advanced fuel cycles and long term storage
play

Advanced Fuel Cycles and Long-Term Storage of Spent Fuel Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advanced Fuel Cycles and Long-Term Storage of Spent Fuel Research and Development Dr. John W. Herczeg Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Fuel Cycle Technologies Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Regulatory


  1. Advanced Fuel Cycles and Long-Term Storage of Spent Fuel Research and Development Dr. John W. Herczeg Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Fuel Cycle Technologies Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Regulatory Commission April 22, 2013

  2. Outline  Overview – Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Areas  Fuels  Separations  Proliferation Risk  Fuel Cycle Options – “Systems Analysis”  Used Fuel Disposition  Nuclear Fuel Storage & Transportation  R&D: Near Term and Longer Term 2

  3. Office of Nuclear Energy Nuclear Energy NE-1/2 Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee Chief Operating Officer Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Senior Advisors NE-21 NE-22 Office of Human Capital & Office of Budget & Business Services Planning NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 Deputy Assistant Secretary Deputy Assistant Secretary Deputy Assistant Secretary Deputy Assistant Secretary for Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fuel Cycle for Nuclear Reactor for Nuclear Facility International Nuclear Energy for Science and Technology Technologies Technologies Operations Policy and Cooperation Innovation Planning Project NE-51 NE-61 NE-41 NE-72 Idaho Operations Office Office of International Nuclear Office of Light Water Reactor Office of Advanced Modeling & Office of Systems Energy Policy Technologies Simulation Engineering & Integration NE-31 NE-62 NE-52 NE-42 NE-74 Office of Innovative Nuclear Office of International Nuclear Office of Fuel Cycle Office of Facilities Management Office of Advanced Reactor Research Fuel Management Research & Development Technologies NE-75 NE-53 Office of Used Office of Space & Nuclear Fuel Disposition Defense Power Systems Research & Development NE-54 Office of Uranium Management and Policy 3

  4. Science-Based Approach to Nuclear Energy Development  Experiments – Physical tests to develop understanding of single effects or integrated system behaviors.  Theory – Creation of models of physical Experiments Theory behaviors based on understanding of fundamental scientific principals and/or experimental observations. Modeling &  Simulation Modeling and Simulation – Use of computational models to develop scientific understanding of the physical behaviors of systems. Also used to apply scientific understanding to predict the behavior of complex physical systems. Engineering-Scale Demonstration  Demonstrations – New technologies, regulatory frameworks, and business models integrated into first-of-kind system demonstrations that provide top-level validation of integrated system technical and financial performance. 4

  5. Advanced Fuels Next generation LWR fuels with Metallic transmutation fuels with enhanced performance and safety enhanced proliferation resistance and reduced waste generation and resource utilization Crosscutting Capability Development supporting the Science-based Approach to Fuels RD&D -Advanced characterization and PIE techniques -Advanced in-pile instrumentation -Irradiation testing (steady-state & transient) -Fuel performance modeling -Analytic techniques 5

  6. Separations R&D Objective: Develop advanced fuel cycle separations and waste management technologies that improve current fuel cycle performance and enable a sustainable fuel cycle with:  Minimal processing, waste generation and potential for material diversion Strategy:  Long-term science based-based, engineering driven  Economical deployment 6

  7. Separations R&D • Develop and demonstrate technologies applicable over a broad Advanced Aqueous (AA) range of aqueous separation methods • Enabling technology for TRU recycle options from LWR fuel Minor Actinide Sigma Team (MA) • Develop cost effective technology ready for deployment • Enabling technology for any recycle option Off-gas Sigma Team (OG) • Develop cost effective technology ready for deployment • Develop advanced methods to develop fundamental understanding Fundamental Science / Mod. of separation methods, waste forms, and waste form performance- & Simulation (FS&M, M&SS) develop predictive models based on fundamental data Separation Process • Investigate alternative process options to determine if significant Alternatives (ASP) cost or performance improvement can be realized • Open disposal options with higher performance waste forms Alt. Waste Forms and Characterization (AWF, WFC) • Develop cost effective technology ready for deployment Uranium Extraction from • Develop and demonstrate extractants and engineered systems with Seawater (FR) double the capacity over current technology Electrochemical Processing • Develop and demonstrate deployable and sustainable technology (DE, JFCS) for fast reactor fuel reprocessing 7

  8. Addressing Proliferation and Terrorism Risks - R&D Objectives  Develop instruments capable of real- time measurement of group transuranics in advanced fuel cycle systems  Develop proliferation risk analyses applied to advanced fuel cycles and spent fuel storage  Safeguards and security by design:  Analyzing proliferation and terrorism risks from the very earliest stages to maximize effectiveness and efficiency and minimize S&S costs 8

  9. Fuel Cycle Options - “Systems Analysis” (technical evaluation of various fuel cycles within political, social, and economic constraints) Objective: Identify fuel cycles with benefits that are significant compared to current fuel cycle Waste Management Proliferation Risk Others -Institutional Technology Nuclear Materials Security Risk Safety Resource Utilization Environmental Economics Impact 9

  10. Used Fuel Disposition  Safety enhanced  Separations  Conventional  Alternative  Evaluating LWR fuel production geologies extended time  Recycled fuel frames  Higher  Innovative  Alternative  Secondary performance approaches waste forms  Transportation waste treatment after storage Consolidated Interim Storage is Key to our Strategy Near Term Needs Long Term Needs 10

  11. “Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High- Level Radioactive Waste”  With the appropriate authorizations from Congress, the Administration currently plans to implement a program:  Sites, designs and licenses, constructs and begins operations of a pilot interim storage facility by 2021 with an initial focus on accepting used nuclear fuel from shut-down reactor sites;  Advances toward the siting and licensing of a larger interim storage facility to be available by 2025 that will have sufficient capacity to provide flexibility in the waste management system and allows for acceptance of enough used nuclear fuel to reduce expected government liabilities; and  Makes demonstrable progress on the siting and characterization of repository sites to facilitate the availability of a geologic repository by 2048 .” 11

  12. Used Fuel Disposition R&D: “Near Term Extended Storage of High Burn- up Fuel Project”  FY 2014  R&D to support:  extended storage of used fuel  transportation of extended storage fuel : field testing to assess realistic loadings during transport  R&D on alternative disposal environments:  modeling, evaluation and experiments  Salt Repository:  Implement field tests to advance salt repository:  science for disposal of heat-generating waste  Borehole research:  Undertake R &D as necessary to further the understanding of hydro- geochemical, physical geology, structural geology and engineering properties of deep crystalline rocks.  Continue evaluation of standardized containers for storage, transportation and potentially disposal. 12

  13. DOE’s New Investment in Fuel Storage “High Burn -up Used Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Project”  Need:  General agreement among DOE, NRC and industry to investigate extended storage of high burn-up fuel to support storage license extension and transport of high burn-up fuel.  Goal: 1. Benchmark predicative models and empirical conclusions developed from short-term laboratory testing for aging of dry storage cask system components, and 2. Build confidence in the ability to predict the performance of these systems over extended time periods.  Cost & Schedule: $15.8M over 5 years 13

  14. DOE’s New Investment in Fuel Storage “High Burn -up Used Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Project”  Involves:  Loading a commercial storage cask with high burn- up fuel in a utility storage pool  Well understood fuel  Cask outfitted with additional instrumentation for monitoring  Drying of the cask contents using prototypic process  Cask will be housed at the utility’s dry cask storage site  Continuously monitored and externally inspected until the first internal inspection at ~10 years  A second cask could be loaded ~5 years following the first with a focus on additional scientific data on fuel behavior  The issue of where the cask will be opened will be decided at a later date. 14

  15. Contract Was Awarded to the EPRI Team  The EPRI Team consists of: • Surrey Plant • North Anna Plant AREVA Federal Services AREVA Transnuclear AREVA Fuels  First task is the preparation of the Test Plan that will be shared with the Public 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend