edTPA Standardized assessment is required for CAEP accreditation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

edtpa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

edTPA Standardized assessment is required for CAEP accreditation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

edTPA Standardized assessment is required for CAEP accreditation Why edTPA??? Nationally available performance-based assessment used to measure new teachers ability to teach in their content area. Assessment is designed with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

edTPA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why edTPA???

  • Standardized assessment is required for CAEP

accreditation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose

  • Nationally available performance-based assessment used

to measure new teachers’ ability to teach in their content area.

  • Assessment is designed with student learning and

principles from research and theory

  • Includes a review of a teacher candidate’s authentic

teaching materials as the culmination of a teaching and learning process

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Content Specific and Performance Based

  • The assessment systematically examines 1) planning, 2)

instruction, and 3) student assessment

  • Evidence includes: lesson plans, instructional materials,

student assignments and assessments, feedback on student work, unedited video recordings of instruction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cycle of Effective Teaching

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Questions we have

  • How often is a teacher candidate evaluated?
  • If the evaluation occurs during or following the student

teaching semester, what if he or she does not receive a satisfactory score?

  • Is passing the edTPA tied to Indiana licensure?
  • What is the cost and how will this be charged to

candidates?

  • How are candidate materials and videos maintained to

ensure confidentiality?

  • Does this dictate our curriculum?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

CAEP Requirements – Impact of P-12 Learning and Development

  • Preservice candidate impact on P-12 student lerning is

evaluated through recurring formative assessments and in some standardized culminating assessment that includes explicit demonstration of P-12 student learning. EPP practices that integrate pre- and post-instruction P- 12 student learning into edTPA or the ETS pre-service portfolio are among examples.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Praxis Performance Assessment for Teachers PPAT

slide-9
SLIDE 9

About PPAT

  • Developed by Educational Testing Service (ETS) in

collaboration with teachers, university faculty, DOE personnel

  • Aligned with InTASC Standards
  • Provides opportunity to demo classroom application with

CCSS

  • No content area specific rubrics
slide-10
SLIDE 10

PPAT Four Tasks

Task Title Type Description Scoring

Task 1: Knowledge of students and the learning environment

Formative

  • Focuses on the beginning steps of a

teacher candidate’s practice

  • Provides first steps for portfolio

creation

  • Includes feedback from cooperating

teacher Locally evaluated by faculty advisor

Task 2: Assessment and data collection to measure and inform student learning

Summative

  • Focuses on specific standards for using

data to inform instruction

  • Requires reflective analysis: what did I

teach? What did they learn? How do I know? Centrally scored anonymously by trained educators

Task 3: Designing instruction for student learning

Summative

  • Focuses on standards for classroom

instruction, including the use of technology to enhance instruction Centrally scored anonymously by trained educators

Task 4: Implementing and analyzing instruction to promote student learning

Summative

  • Focuses on ability to use research-based

instructional strategies and adapt instruction for individual needs

  • Assesses a range of standards with some
  • verlap from other tasks
  • Includes a 15-minute video submission
  • Reflects on overall teaching practice

Centrally scored anonymously by trained educators

slide-11
SLIDE 11

edTPA

Background from pilot testing

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Development

  • More than 1,000 educators
  • 29 states and DC
  • More than 430 institutions of higher ed
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Scoring

  • 650 teachers and teacher educators served as scorers for

the 12,000+ candidates during the field testing

  • 20 hours of training required before able to serve as a

scorer

  • Validation studies reported reliability range from .83-.92
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tasks, Artifacts, and Rubrics

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Rubrics

  • Level 1 - the low end of the scoring spectrum,

representing the knowledge and skills of a struggling candidate who is not ready to teach.

  • Level 2 - the knowledge and skills of a candidate who is

possibly ready to teach.

  • Level 3 - the knowledge and skills of a candidate who is

ready to teach.

  • Level 4 - candidate with a solid foundation of knowledge

and skills for a beginning teacher.

  • Level 5 - the advanced skills and abilities of a candidate

very well qualified and ready to teach.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sample Rubric

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pilot data

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Mean Total Scores

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Passing Scores