the caep accreditation council
play

THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation Associate, CAEP Vince ONeill; Accreditation Director, CAEP Washington, District of Columbia September 2017 OBJECTIVE GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL AND


  1. THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation Associate, CAEP Vince O’Neill; Accreditation Director, CAEP Washington, District of Columbia September 2017

  2. OBJECTIVE GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL AND ACCREDITATION DECISION MAKING PROCESS Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 2

  3. OVERVIEW • Purpose • Timelines • Responsibilities • Structure • Role(s) • Decisions Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 3 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  4. PURPOSE • Oversight of accreditation policies • Review & evaluate EPPs • Handle complaints against accredited EPPs • Develop a quality assurance system Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 4

  5. TIMELINES • Council meets twice a year to review cases • Reviews occur semester after site visit • Decision notification within 30 days • Stipulation removal Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 5

  6. ACCREDITATION COUNCIL STRUCTURE • Fluctuating number of councilors ▪ P12 practitioners, higher education, policy makers, and public representatives ▪ Alternates • Committees • Vice Chair • Chair Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 6 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  7. ROLES Various stakeholders involved • CAEP Staff ▪ Liaison between Council and EPP • Councilors ▪ Conduct reviews (e.g. panel reviews, stipulation removal) ▪ Serve on committees • Lead Site Visitors ▪ Participates in initial panels • EPP Representatives ▪ Observe initial panel Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 7 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT ▪ Secondary Bullet in 24 point Ce

  8. REVIEW AND EVALUATE • Council reviews materials related to site visit ▪ Self-study report ▪ Formative Feedback Report ▪ Site Visit Report ▪ Addendum ▪ Rejoinder • Final decision ▪ Areas for Improvement/ Stipulations ▪ Standards met/unmet Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 8 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  9. THREE STEP REVIEW PROCESS Initial Joint Full Panel Panel Council Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 9

  10. APPEALS Oversight by Appeals Council ▪ Adverse action only ▪ Separate entity from Council Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 12 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  11. QUESTIONS? Bradley.Duncan@caepnet.org Vince.ONeill@caepnet.org Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 13

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend