Advanced Reconstruction in Large Volume Liquid Scintillator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

advanced reconstruction in large volume liquid
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Advanced Reconstruction in Large Volume Liquid Scintillator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advanced Reconstruction in Large Volume Liquid Scintillator Detectors Applied to LENA Bjrn Wonsak Universitt Hamburg 09/06/15 1 Overview Tracking at high energies (GeV) Basic algorithm Performance Application to low


slide-1
SLIDE 1

09/06/15 1

Advanced Reconstruction in Large Volume Liquid Scintillator Detectors

Applied to LENA Björn Wonsak

Universität Hamburg

slide-2
SLIDE 2

09/06/15 2

Overview

  • Tracking at high energies (GeV)
  • Basic algorithm
  • Performance
  • Application to low energies (MeV)
  • New techniques to improve robustness
  • Positron discrimination
slide-3
SLIDE 3

09/06/15 3

Motivation: Tracking at High Energies

νe appearance experiments: NC-background → Is it possible to identify the π0? Reactor experiments Short-lived cosmogenics (9Li/8He) dangerous background Full veto produces too much deadtime → Identify places of high energy deposition (showers induced by muon)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

09/06/15 4

Point-like event: Light emitted in 4π → no directional information Time between emission and detection = distance → Circles

Why no 3D Tracking (so far)?

Point of light emission

slide-5
SLIDE 5

09/06/15 5

Point-like event: Light emitted in 4π → no directional information Time between emission and detection = distance → Circles

Why no 3D Tracking (so far)?

Point of light emission

slide-6
SLIDE 6

09/06/15 6

Point-like event: Light emitted in 4π → no directional information Time between emission and detection = distance → Circles

Why no 3D Tracking (so far)?

Point of light emission

slide-7
SLIDE 7

09/06/15 7

Why no 3D Tracking (so far)?

Track: Lots of emission points with different emissions times → No association between signal and emission time

slide-8
SLIDE 8

09/06/15 8

My Basic Idea

Assumption:

  • One known reference-point (in space & time)
  • Almost straight tracks
  • Particle has speed of light

Concept:

  • Take this point as reference for all signal times
slide-9
SLIDE 9

09/06/15 9

The Drop-like Shape

Signal time = particle tof + photon tof → ct = |VX X| + n*|X XP| Vertex (reference point

  • n track)

track PMT light light emission emission X X path of light

slide-10
SLIDE 10

09/06/15 10

The Drop-like Shape

ct = |VX| + n*|XP| → drop-like form P V X X

slide-11
SLIDE 11

09/06/15 11

The Drop-like Shape

ct = |VX| + n*|XP| → drop-like form Possible Possible

  • rigin of
  • rigin of

light light P V X X

slide-12
SLIDE 12

09/06/15 12

Time Distribution

Used as a smearing on the drop-like shape

time in ns

Convolution of Gaus and Exponential-Function

slide-13
SLIDE 13

09/06/15 13

Time Distribution

time in ns

Convolution of Gaus and Exponential-Function

LS typically has more than

  • ne decay component, the

smallest and dominate one in our case is 4.6 ns.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

09/06/15 14

Result 1 PMT

x [cm] y [cm] The colour-code represents the The co colour- r-co code represe sents the probability of light emission from a pro robability y of light emi missi ssion fro rom m a given point given point red = high probability red = = high pro robability y blue = low probability blue = = low pro robability

slide-15
SLIDE 15

09/06/15 15

Result a Few PMTs

y [cm] x [cm]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

09/06/15 16

Result 266 PMTs

y [cm] x [cm]

slide-17
SLIDE 17

09/06/15 17

Light Distribution (LD) Effects

Some parts of each drop-like shape are more likely the origin of light, because: – they are closer – directly in front of the PMT

→ Need to consider:

– solid angle of PMT area – attenuation – angular acceptance

slide-18
SLIDE 18

09/06/15 18

Light Distribution (LD) Effects

Finally I have to normalise the resulting pdf ! Some parts of each drop-like shape are more likely the origin of light, because: – they are closer – directly in front of the PMT

→ Need to consider:

– solid angle of PMT area – attenuation – angular acceptance

slide-19
SLIDE 19

09/06/15 19

Result all PMTs

3 GeV muon Initial direction (1,-1,0) y [cm] x [cm]

slide-20
SLIDE 20

09/06/15 20

Probability Mask

So far probabilities have been added! → correct for independent information However: Light signals are not completely independent from each

  • ther, because they belong to the same track.

→ Use “Result I” to weight all the single light contribution and re-normalise each of them!

slide-21
SLIDE 21

09/06/15 21

Result I

3 GeV muon Initial direction (1,-1,0) y [cm] x [cm]

slide-22
SLIDE 22

09/06/15 22

Result 2nd Iteration

x [cm] y [cm]

slide-23
SLIDE 23

09/06/15 23

Result 3rd Iteration

x [cm] y [cm]

slide-24
SLIDE 24

09/06/15 24

Result 9th Iteration

x [cm] y [cm]

slide-25
SLIDE 25

09/06/15 25

3D Topology

Probability distribution projected into the xy plane

Color: Total photon emission probability in arbitrary units → dE/dx seems accessible

slide-26
SLIDE 26

09/06/15 26

Image Processing

Medial line XY-Projection Medial line XZ-Projection

  • Ph. D. student Sebastian Lorenz

3D Medial line Blob finding Binarisation 3D-Presentation

Resolution < 20 cm

slide-27
SLIDE 27

09/06/15 27

Computing

One 3 GeV event, 20 cm bins, full light, 22 iterations in LENA → several hours (despite usage of adaptive mesh refinement) However:

  • I'd like to go to 2 cm bins
  • because there should be enough light for this resolution
  • In principle many more iterations are allowed

But algorithm highly parallisable → GPUs, etc.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

09/06/15 28

Current Status

Large reconstruction campaign

  • ngoing!

Muons with 1-5 GeV: (first results)

  • Robustness → okay
  • Angular resolution: ~1.5°

Electron events under production Other event classes still to be studied Paper under preparation!

P r e l i m i n a r y

  • Ph. D. student Sebastian Lorenz
slide-29
SLIDE 29

09/06/15 29

Can also do it with Cherenkov Light

Preliminary Preliminary

Bachelor student David Meyhöfer

3 GeV muon, initial direction (1,-1,0) A few % of light in liquid Scintillator is Cherenkov light → using both could help pattern and partical identification Also suitable for water Cherenkov detectors! Perfect for WbLS!

slide-30
SLIDE 30

09/06/15 30

Tracking at Low Energies (a few MeV)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

09/06/15 31

Robust Iterations!?

x y y y x x

slide-32
SLIDE 32

09/06/15 32

New Procedure

  • Divide detector in different parts
  • Do reconstruction for each part
  • Multiply results
  • Use this as Probability Mask
  • Go back to first step
slide-33
SLIDE 33

09/06/15 33

Result 2nd Iteration

z-projection y-projection

x x z y

1MeV positron at center

slide-34
SLIDE 34

09/06/15 34

Result 2nd Iteration (Zoom)

Z-projection (top view) Y-projection (side view)

x x z y

1MeV positron at center

slide-35
SLIDE 35

09/06/15 35

Result 2nd Iteration Slice 241

XY-slice of 3d probability density distribution X in cm Y in cm

slide-36
SLIDE 36

09/06/15 36

Result 2nd Iteration Slice 240

XY-slice of 3d probability density distribution Y in cm X in cm

slide-37
SLIDE 37

09/06/15 37

Result 2nd Iteration Slice 239

XY-slice of 3d probability density distribution Y in cm X in cm

slide-38
SLIDE 38

09/06/15 38

Result 2nd Iteration Slice 238

XY-slice of 3d probability density distribution Y in cm X in cm

slide-39
SLIDE 39

09/06/15 39

Result 2nd Iteration Slice 237

XY-slice of 3d probability density distribution Y in cm X in cm

slide-40
SLIDE 40

09/06/15 40

Result 2nd Iteration Slice 236

XY-slice of 3d probability density distribution Y in cm X in cm

slide-41
SLIDE 41

09/06/15 41

Crystalisation of the Result

  • Use well defined probability mask
  • Do reconstruction for each photon
  • Identify bin with highest probability
  • Associate photon with this bin

→ number of photons from that bin

slide-42
SLIDE 42

09/06/15 42

Crystalisation: 1 MeV Positron

X in cm Y in cm

Color: Number of photons detected from that bin

slide-43
SLIDE 43

09/06/15 43

Crystalisation: 2 MeV Electron

X in cm Y in cm

Color: Number of photons detected from that bin

slide-44
SLIDE 44

09/06/15 44

Crystalisation: 2 MeV Electron

X in cm Y in cm

Color: Number of photons detected from that bin

slide-45
SLIDE 45

09/06/15 45

Electron vs. Positron Discrimination: First Try Results I

  • 3343 events of electron and positron events each
  • Visible energy 1 – 5.5 MeV
  • At the center of the detector → worst place
  • LENA-MC → 250 photons per MeV

Ratio R of light reconstructed near vertex

  • vs. total light

R in %

Electrons Positrons

Notice: Used perfect vertex position for this analysis (At energies relevant for the IBD of reactor neutrinos.)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

09/06/15 46

Electron vs. Positron Discrimination: At C-11 Energy Region

  • 111 events of electron and positron events each
  • Visible energy 1 – 2 MeV
  • At the center of the detector → worst place
  • LENA-MC → 250 photons per MeV

Ratio R of light reconstructed near vertex

  • vs. total light

R in %

Electrons Positrons

Notice: Used perfect vertex position for this analysis

slide-47
SLIDE 47

09/06/15 47

Remarks on Potential

  • Possible improvements:
  • So far only 250 p.e/ MeV

→ Borexino: 500 p.e/ MeV, JUNO: 1200 p.e/ MeV

  • Faster scintillator
  • Remove scattered light statistically
  • Multivariate analysis
  • Other ideas:
  • Use time as 4th dimension
  • Gradient information (Sobel-Filter)
slide-48
SLIDE 48

09/06/15 48

Remarks on Potential

  • Possible improvements:
  • So far only 250 p.e/ MeV

→ Borexino: 500 p.e/ MeV, JUNO: 1200 p.e/ MeV

  • Faster scintillator
  • Remove scattered light statistically
  • Multivariate analysis
  • Other ideas:
  • Use time as 4th dimension
  • Gradient information (Sobel-Filter)
slide-49
SLIDE 49

09/06/15 49

Eliminating Influence of Scattered Light

  • Idea: Use probability mask and lookup tables to

calculate for each signal the probability to be scattered → reweigh signals after each iteration

slide-50
SLIDE 50

09/06/15 50

Eliminating Influence of Scattered Light

  • Idea: Use probability mask and lookup tables to

calculate for each signal the probability to be scattered → reweigh signals after each iteration Result before removal of scattered light!

x in cm y in cm

Multiplication trick not used here

slide-51
SLIDE 51

09/06/15 51

Eliminating Influence of Scattered Light

  • Idea: Use probability mask and lookup tables to

calculate for each signal the probability to be scattered → reweigh signals after each iteration Result after removal of scattered light!

x in cm y in cm

Multiplication trick not used here

slide-52
SLIDE 52

09/06/15 52

Using the 4th Dimension

  • Observation:
  • Contrast limited by influence of neighbour bins
  • Idea:
  • Use time distribution at each point
  • Fit signal-function + background from neighbours

Example of a bad bin with a lot of noise! Scattered light not removed!

background signal

Time in ns Signal strength in a.u.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

09/06/15 53

Using the 4th Dimension: Result

First result:

  • Very preliminary!

This now respresents a real dE/dx! y in cm x in cm

slide-54
SLIDE 54

09/06/15 54

Using the 4th Dimension: Result

First result:

  • Very preliminary!

This now respresents a real dE/dx! y in cm x in cm

  • Background estimate must be more robust
  • One possibility is to use probability mask to

calculate background from neighbour bins

slide-55
SLIDE 55

09/06/15 55

Other Possible Applications

  • Improvement of:
  • Position reconstruction
  • Energy reconstruction
  • IBD directional information
  • Gamma identification
  • Charge of stopping muons
  • Background reduction for 0νββ-experiments

Influence on non-stochastic term of energy resolution Supernova neutrinos Atmospheric neutrinos γ-cacade vs. point-like

(e.g. 110mAg in KamLAND-Zen)

8B neutrinos

(208Tl background at 2.6 MeV)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

09/06/15 56

Conclusion I

  • My Tracking:
  • Powerful new tool to increase physics potential
  • At both high and low energies
  • Wide range of applications
  • Performance:
  • Spatial resolution of less than 20cm
  • dE/dx accessible
  • Angular resolution for 1-5 GeV muon tracks ~1.5°

Liquid Scintillator, Water Cherenkov, Water based Liquid Scintillator, even Liquid Argon

Used realistic vertex information → As expected from backtracking algorithm

slide-57
SLIDE 57

09/06/15 57

Conclusion II

  • Positron-Discrimination:
  • Promising first results
  • Separation seems possible at low energies
  • Tracking at low energies:
  • Topological dE/dx will be challenging
  • Many possible applications

Used perfect vertex information so far → Need to use existing vertex finding algorithms

slide-58
SLIDE 58

09/06/15 58

Thanks for your attention!

slide-59
SLIDE 59

09/06/15 59

Backup slides

slide-60
SLIDE 60

09/06/15 60

Example: Real Borexino Data

Work of B.W.

Significant bins only

slide-61
SLIDE 61

09/06/15 61

Comment on Ortho-Positronium

  • Longer lifetime

→ Additional time-offset → Annihilation photons not (or badly) reconstructable

  • But:
  • Better separation in inside vs. outside analysis expected
  • Residual asymmetry expected

(deviation from spherical symmetry)

slide-62
SLIDE 62

09/06/15 62

But what about the reference point?

Answer: Any point on track can be used if I know the time the particle passing!

slide-63
SLIDE 63

09/06/15 63

2GeV Muon, First Hit Information

  • Vertex (-500.,0.,0.), Orientation (1.,1.,0.)

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

slide-64
SLIDE 64

09/06/15 64

2GeV Muon, First Hit, Backwards

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

  • Vertex (-500.,0.,0.), Orientation (1.,1.,0.)
slide-65
SLIDE 65

09/06/15 65

2GeV Muon, First Hit, from Middle

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

  • Vertex (-500.,0.,0.), Orientation (1.,1.,0.)
slide-66
SLIDE 66

09/06/15 66

2GeV Muon, First Hit, Back from Middle

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

  • Vertex (-500.,0.,0.), Orientation (1.,1.,0.)
slide-67
SLIDE 67

09/06/15 67

2GeV Muon, First Hit, Back from Middle

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

  • Vertex (-500.,0.,0.), Orientation (1.,1.,0.)

So if I have an outer detector and a particle leaves the LS volume I will have a starting point!

slide-68
SLIDE 68

09/06/15 70

Vertex Finding/Backtracking

Basic idea:

  • Calculate at every point the time correction needed for each

first hit signal to match the flight time to that point

  • Then look for peaks in this time distribution

from Domenikus Hellgartner

slide-69
SLIDE 69

09/06/15 71

Vertex Reconstruction I

y [cm] y [cm] x [cm] x [cm]

Work of D. Hellgartner & K. Loo

Uses first hit time of each PMT and gaussian time distribution

slide-70
SLIDE 70

09/06/15 72

How to improve Backtracking

Some regions on track do not produce many 'first hits' → Need to look more closely at timing patter (tof corrected) → whole track

slide-71
SLIDE 71

09/06/15 74

Stopped Muon in Borexino

slide-72
SLIDE 72

09/06/15 75

Double Muon Event in Borexino

slide-73
SLIDE 73

09/06/15 76

Double Muon Event in Borexino

Both tracks cut out!

slide-74
SLIDE 74

09/06/15 77

The power of the 4th dimension 4d Canny Algorithm

slide-75
SLIDE 75

09/06/15 78

The Reco Result (266 PMTs)

slide-76
SLIDE 76

09/06/15 79

4d-Sobel Result

slide-77
SLIDE 77

09/06/15 80

Reco Result divided by 4d-Sobel

slide-78
SLIDE 78

09/06/15 81

Minima of 4d-Sobel

slide-79
SLIDE 79

09/06/15 82

Result after Follow-up

slide-80
SLIDE 80

09/06/15 83

Some early examples with different particles

slide-81
SLIDE 81

09/06/15 84

465 MeV π0

  • Vertex (0.,0.,0.), Orientation (-1.,0.,0.)

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

slide-82
SLIDE 82

09/06/15 85

465 MeV π0

  • Vertex (0.,0.,0.), Orientation (-1.,0.,0.)

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex But only about 20% of the pion have a clear topology with two maxima visible by eye!

x in cm

y in cm

slide-83
SLIDE 83

09/06/15 86

Muon 800 MeV

  • Vertex (200.,100.,0.), Orientation (-1.,-1.,0.)

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

slide-84
SLIDE 84

09/06/15 87

2 Muons with 750 MeV each

  • Vertex (300.,0.,0.), Orientation +-45°

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm

y in cm

slide-85
SLIDE 85

09/06/15 88

Ridge-Line Analysis

  • Remark:
  • The pictures seem to give only rough spatial information
  • This is only because the single photon resolution is poor
  • But we have a lot of light

→ mean value should be very accurate → Need method to increase contrast/use the picture to find the track position

slide-86
SLIDE 86

09/06/15 89

Ridge-Line Analysis

  • Idea: Track should be a kind of ridge (in 3d)

→ Take only bins, with more than 17 smaller neighbour bins

slide-87
SLIDE 87

09/06/15 90

Resultat: 500 MeV Electron

  • Vertex (0.,0.,0.), Orientation (-1.,0.,0.)

x in cm

z in cm

y in cm

slide-88
SLIDE 88

09/06/15 91

465 MeV π0

  • Vertex (0.,0.,0.), Orientation (-1.,0.,0.)

10% of PMTs

x in cm

z in cm

slide-89
SLIDE 89

09/06/15 92

Muon 800 MeV

  • Vertex (200.,100.,0.), Orientation (-1.,-1.,0.)

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm y in cm

slide-90
SLIDE 90

09/06/15 93

2 Muons with 750 MeV each

  • Vertex (300.,0.,0.), Orientation +-45°

10% of PMTs at +-500 cm in z with respect to vertex

x in cm y in cm

slide-91
SLIDE 91

09/06/15 94

slide-92
SLIDE 92

09/06/15 95

Event Signature for Tracking

Charge (First) Hit time Simulated distributions

  • ver detector surface!