ACC EXPANSION CONCEPT DESIGN PREVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ACC EXPANSION

CONCEPT DESIGN PREVIEW

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

1

AGENDA

2

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

AGENDA

1. Introduction 2. Educational Specifications 3. Parking and Transportation 4. Building Design 5. Next Steps

3

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

INTRODUCTION

4

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

SCHEDULED MEETINGS ARE SHOWN HERE RECENT PRESENTATIONS TO SCHOOL BOARD ROSTER, RESPONSIBILITIES, PARTICIPANTS AND PROCESS (VERY) RELEVANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION $$$ HOW MUCH, BY WHEN, FOR WHAT?

CHECK IT OUT!

https://www.apsva.us/design-and-construction/ arlington-career-center/

5

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

PROJECT OVERVIEW

BLPC CHARGE

ARLINGTON CAREER CENTER 6

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

2

CCWG CIP ED SPEC BLPC/PFRC ACC EXPANSION PROJECT

PROJECT BUILDING BLOCKS

7

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

THE JOURNEY WE’VE TAKEN

Meeting No. 1: BLPC/PFRC Charge, Urban Design, CIP Meeting No. 2: CCWG, Transportation Study Meeting No. 3: Ed Specs, ACC Programs Meeting No. 4: Design Exercise Meeting No. 5: Bus and Parent Pick Up / Drop Off Meeting No. 6: Parking Meeting No. 7: Auto Tech/Collision, Community Programs, Service Meeting No. 8: Concept Design Review Community Meeting: January 22, 2020

8

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

9

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

ED SPECS FOR THE ACC EXPANSION

• 1. Developed through a series of collaborative

meetings with representatives from Department of Teaching and Learning, Arlington Career Center and Facilities and Operations

• 2. Reflect APS and ACC pedagogy
• 3. Are adaptable to future instructional changes

Approved by the School Board on November 7, 2019. Any revisions will be identified concurrent with Concept, Schematic, and Final Design reviews.

10

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

SPACE PROGRAM AT-A-GLANCE

GSF

Note: GSF – Gross Square Footage

11

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

CHANGE COMMUNITY CONNECTED

ACC

PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION

12

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

TRANSPORTATION: GOALS

1. Provide and promote multi-modal options to help reduce the amount of driving to the Career Center 2. Create a safe campus for all modes of travel 3. Minimize traffic impact generated by the Career Center 4. Minimize parking costs of project 5. Minimize on-street parking conflicts 6. Provide efficient and convenient transportation options for APS families and staff 7. Minimize space dedicated to transportation on Career Center campus

13

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

BLPC CHARGE: PARKING OPTIONS

Develop options and estimated costs for various options for on-site parking during the Concept Design phase, including: 1. No structured parking and accessible parking spaces only provided on site 2. A one-level 225 to 250-space, below-grade parking structure 3. A two-level 450 to 500-space, below-grade parking structure 4. Other parking solutions that may emerge during Concept Design

14

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

PROCESS FOR DETERMINING PARKING

1. Calculate estimated peak demand considering all site uses 2. Determine reasonable expected reduction using Transportation Demand Management (TDM) division-wide goals (APS GO! and Vision Zero) 3. Assign parking supply to match peak demand; parking supply could utilize on-site, off-site, and on-street strategies 4. County Board approves required parking as part of the Use Permit

15

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

16

16

PARKING DEMAND

Demand Range (2PM Peak)

HS Staff: 210-247 spaces ES Staff: 72-79 spaces Students: 85-135 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 402-496 spaces

*Low relies heavily on Transportation Demand Management (TDM)

HS – High School ES – Elementary School

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

17

17

PARKING DEMAND

Demand Range (2PM Peak)

HS Staff: 210-247 spaces ES Staff: 72-79 spaces Students: 85-135 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 402-496 spaces

*Low relies heavily on Transportation Demand Management (TDM)

Recommended Demand (2PM Peak)

HS Staff: 210 spaces ES Staff: 72 spaces Students: 103 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 420 spaces

Applied Mode Splits HS Staff: 75% (APS Go! 2021 Target, reduction from 85%) ES Staff: 75% (APS Go! 2021 Target, reduction from 79%) Students: 12% (25% reduction in driving students)

HS – High School ES – Elementary School

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

18

18

PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY

On-Site

Options: Below-grade Above-grade Surface

Off-Site

Lease (up to 200 spaces if available) ECDC garage for temporary use only (up to 100 spaces under present agreement)

On-Street

Adjacent: 77 spaces Nearby Unrestricted: Up to 144 spaces

Supply Recommended Demand (2PM Peak)

HS Staff: 210 spaces ES Staff: 72 spaces Students: 103 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 420 spaces

BALANCE

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

19

19

PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY

On-Site

Options: Below-grade Above-grade Surface

Off-Site

Lease (up to 200 spaces if available) ECDC garage for temporary use only (up to 100 spaces under present agreement)

On-Street

Adjacent: 77 spaces Nearby Unrestricted: Up to 144 spaces

Supply Recommended Demand (2PM Peak)

HS Staff: 210 spaces ES Staff: 72 spaces Students: 103 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 420 spaces Provides greatest flexibility and predictability for parking management; Requires capital investment, permanence reduces options for alternative site development

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

20

20

PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY

On-Site

Options: Below-grade Above-grade Surface

Off-Site

Lease (up to 200 spaces if available) ECDC garage for temporary use only (up to 100 spaces under present agreement)

On-Street

Adjacent: 77 spaces Nearby Unrestricted: Up to 144 spaces

Supply Recommended Demand (2PM Peak)

HS Staff: 210 spaces ES Staff: 72 spaces Students: 103 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 420 spaces Limited flexibility and dependent on availability and market conditions; Distance from ACC may make use of leased spaces ineffective

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

21

21

PARKING DEMAND & SUPPLY

On-Site

Options: Below-grade Above-grade Surface

Off-Site

Lease (up to 200 spaces if available) ECDC garage for temporary use only (up to 100 spaces under present agreement)

On-Street

Adjacent: 77 spaces Nearby Unrestricted: Up to 144 spaces

Supply Recommended Demand (2PM Peak)

HS Staff: 210 spaces ES Staff: 72 spaces Students: 103 spaces Library/Visitor: 35 spaces Total: 420 spaces A viable option to address demand, particularly for spaces immediately adjacent to APS property; Strategy successfully utilized on past APS projects

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

LOCATION OF ON-SITE PARKING

22

Items to consider when determining the quantity and location of on-site parking must include: 1. Maintaining safe school operations during construction 2. Initial capital and ongoing operational/maintenance costs 3. Construction phasing 4. Trade-offs for alternative site uses: a. Geothermal well field b. Stormwater management (APS requirements and broader County goals) 5. Impact on flexibility for future site development 6. Ability to modify (expand or reduce) as parking demand changes

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

ON-SITE PARKING COSTS

$0

$5M +/-

$15M +/-

$30M +/-

+/- 250 below grade +/- 500 below grade +/- 450 above grade +/- 150 surface

23

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

SITE DESIGN

24

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

SITE DESIGN

25

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

EXAMPLE – APPROX. 450 SPACES ON-SITE

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

26

EXAMPLE – APPROX. 350 SPACES ON-SITE

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

27

EXAMPLE – APPROX. 300 SPACES ON-SITE

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

28

STATUS OF TRANSPORTATION ITEMS

29

1. Meet parking demand using a combination of on-site and proximate on-street spaces 2. Consider leased spaces as a short-term solution, particularly during construction, not for a long-term solution to meet parking demand 3. General agreement between APS and Arlington County transportation staff that 420 spaces is a reasonable parking demand to expect

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

TRANSPORTATION NEXT STEPS

30

1. Continue discussions with Arlington County staff, specifically seeking feedback on: a. On-street opportunities for accommodating parking demand b. Location and access to on-site parking c. Proposal for use of right-of-way areas to support school bus/parent vehicle operations 2. Finalize APS staff recommendation for quantity of on-site parking provided 3. Develop concept designs and cost estimates for parking scenarios required by the BLPC charge

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

BUILDING DESIGN

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

CONCEPT DESIGN DRIVERS

32

1. Amount of new space required 2. Building height, density, and setbacks 3. Location of and amount of space allocated to transportation facilities 4. Maintaining safe school operations during construction 5. Construction phasing 6. Location of large space elements, particularly athletics and performing arts 7. Maintaining flexibility for future site development

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

HOW MUCH MORE AREA (SF) DO WE NEED?

167,000 SF

370,800 SF

• 167,000 SF

203,800 SF

=

Highland St. S Walter Reed

TO REMAIN

TO BE REPLACED

(ED SPEC) (EXISTING)

33

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

34

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

GROUP DESIGN PROPOSALS

35

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

COMMITTEE AREAS OF CONSENSUS

CTE

S Walter Reed Highland St.

36

• 1. Prominent entry @ 9th St. and

Walter Reed

• 2. Relocate existing CTE space

along 9th in an early construction phase

• 3. Maximize density toward corner
• f Walter Reed and 9th
• 4. Concentrate major community

spaces (athletics and performing arts) on 9th

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

58,400 SF

44,000 SF

Highland St. S Walter Reed

=

EXISTING +/- 167 KSF

167 KSF + 35 KSF + 168 KSF

370 KSF

(EXISTING) (HIGHLAND) (9 th ST)

MAXIMIZING OUR OPPORTUNITIES

+/-

37

CTE

CTE / AUTO TO BE RELOCATED +/- 35 KSF ATHLETICS & PERF. ARTS, STACKED W/ CORE & CTE, MAXIMIZING HEIGHT ALLOWANCE +/- 168 KSF

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

58,400 SF

44,000 SF

Highland St. S Walter Reed

38

CTE

WHAT ELSE MIGHT INFLUENCE A CONCEPT?

• 1. Circulation pattern through the

building

• 2. Bus loading/unloading @ 9th St.
• 3. 8’-10’ Slope from Highland to

Walter Reed

• 4. Tree Preservation
• 5. Service Location

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

BUILDING DESIGN NEXT STEPS

39

1. Produce concept design options that include: a. General location of building and building massing b. General site plan showing location and quantity of on-site parking spaces, proposed streetscape changes, bus and parent vehicle pick-up/drop off areas, and field space c. Preliminary construction sequencing and phasing 2. Prepare a conceptual level cost estimate for each option

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

NEXT STEPS

40

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020

NEXT STEPS

Public meeting dates and past presentations are posted on the APS project website: https://www.apsva.us/design-and-construction/arlington-career-center/

41

1. February 19, 2020 – BLPC/PFRC Meeting #9 2. February 26, 2020 – BLPC/PFRC Meeting #10 3. March 26, 2020 – Concept Design School Board Information Item 4. April 2, 2020 – Concept Design School Board Action Item

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 30, 2020