Aaron T Wolf, PhD Program in Water Conflict Management Oregon State University, USA International Symposium on Water Diplomacy Stockholm, Sweden 16-17 November 2016
EMAIL: WOLFA@GEO.ORST.EDU WWW.TRANSBOUNDARYWATERS.ORST.EDU
Aaron T Wolf, PhD Program in Water Conflict Management Oregon State - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Aaron T Wolf, PhD Program in Water Conflict Management Oregon State University, USA International Symposium on Water Diplomacy Stockholm, Sweden 16-17 November 2016 EMAIL: WOLFA@GEO.ORST.EDU WWW.TRANSBOUNDARYWATERS.ORST.EDU Aaron T Wolf, PhD
Aaron T Wolf, PhD Program in Water Conflict Management Oregon State University, USA International Symposium on Water Diplomacy Stockholm, Sweden 16-17 November 2016
EMAIL: WOLFA@GEO.ORST.EDU WWW.TRANSBOUNDARYWATERS.ORST.EDU
Aaron T Wolf, PhD Program in Water Conflict Management
International Symposium on Water Diplomacy Stockholm, Sweden 16-17 November 2016
EMAIL: WOLFA@GEO.ORST.EDU WWW.TRANSBOUNDARYWATERS.ORST.EDU
Aaron T Wolf, PhD Program in Water Conflict Management Oregon State University, USA International Symposium on Water Diplomacy Stockholm, Sweden 16-17 November 2016
EMAIL: WOLFA@GEO.ORST.EDU WWW.TRANSBOUNDARYWATERS.ORST.EDU
water governance culture
“customized” solutions
among stakeholders.
continents.
collection of international river basins
documenting transboundary water treaties & events
understand water-related conflict and cooperation Oregon State University Program in Water Conflict Management and Transformation Professional/Graduate Certificate Program Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD) Universities Partnership for Transboundary Waters Certificate
problem solving Collaborative Facilitations and Mediations
to promote cooperation between stakeholders
Political Opportunity Political Risk Economic Benefit Economic Cost
Countries may pursue unilateral development given high risks and high costs Countries most likely to make a deal Countries likely to consider a deal; risk reduction and
would improve likelihood Countries likely to consider a deal; benefit expansion would improve likelihood
Source: Subramanian, Brown & Wolf 2013
Political Opportunity Political Risk Economic Benefit Economic Cost
Countries may pursue unilateral development given high risks and high costs Countries most likely to make a deal Countries likely to consider a deal; risk reduction and
would improve likelihood Countries likely to consider a deal; benefit expansion would improve likelihood
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 21 17 6 68 227 420 122 682 276 242 334 7 164
Increasing Conflict
12
13
Source: UNEP/DEWA/GRID-Europe 2006 21
Source: NBI RPTP 2011 22
24
25
Green Least Impact Orange More Impact Red Most Impact
Justice/Self Mercy/Other Compassion Anger/ The Other Side
Universal?
Al-Hakam/ Father Ar-Rahman/ Son Ar-Rahim/ Holy Spirit