$/ct

Total 2017 diamond production was 39.6 m ct Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018” Open-pit mines Alluvials 28 39 44 78 $180 $100 $60 $30 5Y av. realized price of gem-quality rough diamonds $176/ct $160/ct $136/ct max min Source: JORC as of 01 July 2016 (Micon), Company’s estimates 42 Aikhal UG mine International UG mine Udachny UG mine 2.5 21.1 3.7 8.0 1.6
slide-13
SLIDE 13

LOW COST PRODUCTION PLATFORM WITH MODERATE GROWTH

13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
  • Company operates high quality assets with underground operations

delivering strong diamonds yields

  • Output to stabilize at ~38 m ct, which is slightly above 2013-2016

volumes

  • New projects to drive production from 2018 and on:
  • Ramp up of Verkhne-Munskoye deposit with a design capacity of 1.8 m cts

pa (by 2019)

  • Increase in production of Severalmaz to 5.1 m cts per year by 2021

Range of average mined diamond grade (2017)

ct/t

8.0 21.1 1.6 2.5 3.7 Udachny UG mine 2017 diamond production 1.19 1.87 5.83 6.89 ~1 ct/t – average grade

ALROSA’s diamond production to stabilize at 37-38 m carats

m ct

25.1 23.9 24.3 21.5 22.3 21.0 20.3 2.2 1.5 2.2 3.2 2.8 9.0 9.1 9.4 9.2 10.2 8.2 5.9 0.6 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.6 3.3 3.8 0.1 0.4 1.3 1.6 3.9 5.7 0.1 0.2 1.8 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018F 2019F Verkhne-Munskoye Udachny UG mine Severalmaz Jubilee pipe Mir UG mine (stopped from Aug'17) Other Note: detailed ALROSA’s production plan is disclosed in the Appendix (slide 28)

36.9 36.2 38.3 37.4 39.6 36.6 ~37.5 – 38 Total

0.42 Alluvials International UG mine Aikhal UG mine Open-pit mines
slide-14
SLIDE 14 14

IMPROVED QUALITY OF SALES WITH 70% OF LONG TERM CLIENT BASE

ALROSA’s rough diamond sales channel breakdown

18% 64% 71% ~70% 72% 17% 12% 10-20% 10% 19% 17% 10-20% 2006-2008 2012-2014 2015-2016 2020F Tenders Spot sales Long-term contracts
  • Diverse product mix (total 204 boxes) with different segment exposure

and price dynamic, e.g.:

  • small stones – for mass market bridal rings
  • Mid-size and large stones – luxury segment offering resilient prices
  • Sales channels based on long-term agreements which provides stable

sales and predictable prices during volatility on diamond market

  • Diversified geography of sales:
  • presence in all key diamond hubs
  • growing focus on Asia

Sorting of rough diamonds

26 sizes 16 shapes 5 clarity categories 8,013 classification positions

ALROSA’s geography of sales based on clients legal residences

number of long-term clients in 2018 49% 51% 17% 16% 11% 10% 10% 10% 6% 7% 2016 2017 Other China UAE Russia Israel India Belgium 4% 4% 3% 2% 3 6
  • 10
15 5 24

34 colors

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DIAMOND SALES STRUCTURE

15
  • Gem-quality diamonds sales account for c. 70% of total sales and 98%

pf sales value

  • The bulk of the sold diamonds in 2017 is less than 3 GR (~0.75 carat)
  • Diamonds over 1 carat make c. 11% of total diamonds sold in volume

terms and c. 60% in value terms 2017 rough diamond sales structure by size and weight group

Note: excluding the foreign network of ALROSA, 1 GR = ~0,25 ct

Allocation of rough diamond by quality

~30% ~2% ~70% ~98%

By volume (carats) By value (USD) Gem quality diamonds (>0.03 CT) Non-gem quality diamonds (<0.03 CT) 0.4% 8.8% 4.9% 36.9% 5.5% 14.0% 4.0% 5.4% 80.7% 34,8% 4.5% 0.1% By volume (carats) By value (USD) Powder less 3 GR (less ~0.75 CT) 3 GR (~0.75 CT) 4-6 GR (~1-1.5 CT) +1.8 CT +10.8 CT
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Q3 Q3 & 9M RES & 9M RESULTS ULTS

slide-17
SLIDE 17 1,289 1,114 823 859 1,556 1,034 933 3,226 3,523 20 18 25 21 26 23 16 63 65 1,309 1,132 848 881 1,582 1,057 949 3,289 3,588 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9M 2017 9M 2018 Industrial quality diamonds Gem-quality diamonds 11.0 8.0 4.9 6.2 10.1 6.3 4.7 23.9 21.1 3.0 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 2.7 2.0 7.8 8.0 14.1 10.2 7.5 9.4 13.4 9.0 6.7 31.8 29.1 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9M 2017 9M 2018 Industrial quality diamonds Gem-quality diamonds

Q3 SALES

17 15 14 18 18 12 11 16 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018

Q3 2018 Sales

  • In Q3 2018, diamond sales decreased by 2.3 m carats (26% q-o-q) to 6.7

m carats due to a drop in sales of small-size diamonds

  • Sales were down 11% y-o-y also due to weaker small-size diamond

sales 9M 2018 Sales

  • In 9M 2018, sales in carats reduced by 9%, while
  • … diamond sales in value terms rose by 9% to USD 3.6 bn on the back
  • f stronger prices and improved mix of gem-quality diamonds as sales
  • f +10.2 and +2 carats stones grew

