THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the caep accreditation council
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation Associate, CAEP Vince ONeill; Accreditation Director, CAEP Washington, District of Columbia September 2017 OBJECTIVE GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL AND


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Washington, District of Columbia September 2017

THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL

Bradley Duncan; Accreditation Associate, CAEP Vince O’Neill; Accreditation Director, CAEP

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL AND ACCREDITATION DECISION MAKING PROCESS

2

OBJECTIVE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

  • Purpose
  • Timelines
  • Responsibilities
  • Structure
  • Role(s)
  • Decisions

3

OVERVIEW

SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

PURPOSE

  • Oversight of accreditation policies
  • Review & evaluate EPPs
  • Handle complaints against accredited EPPs
  • Develop a quality assurance system

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

TIMELINES

  • Council meets twice a year to review cases
  • Reviews occur semester after site visit
  • Decision notification within 30 days
  • Stipulation removal

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

ACCREDITATION COUNCIL STRUCTURE

  • Fluctuating number of councilors

▪ P12 practitioners, higher education, policy makers, and public representatives ▪ Alternates

  • Committees
  • Vice Chair
  • Chair

6

SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

ROLES

Various stakeholders involved

  • CAEP Staff

▪ Liaison between Council and EPP

  • Councilors

▪ Conduct reviews (e.g. panel reviews, stipulation removal) ▪ Serve on committees

  • Lead Site Visitors

▪ Participates in initial panels

  • EPP Representatives

▪ Observe initial panel ▪ Secondary Bullet in 24 point Ce

7

SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

REVIEW AND EVALUATE

  • Council reviews materials related to site visit

▪ Self-study report ▪ Formative Feedback Report ▪ Site Visit Report ▪ Addendum ▪ Rejoinder

  • Final decision

▪ Areas for Improvement/ Stipulations ▪ Standards met/unmet

8

SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

THREE STEP REVIEW PROCESS

Initial Panel Joint Panel Full Council

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

APPEALS

Oversight by Appeals Council

▪ Adverse action only ▪ Separate entity from Council

12

SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C.

QUESTIONS?

Bradley.Duncan@caepnet.org Vince.ONeill@caepnet.org

13