Adapting The PRMS to Unconventional Resources Presented by Ronald - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

adapting the prms to unconventional resources
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Adapting The PRMS to Unconventional Resources Presented by Ronald - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

th Annual Ryder Scott Reserves Conference 4 th Annual Ryder Scott Reserves Conference 4 May 9, 2008 May 9, 2008 Adapting The PRMS to Unconventional Resources Presented by Ronald Harrell, P.E. Chairman Emeritus at Ryder Scott Company 0


slide-1
SLIDE 1

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

4 4th

th Annual Ryder Scott Reserves Conference

Annual Ryder Scott Reserves Conference

May 9, 2008 May 9, 2008

“Adapting The PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

Presented by Ronald Harrell, P.E. Chairman Emeritus at Ryder Scott Company

slide-2
SLIDE 2

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

1

Disclaimer and Attributions Disclaimer and Attributions

  • The opinions and conclusions

included in this presentation are those

  • f the presenter and are not

attributable to any company or

  • rganization.
  • Appreciation is extended to Kerogen

Resources Inc and Rimrock Energy LLC for selected information contained herein.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

2

SPE SPE’ ’s Role In Reserves s Role In Reserves Definitions Began 46 Years Ago Definitions Began 46 Years Ago

  • Comprised of 2 oil companies, 1 gas pipe line, 1

college professor, 2 banks, 2 insurance cos. and 4 consultants

  • SPE Board appointed 12-man

committee in 1962 – “Special Committee On Definitions Of Proved Reserves For Property Evaluation”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

3

Committee Members were Committee Members were… …

  • J.J. Arps – consultant & chair
  • Wm. F. Burke – Lone Star Gas
  • Prof. J.M. Campbell – Oklahoma University
  • D.V. Carter – Mobil
  • C.R. Dodson – United California Bank
  • W.S. Eggleston - Consultant
  • K.M. Fagin - SW Life Insurance Co.
  • C.H. Keplinger - Consultant
  • J.F. King – Mutual Life Insurance Co.
  • Morris Muscat – Gulf Oil
  • E.G. Trostel – D&M
  • W.W. Wilson – Continental Illinois Bank
slide-5
SLIDE 5

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

4

SPE SPE’ ’s Role Began 46 Years Ago s Role Began 46 Years Ago – – cont. cont.

  • In June 1965, definitions approved by SPE

Board (with API concurrence; AGA objected)

  • Board Vote: 7 yes, 3 no, 2 abstained
slide-6
SLIDE 6

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

5

Key sentence in 1965 definitions Key sentence in 1965 definitions

  • PROVED RESERVES – The quantities of crude
  • il, natural gas and natural gas liquids which

geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in the future from known oil and gas reservoirs under existing economic and operating

  • conditions. They represent strictly technical

They represent strictly technical judgments, and are not knowingly influenced judgments, and are not knowingly influenced by attitudes of conservatism or optimism. by attitudes of conservatism or optimism.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

6

WHAT WHAT’ ’S NEW IN THE S NEW IN THE 2007 PRMS DEFINITIONS? 2007 PRMS DEFINITIONS?

  • SYSTEM IS

SYSTEM IS “ “PROJECT BASED PROJECT BASED” ”

  • RESOURCES

RESOURCES “ “CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION” ” IS BASED ON IS BASED ON COMMERCIALITY COMMERCIALITY

  • RESERVES

RESERVES “ “CATEGORIZATION CATEGORIZATION” ” IS BASED ON IS BASED ON UNCERTAINTY OF RECOVERY UNCERTAINTY OF RECOVERY

  • PRICES AND COSTS BASED ON FORECAST

PRICES AND COSTS BASED ON FORECAST CONDITIONS CONDITIONS

  • RECOGNITION OF UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCES

RECOGNITION OF UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES AND RESERVES

  • EXPANDED SECTION ON

EXPANDED SECTION ON “ “ANALOGS ANALOGS” ”

  • GUIDANCE ON

GUIDANCE ON “ “BOOKING (REFERENCE) POINT BOOKING (REFERENCE) POINT” ”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

7

ALL HYDROCARBON ALL HYDROCARBON RESOURCES RESOURCES … ….. ..

Follow the same general estimation template:

  • Rock volume
  • Hydrocarbons in place
  • Development plan and execution
  • Capital funding for extraction methodology
  • Operating costs (including taxes)
  • Commercial recovery efficiency
  • Predicted production profile
  • Cash flow projections
slide-9
SLIDE 9

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

8

Sub-classify by Project Maturity

Not to scale

RESERVES PRODUCTION PROSPECTIVE RESOURCES

UNRECOVERABLE UNRECOVERABLE

TOTAL PETROLEUM INITIALLY-IN-PLACE (PIIP)

DISCOVERED PIIP UNDISCOVERED PIIP

Range of Uncertainty CONTINGENT RESOURCES Increasing Chance of Commerciality Project Maturity Sub-classes

On Production Approved for Development Justified for Development Development Pending

  • Dev. Un-clarified
  • r on hold

Development not Viable Prospect Lead Play

COMMERCIAL SUB-COMMERCIAL

Discovery Criteria Commercial Criteria

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

9

“ “JUSTIFIED FOR JUSTIFIED FOR DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT” ”

  • “Implementation of the development project

is justified on the basis of reasonable forecast commercial conditions at the time of reporting and that there are reasonable expectations that all necessary approvals/contracts will be

  • btained. A project maturity sub-class that

reflects the actions required to move a project forward toward commercial production. “ ( PRMS Glossary – Appendix A)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

10

PRMS Definition of PRMS Definition of

UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCES UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCES

Unconventional resources exist in petroleum accumulations that are pervasive throughout a large area and that are not significantly affected by hydrodynamic influences (also called “continuous-type deposits”). Examples include coal bed methane (CBM), basin-centered gas, shale gas, gas hydrates, natural bitumen, and oil shale deposits. Typically, such accumulations require specialized extraction technology (e.g., dewatering of CBM, massive fracturing programs for shale gas, steam and/or solvents to mobilize bitumen for in-situ recovery, and in some cases, mining activities). Moreover, the extracted petroleum may require significant processing prior to sale (e.g., bitumen upgraders).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

11

PRMS Unconventional Resources PRMS Unconventional Resources “ “words of guidance words of guidance” ” – – 1/3 1/3

For these petroleum accumulations that are not significantly affected by hydrodynamic influences, reliance on continuous water contacts and pressure gradient analysis to interpret the extent of recoverable petroleum may not be possible. Thus, there typically is a need for increased sampling density to define uncertainty of in-place volumes, variations in quality of reservoir and hydrocarbons, and their detailed spatial distribution to support detailed design of specialized mining or in-situ extraction programs.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

12

PRMS Unconventional Resources PRMS Unconventional Resources “ “words of guidance words of guidance” ” – – 2/3 2/3

It is intended that the resources definitions, together with the classification system, will be appropriate for all types of petroleum accumulations regardless of their in-place characteristics, extraction method applied, or degree of processing required

slide-14
SLIDE 14

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

13

PRMS Unconventional Resources PRMS Unconventional Resources “ “words of guidance words of guidance” ” – – 3/3 3/3

Similar to improved recovery projects applied to conventional reservoirs, successful pilots or

  • perating projects in the subject reservoir or

successful projects in analogous reservoirs may be required to establish a distribution of recovery efficiencies for non-conventional accumulations. Such pilot projects may evaluate both extraction efficiency and the efficiency of unconventional processing facilities to derive sales products prior to custody transfer.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

14

ANALOGS ANALOGS

  • 4.1.1 Analogs
  • Analogs are widely used in resources estimation,

particularly in the exploration and early development stages, where direct measurement is limited. The methodology is based on the assumption that the analogous reservoir is comparable to the subject reservoir regarding reservoir and fluid properties that control ultimate recovery of petroleum. By selecting appropriate analogs, where performance data based upon comparable development plans (including well type, well spacing and stimulation) are available, a similar production profile may be forecast.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

15

ANALOGS ANALOGS – – cont cont’ ’d. d.

  • Analogs are defined by features and characteristics

including, but not limited to, approximate depth, pressure, temperature, reservoir drive mechanism,

  • riginal fluid content, reservoir fluid gravity, reservoir

size, gross thickness, pay thickness, net-to-gross ratio, lithology, heterogeneity, porosity, permeability and development plan. Analogous reservoirs are formed by the same, or very similar, processes with regard to sedimentation, diagenesis, pressure, temperature, chemical and mechanical history and structural deformation.

  • Cont’d
slide-17
SLIDE 17

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

16

ANALOGS ANALOGS – – cont cont’ ’d d

  • Comparison to several analogs may improve the

range of uncertainty in estimated recoverable quantities from the subject reservoir. While reservoirs in the same geographical area and of the same age typically provide better analogs, such proximity alone may not be the primary

  • consideration. In ALL CASES, evaluators should

document the similarities and differences between the analog and the subject reservoir/project. Review of analog performance is useful in quality assurance of resource assessments at all stages of development.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

17

What What’ ’s Missing in s Missing in “ “SPE SPE Analogs Analogs” ” for Unconventional for Unconventional Reservoirs? Reservoirs?

Maybe terms like:

  • Organic richness
  • Thermal maturity
  • Depth & geological age
  • TOC
  • Vitrinite reflectance
  • Poisson’s ratio
  • Stress profiles
  • Brittleness
  • Roughness
  • Sorption Isotherms
  • Seals
  • Completion efficiency

Terms not applicable:

  • Contacts
  • Lowest Known

Hydrocarbons

  • Drive mechanisms
  • Saturations(?)
  • Net pay(?)
  • Structural position
slide-19
SLIDE 19

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

18

UNCONVENTIONAL UNCONVENTIONAL PUDs PUDs

  • US SEC – “one offset” rule, firm operator commitment
  • SPE PRMS – “justified” in the opinion of the evaluator

supported by adequate evidence (Think P-90)

  • PUD locations should be defensible using adequate

data, including rock info, analogs plus high confidence in drilling and completion efficiency. 3-D Seismic and micro seismic may be desirable.

  • PUD locations should not be contingent upon success of

any other PUD location

  • Reservoir simulation is excellent reservoir analysis

methodology but may not be the best reserves tool

  • PUDs may be best handled through multi-well projects

particularly in gas shales because of frac efficiency.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

19

A BRIEF LOOK AT GAS SHALES A BRIEF LOOK AT GAS SHALES

  • …..Particularly some Barnett

Shale examples to generate your interest and thoughts……

slide-21
SLIDE 21

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

20

Considerations in Gas Shale Considerations in Gas Shale Candidate Selection Candidate Selection – – Creating a Creating a “ “reservoir reservoir” ”

  • ut of a virtually impervious container
  • ut of a virtually impervious container
  • Effect of matrix modulus and Poisson’s ratio.
  • Stress effects on fractures remaining open.
  • Effect of associated and unassociated oils.
  • Effects that create a Rubblized drainage volume.
  • Location of faults, bedding planes, stresses, frac

breakdown pressures, maturity variations, pore pressure, structures, frac barriers, kerogen types/development and water sources.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

21

What does micro What does micro-

  • seismic

seismic really tell you? really tell you?

  • Location trends of sounds (micro-bursts/mini-earthquakes) in the

rock that are above a certain energy (the gate level).

  • There are high and low energy events and high and low

confidence events.

  • A decent view of fracture extension, fracture direction, fracture

isolation, upper and lower frac penetration, and fracture “flow path” development.

  • In some cases, it can tell you the effect of near-field and far-field

stresses, bedding planes and faults.

  • M-S can confirm complex rock fracturing.
  • There are also sounds totally unconnected with a frac.
  • Can we use this to estimate rock volume for reserves

estimation?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

22

TWO BARNETT SHALE TWO BARNETT SHALE FRAC EXAMPLES FRAC EXAMPLES -

  • April 2008

April 2008

  • Names are redacted
  • Simplified display format
  • Presented only for limited discussion

purposes

  • Your “general” questions are encouraged
slide-24
SLIDE 24

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

23

Marble Falls Ellenberger

Geophones

slide-25
SLIDE 25

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

24

(Tracers added in each frac interval)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

25

Micro Micro-

  • Seismic Views

Seismic Views -

  • Static

Static

Ellenberger Marble Falls Drainage area?

(+/- 150 acres)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

26

Another Well Another Well…… …… And the drainage area is And the drainage area is… …..? ..?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

“Adapting the PRMS to Unconventional Resources”

27

THANKS FOR LISTENING THANKS FOR LISTENING

  • Questions?
  • Comments?
  • Arguments?