Diamond sales

m cts

Increase in diamond sales by value, 9M 2018

$ m

ALROSA's diamond inventories

m cts

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Q3 OUTPUT

18
  • In Q3 2018, the volume of processed ore and gravels grew by 70% q-o-

q (up 10% y-o-y) to 17.2 m tonnes, due to a seasonal return to production at alluvial deposits (up 7.9 m tonnes)

  • Average grade dropped by 28% q-o-q (down 7% y-o-y) to 0.61 carat per

tonne due to a seasonal return to production at alluvial deposits and a lower diamond grade at Nyurbinskaya pipe

  • Diamond production was up 23% q-o-q (2% y-o-y) to 10.5 m carats due

to seasonal growth of production at alluvial deposits by 3.5 m carats. On top of that, the Nyurba Division’s deposits increased ore processing, and recently launched Udachny underground mine and Severalmaz gradually ramped up their production to design capacity Ore and sands processing

m tonnes

Diamond production

m cts

6.1 10.1 15.7 7.3 5.7 10.1 17.2 31.9 33.0 1.46 1.03 0.65 1.39 1.30 0.84 0.61 0.93 0.80 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Grade, carat/tonne 5.8 5.2 3.5 6.6 5.3 4.1 3.8 14.5 13.1 2.9 3.3 3.1 2.0 2.1 7.5 5.1 1.9 5.4 2,3 5,8 7.6 8.2 8.9 10.4 10.3 10.1 7.4 8.5 10.5 29.5 26.4 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Alluvials Underground Open pit 50% 19% 31% 36% 9% 55% Share, % Share, %
slide-19
SLIDE 19

KEY FINANCIALS IN Q3 & 9M

19 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.1 3.7 3.9 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 1.7 2.1 43% 52% 46% 44% 50% 58% 57% 47% 54% Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Revenue EBITDA EBITDA margin

Q3 2018:

  • Revenue came in at USD1,046 m (down 8% q-o-q) as sales in carats

decreased (down 26% q-o-q)

  • 8% y-o-y growth was driven by stronger pricing and a better sales mix
  • EBITDA stood at USD611 m (down 10% q-o-q), rising by 33% y-o-y on

better mix and cost control

  • EBITDA margin slightly decreased q-o-q by 1 p.p. to 58%
  • Net income stood at USD317 m (down 10% q-o-q, up 71% y-o-y)
  • FCF increased by 6% q-o-q to USD363 m (+89% y-o-y)

9M 2018:

  • Revenue grew by 7% to USD3,9 bn on stronger pricing and a better

sales mix, offsetting a 9% drop in sales (incl. 12% of gem-quality)

  • EBITDA hiked by 24% to USD2,1 bn supported by a stronger revenue

and lower production costs

  • EBITDA margin climbed 8 p.p. to 55%
  • Leverage slimmed down with Net debt / EBITDA standing at 0.5х
  • Net income increased by 28% to USD1.4 bn
  • FCF grew by 35% to USD1.4 bn

Superior profitability

$ bn

Strong Free Cash Flow generation

$ m

603 264 192 201 718 344 363 1,059 1,425 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Free Cash Flow = Operating Cash Flow minus Capex
slide-20
SLIDE 20

1.34 1.17 1.33 1.23 1.18 1.39 1.28 1.26

Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9M 2017 9M 2018

COSTS DYNAMICS & STRUCTURE

* Costs – production costs + selling, general and administrative expenses + other operating income and expenses
  • Q3 unit costs increased by 18% to RUB1,390 per cu m mainly due to

decreased volume of run-of-mine ore

  • In 9M 2018, the Company’s costs* went down by 5%, to RUB109 bn

Key drivers:

  • reduction of sales in carats by 9%
  • down RUB2.1 bn: reduced staff costs largely due to a streamlined

headcount

  • down RUB1.8 bn: lower MET due to a decline in diamond production

and prices and mix changes (RUB1.1 bn of impact) and sale of gas assets (RUB1.2 bn of impact)

  • down

RUB1.4 bn: reduced exploration costs due to exploration restructuring (RUB0.6 bn of impact) and sale of gas assets

  • down RUB1.0 bn: lower materials costs due to reduction of Mirny

Division’ expenses and transfer of Almazy Anabara’ expenses to Q4 2018

  • down RUB0.5 bn: lower SG&A expenses reflecting a reduced

administrative payroll

Per unit costs

RUB '000 / cu m

Total operating costs

RUB bn

20 32.5 30.5 9.3 10.2 9.5 8.5 7.3 7.5 11.0 11.1 10.5 10.7 11.1 10.7 16.7 14.9 6.5 5.2

114.5 109.2

9M 2017 9M 2018 Exploration costs Mineral Extraction Tax (MET) SG&A expenses Movement of diamond inventory, ore and sands Other Services and transportation Materials costs Fuel and energy Wages, salaries and other staff costs (5%) Non-production costs Production costs
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Q3 PROFITABILITY

21

Q3 2018 EBITDA declined to RUB40.0 bn (down 3% q-o-q) driven by:

  • (-) carat sales down 26% q-o-q due to a drop in sales of small-size

diamonds

  • (+) improved sales mix and prices
  • (+) FX rate impact
  • (+) changes in diamond and ore inventories

9M EBITDA was up by 29% to RUB129.1 bn driven by:

  • (-) 9% reduction in carat sales, including lower sales of gem-quality

diamonds (down 12%)

  • (+) changes in the sales mix and stronger prices
  • (+) FX rate impact
  • (+) lower costs

Q3 EBITDA – key drivers

RUB bn

9M EBITDA – key drivers

RUB bn

Note: “Other” mainly includes changes in diamond and ore inventories, lower tariffs and higher electricity subsidies

41.3 40.0 9.1 1.5 (17.5) 3.7 0.3 1.5

EBITDA Q2 2018 Сhanges in sales mix Сhanges in pricing Changes in sales volume Rouble devaluation Payroll reduction Other* EBITDA Q3 2018

100.0 129.1 34.7 4.9 (21.8) 8.9 1.3 1.2

EBITDA 9М 2017 Сhanges in the sales mix Сhanges in pricing Changes in sales volume Rouble devaluation Payroll reduction Other* EBITDA 9М 2018 Note: “Other” mainly includes changes in diamond and ore inventories
slide-22
SLIDE 22 5,8 5,6 7,0 8,5 4,8 7,2 8,8 18,4 20,8 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018

CAPEX TO STABILIZE AT BELOW RUB30 bn

22
  • In Q3 2018, capex was up 22% q-o-q to RUB8.8 bn driven by larger

expansion capex (up RUB1.6 bn):

  • the Verkhne-Munskoye deposit (up RUB2.2 bn)
  • the Udachny underground mine (down RUB0.6 bn)
  • the Zarya pipe (down RUB0.4 bn)
  • In Q3, capex was up RUB1.8 bn y-o-y due to the mining capex cycle
  • 9M: Capex was up 13% to RUB21 bn as the Verkhne-Munskoye deposit

capex cycle peaked in 2018 Capex

RUB bn

Capex to stabilize

RUB bn

26.5 25.6 25.7 23.4 20.5 18.1 5.1 2.6 1.5 0.2 6.6 7.9 6.5 5.1 2.7 1.7 0.5 3.3 3.7 8.3 38.2 36.1 34.2 31.8 26.9 28.3 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E Verkhne- Munskoye Udachny mine Severalmaz Other
slide-23
SLIDE 23

85.7 106.4 129.1 (20.8) (3.3) (25.0) 5.7

40 21 18 20 46 28 32 80 106 6 6 7 9 5 7 9 18 21 35 16 12 12 41 21 24 62 86 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 9М 2017 9М 2018 Operating cash flow Capital investments Free cash flow 23
  • Q3 FCF increased by 13% q-o-q (up 2.0x y-o-y) to RUB23.6 bn driven by:
  • Resilient profitability on price growth, mix improvement and FX
  • Net working capital build-up on seasonality offset by insurance proceeds
  • Seasonal growth in capex
  • 9M FCF grew 38% y-o-y to RUB85.7 bn driven by
  • Growth in profitability
  • Working capital release of RUB5.7 bn on sales on destocking
  • Limited growth in capex
Notes: (1) OCF – operating cash flow; (2) FCF – free cash flow is, defined as OCF net of capex in the core business

Free cash flow bridge

RUB bn EBITDA Changes in net working capital* Income tax Other Operating cash flow Capex Free cash flow

Operating cash flow and capex

RUB bn 23.6 32.4 40.0 (8.8) (0.8) (5.8) (1.0)

9M 2018 Q3 2018

Notes: * Changes in working capital include change in insurance reimbursement (+RUB6.3 bn in Q3 and +RUB7.6 bn in 9M) “Other” mainly includes pension plan contribution and FX

Q3 FREE CASH FLOW DRIVERS

slide-24
SLIDE 24 24
  • Total debt amounted to $1.3 bn, down $310 m year-to-date
  • Liquidity decreased by 18% q-o-q to $0.75 bn mainly due to 2017

dividends of RUB38.6 bn payment

  • Net debt / EBITDA reduced to 0.2x vs 0.7x earlier this year on the back
  • f robust FCF
  • Active debt management drove interest payment 50% down (year-on-

year)

  • S&P upgraded ALROSA credit rating to investment grade in July 2018
  • Targeted leverage at between 0.5x to 1.0x of Net Debt/EBITDA

Debt is down on deleveraging efforts and strong FCF generation

$ m

Strong liquidity position

$ m

4,217 3,496 3,057 2,344 1,621 1,312 3,951 3,119 2,781 1,374 1,494 559 1.9x 1.9x 1.7x 0.5x 0.7x 0.2x 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 30.09.2018 Total debt Net debt Net debt / EBITDA (RUB), x times

Debt repayment schedule

$ m

343 954 6 6 2 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Eurobonds Bank loans

753 3,121 3,874

30.09.2018

9.8 10.6 13.1 12.5 10.4 4.2

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 9M 2018

Changes in interest on loans and borrowings

RUB bn

Credit lines Cash and equivalents

LEVERAGE REMAINS BELOW TARGETED RANGE OF 0.5X TO 1.0X

1.0x 0.5x

slide-25
SLIDE 25

NEW DIVIDEND POLICY

25 50% 35% 50% 50% 50% 75% 70% 26% 37% 59% 52% 70% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 Minimum level of dividends based on IFRS net income (new dividend policy) Payment ratio based on IFRS net income Payment ratio based on FCF
  • In August 2018, ALROSA’s Board of Directors approved an updated

dividend policy:

  • free cash flow as the basis
  • payments twice a year
  • minimum payout at 50% of IFRS net income
  • Dividend pay-out estimate under the new policy:

❶ Net debt / EBITDA < 0.0 – over 100% FCF ❷ Net debt / EBITDA: 0.0–1.0 – 70–100% FCF ❸ Net debt / EBITDA: 1.0–1.5 – 50–70% FCF

  • Based on the Company’s performance in 6M 2018 the General Meeting
  • f Shareholders approved dividends of RUB 5.93 per share (70% of free

cash flow) Dividend pay-out ratios Dividend payment

$ m

277 317 204 275 1,145 666* 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.09* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 USD per share * based on FX rate as of 30.09.2018
slide-26
SLIDE 26

OUTLOOK

26

Market outlook

  • Diamond jewellery demand remains healthy, while softer currencies will start being a drag
  • Mid-stream stocks are expected to remain low due to FX volatility and rising financing costs for polishers

Operating performance

  • 2018 full-year sales outlook is revised downwards to 37-38 m cts on lower demand for small stones
  • 2018 production outlook remains unchanged at 36.6 m cts
  • In Q4 2018, output is expected to grow on ramp-up at the Udachny underground mine and Severalmaz
slide-27
SLIDE 27

AP APPE PENDIX NDIX

slide-28
SLIDE 28 28

37 (24) 6 86 (0.3) 13 38 4 2 10 (30) (62)

Net debt bridge

RUB bn

  • In Q3, net debt increased from RUB6.0 bn to RUB36.6 bn q-o-q

Drivers:

  • Dividend payment – RUB38 bn
  • Purchase of shares of ALROSA-Nyurba
  • 9M: Net debt was down 59% due to strong FCF and use of cash

proceeds from disposals (RUB30 bn) to pay-down debt

  • To set up its stock option plan, ALROSA bought back 156.1 m shares year-

to-date (2.1% of the authorised capital)

Net debt as at 31 December 2017 Free cash flow in H1 2018 Sale of gas assets Acquisition of quasi- treasury shares Other Net debt as at 30 June 2018 Free cash flow in Q3 2018 Acquisition of quasi- treasury shares Dividends paid Purchase of shares of ALROSA-Nyurba Other Net debt as at 30 September 2018

NET DEBT CHANGE

slide-29
SLIDE 29 29
  • ALROSA is an exporter with 93% of revenue denominated in USD
  • Major portion (84%) of costs and capex is denominated in RUB
  • 94% of the Company’s debt portfolio is denominated in USD to create a

natural hedge against FX risks

  • ALROSA's financial sensitivity analysis shows that a change in the USD

exchange rate by +/- 1 RUB/USD leads to the following change in metrics:

  • revenue – +/-1.51%
  • cost of sales – +/-0.24%
  • EBITDA – +/-2.61%
  • capex – +/-0.22%

Financial metrics breakdown by currency (9M 2018)

% of metric's total

93% 16% 26% 76% 94% 7% 84% 74% 23% 6% Revenue Cost of sales Capex Cash and cash equivalents Total debt RUB USD

FX RATE

slide-30
SLIDE 30

LAB-GROWN ROUGH DIAMONDS / SYNTHETICS

30

Global production

m ct

~7K-10K ~2-4

Lab-grown rough diamonds Gem-quality diamonds Industrial diamonds

~14 ~0.2-0.5

Natural diamonds Artificial diamonds
  • Lab-grown diamonds history (key events):
  • 1953 – first HPHT diamond synthesized
  • 1960s – first CVD diamond synthesized
  • 1970 – first lab-grown gem quality diamond crystals produced
  • 1970s – volumes of synthetic diamonds exceeded those for natural
  • 2000s – commercialization of CVD technology
  • 2018 – De Beers launched “Lightbox”
  • Two types of technologies:
  • HPHT1 (~99% – share of lab-grown diamond market) – the process of

growing crystals of diamond at high temperature (~1500

0C) and

pressure (~50-70K atm.), diamonds are largely used in construction industry for abrasive qualities

  • CVD2 (~1% – share of lab-grown diamond market) – the process of

depositing diamond from an ionized hydrocarbon gas atmosphere on a substrate heated to 600-700 0C by means of microwave radiation, stones are mostly used in high-tech, medical and jewelry manufacturing industries

  • Gem-quality synthetic diamond market accounts for 2-3% of natural rough

diamond production and c. 3% of world rough diamond sales

~$4.0K ~$1.6K-$2.0K ~$0.3-$0.5

2008 … 2013 … 2018 Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018” Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018”

Global sales

$ bn

Production cost of lab-grown rough diamond is gradually declining

$/ct G VS polished diamond

  • 50-60%
  • 70-80%
Note: HPHT – High pressure, high temperature; CVD – Chemical Vapor Deposition
slide-31
SLIDE 31

LAB-GROWN ROUGH DIAMONDS: FIVE FACTS

31

Price of 1 carat polished diamond: natural VS synthetic

Round, VS clarity, F-H color

1. Lab-grown diamonds have essentially the same physical and chemical characteristics as natural diamonds, but they are not identical – they are easily detected since both HPHT and CVD methods leave growth marks and telltale signs that are distinctive of an artificially produced diamond 2. Lab-grown diamonds are produced in a matter of weeks, primarily in factories situated outside of the US, mostly in China, India and Singapore – the origin of the product is almost never disclosed 3. Retail prices continue to erode as the costs of production decline 4. The carbon emissions for a 1 carat synthetic diamond are similar to, and sometimes greater than, those for an equivalent natural diamond: the carbon emission per 1 polished carat of synthetic diamond produced in Singapore using the CVD is approximately 40% higher than for natural polished diamonds 5. 68% of US consumers believe that a lab-grown diamond is not a “real diamond”

Source: Paul Ziminskiy report “2018: The Year of the Lab-created Diamond” Source: Diamond Producers Association analysis

Carbon emission CO2

Note: HPHT – High pressure, high temperature; CVD – Chemical Vapor Deposition Source: Diamond Producers Association materials $0,000 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Now Natural diamond prices Lab-grown diamond prices De Beer's Lightbox lab-grownd diamond price

~40% greater carbon emission

Natural diamonds Lab-grown diamonds (CVD produced in Singapore) Mostly arising from the trucks use Most of manufacturers use electricity generated by fossil fuel
  • 16%
  • 16%
  • 18%
  • 42%
  • 81%
slide-32
SLIDE 32

ALROSA’S PRODUCTION FORECAST

32 Type of mining Grade, ct/t Price per carat, $ Cash costs per carat, $ Diamond production forecast, ‘000 ct 2017 2017 2018F 2019F 2020F Aikhal Division Jubilee pipe
  • pen-pit
1.33 141 26 10,160 8,207 5,885 5,410 Aikhal underground mine underground 5.83 47 28 2,480 2,723 2,725 2,708 Komsomolskaya pipe
  • pen-pit
0.36 239 187 370 370 352 421 Zaria pipe
  • pen-pit
0.28 244 234
  • 13
75 Mirny Division International underground mine underground 6.89 210 42 3,699 3,693 ~3 m cts ~3 m cts Mir underground mine underground 3.71 131 46 2,772
  • Alluvial and technogenic deposits
alluvial 0.19 201 69 760 692 886 885 Udachny Division Udachnaya pipe
  • pen-pit
0.63 90 42 1,046
  • Udachny underground mine
underground 1.87 103 78 1,615 3,872 5 695 5,673 Zarnitsa pipe
  • pen-pit
0.28 165 110 786 995 711 843 Verkhne-Munskoe deposit
  • pen-pit
1.07 126 67 80 175 1,804 1,827 Alluvial deposits alluvial 0.26 89 97 295 246 115
  • Nyurba Division
Nyurbinskaya pipe
  • pen-pit
4.80 98 44 4,774 4,195 3,780 3,365 Botuobinskaya pipe
  • pen-pit
6.12 98 44 1,211 1,100 2,139 1,866 Alluvial deposits alluvial 1.97 98 44 1,728 2,056 1,402 2,151 Severalmaz Arkhangelskaya pipe
  • pen-pit
0.70 54 31 1,283 1,503 2,135 2,336 Karpinskogo-1 pipe
  • pen-pit
0.95 55 31 1,359 1,817 1,688 1,862 Almazy Anabara alluvial 0.40 74 38 5,197 4,977 4,973 4,999 ALROSA 1.01 117 42 39,614 36,620 >37.5 m cts ~37.5 m cts underground 4.11 135 45 10,566 10,288 ~12 m cts ~12 m cts
  • pen-pit
1.19 118 39 21,069 18,361 18.5 m cts 18.0 m cts alluvials 0.42 92 44 7,979 7,971 7.4 m cts 8.0 m cts
slide-33
SLIDE 33

KEY INVESTMENT PROJECTS

33

Udachny underground mine Verkhne-Munskoe deposit (open pit mining) Mayskaya pipe (open pit mining) Production start 2014 2018 2025 Expected design capacity 2020 2019 2027 Expected life of mine 2040 2042 2039 Investment start date 2002 2015 2018 Total capex, RUB bn 63.9 63.0 14.4 Total capex invested, RUB bn 52.8 (81%) 16.2 (26%) 0.03 (0.2%) Target ore output, m tonnes pa 4.0 3.0 0.3 Diamond production, m carats pa 4.9 (2019F) 1.8 (2019F) 0.8 (2027F) Average grade, carats per tonne 1.52 (2019F) 0.6 (2019F) 2.87 (2027F) Total resources, m carats 212.6 38.4 13.9 Verkhne-Munskoe deposit Udachnaya pipe

slide-34
SLIDE 34

ROUGH DIAMOND PRODUCTION IS DOMINATED BY FEW MINING COMPANIES WITH THE HIGHEST MARGINS ACROSS DIAMOND PIPELINE, WHERE ALROSA BENEFITS FROM LEADING MARKET SHARE OF 26%

34

Diamond pipeline structure Major global diamond producers

Share in global production

Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2018” 22‒24% 1‒3% 2‒4% 3‒11% 1‒3% Average operating margins Players Top 5 players control ~ 70%
  • f the market
~ 5,000 players > 10,000 players Major retailers control ~ 35% of the market ~ 100 players Rough diamond production Sales of rough diamonds from major producers Cutting & polishing
  • f diamonds
Diamond jewelry manufacturing Retail sales
  • f diamond jewelry
26% 22% 14% 5% ALROSA DeBeers Rio Tinto Catoca Sources: Diamond producers’ data, Company’s estimates, Kimberley Process statistics 46% 25% 41% 44% EBITDA margin
slide-35
SLIDE 35

OUR PEOPLE

  • In 2017 the headcount declined by -2% to 36.4 thousand employees
  • Woman account for 37% of total staff members and 32% of executive

staff – according to PWC, ALROSA is a leader in this indicator among industry’s companies

  • The majority of staff are employees of 30-50 years – 57%
  • The average age of workers – 41.4 years
  • Most of employees (86.7%) work in the territory of Western Yakutia

where the main production facilities are located

Source: Company’s data

Age groups as of 2017

% of the total headcount

57% 24% 19%

30-50 years > 50 years < 30 years

Total headcount as of the end of the year

000’ people

62% 62% 62% 63% 63% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37%

40.3 40.7 40.2 37.2 36.4

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Women Men 87% 4% 4% 5%

Yakutia Moscow Arkhangelsk Other

Territorial distribution of staff

% of the total headcount

35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

HEALTH AND SAFETY

  • Expenses on labor protection and industrial safety per 1 employee are

stable at level RUB 39,000 since 2015 and totals RUB 1.1-1.4 bn per year

  • LTIFR1 in 2017 was increased up to 0.94 due to Mir mine accident in

August which injured 13 miners

  • In 2017, ALROSA began building an independent management vertical

structure in H&S functions – the safety services were withdrawn from the supervision of divisions’ chief engineers and organized to report to Managing Director.

