aapa 2 0 1 5 gatew ay sum m it presentation
play

AAPA 2 0 1 5 Gatew ay Sum m it Presentation John N. Young - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AAPA 2 0 1 5 Gatew ay Sum m it Presentation John N. Young Director of Freight & Surface Transportation Policies American Association of Port Authorities jyoung@aapa-ports.org September 2, 2015 American Association of Port Authorities


  1. AAPA 2 0 1 5 Gatew ay Sum m it Presentation John N. Young Director of Freight & Surface Transportation Policies American Association of Port Authorities jyoung@aapa-ports.org September 2, 2015 American Association of Port Authorities 703.684.5700 • w w w .aapa-ports.org 1

  2. Am erican Association of Port Authorities Representing Seaports of the Western Hemisphere for 100 years! • AAPA was established in 1912 • Since then, AAPA has been providing a space for collaboration and exchange of best practices • Fostering collaboration among members and allied groups through:  Education and Training  Networking and one on one interaction  Legislative and Policy support for U.S. ports  Outreach 2

  3. 1 9 Mem bers in the Freight Stakeholder Coalition, and Grow ing 3

  4. Seaports W aterside Needs Nav 1 Number Hit the HMT Target! 4

  5. I nfrastructure Vital for Am erica’s Trade Future Landside and W aterside Connections Critical 5

  6. The Port Footprint is Expanding Larger Vessels •  Assessing the adequacy of channel and marine terminal capacity More work is being pushed • out beyond the gate to accommodate Increasing populations in • metropolitan areas  Greater trade volumes 6

  7. I m pact Beyond the Port Gates  Need for cleaner intermodal connections to connect to surface transportation network • Highway • On dock rail  More integrated port networks reach beyond the gate • Marine highways • Distribution centers 7

  8. Am erican Association of Port Authorities 2 0 1 5 Port Surface Transportation I nfrastructure Survey The State of Freight Planning • Investments • Financing • 8

  9. Findings Congestion is on the rise at land-side seaport connectors . 38% of our • survey respondents said congestion at their ports’ intermodal connections has increased between 10% and 25%. 33% saw more than a 25% increase in congestion. Congestion is hurting port productivity . One-third of respondents said • congestion at their port’s landside connectors over the past decade has caused port productivity to decline by 25 percent or more. Investment is needed to improve intermodal connections. Nearly one-third • of AAPA-member U.S. ports said they need at least $100 million in landside upgrades, both intermodal rail and road/bridge/tunnel connections, by 2025. 80% of survey respondents said a minimum of $10 million must be invested in their port’s intermodal connectors through 2025. 9

  10. 10

  11. Planning Results from AAPA’s Port Surface Freight Infrastructure Survey, The State of Freight : 67 % of our nation’s ports are working directly with their region’ s • Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) or Council of Governments (COG) in the development and planning of a recent (or as-yet-unfinished) freight project 75% of our ports participated in the development of their state's statewide • freight plan 69% of ports are members of a local freight advisory committees • 11

  12. Financing Gaps 13% Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing (RRIF) • 8% Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) • 34% reported using, or planning to utilize P3s • 14% identified Private Activity Bonds (PAB) • 61 % selected the survey response option, “Other” • We need to capture the investment and leverage resources that ports provide in our freight network. 12

  13. 13

  14. Since 2 0 0 9 TI GER Funding has Leveraged $ 7 0 0 Million for the Freight Netw ork • 2009 TIGER incorporated freight planning into the process • Multi-modal and multi-jurisdictional competitive grant program • 39 maritime projects, worth $500 Million • Port TIGER Grants have leveraged an additional $700 million • There are additional freight rail and federal highway TIGER projects that also move maritime freight • In addition to TIGER, ports and their private sector partners are investing more than $46 billion over 5 years 14

  15. TI GER Brought Ports into the Planning & Funding Process Port of Seattle Neah Bay, WA Garibaldi, OR Eastport, ME Duluth, MN Maine Ports, ME Lewiston, ID Benton, WA Coos Bay, OR Oswego NY ProvPort, RI Quonset, RI Port Newark Bayonne, NJ Stockton, CA Wilmington, DE Green Trade South Jersey W. Sacramento, CA Corridor, CA Port Corp, NJ Oakland, CA Baltimore, MD Tri-City, IL Virginia Port Authority Cates Landing, TN Catoosa, OK Port of L.A., CA Port of Long Beach, CA Port of Charleston Pascagoula, MS Mobile, AL Pier 29, HI Port of Lake Charles JaxPort, FL New Orleans, LA Gulfport, MS Houston, TX Orange, TX Corpus Christi, TX Port Manatee, FL Port of Miami, FL Seward Brownsville, TX Auke Bay, AK TIGER FY2012 TIGER FY 2009 TIGER FY 2010 TIGER FY 2013 15 15 TIGER FY 2011 TIGER FY 2014

  16. AAPA & MARAD & Gatew ay Directors W orking Together Port Planning Tool Kit (ongoing) • TIGER Grants • Strong partnership is needed to continue to address the regional and • federal needs of the industry. “Freight is what connects our regional economies” • Energy and environment projects and issues will continue to grow • There is a growing emphasis in supply chain models, security issues as well • as cybersecurity (as well as nuclear detection scanning equipment) We need Gateway Directors to help us advocate and shape policy to meet • the evolving challenges of the industry 16

  17. Transportation & Freight Activity in W ashington  Highway Trust Fund?  Rep. Lowenthal Bill (H.R. 1308) Waybill Fee  Senate EPW Reauthorization Bill, DRIVE Act (H.R. 22) $11.650 Billion • $2.1 Bllion (AMPPS) • $200 Million (authorized) Intermodal Freight Grant Program •  Port Performance Provisions  Continue TIGER Funding to Keep Federal Freight Projects Moving footer goes here 17

  18. AAPA Landside Freight Priorities  Need for Federal and State Planning • Designation of Gateways and Corridors • Identification of connectors on Primary Freight Network • Expertise in maritime/freight planning should be a part of every state DOT • Short sea shipping or America’s marine highways  Dedicated Freight Funding • Port authorities should be eligible to apply directly for funding • Funding for connectors, intermodal projects and ‘first and last mile’ projects • Funding for Projects of National & Regional Significance (PNRS)  TIFIA and Strong Financing Options 18

  19. AAPA-PORTS.ORG seaportsdeliverprosperity.org Contact: John Young Jyoung@aapa-ports.org 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend