a t maturity zero coupon bond zcb pays 1 at time t and
play

A T -maturity zero coupon bond (ZCB) pays 1 at time T (and only - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A T -maturity zero coupon bond (ZCB) pays 1 at time T (and only that); its time- t price denoted P ( t ; T ) . As a fct of T : Smooth. As a fct of t : Erratic (Ito-process). Continuously compounded ZC yield y ( t, ) is defined by P ( t ; t +


  1. A T -maturity zero coupon bond (ZCB) pays 1 at time T (and only that); its time- t price denoted P ( t ; T ) . As a fct of T : Smooth. As a fct of t : Erratic (Ito-process). Continuously compounded ZC yield y ( t, τ ) is defined by P ( t ; t + τ ) = exp( − τy ( t ; τ )) ⇔ y ( t ; τ ) = − ln P ( t ; t + τ ) . τ Note the shift from time of maturity to time to maturity. Instantaneous forward rates (mathematically convenient) f ( t, T ) = − ∂ ln P ( t ; T ) . ∂T Interpretation. Why does this make sense? BLACKBOARD Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 1

  2. The term structure of interest rates at date t is the mapping τ �→ y ( t ; τ ) or some translation of it (eg. into ZCB prices or forward rates). In theory this curve is observable in practice. In practice, well . . . Short rate: r ( t ) = f ( t ; t ) Bank account: �� t � β ( t ) = exp r ( s ) ds , 0 so dβ ( t ) = r ( t ) β ( t ) dt , and we say/note that this is a locally risk-free asset. Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 2

  3. Dynamics equations (Bj¨ ork equations 22.1-3) Short rate ( ⊤ means transposition) dr ( t ) = a ( t ) dt + b ⊤ ( t ) dW ( t ) (1) ZCB prices (one eqn’ for each T ; note shift to prop. coefficients) dP ( t ; T ) = P ( t ; T ) m ( t ; T ) dt + P ( t ; T ) v ⊤ ( t ; T ) dW ( t ) (2) Forward rates f ( t ; T ) = α ( t ; T ) dt + σ ⊤ ( t ; T ) dW ( t ) (3) d Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 3

  4. No financial assumptions yet; W is just BM under some measure. Coefficients are adapted (vector-valued) process, but smooth in T ; subscript- T denotes T -differentiation. We have � � � T f ( t ; T ) = − ∂ ln P ( t ; T ) ⇔ P ( t ; T ) = exp − f ( t ; s ) ds ∂T t and r ( t ) = f ( t, t ) . So what’s the connection? Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 4

  5. Proposition 22.5 (Quite important result.) 1) If ZCB prices satisfy (2) then forward rates satisfy (3) with α ( t ; T ) = v ⊤ T ( t ; T ) v ( t ; T ) − m T ( t ; T ) and σ ( t ; T ) = − v T ( t ; T ) . 2) If forward rates satisfy (3) then the short rate satisfies (1) with a ( t ) = f T ( t, t ) + α ( t, t ) and b ( t ) = σ ( t ; t ) . 3) If forward rates satisfy (3) then ZCB prices satisfy (2) with m ( t ; T ) = r ( t ) + A ( t ; T ) + 1 2 S ⊤ ( t ; T ) S ( t ; T ) and v ( t ; T ) = S ( t ; T ) , � T � T where A ( t ; T ) = − t α ( t ; s ) ds and S ( t ; T ) = − t σ ( t ; s ) ds. Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 5

  6. You’ll forget terms if you aren’t careful, so let’s look at a proof. 1): Take logs, use Ito & differentiate wrt. T The complication with the last two statements is that we have t appearing both under the integral sign and in the limit. Recall the Leibniz rule (where h : R 2 �→ R is a smooth fuction) � x � x d h ( t, x ) dt = h ( x, x ) + h x ( t, x ) dt. dx 0 0 2): r ( t ) = f ( t ; t ) , but by Leibniz, we’re inspired to write dr ( t ) = d t f ( t ; T ) | T = t + d T f ( t ; T ) | T = t � �� � = f T ( t ; T ) dt Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 6

  7. and the result follows. Bj¨ ork has a proof on integral form — except his “changing the order and identifying” may leave a little too much to the reader. Details on homepage. Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 7

  8. � � � T 3): P ( t ; T ) = exp − t f ( t ; s ) ds , so t enters in two places in an even trickier way. Bj¨ ork gives “a heuristic proof”; even if I wanted to, I can’t repeat the arguments in a way that sounds convincing. So let me sketch a proof. BLACKBOARD and details on homepage. Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 8

  9. An application: The HJM drift condition Assume that a model of forward rates is given by (3) under some measure P . Suppose further that the model is arbitrage-free. Then there exists an equivalent martingale measure Q ∼ P such that P ( t ; T ) is a Q -martingale for all T. β ( t ) So dP ( t ; T ) = P ( t ; T ) r ( t ) dt + P ( t ; T ) S ⊤ ( t ; T ) dW Q ( t ) . Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 9

  10. Note the subtle application of Girsanov’s theorem: Equivalent changes of measure change drift – not volatility. But from Proposition 20.5 3) we get r ( t ) = r ( t ) + A Q ( t ; T ) + 1 2 S ⊤ ( t ; T ) S ( t ; T ) ⇒ − A Q ( t ; T ) = 1 2 S ⊤ ( t ; T ) S ( t ; T ) . Differentiate both sides wrt. T and get the Heath-Jarrow-Morton drift condition � T α Q ( t ; T ) = σ ⊤ ( t ; T ) σ ( t ; s ) ds. t Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 10

  11. But what about drifts under P ? From Girsanov’s theorem we know that there exists a stochastic process λ such that dW Q = dW P − λ ( t ) dt defines a Q -BM. Important: λ doesn’t depend on T . Not important: Whether I choose to write “+” or “-”. We have dP ( t ; T ) P ( t ; T ) = ( r ( t ) + A P ( t ; T ) + 1 2 S ⊤ ( t ; T ) S ( t ; T )) dt + S ⊤ ( t ; T ) dW P ( t ) � � A P ( t ; T ) + 1 = r ( t ) dt + S ⊤ ( t ; T ) dW Q ( t ) + 2 S ⊤ ( t ; T ) S ( t ; T ) + S ⊤ ( t ; T ) λ ( t ) dt. � �� � must = 0 Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 11

  12. This means that − A P ( t ; T ) = 1 2 S ⊤ ( t ; T ) S ( t ; T ) + S ⊤ ( t ; T ) λ ( t ) . Differentiating wrt. T gives �� T � α P ( t ; T ) = σ ⊤ ( t ; T ) σ ( t ; s ) − λ ( t ) . t In sloppy matrix notation we may write λ ( t ) = − E P ( return on ZCB ) − r ( t ) . Vol ( ZCB ) If σ (forward rate volatility) is chosen positive then (typically) λ ( t ) will be positive. Otherwise it’s negative. Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 12

  13. Forward rates are martingales under forward measures The Q T -drift of f ( t, T ) is 0. Expectation hypotheses: No w/ 1-d Brownian motion. Yes, in higher dimensions (find function such that ∇ g · g = 0 ) — but pretty strange models (forward rates move like waves). Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 13

  14. Another application: HJM and the Markov-property The drift condition makes the dynamics of one forward rates dependent on all other forward rates ⇒ Non-markovian, But sometimes the models are Markovian. And this you get to do in an exercise There’s more literature on this where people do cunning stuff. Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 14

  15. A third application: Musiela formulation/parametrization Change to time to maturity in forward rates: r ( t, x ) = f ( t ; t + x ) . “How rates are quoted” (practice) and we get an object that lives on a rectangular domain (mathematical). By Leibniz ∂ dr ( t, x ) = d t f ( t ; T ) | T = t + x + d T f ( t ; T ) | T = t + x = d f ( t, t + x ) + r ( t, x ) , ∂x ���� = F and in fancy notation the drift condition gives dW Q ( t ) dr ( t, x ) = ( F r ( t, x ) + D ( t, x )) dt + σ 0 ( t, x ) � �� � = σ ( t,t + x ) Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 15

  16. The term structure can now be analyzed with tools for infinite dimensional SDEs. Very tricky stuff! Bj¨ ork et al. study consistency questions. Asset Pricing 2; Bj¨ ork Ch. 22, 25 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend