A SCARCE ASSET IN A TRUE MINING DISTRICT August 2017 FORWARD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a scarce asset in a true mining district
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A SCARCE ASSET IN A TRUE MINING DISTRICT August 2017 FORWARD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A SCARCE ASSET IN A TRUE MINING DISTRICT August 2017 FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT This presentation of Guyana Goldfields Inc. (the "Company") contains other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions; the possibility of cost


slide-1
SLIDE 1

August 2017

A SCARCE ASSET IN A TRUE MINING DISTRICT

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.guygold.com

2

This presentation

  • f

Guyana Goldfields Inc. (the "Company") contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements." Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause

  • ur

actual results, performance

  • r

achievements,

  • r

developments in our industry, to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking

  • statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical

facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words "expects," "aims," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "intends," "estimates," "projects," "potential" and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will," "would," "may," "could" or "should" occur. Information inferred from the interpretation of drilling results and information concerning mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates may also be deemed to be forward looking statements, as such information constitutes a prediction of what might be found to be present when and if a project is actually developed. Forward-looking statements this document include statements regarding: the Company's expectations regarding drilling and exploration activities on properties in which the Company has an interest; and the Company's statements regarding estimates of reserves and resources

  • n properties in which the Company has an interest.

There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate. Actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of their respective dates. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations include among others, risks related to fluctuations in mineral prices; uncertainties related to raising sufficient financing to fund planned work in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; changes in planned work resulting from weather, logistical, technical or other factors; the possibility that results of work will not fulfill expectations and realize the perceived potential

  • f the Company's properties; uncertainties involved in the estimation of

resources and reserves; the possibility that required permits may not be

  • btained on a timely manner or at all; the possibility that capital and operating

costs may be higher than currently estimated and may preclude commercial development or render operations uneconomic; the possibility that the estimated recovery rates may not be achieved; risk of accidents, equipment breakdowns and labour disputes or

  • ther unanticipated difficulties or interruptions; the possibility of cost overrun or

unanticipated expenses in the work program; the risk of environmental contamination or damage resulting from the Company's operations; risks associated with title to mineral properties; and other risks and uncertainties discussed appear elsewhere in the Company's documents filed from time to time with the Toronto Stock Exchange and Canadian securities regulators. These statements are based

  • n

a number

  • f

assumptions, including assumptions regarding general market conditions, the availability of financing for proposed transactions and programs

  • n

reasonable terms, the cost

  • f

exploration and development and the ability of outside service providers to deliver services in a satisfactory and timely manner. Forward-looking statements are based

  • n

the beliefs, estimates and

  • pinions
  • f

the Company's management on the date the statements are made. Except as expressly required by applicable securities laws, the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. This presentation uses the terms "Inferred Resource", "Indicated Resource", “Measured Resource” and "Mineral Resource". The Company advises readers that although these terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects"), the US Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. Readers are cautioned not to assume that any part or all

  • f the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

In addition, "Inferred Resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that any part of an Indicated or Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, or economic studies except for a Preliminary Assessment as defined and permitted under National Instrument 43-101. Readers are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an Inferred Resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable. The Mineral Resources stated in this presentation are not Mineral Reserves and, in the absence of a current feasibility study, do not demonstrate economic viability. The determination of Mineral Reserves can be affected by various factors including environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, and marketing issues.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.guygold.com

3

  • Cash position of US$65.4M vs. debt of US$68.8M as at June 30, 2017
  • +20% annual production growth 2017 to 2018 via mill expansion from 5,600 – 8,000 tpd

Organic Growth

  • High grade +200 average koz/yr Au producer with +15 years reserve life with upside
  • Simple metallurgy and mine plan, positive grade reconciliation to date
  • Exceptional free cash flow generation

A Scarce Asset

  • No by-products
  • Minimal currency exposure
  • Oil price hedged for the near term up to 2019

100% Pure Gold Exposure

  • +200,000 acre land package in highly prospective & underexplored greenstone belt
  • Targeting open pit exploration targets within a 30km radius from Aurora Mill

District Potential Strong Balance Sheet

INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.guygold.com

4

Proven and Probable Reserves Grade – Precious Metals Only (g/t Au equivalent)

Source: Company filings and BMO Capital Markets Note: Includes precious metals, converted to AuEq grade using LT pricing of US$1,250/oz Au and US$18.00/oz Ag when not converted by the company.

