AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF
Anti-Aging Technology Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Increases Cell Respiration + Collagen & Elastin Synthesis + Enhances Cell Metabolism
AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF Increases Cell Respiration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF Increases Cell Respiration + Collagen & Elastin Synthesis + Enhances Cell Metabolism Anti-Aging Technology Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF Technical Information:
Increases Cell Respiration + Collagen & Elastin Synthesis + Enhances Cell Metabolism
In North America + South America + Europe LYCD is primarily a cosmetic potentiater: Stimulates Oxygen Consumption Combats Irritation
Residual yeast sediment was then added to
Wine production process born!
Protocol
Respiratory Factor Advanced PF to reduce the discomfort produced by
lotions containing either AC DRF Advanced PF (2.8% w/w) or Benzocaine (0.5% w/w)
immediately after sun exposure
perception and perception after 2 hours (1 to 5 with 5 being complete reduction in pain) Topical application of AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF is capable of producing consumer perceivable reduction in both erythema and pain caused due to overexposure to UV light.
0.1 0.2 0.15 1.45 1.15 1.3 3.6 3.95 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 t = 0 Hr t = 2 Hr t = 0 Hr t = 2 Hr t = 0 Hr t = 2 Hr t = 0 t = 2 Hr Benzocain AC DRF Advanced PF Benzocaine AC DRF Advanced PF Reduction of Erythema Reduction of Sunburn Pain Perceived Reduction
30 60 90 120 150 180 50mg/mL IGF-1 .01% AC DRF Advanced .1% AC DRF Advanced 1.0% AC DRF Advanced
Percent (%) Increase
Protocol
the dermis & provides structure & elasticity to the skin
to the control – .01%, .1% & 1%
ELISA Assay
concentrations of AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF was effective at increasing collagen synthesis
Figure 2. Increase in collagen production following application of AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF .
Protocol
assess AC DRF Advanced impact
Advanced PF is capable
increasing the expression of type 1-C Peptide in a fibroblast cell culture model
intended to increase collagen synthesis
Figure 3. Comparison of the effects on procollagen levels following treatment.
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 1% Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate 0.5% Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate 1% AC DRF Advanced PF 0.5% AC DRF Advanced PF 4mM Sodium Butyrate Untreated
Type 1 C-Peptide (ng/ml)
97 13 116 46 15 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 100µM Trolox 12.5µM Trolox 2% 20219 AC DRF Advanced 1% 20219 AC DRF Advanced 0.5% 20219 AC DRF Advanced
Antioxidant Capacity (µMTE)
Protocol
concentrations for a reference
taken every 2 minutes for 2 hours
Advanced PF showed antioxidant activity at all concentrations tested.
Figure 4. Results of antioxidant capacity of test materials.
Protocol
23 and 45
subject’s volar forearms
taken on day one of the study
PF is capable of decreasing erythema when compared to both the untreated control as well as the base lotion
Figure 5. Pigmentation Results for Individual Test Sites.
10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00 13.50 T = 0 T = 1 Week T = 2 Weeks T = 3 Weeks T = 4 Weeks
Erythema
Average Results for Individual Test Sites
Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) Base Lotion Untreated
Protocol
subject’s volar forearms
taken on day one of the study
Advance PF showed reductions in erythema at a 2.0% concentration
Figure 6. Pigmentation Results Compared in Percent Difference between Test Sites.
0.00% 5.00% 10.00%
T = 0 T = 1 Week T = 2 Weeks T = 3 Weeks T = 4 Weeks
Percent (%) Difference
Erythema
Comparative Data Between Two Sites
Base Lotion vs. Untreated Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) vs. Untreated Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) vs. Base Lotion
Protocol
subject’s volar forearms
their volar forearms
Advanced PF is capable of improving skin density when compared to both the untreated control as well as the base lotion
Figure 7. Ultrasound Results Comparing Test Sites to Untreated Site.
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% T = 0 T = 1 Week T = 2 WeeksT = 3 WeeksT = 4 Weeks Percent (%) Difference
Collagen Ultrasound
Comparison of Experimental + Control to Untreated Site
Base Lotion vs. Untreated Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) vs. Untreated
performed using human keratinocytes
period of 24 hours at a temperature of 37C with the concentration of carbon dioxide in the incubator being limited to 5%
for a period of 72 hours
capable of increasing the percent concentration
comparison to the control
Figure 8. Hyaluronic Acid Production comparing AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF and Control.
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Control 0.5% AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF 1.0% AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF
Percent (%) Increase
96-well tissue culture plates
nor the preservatives exhibited any inhibition of cell viability
use concentrations AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF is not cytotoxic
0% 5% 10% 15% 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 Complete Media 0.1% AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF 0.01% AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF MFU MFU % Change
Figure 9. Cellular Metabolism of AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF- treated fibroblasts expressed in terms of percent of control.
ages of 23 and 45
44.60% after 24 hours and by 95.0% after 4 weeks when compared to the untreated control
cream, AC DRF Advanced PF improved moisturization by 33.74% after 4 weeks
0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 T = 0 T = 24 Hours T = 1 Week T = 2 Weeks T = 3 Weeks T = 4 Weeks T = -24 Hours T = -1 Week Moisturization (μSiemens)
Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) Base Lotion Untreated
Figure 10. Average increase in moisturization per test site.
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.00 T = 0 T = 24 Hours T = 1 Week T = 2 Weeks T = 3 Weeks T = 4 Weeks T = -24 Hours T = -1 Week Percent (%) Difference Between Test Sites
Base Lotion vs. Untreated Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) vs. Untreated Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) vs. Base Lotion
Figure 11. Percent difference in moisturization between two test sites
Lotion moisturized the skin 19.76% better after 24 hours and was still 9.01% more effective in moisturizing the skin when reading were taken
both test materials ceased
Figure 12. Regression in skin moisturization after application of experimental material ceased.
ages of 23 and 45
Advanced PF is not only capable
but it is also capable of providing moisturizing and skin hydrating benefits when added to cosmetic applications
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.00 T = 0 T = 24 Hours T = 1 Week T = 2 Weeks T = 3 Weeks T = 4 Weeks T = -24 Hours T = -1 Week Percent (%) Difference
Moisture Regression
Experimental Treatment vs. Untreated
ages of 23 and 45
volar forearms; apply 2 mg of each test material
Advanced PF showed very effective moisture retention capabilities at a 2.0% concentration
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 T = 0 T = 1 Week T = 2 Weeks T = 3 Weeks T = 4 Weeks Open Chamber Water Levels
Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) Base Lotion Untreated
Figure 13. TEWL measurements taken at individual test sites
ages of 23 and 45
volar forearms; apply 2 mg of each test material
AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF was shown to decrease transepidermal water loss by 29.24% and by 50.00% when compared to the untreated control after 4 weeks
benefits when added to cosmetic applications
0.00%
Base Lotion vs. Untreated Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) vs. Untreated Experimental (2.0% AC DRF Advanced PF + Base Lotion) vs. Base Lotion
Percent (%) Difference
Transepidermal Water Loss
Comparison of Test Sites - Water Loss Reduction Over Time
T = 0 T = 4 Weeks
Figure 14. Comparison of percent reduction in water loss over time between two test sites.
seeded into 6-well tissue culture plates
Respiratory Factor Advanced PF was added to the serum-free DMEM and incubated with fibroblasts
and up to 96 hours
Advanced PF was able to increase cell migration and close the scratch at a rate comparable to the positive control
cell proliferation properties
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 24 48 72 96
Scratch Area (mm2) Time Pose Scratch (Hours)
Area Enclosure
Positive Control Negative Control AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 24 48 72 96
Migration Rate (nm2/ hour) Time Post Scratch (Hours)
Migration Rate
Positive Control Negative Control AC Dermal Respiratory Factor Advanced PF