Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes in Sweden Martin Lardn - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

accreditation of behavioural
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes in Sweden Martin Lardn - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes in Sweden Martin Lardn Head of Central Coordination in Treatment Swedish Prison & Probation Service Population: 9.5 million Prison: 4667 each day (2009) Probation: 14 244 each day (2009)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes in Sweden

Martin Lardén Head of Central Coordination in Treatment Swedish Prison & Probation Service

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Population: 9.5 million Probation: 14 244 each day (2009) Prison: 4667 each day (2009)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introducing the Accreditation Panel

  • The Swedish prison & probation Service (SPPS)
  • The Director General of the SPPS
  • Part of the “What Works” agenda
  • Inspired by England & Wales
  • Independent regarding decision
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Purpose of Accreditation

  • To create a basis of programmes for the

Swedish Prison & Probation Service, that is directed to a majority of the clients and that is built on the principles of "What Works".

  • An accredited programme is a programme that

is based on research and that is expected to reduce recidivism, if correctly administered.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Accreditation criteria

  • 1. Research-based Model of Change
  • 2. Target Group & Allocation of Offenders
  • 3. Focus on Dynamic Risk Factors
  • 4. Effective Methods
  • 5. Skill Orientation
  • 6. Engagement & Motivation
  • 7. Intensity & Duration
  • 8. Ecological Validity
  • 9. Programme Integrity
  • 10. On-going Evaluation
slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Panel December 2011

  • Prof. Emeritus. Lennart Melin, Uppsala
  • Prof. Odd Lindberg, Örebro
  • Prof. Mats Fridell, Växsjö
  • Prof. Emeritus. Bengt-Åke Armelius
  • Prof. Britt af Klinteberg
  • Ass. Prof. Marianne Kristiansson, KI
  • Prof. Jerzy Sarnecki, Stockholm
  • Martin Lardén, SPPS, Chair
  • Anders Claus, SPPS, Secretary
  • Lars Krantz, SPPS
slide-7
SLIDE 7

17 VINN 16 VPP 15 NSAP 14 PfL 13 RP 12 12-step 11 ROS-Ind 10 PRISM 9 ETS 8 BSF 7 ROS 6 IDAP 5 OSAPP 4 BC 3 ART 2 OTO 1 CS 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Accreditation of Programmes

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Probation Prison

Completed programmes in probation & prisons 2007-2011

slide-9
SLIDE 9

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 ART BB OTO ROS G ROS I ROS U BSF IDAP PRISM ETS PFL VINN ÅP Allocated-08 Completed-08 Allocated-09 Completed-09 Allocated-10 Completed-10 Allocated-11 Completed-11

Frivård; Uppdrag och antal fullföljda per program 2008 - 2011

slide-10
SLIDE 10

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2009 2010 2011 Starters Completed

Started & completed programmes in probation 2009-2011

80% 84% 83%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DG

Nils Öberg

CU

Martin Grann

C CSB

Martin Lardén Central Coordination in Treatment Research & Development CSB HQ Violence & criminality Substance Abuse & Dependency Relational & Sexual offending Motivation & Programmme Support

  • Allocation of

resources

  • Quality

Insurance

  • Evaluation

Våga Välja 12-steg PFL PRISM Problematic gambling BC ETS VPP OTO Entré + CPAI ROS IDAP IPPV BSF ÅP VINN MIK

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results completers

  • PRISM
  • IDAP
  • OTO
  • 12-STEP
  • ROS
  • OSAPP
  • ETS
  • BC
  • ART

0.50 1.50 1.00

slide-13
SLIDE 13

I think the trainer/s were good

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 A R T B B C S E T S O T O Å P I D A P B S F P R I S M V V 1 2 s t e g i n t r

  • 1

2 s t e g g r u n d P F L Andel (%) Håller inte med Håller delvis med Instämmer Instämmer helt

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Organisational Culture
  • Program implementation
  • Management/staff
  • Risk-Need management
  • Program characteristics
  • Core Correctional Practice
  • External co-operation
  • Evaluation

CPAI – 2000 (131 )

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

The End

martin.larden@kriminalvarden.se

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Positive experiences

  • High status of accreditation & the panel
  • Focus on integrity & implementation issues
  • Improved quantity & quality of programmes