The challenges and Opportunities for Next Generation
- f Forest Product Biorefineries
All Biorefineries Are Regional Biodiesel Biogasoline BioFuels US: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The challenges and Opportunities for Next Generation of Forest Product Biorefineries Arthur J. Ragauskas School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Institute of Paper Science and Technology Georgia Institute of Technology All Biorefineries Are
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2012
U.S.A. Bioethanol MM Gal. Annual
US: Currently Bioethanol 2% Biodiesel 0.01%
O HO HO OH OH OH
Today
Amylase Yeast
H3C H2 C OH
O HO HO OH OH OH
Today
Amylase Yeast
H3C H2 C OH
O HO HO OH OH OH O HO HO OH OH
Future Biomass Acid Catalyst
Enzymes
Fermentation
H3C H2 C OH
Others
Lignin Polymer Derived from Coniferyl, Coumaryl, Sinapyl, Alcohol Major Global Biopolymers Hemi Cellulose Short chain branched,substituted polymer of sugars DP: ~ 70 - 200 Cellulose Polymer of β-(1,4)-glucan DP: ~300 – 15,000
Content: ~ 35 – 50% Content: ~ 20 - 30% Content: ~ 15 – 30%
Lignin Polymer Derived from Coniferyl, Coumaryl, Sinapyl, Alcohol Major Global Biopolymers Hemi Cellulose Short chain branched,substituted polymer of sugars DP: ~ 70 - 200 Cellulose Polymer of β-(1,4)-glucan DP: ~300 – 15,000
Content: ~ 35 – 50% Content: ~ 20 - 30% Content: ~ 15 – 30%
BioResource % ∼ Lignin Hemicellulose Cellulose Softwood 27 28 39 Hardwood 25 30 40 Corn Stover 18 22 38 Wheat Straw 23 21 38 Fine Paper
80 Switch Grass 18 21 31
O O O OAc O O HO OAc O HO O O O AcO OH O-Xylan O O HO OAc O O AcO OAc O O HO HO O HO O HO HO OH HO O O HO OH O O O H3CO OH OH OH O O HO OH O O HO OH OH OH O HO OH O O HO OH O OH OH O OH OH OCH3 HO OCH3 O HO HO H3CO O HO HO OCH3 O HO OCH3 O HO OH O O H3CO HO HO O OH OH OCH3 OCH3 OH OH O OCH3 O O OCH3 O OCH3 HO HO OCH3 O O OCH3 HO O HO HO OCH3DOE
– Is the world’s largest manufacturer of forest products – Directly employs over 1.3 million people – Ranks among the top ten manufacturing employers in 42 states – Estimated payroll of $50 billion. – Sales top $230 billion annually in the U.S. and export markets.
– Industry has not earned its cost of capital in a decade – Mergers and Acquisitions
Forest Products – Return on Equity 1990 – 1995
– Tropical pulp mills have advantage in the HW market – China is filling their needs with modern, high-technology, low-cost mills – Competition from foreign- made products in the U.S. market is growing
– Allow production (and supply chains) to migrate offshore – Introduce new line of products to provide significant growth
+ +
Wood
Cellulose Lignin Cellulose Hemicellulose
Cooking bleaching stages Bleached pulp
Lignin Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin
Paper
Thermal Energy
Kraft Pulping-Bleaching Greenfield Mill: $1 – 2 Billion Collects: 650,000 tons of wood/year Generates: 350,000 tons of pulp US: 110 million tons pulpwood/year
Softwood and Hardwood Kraft Pulping Conditions. Softwood Hardwood Active alkali on dry wood 17 - 21 % 14 – 18 % Liquor sulfidity (Na2S) 25 % 25 %
170 170 Total cooking time/min 112 - 174 63 – 95 Kraft cook completed at lignin content 5 % 2 % Yield 48 – 43 49 – 47
Wood Debarking Collection Wood Chipping Pulp Bleaching Papermaking Energy Pulping Chemicals Bark Energy Unbleached Pulp Papermaking Wood Chips Pulping Combustion of Chemical Pulp Waste Proposed Hemicellulose Extraction Stage Extracted Woodchips Wood Hemicellulose Sugars Bioethanol Fermentation Wood Extractives Chemical Markets Biofuels Value-Added Chemicals
Current Products: Pulp, Tall Oil, Turpentine Future Select Hemicellulose
Typical Wood Chemical Distribution for Wood Before and After Kraft Pulping
Component Wood Components Kraft Pulp Components Pine Birch Pine Birch As a % of Original Wood Cellulose 38 – 40 40 – 41 35 35 Glucomannan 15 - 20 2 - 5 5 1 Xylan 7 - 10 25 – 30 5 16 Other carbohydrates 0 - 5 0 – 4
25 - 30 20 – 22 2 – 5 1.5 – 3 Extraneous compounds 4 - 6 2 - 4 0.25 < 0.5
Typical kraft pulp mill will utilize ∼630,000 tons of wood/year Approximately 90,000 tons of hemicellulose/year are degraded
. Carbohydrate Profile for Loblolly Pine Wood and Kraft Pulp. Source Glucose Galactose Mannose Xylanose Arabinose Wood 67.9 3.5 17.7 8.8 2.1 Pulp 84.9 0.3 7.1 7.1 0.5
Mayor Chemical Constituents of Wood. Wood Macromoleculesa Wood Species Cellulose (%) Lignin (%) Hemicelluloses (%) Softwoods Picea glauca 41 27 31 Abies balsamea 42 29 27 Pinus strobes 41 29 27 Tsuga Canadensis 41 33 23 Thuja occidentalis 41 31 26 Hardwoods Acer rubrum 45 24 29 Ulmus Americana 51 24 23 Populus tremuloides 48 21 27 Betula papyrifera 42 19 38 Fagus grandifolia 45 22 29
aall samples were analyzed extractives free
Potential Process Benefits from Pre-Extracting Hemicelluloses Prior to Kraft Pulping
Cellulose DP: ∼ 1600 post-pulping, ∼ 700 post-bleaching Hemicellulose: α-cellulose content > ∼80%, a decrease paper sheet strength properties occurs.
