ALRO ALROSA SA
Photo: Botuobinsky mine, Yakutia03 03 October
- ber 2018
8
ALRO ALROSA SA 03 03 October ober 2018 8 Photo: Botuobinsky - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ALRO ALROSA SA 03 03 October ober 2018 8 Photo: Botuobinsky mine, Yakutia Disclaimer The information contained herein has been prepared for the use in this Presentation (the Presentation) and has not been independently verified. Such
03 03 October
8
Disclaimer
2 The information contained herein has been prepared for the use in this Presentation (the “Presentation”) and has not been independently verified. Such information is confidential and is being provided to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced, retransmitted, further distributed to any other person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose. The opinions presented herein are based on general information gathered at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. Certain industry, market and competitive position data contained in this Presentation come from official or third party sources believed to be reliable but ALROSA does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. This Presentation contains statements about future events and expectations that are forward-looking statements. Any statement in this Presentation that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement that involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the ALROSA’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results, and no representation or warranty, expressDiamond industry – key demand drivers
the personal luxury (annual growth 5%)
disposable income
Personal luxury market growth by region 2017
Indexed diamond jewelry sales vs indexed US’ GDP (2011 = 100)
262 1,160 Personal luxury Lux cars Hospitality Fine wines Fine food Fine art Designer furniture Jets & yachts Total 2017EGlobal luxury market breakdown in 2017
Source: Bain luxury goods worldwide market study (October 2017)€ bn
+5% +5% Source: Company’s estimates, World Bank statistics 2% 7% 8% 9% 18% 0% Americas Europe Japan Rest of Asia China RoW Source: Bain luxury goods worldwide market study (October 2017)33% 32% 14% 8% 8% 5%
Diamond jewelry sales are highly correlated with GDP
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Indexed jewelery sales Indexed GDPMarket size:
100Global diamond jewellery market grows by 4%
4 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 4% 7% 4% 4% 4% US India China Other Total Base case scenario Optimistic scenariohealthy demand across all regions
enjoyed even stronger demand amid better consumer sentiment and a favorable macro environment
long-term are:
early stage of adoption of bridal rings gifts tradtion;
middle class. World diamond jewellery sales grew by 4% annually
Diamond jewelry market, $ bn
Outlook for world diamond jewellery demand
CAGR 2016-2030F
Source: Company’s estimatesMarketing spending of the industry
5producers in 2015 to support the development of the diamond sector through protection and promotion of reputation of diamonds
launched in the US (2016) and in India (2017)
and India)
for themselves is called “From Me, To Me”, launched in mid-September 2018
5 10 60 60 2016 2017 2018 Source: Company’s dataMarketing budget of the industry association growth
$ m
53% 6% 20% 21%India (from 2017) Asia Pacific ex. Japan (China from 2018) RoW
DPA marketing campaigns by region
% represents share of a region in global jewelry consumption
Global rough diamond sales and prices
6 28% 28% 29% 32% 31% 28% 29% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ALROSA Others 123 197 194 175 172 170 149 136 117 138 169 139 154 164 +60% (2%) (10%) (2%) (1%) (12%) (9%) (21%) +18% +22% (18%) +11% +6%driven by better diamond market demand Rough diamond sales demonstrates moderate recovery
$ bn
Average realized price for ALROSA’s gem-quality rough diamonds
$/ct
+21% +46% (20%) 0% +7% (14%) 0% +2% +2% +2% (1%) (1%) +2% +3%Rough diamond price index is 5% in H1’18 on lower stocks and better demand
price change 6.7 6.5 6.8 6М 2016 6М 2017 6М 2018 Sources: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2017” (December 2017), Company’s estimates ~15 ~15 ~15 ~16 ~12 ~15 ~15 Source: ALROSA’s rough diamond price index under long-term agreement and spot salesGlobal rough diamond production and midstream situation
7while in Q2 2018
increased marginally in value terms.
rough in the midstream suggests now inventory overhang in the system.
Decrease in global diamond output, 6M 2018*
m carats
Midstream rough and polished diamond inventories
$ bn
Note: data based on results of ALROSA and other major diamond producers with a market share totalling c. 74% in 2015-2017 41.5 39.5 41.3 42.6 40.3 41.0 41.8 Q4 2014 Q4 2015 Q4 2016 Q2 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 9 10 10 10 7 9 19 16 24 27 31 30 26 26 51 52 33 37 41 40 33 35 70 68 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6M 2017 6M 2018 Other AlrosaIndia polished diamond exports value (monthly)
$ m
Source: industry data, Morgan Stanley research 500 1 000 1 500 2 000 2 500 3 000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5-Yr Range 5-Yr Average 2018 2017Long term supply outlook: incremental growth is limited
8 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 International (ALROSA) Orapa (De Beers) Nyurbinskaya (ALROSA) Catoca (ALROSA/Endiama/LLI Holding) Argyle (Rio Tinto) Ekati (DDC) Diavik (Rio Tinto/DDC) Jwaneng (De Beers) Venetia (De Beers) Jubilee (ALROSA) Udachnaya (ALROSA)products (brown diamonds with 80% price discount to standard gem- quality)
~70% of global rough diamond output controlled by BIG-3
m cts
Exploration periods of deposits
Sources: Company’s analysis, Kimberley Process statistics ALROSA 26% 22% De Beers 14% Rio Tinto Other 23% 7% DDC 5% Catoca Petra Diamonds 3% 151 m cts ~8 years – average exploration 80 115 150 150 125 2014 2017 2020F 2023F 2027F 2030F Gahcho Kue Grib Renard Argyle (brown color diamonds, average price is c. 20 $/ct ) Diavik Mir Source: diamond mining companies’ forecastWorld diamond production forecast
m cts
About ALROSA
9foundation for shareholder returns Financial results summary
$ bn
Loans and borrowings
$ m
Dividend payments
$ m
* FCF = operating cash flow less capex 277 317 204 275 1,145 636* 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.09* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 USD per share * based on FX rate as of 14.09.2018; dividends to be approved by the Meeting of Shareholders by 30 September 2018 3.7 4.6 4.6 2.8 1.9 2.6 2.2 1.1 0.7 1.6 1.3 1.1 52% 56% 47% 40% 2015 2016 2017 6M 2018 Revenue EBITDA Free cash flow EBITDA margin 3,951 3,119 2,781 1,374 1,494 96 1.8 1.2 1.8 0.6 0.9 0.1 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 30.06.2018 Net debt Net debt / EBITDA7%
ALROSA: assets geography
10 Note: the amount of total resources, including reserves (according to JORC) are as of July 1, 2016Share of division in 2017 diamond production Geography of production assets
1,030 m ct
Total resources, including reserves653 m ct
Total reserves Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Arkhangelsk Region Russian Federation 93% 7% Angola ALROSA owns 32.8% of Catoca Ltd (Angola) Open-pit mining from 9 mines in 2017 Underground mining from 4 mines in 2017 Alluvial mining from alluvial deposits in 201753% 27% 20% Severalmaz
Arkhangelskaya pipe Karpinskogo-1 pipe7% 2.6
m ctAikhal Division
Aikhal UG mine Jubilee pipe Komsomolskaya pipe33% 13.0
m ctNyurba Division
Nyurbinskaya pipe Botuobinskaya pipe Alluvial deposits19% 7.7
m ct18% Mirny Division
International UG mine Alluvial deposits Mir UG mine*7.2
m ct10% Udachny Division
Udachny UG mine Zarnitsa pipe Zapolyarnaya Pipe (Verkhne-Munskoye deposit) Alluvial deposits3.8
m ct13% Almazy Anabara & Nizhne-Lenskoye
Alluvial deposits5.2
m ct * production suspended in August 2017 as a result of the accident (incl. 2.8 mln ct from Mir pipe)33% 19% 18% 10% 13%
Highest quality assets
11 653 434 132 95 48 377 inferred resources ALROSA Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 33% 30% 16% 26% 28% 42% 31% 15% 16% 18% ALROSA Peer 2 Peer 1 Peer 3 Peer 4 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017cost/quality balance
realized price of gem-quality rough diamond is 160 $/ct
while grades at underground are higher by over 3x ALROSA operates largest reserves with long life of mine
m cts
ALROSA is sustainably tops the ranks as one of the most profitable miner
EBIT margin, %
High profitability margin maintained even at the bottom of the cycle
$/ct
Total 2017 diamond production was 39.6 m ct Source: Bloomberg, Companies’ data Open-pit mines Alluvials 28 39 44 78 $180 $100 $60 $30 5Y av. realized price of gem-quality rough diamonds 176 $/ct 160 $/ct 136 $/ct max min Source: JORC as of 01 July 2016 (Micon), Company’s estimates 42 Aikhal UG mine International UG mine Udachny UG mine 2.5 21.1 3.7 8.0 1.6Low cost production platform with moderate growth
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7delivering strong diamonds yields
volumes
2019)
Range of average mined diamond grade (2017)
ct/t
8.0 21.1 1.6 2.5 3.7 Udachny UG mine 2017 diamond production 1.19 1.87 5.83 6.89 ~1 ct/t – average gradeALROSA’s diamond production to stabilize at 37-38 m carats
m ct
25.1 23.9 24.3 21.5 22.3 21.0 20.3 2.2 1.5 2.2 3.2 2.8 9.0 9.1 9.4 9.2 10.2 8.2 5.9 0.6 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.6 3.3 3.8 0.1 0.4 1.3 1.6 3.9 5.7 0.1 0.2 1.8 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018F 2019F Verkhne-Munskoye Udachny UG mine Severalmaz Jubilee pipe Mir UG mine (stopped from Aug'17) Other Note: detailed ALROSA’s production plan is disclosed in the Appendix (slide 28)36.9 36.2 38.3 37.4 39.6 36.6 ~37.5 – 38 Total
0.42 Alluvials International UG mine Aikhal UG mine Open-pit minesImproved quality of sales with 70% of long term client base
ALROSA’s rough diamond sales channel breakdown
18% 64% 71% ~70% 72% 17% 12% 10-20% 10% 19% 17% 10-20% 2006-2008 2012-2014 2015-2016 2020F Tenders Spot sales Long-term contractsand price dynamic, e.g.:
sales and predictable prices during volatility on diamond market
Allocation of rough diamond by quality Sorting of rough diamonds
26 sizes 16 shapes 5 clarity categories 34 colors 8,013 classification positionsALROSA’s geography of sales based on clients legal residences
number of long-term clients in 2018 49% 51% 17% 16% 11% 10% 10% 10% 6% 7% 2016 2017 Other China UAE Russia Israel India Belgium 4% 4% 3% 2% 3 6Q2 2018 Results
Q2 Sales
15 11.0 8.0 4.9 6.2 10.1 6.3 19.1 16.4 3.0 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 2.7 5.2 6.0 14.1 10.2 7.5 9.4 13.4 9.0 24.3 22.4 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6M 2017 6M 2018 Industrial quality diamonds Gem-quality diamonds 15 14 18 18 12 11 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018Q2 2018 Sales
6M 2018 Sales
prices and a better mix of gem quality diamonds.
low of 11 m carats, approaching the technological minimum on the back of steady demand across the entire sales mix.
Diamond sales
m cts
Increase in diamond sales by value, 6M 2018
$ m
ALROSA's diamond inventories at multi-quarter lows
m cts
1,289 1,114 823 859 1,556 1,034 2,403 2,590 20 18 25 21 26 23 38 49 1,309 1,132 848 881 1,582 1,057 2,442 2,639 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6M 2017 6M 2018 Industrial quality diamonds Gem-quality diamondsQ2 Output
16 5.8 5.2 3.5 6.6 5.3 4.1 10.9 9.4 2.9 3.3 1.3 3.1 2.0 2.1 6.2 4.1 1.9 5.4 2.3 2.2 2.6 8.9 10.4 10.3 10.1 7.6 8.5 19.3 16.1 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6М 2017 6М 2018 Alluvials Underground Open pit 6.1 10.1 15.7 7.3 5.7 10.1 16.2 15.8 1.46 1.03 0.65 1.39 1.30 0.84 1.19 1.01 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6М 2017 6М 2018 Grade, carat/tonne(up 1% y-o-y) due to alluvial deposits output growth (up 4.4 m tonnes), while mined ore output remained flat
due to higher share of alluvial production with lower carat/tonne ratios, and lack of higher grade volumes from Mir UM
carats due higher output (+77% qoq), largely coming from lower grade deposits
the Mir UM with higher carat/tonne ratios, a lower grade at deeper levels of the International UM along with a larger share of lower-grade
Ore and sands processing
m tonnes
Diamond production
m cts
59% 26% 15% 48% 25% 27% Share, % Share, %Q2 and 6M Financials
17 1.42 1.24 0.97 1.00 1.67 1.14 2.66 2.81 0.62 0.65 0.46 0.46 0.63 0.48 1.26 1.11 43% 52% 47% 46% 38% 42% 47% 40% Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6М 2017 6М 2018 Revenue EBITDA EBITDA marginQ2 2018:
decreased (down 32% q-o-q on a high base of Q1 2018).
better sales mix.
the back of cost and pricing improvements.
6M 2018:
selling prices and a better sales mix, despite a 8% decrease in sales in carats, including a 14% drop in gem-quality diamond sales.
and lower production costs.
standing at 0.04х. Q2 margins expanded
$ bn
Strong Free Cash Flow generation
$ m
603 264 192 201 718 344 867 1062 0.62 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6М 2017 6М 2018 Free Cash Flow = Operating Cash Flow minus CapexCosts dynamics and structure in 6M 2018
* Costs – production costs + selling, general and administrative expenses + other operating income and expensesALROSA’s operational excellence programme
Key drivers:
administrative payroll;
RUB 1.0 bn: reduced exploration costs due to (a) exploration restructuring (RUB 0.5 bn of impact) and (b) sale of gas assets;
(largely the shutdown of the Mir underground mine) and sale of gas assets.
Per unit costs
RUB '000 / cu m
Cost breakdown by category
RUB bn
Profitability analysis
19Q2 2018:
6 m carats were sold from stock;
6M 2018:
diamonds (down 14%).
EBITDA bridge
RUB bn
Note: “Other” includes changes in diamond and ore inventories, lower tariffs and higher electricity subsidies, etc.89.1 72.8 0.9 1.6 2.6
30.4 EBITDA (2017) Changes in sales mix and pricing Changes in sales volume Rouble devaluation Payroll growth/reduction Other* EBITDA (2018)
6M 2018 y-o-y Q2 2018 q-o-q
41.3 47.7 18.4
5.6
4.2
Annual capex is expected to stabilize at RUB 26-28 bn
20 5.8 5.6 7.0 8.5 4.8 7.2 11.4 12.0 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6М 2017 6М 2018(up RUB 2.1 bn), the Udachny underground mine (up RUB 0.7 bn) and the Zarya pipe (up RUB 0.7 bn) due to partial roll-over caused by weather.
capex cycle peaked in 2018. Capex
RUB bn
Capex to stabilize
RUB bn
26.5 25.6 25.7 23.4 20.5 20.1 22.6 23.7 5.1 2.6 1.5 0.2 0.7 6.6 7.9 6.5 5.1 2.7 2.1 1.7 2.6 0.5 3.3 3.7 9.2 1.4 1.7 38.2 36.1 34.2 31.8 26.9 31.6 26.4 28.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 2019E 2020E Verkhne- Munskoye Udachny mine Severalmaz OtherFree cash flow drivers
21ensure reliable operations in winter);
supported by improved sales mix and selling prices.
by a slight (up RUB 0.6 bn) growth in capex and release of cash from the working capital.
Note: free cash flow is defined as operating cash flow net of investments (capital expenditures) in the core business Source: Company data62.1 74.1 74,1 89.1
6.6
Cash flow bridge
RUB bn EBITDA Changes in working capital Income tax Other Operating cash flow Capex Free cash flow
Operating cash flow and capex
RUB bn 20.9 28.1 41.3
1.1
6M 2018 Q2 2018
40 21 18 20 46 28 62 74 6 6 7 9 5 7 11 12 35 16 12 12 41 21 50 62 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 6М 2017 6М 2018 Operating cash flow Capital investments Free cash flowDebt position
22from gas assets sale
stronger free cash flow
year)
Debt profile changes
$ m
Liquidity position
$ m
4,217 3,496 3,057 2,344 1,621 1,017 3,951 3,119 2,781 1,374 1,494 96 1.8 1.2 1.8 0.6 0.9 0.1 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 30.06.2018 Total debt Net debt Net debt / EBITDADebt repayment schedule
$ m
1,005 6 5 1 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Eurobonds Bank loans 922 3,220 4,141 30.06.2018 9.8 10.6 13.1 12.5 10.4 2.8 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6M 2018Changes in interest on loans and borrowings
$ m Credit lines Cash and equivalents
New Dividend Policy
23 50% 35% 50% 50% 50% 60% 70% 26% 37% 59% 52% 70% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 Minimum level of dividends based on IFRS net income (new dividend policy) Payment ratio based on IFRS net income Payment ratio based on FCFdividends at 35% of IFRS net income, however, over the recent three years the Company has maintained a 50% net income pay-out ratio
dividend policy:
❶ Net debt / EBITDA < 0.0 – over 100% FCF; ❷ Net debt / EBITDA: 0.0–1.0 – 70–100% FCF; ❸ Net debt / EBITDA: 1.0–1.5 – 50–70% FCF.
made a preliminary recommendation that the General Meeting of Shareholders approve dividends of at least RUB 5.93 per share (GM tentatively scheduled on 30 September)
Dividend payout ratios Dividend payment
$ m
277 317 204 275 1,145 636* 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.09* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6М 2018 USD per share * based on FX rate as of 14.09.2018; dividends to be approved by the Meeting of Shareholders by 30 September 2018Outlook
24Market outlook
Operating performance
Appendix
Net debt change
26shares (1.6% of the authorised capital).
6 19 86 5 3
7
Net debt bridge
RUB bn Net debt as at 31 December 2017 Free cash flow in Q1 2018 Sale of gas assets Acquisition of quasi- reasury shares Other Net debt as at 31 March 2018 Free cash flow in Q2 2018 Acquisition of quasi- treasury shares Other Net debt as at 30 June 2018
FX rate
27USD.
RUB.
USD.
the USD exchange rate by +/- 1 RUB/USD leads to the following change in metrics:
Financial metrics breakdown by currency
% of metric's total
94% 13% 13% 71% 97% 6% 87% 87% 29% 3% Revenue Cost of sales Capex Cash and cash equivalents Total debt RUB USDALROSA’s production forecast
28 Type of mining Grade, ct/t Price per carat, $ Cash costs per carat, $ Diamond production forecast, ‘000 ct 2017 2017 2018F 2019F 2020F Aikhal Division Jubilee pipeKey investment projects
29Udachny underground mine
Production start 2014 Expected design capacity 2019 Expected life of mine 2040 Investment start date 2002 Total capex, RUB bn 65.4 Total capex invested in 2002–2017, RUB bn 52.8 (81%) Target ore output, m tonnes pa 4.0 Diamond production, m carats pa (2019F) 5.7 Average grade, carats per tonne (2019F) 1.50 Udachnaya pipe total resources (including reserves), m carats 212.6Verkhnemunskoye deposit (open pit mining)
Production start 2018 Expected design capacity 2020 Expected life of mine 2041 Investment start date 2007 Total capex, RUB bn 22.4 Total capex invested in 2007–2017, RUB bn 8.3 (37%) Target ore output 3 Diamond production, m carats pa (2019F) 1.7 Average grade, carats per tonne (2019F) 0.63 Total resources (including reserves), m carats 40.5Supply of diamonds is constrained by lack and complexity of new diamond discoveries and significant time required to ramp-up production
30 Source: Company’s estimatesNo less than 4 years is required to ramp-up full scale production on a diamond mine
Discovery-to-production period, yearsDiscovery and development of new kimberlite pipes are much more challenging now
1954- 1956 1960 1969 1974-1975 1994 1996 2006 I II III Aikhal International Jubilee Botuobinskaya Nyurbinskaya Mayskaya Host rocks Sandstones Kimberlite pipes 60 m 9 m 80 m 70 m Year of discovery 9 7 6 6 6 4 4 Diavik Ekati Argyle Nyurbinskaya Catoca Finsch Orapa Development process Development process + dewateringRough diamond production is dominated by few mining companies with the highest margins across diamond pipeline, where ALROSA benefits from leading market share of 26%
31Diamond pipeline structure Major global diamond producers
Share in global production
Source: AWDC Bain report “The Global Diamond Industry 2017” 27‒28% 1‒4% 2‒4% 3‒11% 1‒4% Margins Players Top 5 players control ~ 70%Economic efficiency of underground mining is fostered by block caving mining method
32 Backfilled production level Next production levelTraditional cut-and-fill mining
Mir underground mine International underground mine Aikhal underground mine Next production level Production levelBlock caving method
Udachny underground mineCut-and-fill mining method at Udachny underground mine would have required more than 330 thousand tons of cement a year (~ RUB 1 bn in current prices), which is an equivalent of total cement output in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
ALROSA’s low environmental impact, as well as efficient information disclosure are acknowledged by ESG ratings
33Water intake
m m3
Area of annually disturbed land
ha
LTIFR
number of lost time injuries per 1 m hours worked
3rd place (out of 33) in the “First rating of environmental performance of mining companies in Russia” (held by the WWF and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Russian Federation in 2017) Rated among top-10 Russian companies with transparent corporate reporting according to Transparency International-Russia research
15.2 4.9 2012 2017* (3x) 2,853 571 2012 2017 (5x) 0,55 0,94 2012 2017 +71% Note: key sustainable performance indicators represent PJSC ALROSA data *excluding heat and power supplying company, which was removed from PJSC ALROSA perimeter and became its subsidiaryManagement team is fully committed to deliver on ALROSA’s development plans
34Operational Team Executive Team
CEO Sergey Ivanov Chief Executive OfficerSupervisory Board overview (1/2)
35 Anton Siluanov First Deputy Chairman of the GovernmentSupervisory Board overview (2/2)
36 Evgenia Grigorieva Minister of Property and Land Relations of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Sergey Ivanov Chief Executive Officer of ALROSA Dmitry Konov Member of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Management Board at SIBUR Holding Valentina Lemesheva Independent director of the Supervisory Board, ALROSA Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Nominated by: the Russian Federation Nominated by: the Russian Federation as an independent director Nominated by: the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) as an independent director Previously held positions include:Resources inclusive of reserves according to JORC Code as of July 1, 2016 (1/2)
37 Deposit Resource category Tonnage ('000 t) Resource grade (cpt) Contained diamonds ('000 cts) Udachny division Udachnaya Pipe Measured 13,646 1.16 15,812 Indicated 83,524 1.53 127,801 Inferred 53,991 1.28 68,978 Zarnitsa Pipe Indicated 27,131 0.25 6,858 Verkhne-Munskoe Deposit Indicated 46,914 0.65 30,616 Inferred 17,168 0.57 9,857 Alluvial deposits Indicated 2,447 0.49 599 Inferred 1,176 0.63 373 Aikhal division Jubilee Pipe Measured 18,420 0.86 15,815 Indicated 88,138 0.74 65,401 Inferred 57,821 0.63 36,352 Aikhal Pipe Measured 4,361 4.97 21,666 Indicated 690 3.14 2,168 Inferred 1,716 4.06 6,966 Komsomolskaya Pipe Indicated 3,943 0.38 1,494 Zaria Pipe Indicated 12,392 0.28 3,515 Inferred 27,347 0.13 3,583 Mirny division Mir Pipe Measured 20,104 3.71 74,521 Indicated 16,538 3.36 55,525 Inferred 1,072 3.11 3,339 International Pipe Measured 1,448 8.21 11,888 Indicated 3,544 8.71 30,848 Alluvial deposits Measured 17,509 0.39 3,379 Indicated 22,273 0.21 2,322 Inferred 440 0.40 88 Solur-Vostochnaya placer Indicated 5,982 1.97 5,903 Inferred 959 1.80 865Resources inclusive of reserves according to JORC Code as of July 1, 2016 (2/2)
38 Deposit Resource category Tonnage ('000 t) Resource grade (cpt) Contained diamonds ('000 cts) Nyurba division Nyurbinskaya Pipe Measured 1,432 4.12 5,905 Indicated 7,095 4.32 30,623 Inferred 1,217 5.56 6,767 Botuobinskaya Pipe Measured 3,172 5.30 16,827 Indicated 10,139 5.90 59,814 Inferred 2,762 5.71 15,778 Maiskoye Kimberlite Body Indicated 1,231 6.03 7,426 Inferred 1,768 2.99 5,278 Alluvial deposits Measured 187 7.85 734 Indicated 6,897 4.67 16,094 Inferred 4,762 3.01 377 Lomonosov division (Severalmaz) Arkhangelskaya Pipe Measured 18,231 0.97 17,764 Indicated 29,689 1.08 32,184 Inferred 39,407 1.24 48,941 Karpinsky-1 Pipe Measured 6,971 1.08 7,501 Indicated 6,915 1.72 11,893 Inferred 8,615 1.16 9,993 Pionerskaya Pipe Indicated 58,330 0.47 27,530 Inferred 42,875 0.52 22,502 Lomonosov Pipe Indicated 32,523 0.50 16,230 Inferred 42,250 0.46 19,530 Almazy Anabara Indicated 38,160 1.33 25,373 Inferred 9,366 0.77 3,621 Nizhne-Lenskoye Indicated 10,793 0.57 3,075 Inferred 16,068 0.58 4,661 Total for ALROSA Group of Companies Measured 105,482 1.82 191,811 Indicated 515,285 1.09 563,291 Measured + Indicated 620,767 1.22 755,102 Inferred 330,779 0.83 274,629 Total 951,546 1.08 1,029,731Thank you!
24 Ozerkovskaya emb. Moscow 115184 Russia
IR@alrosa.ru