1
Addressing Boulder County’s
Affordable Housing Crisis Through Collaboration and Vision
Prepared for the Boulder County Consortium of Cities February 1, 2017
Addressing Boulder Countys Affordable Housing Crisis Through - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Addressing Boulder Countys Affordable Housing Crisis Through Collaboration and Vision Prepared for the Boulder County Consortium of Cities February 1, 2017 1 As a region, were falling far short of meeting the need for affordable
1
Addressing Boulder County’s
Prepared for the Boulder County Consortium of Cities February 1, 2017
2
The Boulder County Regional Affordable Housing Strategic Plan:
As a region, we’re falling far short
housing. The Boulder County Regional Housing Partnership has created a plan to address this, and we ask for your support of this plan.
3
Build on what has been working:
Kathy Fedler – Longmont Community Services Kurt Firnhaber – Boulder Division of Housing Kristin Hyser – Boulder Community Investment Program Betsey Martens – Boulder Housing Partners Molly McElroy – Longmont Community Services Michael Reis – Longmont Housing Authority
Frank Alexander – Boulder County Housing & Human Services Robin Bohannan – Boulder County Community Services Jeremy Durham – Boulder Housing Partners Norrie Boyd – Boulder County Housing Authority Leslie Durgin – Boulder Chamber of Commerce Krystal Winship Erazo – Longmont Housing Authority
Rising housing costs Lost affordable housing supply Incomes not keeping pace Land costs increasing Additional transportation problems Increased public concern: affordable housing is our top priority
Frank Rising housing costs
Boulder (67%) Louisville (65%) Lafayette (49%) Longmont (76%)
Increase in Longmont Average Home Sale Prices from 2010-2016
Boulder County Housing Stock Valued at Greater than $300,000
$200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000 $1,000,000 $1,100,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Mountains (65%)
Source: Boulder Area Realtors Association
8
Percent of Boulder County Population Renting
Increase in Boulder County Median 2BR Rents from 2011-2016
Source: Zillow Rent Index, 2 Bedroom
Boulder (31%) Longmont (33%) County-wide (36%) Lafayette (42%) Louisville (36%)
$2,000 $1,700 $1,400 $1,100
Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data; U.S. Census data 2015
15,029 Renter Households (32% of renters)
40,0of income toward rent)
10,004 Renter Households (22% of renters)
than 50% of income toward rent)
SEVERELY COST-BURDENED
(more than 50% of income toward rent)
COST-BURDENED
(more than 30% of income toward rent)
Boulder County Renters
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
54% of Renters in Boulder County are Housing-Cost-Burdened
More affordable housing
More Energy Efficiency More open spaces
Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan Survey City of Boulder Citizen Survey Affordable housing
Affordable housing is the top priority City of Longmont Citizen Survey Housing affordability getting worse Deep Community Concerns Around Lack of Affordable Housing
11
53% Increase in Housing Costs 36% Increase in Rents
What does it take to fill the financing gap?
Debt Equity Gap
City fee waivers No-cost/low-cost land Grants Soft debt Tackling the High Cost of Development in Boulder County
processes that hinder affordable housing creation
heights/densities, mixed use and AH options) that can be approved administratively by staff
affordable units
help create almost 1,000 affordable homes within 3 to 5 years
financers are essential
development in all communities was key to success
to keeping units in production
$650,000 $331,750 $284,500 $439,950 $574,525 $291,863 $865,748 $348,450 $286,000 $450,500
Detached All Attached Condo Townhome 3-pp 150% AMI Afford 3-pp 80% AMI Afford
≤ 2,000 SQFT Homes All Homes Median Home Price (2015)
1. Land Use & Policy: Provide policy direction related to
middle income housing and recommended land use changes to enable new middle income housing.
2. Middle Income Community Benefit Zoning: Adopt
community benefit policies and outline incentive-based rezoning/community benefit zoning.
3. Inclusionary Housing: Amend Inclusionary Housing
(IH) regulations to include a middle income tier.
4. Additional Community Benefit (Annexation):
Adopt policies requiring more middle income community benefit.
2,395
(553 DR)
3,462
(52 DR)
603
(272 DR)
50
Mountains Nederland Lyons Central Boulder Gunbarrel Niwot
Permanently-Affordable Housing Inventory
in Boulder County (2017) – Units by Region
Northeast Longmont Southeast Lafayette Louisville
Regions:
Recent Affordable Housing Development
Lee Hill, Boulder 31 units
Aspinwall, Lafayette 72 new & 95 refurbished units
High Mar, Boulder 59 units Red Oak Park, Boulder 59 units
Josephine Commons, Lafayette 74 units
Spring Creek, Longmont 60 units Hearthstone, Longmont 50 units
21
Current & Proposed Affordable Housing Development
Kestrel, Louisville 200 units, 2017 Palo Park, Boulder, 44 units, 2018 Twin Lakes, Gunbarrel 120-240 units, 2020(?) 2nd Street, Nederland 30 units, 2019 Fall River, Longmont, 60 units, 2019
In order to develop and preserve diverse affordable housing options, local jurisdictions will work both individually and collaboratively to:
for future housing
should be rental
the rest would be acquisition
Homes New Construction Acquisition Total For Rent 3,150 3,150 6,300 For Ownership 1,350 1,350 2,700 Total 4,500 4,500 9,000
Proposed Tenure and Method – 10% Goal
4,900 6,000 3,100 2,500
Mountains Nederland Lyons Central Boulder Gunbarrel Niwot
Permanently-Affordable Housing Inventory
in Boulder County (2035) – Units by Region
Northeast Longmont Southeast Lafayette Louisville Superior
Regions:
Goal of homes built or acquired/year Existing Local Resources to Invest Annually New Local Funding sources needed at investment of $50,000/home New Local Funding sources needed at investment of $85,000/home
600
(Recommended)
$15,000,000 $15,000,000 $36,000,000 1,000 (Most bold) $15,000,000 $35,000,000 $70,000,000
fund with variety of potential funding sources:
some to affordable housing
and design flexibility for new developments with affordable housing
development rights for affordable housing development projects
financial feasibility for developing diverse housing options
facilitate the creation and preservation of affordable housing
parcels and designate them for affordable housing development
disposition of land in their ownership to serve the development of diverse housing options
prioritize the redevelopment of the site(s) for affordable housing development (in areas formerly designated as Business, Commercial, Industrial)
inventory.
allowing developments currently featuring more units than allowed by current zoning to be rebuilt to include up to the existing unit count with a requirement for increased permanent affordable housing.
600/year goal, need to acquire 300/year; for 1,000/year goal, need to acquire 700/year.
With the adoption of these goals and strategies, the Boulder County Regional Housing Partnership will meet quarterly to review progress and prioritize new opportunities and funding resources. Boulder County Regional Housing Partnership will report to the Consortium of Cities annually.
Planning Phase: Implementation Phase:
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 …. 2035
Set Goals Build staff capacity Bolster Financial Resources Align Regulations Secure Land Acquire and build
250-300 Homes 300-350 Homes 350-400 Homes 500-600 homes 600- 700 600- 700 600- 700 600- 700 600- 700
Monitor
funding, and land banking
1. Does the plan respond to what you are hearing in your community? 2. How bold do you feel it should be? Does the 10-15% of inventory approach we’ve discussed make sense? Where in that range do you want the goal to be? 3. Do the tools and strategies make sense? Are there any tools or strategies you feel are missing? 4. Do you support the assumptions about new construction and acquisition targets? 5. How do you feel about the ownership (30%)/rental (70%) proposal? 6. In order to set ambitious goals, we need commitments to work on new resources (land and funding). Of the financial tools available, which ones seem the most promising? 7. Are there any changes needed before bringing this to your Council?
35