Southern Loblolly Pine Chips Control Kraft Pulping Wood Chips Kraft Pulping Pulp Yield Fiber Properties Paper Properties Hemi-Extracts Pulp Yield Fiber Properties Sheet Properties Hemi Yield Lignin Yield Hemi Composition
Wood Chip Pre-extraction Acidic – Basic
Loblolly Pine Experimental Parameter Alkaline Pre-extraction Acidic Pre-extraction Steam Pre-extraction Temperature/ oC 100 - 170 130 - 150 130 - 170 Time/h 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 0.5, 1.0 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 Chemicals/% 1.0, 1.5% NaOH 0.0, 0.2, 0.5% H2SO4 53 psi Ratio of Liquor to Wood 5.0 : 1.0 5.0 : 1.0 4.0 : 1.0 Post Extraction Washing No Yes & No No
O O O OAcO O HO OAc O HO O O O AcO OH O-Xylan O O HO OAcO O AcO OAc O O HO HO O HO O OH HO OH O HO HO OH O O O OH O O HO OH O HO O O O HO OH O-Xylan O O HO OAcO O HO OH O O HO HO O HO O OH HO OH O HO HO OH
+ HOAc
Steam < 3% Yield
Mass Terminal pH % Recovery
0.5h Pre-Extraction 0.0% H2SO4: 5 3.2 0.2% H2SO4: 5 2.7 0.5% H2SO4: 8 2.3 1.0h Pre-Extraction 0.0% H2SO4: 8 3.7 0.2% H2SO4: 10 2.4 0.5% H2SO4: 12 2.2
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
% Hydrolyzed Sugars
0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4 0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4
Arabinose Galactose Glucose Xylose Mannose
0.5 h 1.0 h
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 Minutes 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 nC 1-2 Fucose Arabinos e Galactos e Glucos e Xylose Mannos eYields 10 – 18%
5 10 15 20 25 30
Kappa #
C
t r
( n
r e
x t r a c t i
) . 5 h r p r e
x t r a c t e d / W i t h w a s h i n g . % H 2 S O 4 . 2 % H 2 S O 4 . 5 % H 2 S O 4 1 . h r p r e
x t r a c t e d / W i t h w a s h i n g . % H 2 S O 4 . 2 % H 2 S O 4 . 5 % H 2 S O 4 1 . h r p r e
x t r a c t e d / W i t h
t w a s h i n g . % H 2 S O 4 . 2 % H 2 S O 4 . 5 % H 2 S O 4
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
Viscosity/cP
Control(no pre-extraction) 0.5hr pre-extracted/With washing 0.0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4 1.0hr pre-extracted/With washing 0.0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4 1.0hr pre-extracted/Without washing 0.0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Original 0.5hr pre-extracted(with washing) 0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4 1.0hr pre-extracted(with washing) 0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4 1.0hr pre-extracted(without washing) 0 % H2SO4 0.2% H2SO4 0.5% H2SO4 Burst Index
Burst Index
H2SO4/H2O t=0 H2SO4/H2O t= 48 h Spray Chips 1 h, 150 oC
H2SO4/H2O Direct & Delayed 1 h, 150 oC Reducing Sugars (mg/ml) % Hemicellulose 0.5% H2SO4 Direct (t:0) 36.3 12 Delayed (t: 48 h) 57.8 19 0.75% H2SO4 Direct (t:0) 67.9 22 Delayed (t: 48 h) 72.2 23
NaOH/H2O 1 h, 150 oC Exp. Terminal pH %Sugar Recovery Reducing Sugar (mg/ml) 150 oC 4.5% NaOH 1.0 h: 10.6 8 1.9 160 oC 4.5%% NaOH 1.0 h: 10.0 11 2.0 170 oC 4.5% NaOH, 2 h 8.9 11 2.3 6.0% NaOH, 1 h 11.3 14 2.5 9.0% NaOH, 1 h 12.7 16 3.3 12.0% NaOH, 1h 12.7 18 4.0
Experimental Conditions: NaOH: 4.5 – 12.0% t: 1.0 – 3.0 hr Temp.: 150 - 170 oC
10 20 30 40 50 60
% Monosaccharide 150 C NaOH 4.5%, 1hr 160 C NaOH 4.5%, 1hr 170 C NaOH 4.5%, 1hr NaOH 4.5%, 2hr NaOH 4.5%, 3hr NaOH 6.0%, 1hr NaOH 9.0%, 1hr NaOH 12.0%, 1hr
Arabinose Galactose Glucose Xylose Mannose
Exp. Terminal pH 150 oC 4.5% NaOH 1.0 h: 10.6 160 oC 4.5%% NaOH 1.0 h: 10.0 170 oC 4.5% NaOH, 1 h 9.1 4.5% NaOH, 2 h 8.9 4.5% NaOH, 3 h 8.0 6.0% NaOH, 1 h 11.3 9.0% NaOH, 1 h 12.7 12.0% NaOH, 1h 12.7
Production Costs from Biomass-Derived Syngas Competitive in Some Cases
Spath and Dayton, 2003
Syngas Syngas Power Export $3.8 billion
Liquid Fuels/Chemicals $5.5. billion
O2
Pulp $5.5 billion Steam, Power & Chemicals
BL Gasifier Wood Residual Gasifier Combined Cycle System Process to manufacture Liquid Fuels and Chemicals
Manufacturing
CO2
Extract Hemicelluloses new products chemicals & polymers $3.3 billion
Black Liquor & Residuals
Net Revenue Assumptions:
Acetic Acid - $1.73/gallon Purchased Electricity - $43.16/MWH Ethanol - $1.15/gallon Exported Electricity - $40.44/MWH Pulp - $100/ton net profit Renewable Fischer Tropsch Fuel - $57/bbl
Select Hemicelluloses
Projected Net New Ethanol Revenue: $4 – 5 MM/mill
Syngas Syngas Power Export 116 million BOE
Liquid Fuels/Chemicals 109 million barrels
O2
Pulp SW 55 million tons
Steam, Power & Chemicals
BL Gasifier Wood Residual Gasifier Combined Cycle System Process to manufacture Liquid Fuels and Chemicals
Manufacturing
CO2
Extract Hemicelluloses new products chemicals & polymers 1.9 billion gallons Ethanol 600 million gallons Acetic Acid
Black Liquor & Residuals
Lignocellulosic Biomass
Fermentation
Catalysis Syngas Production Sugar Production Ethanol
Products: propanol, butanol
Products: polyols, organic acids,
Lignin-rich Residues Low Quality Residues CHP Distillation
O OH H O H OH H H O H OH O OH2 + H O H OH H H O H OH C + O H O H OH H H O H OH O + H O H OH H H O H OH O H O H OH H H O H OH– C18 tall oil fatty acids, terpenes (Turpentine) 825,000 Total 100,000 MeadWestvaco, De Ridder, La. 115,000 MeadWestvaco, Charleston SC 75,000 Eastman Chemical, Savannah, Ga. 75,000 Eastman Chemical, Franklin, Va. 20,000 Hercules, Burlington, Ontario 130,000 Georgia-Pacific, Crossett, Ark. 120,000 Arizona Chemical, Savannah, Ga. 110,000 Arizona Chemical, Port St Joe, Fla. 80,000 Arizona Chemical, Panama City, Fla. CAPACITY
(short tons)
PRODUCER
HO H
Pine Sitostanol
CO2H H H
Abietic Acid
Oleic Acid:CH3(CH2)7CH=CH(CH2)7COOH
Food Additive
O2 Pulp CO2
BL Recovery Boiler Power Boiler Black Liquor & Residuals
Manufacturing Purchased Power – 6 GW $2.0 billion
CO2
Syngas CO + H2 Methanol
H2O WGS Purify
N2 over Fe/FeO (K2O, Al2O3, CaO)
NH3
Cu/ZnO
Isosynthesis ThO2 or ZrO2
i-C4
A l k a l i
e d Z n O / C r2 O3 C u / Z n O ; C u / Z n O / A l2 O3 C u O / C
/ A l2 O3 M
Mixed Alcohols
Oxosynthesis
H C
C O )4 H C
C O )3 P ( B u3 ) R h ( C O ) ( P P h3 )3
Aldehydes Alcohols
Fischer-Tropsch
Fe, Co, Ru Waxes Diesel Olefins Gasoline
Ethanol
Co, Rh Formaldehyde A g DME
Al2O3
zeolites MTO MTG Olefins Gasoline
MTBE Acetic Acid
carbonylation CH3OH + CO Co, Rh, Ni
M100 M85 DMFC Direct Use
h
a t i
C
acidic ion exchange
Source: R. Bain, NREL, 2004
The Forest Products Industry and Partners have a unique opportunity:
Paper, Biofuels, Electricity, and Biomaterials
Reinvent Itself
?When?