  • Established permanent industrial safety committees:
  • Central Industrial Committee under the supervision of CEO (quarterly

meetings to define the strategy)

  • Committee under the supervision of Managing Director (quarterly meetings

to strategy implementation)

  • Committee under the supervision of the division head (weekly meetings to

review any violations and develop remedial measures)

Source: Company’s data

Independent management structure to insure industrial safety Health and safety costs

000’ RUB per 1 person 29.9 33.3 39.3 38.9 39.1 0.48 0.21 0.45 0.38 0.94

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LTIFR

CEO

Deputy CEO for H&S Managing Director H&S Department Central Committee Managing Director’s Committee Division Committee Divisions’ directors H&S Services

Note: (1) number of lost time injuries per 1 m hours worked 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

ENVIRONMENT AND ESG RATINGS

37
  • 2017 capex related to environmental activities stood at the level of RUB

4.4 bn

  • Efficient disclosure are acknowledged by ESG ratings:
  • 3rd place (out of 33) in the “First rating of environmental performance of

mining companies in Russia”

  • Rated among top-10 Russian companies with transparent corporate

reporting according to Transparency International-Russia research

  • 2017 area of disturbed land decreased by 47% y-o-y
  • ALROSA plans to reduce CO2 emissions mostly arising from the trucks

use

Source: Company’s data

Are of annually disturbed land

ha

Financing of environmental activities

RUB bn 6.6 5.9 6.0 5.5 4.4

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

CO2 emissions

000’ t 1,414 1,080 571

2015 2016 2017

530 460 465

2015 2016 2017
slide-38
SLIDE 38

ENERGY RESOURCES

38
  • ALROSA’s share of renewable energy consumption is 87%, long-term

target level – 95%

  • 2017 unit energy consumption decreased by 7% y-o-y to 0.327 GJ/carat

meanwhile diamond production increased by 6% y-o-y

  • 2017 water intake for production purposes decreased by 2.3x mainly due

to excluding of the Heat and power supply company, which was removed from PJSC “ALROSA” structure starting from 01.01.2017 to subsidiary PTWS LLC

Note: 2017 numbers does not include the Heat and power supply company, which was removed from PJSC “ALROSA” structure starting from 01.01.2017 and became its subsidiary PTWS LLC Source: Company’s data

Per unit energy consumption

GJ/carat

Share of renewable energy consumption Water intake (production)

m m3 0.323 0.351 0.327

2015 2016 2017

12.5 11.3 4.9

2015 2016 2017

87%

Renewable energy consumption Other

slide-39
SLIDE 39

GOVERNANCE

39
  • In 2013, the Supervisory board approved the Corporate Governance Code
  • Board has three active committees with independent directors:
  • The Strategic Planning Committee
  • The Auditing Committee
  • The HR and Remunerations Committee
  • Continuous progress in corporate governance reflected in positive rating

dynamics

  • Regular and transparent disclosure
  • New initiatives are under way:
  • Corporate Strategy till 2024
  • HR Strategy with the overhaul of the organization structure and motivation

schemes (stock option program is one of the initiatives)

Source: Russian Institute of Directors, Company’s data

Corporate governance rating Supervisory Board composition

Number of members

7+ 7+ 7++ 7++ 8

2015 2016 2017 2018 Oct-2018 2 3 5 4 4 12 11 9 9 10

15 15 15 15 15

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Other Executive directors Independent directors
slide-40
SLIDE 40

MANAGEMENT TEAM IS FULLY COMMITTED TO DELIVER ON ALROSA’S DEVELOPMENT PLANS

40

Operational Team Executive Team

CEO Sergey Ivanov Chief Executive Officer
  • Joined the Company in 2017
  • Senior Vice President at Sberbank of Russia (2016‒2017)
  • Chairman of the Management Board of SOGAZ (2011‒2016)
  • Top management positions at Gazprombank (2005‒2011)
COO Igor Sobolev First Deputy CEO – Chief Operating Officer
  • Joined the Company in 2007
  • Head of Capital construction division, mining & metallurgical directorate
at Norilsk Nickel (2000‒2007) CFO Alexey Philippovskiy Deputy CEO – Chief Financial Officer
  • Joined the Company in 2017
  • CFO of Siberian Generating Company (2015–2017)
  • CFO of Sibur (2004–2013)
  • Consultant at McKinsey & Co. (2001-2004)
Sales Yuri Okoyomov Deputy CEO for Sales
  • Joined the Company in 1993
  • Vice President of ALROSA for marketing and sales since August 2009
Mirny division Alexey Kovalenko Director, Mirny mining and processing division
  • Joined the Company in 1996
  • Over 20 years of industry experience
Udachny division Alexander Makhrachev Director, Udachny mining and processing division
  • Joined the Company in 1979
  • Over 38 years of industry experience
Aikhal division Evgeniy Denisov Director, Aikhal mining and processing division
  • Joined the Company in 2005
  • Over 15 years of industry experience
Nyurba division Anatoliy Platonov Director, Nyurba mining and processing division
  • Joined the Company in 1992
  • Over 25 years of industry experience
Almazy Anabara Pavel Marinychev CEO Almazy Anabara
  • Joined the Company in 2016
  • First deputy Prime Minister of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) (2014‒2016)
  • Deputy Prime Minister of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) (2010‒2014)
Severalmaz Andrey Pismenny CEO Severalmaz
  • Joined the Company in 1997
  • Over 20 years of industry experience
  • Chief engineer of ALROSA in 2010‒2015
slide-41
SLIDE 41 Anton Siluanov First Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation Aysen Nikolaev Head of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nikolay Alexandrov First Deputy Head of Suntarsky Ulus Municipal District of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Vladimir Solodov Chairman of the Government of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nominated by: the Russian Federation Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nominated by: Municipal Districts of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Previously held positions include:
  • 2005-2011 – Deputy Minister of Finance of the
Russian Federation
  • Since 2011 – Minister of Finance of the Russian
Federation
  • Since 2018 – First Deputy Chairman of the
Government of the Russian Federation Previously held positions include:
  • 2012-2018 – Head of the urban district ”City of
Yakutsk”
  • Since 2018 – Head of the Republic of Sakha
(Yakutia) Previously held positions include:
  • 2009-2015 – Specialist, Senior Specialist,
Leading Specialist, Head of water transport Department of Ministry of Transport and Road Infrastructure of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
  • 2015-2016 – General Director of the state-run
enterprise of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) “Arctic Transportation Company”
  • Since 2017 – First Deputy Head of Suntarsky
Ulus Municipal District of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Previously held positions include:
  • 2013-2015 – Head of department in Agency of
Strategic Initiatives
  • 2015-2018 – Deputy Plenipotentiary
Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Far Eastern Federal District
  • Since 2018 – Chairman of the Government of
the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Alexey Chekunkov CEO of Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund Kirill Dmitriev CEO of Russian Direct Investment Fund Oleg Fedorov Independent director of the Supervisory Board, ALROSA Maria Gordon Independent director of the Supervisory Board, ALROSA Nominated by: the Russian Federation Nominated by: the Russian Federation Nominated by: minority shareholders as an independent director Nominated by: minority shareholders as an independent director Previously held positions include:
  • 2009-2011 – Head of New Nations Capital
Investment Company
  • 2011-2013 – Director, member of the board,
member of investment committee of the Russian Direct Investment Fund
  • Since 2014 – General Director of the Far East
Development Fund Previously held positions include:
  • 2007-2011 – Development Director, President
  • f Icon Private Equity Limited Representative
Office
  • Since 2011 – CEO of Russian Direct Investment
Fund Previously held positions include:
  • 2009-2012 – Head, Department of Investment
and Banking, VTB Capital
  • 2012-2014 – Adviser to the Head of the Federal
Agency for State Property Management
  • Since 2013 – Independent director of the
Supervisory Board of ALROSA Previously held positions include:
  • 1998-2010 – Goldman Sachs, investment
activity
  • 2010-2014 – PIMCO, investment activity
  • Since 2015 – Independent director of the
Supervisory Board of ALROSA

SUPERVISORY BOARD OVERVIEW (1/2)

41 2 1 6 3 5 7 8 4
slide-42
SLIDE 42 Sergey Mestnikov CEO of Trust Fund for Future Generations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Alexey Moiseev Deputy Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation Ilya Yelizarov Assistant Head of the Federal Agency for State Property Management (Rosimushchestvo) Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nominated by: the Russian Federation Nominated by: the Russian Federation Previously held positions include:
  • 2010-2012 – Deputy Head, Head, Secretariat of
Chairman of the Government of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
  • 2012-2016 – First Deputy Minister of Property and
Land Relations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
  • Since 2016 – CEO of Trust Fund for Future
Generations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Previously held positions include:
  • 2001-2010 – Senior Economist, Deputy Head of
Analytical Department of Renaissance Capital - Financial Consultant
  • 2010-2012 – Deputy Head of Department, Head
  • f Division at VTB Capital
  • Since 2012 – Deputy Minister of Finance of the
Russian Federation Previously held positions include:
  • 2010-2012 – Referent of the Department of the
Presidential Experts' Directorate, Assistant Head of Presidential Administration
  • 2012-2015 – Assistant Chairman of the
Government of the Russian Federation
  • Since 2017 – Assistant Head of the Federal
Agency for State Property Management (Rosimushchestvo)

SUPERVISORY BOARD OVERVIEW (2/2)

42 Evgenia Grigorieva Minister of Property and Land Relations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Sergey Ivanov Chief Executive Officer of ALROSA Dmitry Konov Member of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Management Board at SIBUR Holding Galina Makarova Independent director of the Supervisory Board, ALROSA Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nominated by: the Russian Federation Nominated by: the Russian Federation as an independent director Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) as an independent director Previously held positions include:
  • 2007-2011 – First Deputy Minister of Property
Relations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
  • Since 2011 – Minister of Property and Land
Relations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Previously held positions include:
  • 2011-2016 – Chairman of the Management
Board of AO SOGAZ
  • 2016-2017 – Senior Vice President, Head of
Wealth Management at Sberbank of Russia
  • Since 2017 – CEO of ALROSA
Previously held positions include:
  • 2011-2016 – CEO of SIBUR
  • Since 2007 – Member of the Board of Directors,
Chairman of the Management Board (since 2009) at SIBUR Holding Previously held positions include:
  • 2003-2007 – Ministry of Property Relations of
the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
  • 2007-2015 – Permanent Representative of the
Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) in St. Petersburg
  • Since 2018 – Independent director of the
Supervisory Board of ALROSA 10 9 11 14 13 15 12
slide-43
SLIDE 43

DIAMOND DISCOVERIES

43 Source: Company’s estimates

Discovery-to-production periods

Years Discovery and development of new kimberlite pipes are much more challenging now

1954-1956 1960 1969 1974-1975 1994 1996 2006 I II III Aikhal International Jubilee Botuobinskaya Nyurbinskaya Mayskaya Host rocks Sandstones Kimberlite pipes 60 m 9 m 80 m 70 m Year of discovery 9 7 6 6 6 4 4 Diavik Ekati Argyle Nyurbinskaya Catoca Finsch Orapa Development process Development process + dewatering
  • Supply of diamonds is constrained by lack and complexity of new diamond

discoveries and significant time required to ramp-up production

  • No less than 4 years is required to ramp-up full scale production on a

diamond mine

slide-44
SLIDE 44

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF UNDERGROUND MINING IS FOSTERED BY BLOCK CAVING MINING METHOD

44 Backfilled production level Next production level

Traditional cut-and-fill mining

Mir underground mine International underground mine Aikhal underground mine Next production level Production level

Block caving method

Udachny underground mine

Cut-and-fill mining method at Udachny underground mine would have required more than 330 thousand tons of cement a year (~ RUB 1 bn in current prices), which is an equivalent of total cement output in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

RESOURCES INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES ACCORDING TO JORC CODE AS OF JULY 1, 2016 (1/2)

45 Deposit Resource category Tonnage ('000 t) Resource grade (cpt) Contained diamonds ('000 cts) Udachny division Udachnaya Pipe Measured 13,646 1.16 15,812 Indicated 83,524 1.53 127,801 Inferred 53,991 1.28 68,978 Zarnitsa Pipe Indicated 27,131 0.25 6,858 Verkhne-Munskoe Deposit Indicated 46,914 0.65 30,616 Inferred 17,168 0.57 9,857 Alluvial deposits Indicated 2,447 0.49 599 Inferred 1,176 0.63 373 Aikhal division Jubilee Pipe Measured 18,420 0.86 15,815 Indicated 88,138 0.74 65,401 Inferred 57,821 0.63 36,352 Aikhal Pipe Measured 4,361 4.97 21,666 Indicated 690 3.14 2,168 Inferred 1,716 4.06 6,966 Komsomolskaya Pipe Indicated 3,943 0.38 1,494 Zaria Pipe Indicated 12,392 0.28 3,515 Inferred 27,347 0.13 3,583 Mirny division Mir Pipe Measured 20,104 3.71 74,521 Indicated 16,538 3.36 55,525 Inferred 1,072 3.11 3,339 International Pipe Measured 1,448 8.21 11,888 Indicated 3,544 8.71 30,848 Alluvial deposits Measured 17,509 0.39 3,379 Indicated 22,273 0.21 2,322 Inferred 440 0.40 88 Solur-Vostochnaya placer Indicated 5,982 1.97 5,903 Inferred 959 1.80 865
slide-46
SLIDE 46

RESOURCES INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES ACCORDING TO JORC CODE AS OF JULY 1, 2016 (2/2)

46 Deposit Resource category Tonnage ('000 t) Resource grade (cpt) Contained diamonds ('000 cts) Nyurba division Nyurbinskaya Pipe Measured 1,432 4.12 5,905 Indicated 7,095 4.32 30,623 Inferred 1,217 5.56 6,767 Botuobinskaya Pipe Measured 3,172 5.30 16,827 Indicated 10,139 5.90 59,814 Inferred 2,762 5.71 15,778 Maiskoye Kimberlite Body Indicated 1,231 6.03 7,426 Inferred 1,768 2.99 5,278 Alluvial deposits Measured 187 7.85 734 Indicated 6,897 4.67 16,094 Inferred 4,762 3.01 377 Lomonosov division (Severalmaz) Arkhangelskaya Pipe Measured 18,231 0.97 17,764 Indicated 29,689 1.08 32,184 Inferred 39,407 1.24 48,941 Karpinsky-1 Pipe Measured 6,971 1.08 7,501 Indicated 6,915 1.72 11,893 Inferred 8,615 1.16 9,993 Pionerskaya Pipe Indicated 58,330 0.47 27,530 Inferred 42,875 0.52 22,502 Lomonosov Pipe Indicated 32,523 0.50 16,230 Inferred 42,250 0.46 19,530 Almazy Anabara Indicated 38,160 1.33 25,373 Inferred 9,366 0.77 3,621 Nizhne-Lenskoye Indicated 10,793 0.57 3,075 Inferred 16,068 0.58 4,661 Total for ALROSA Group of Companies Measured 105,482 1.82 191,811 Indicated 515,285 1.09 563,291 Measured + Indicated 620,767 1.22 755,102 Inferred 330,779 0.83 274,629 Total 951,546 1.08 1,029,731
slide-47
SLIDE 47

24 Ozerk rkovska vskaya emb. Mosc scow 115184 Ru Russi sia

  • Tel. +7 495 620 92 50 (ex.
  • ex. 1178)

st@al @alrosa

  • sa.r

.ru

TH THANK ANK YO YOU! U!