(1) (2) (3)

WHAT STANDS US APART? Aurora is a High Grade Gold Mine

3.4 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 Median: 1.3 g/t SEMAFO Guyana Torex Alacer Primero Alamos OceanaGold B2Gold IAMGOLD Eldorado Tahoe Detour New Gold Kinross Centerra Silver Standard Yamana

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.guygold.com

5

2017 Performance: On Track To Meet Guidance

Q1 2017 Q2 2017 FY Guidance Gold Produced (ounces) 40,900 29,700 160-180k Cash costs per ounce – before royalty¹ ($/ounce) 516 757 500-550 All-in sustaining1 (“AISC”) ($ per ounce) 861 1,144 775-825 Cost of sales (prod, royalty and dep) ($/ounce) 827 1,164 800-850 Gold Sold (ounces) 40,700 30,000 Average Realized Gold Price US$/ounce 1,227 1,263 Gross Revenue (US$ mlns) 50M 38M Ore mined (tonnes) 498,800 511,600 Waste mined (tonnes) 2,389,700 3,097,200 Total Mined (tonnes) 2,888,400 3,608,800 Strip ratio (waste:ore) 4.8 6.1 Tonnes mined per day 32,100 39,700 Ore processed (tonnes) 602,800 515,600 Tonnes processed per day 6,700 5,700 Head grade g/t Au 2.44 2.06 Recovery (%) 89.7 86.5

1 This is a non-IFRS measure. Refer to non-IFRS Performance Measures section in the latest MD&A

Excellent health, safety and environmental track record with +3,500,000 employee hours worked without a lost time incident !

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.guygold.com

6

Q2: Weakness is in the Past and Non Recurring

  • Lower Grade:
  • Fed the mill with lower grade stockpiled ore along with a higher strip ratio.
  • Non-Recurring: Stockpile was accumulated early on in the mine life when ore control

measures were still being fine tuned. Low grade stockpile has been depleted and the strip ratio is expected to decline significantly in Q3 and Q4 based on mine sequencing as mining shifts to higher grade ore within the Rory’s Knoll tonalite.

  • Lower Recovery:
  • Presence of organic material (timber shafts and support beams) associated with the historic

underground workings at Aleck Hill resulted in the preg-robbing of gold ore in the processing circuit causing lower than expected gold recoveries.

  • Non-Recurring: GGI is now close to mining below the level of the historic underground

workings and, hence, does not expect to encounter further organic material.

  • Higher Costs:
  • Lower grades, lower recoveries and a higher strip ratio resulted in higher costs.
  • Higher mining costs due to a delayed delivery of two new drill rigs to site resulting in the

continued use of more expensive rental drills.

  • Higher blasting costs due to a manufacturer delivery delay of bulk emulsion explosives to site

resulting in a shift back to more expensive packaged explosives.

  • Non-recurring: All items and equipment arrived at site resulting in the full operation of the

two new drill rigs and bulk emulsion explosives being used starting in Q3 for all blasting activities.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.guygold.com

7

Preliminary Q3 Performance: July

  • For the month of July 2017, operational and cost performance trended favourably, as

expected.

  • Gold production from July mining operations totalled approximately 12,100 ounces.
  • Mine and mill performance was above budgeted levels with the mill having

processed an average of 6,032 tpd of ore at an average head grade of 2.21 g/t Au with gold recoveries averaging 89.5%.

  • Cost efficiency was further achieved at the beginning of the third quarter as the

Company commissioned two new drill rigs resulting in only minor reliance on the use

  • f more expensive rental drills. In addition, bulk emulsion explosives were being

used for all blasting activities post quarter end after a delay in the delivery of the explosives from the manufacturer resulted in a shift back to more expensive packaged explosives in the second quarter.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.guygold.com

  • 1. This is a non-IFRS measure. Refer to non-IFRS Performance Measures section in the latest MD&A.

8

2017 Guidance: 2H/17 Higher Production & Lower Costs

  • Lower end of the guidance range of 160,000 – 180,000 ounces of gold is

expected to be achieved.

  • Due to mine sequencing, which envisions a significant increase in head grade
  • ver the second half of the year, gold production is expected to be higher in

the second half of the year relative to the first half. In addition, stripping ratio is expected to be materially lower in 2H/17.

  • Due to the timing of sustaining capital expenditures, AISC¹ are expected to be

lower in the second half of the year relative to the first half.

2017 Guidance (@ $1,200/oz) Gold production (ounces) 160,000 – 180,000 Cost of sales (production costs, royalty and depreciation) ($ per ounce) $800 - $850 Cash cost¹, excluding royalty ($ per ounce) $500 - $550 AISC¹ ($ per ounce) $775 - $825

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.guygold.com

9

Mill Expansion: Phased Approach Internally Funded

Source: February 2017 NI-43 101 Technical Report

 Expected to increase production to +200koz/yr starting 2018  Both phases are fully permitted and are expected to be funded internally

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.guygold.com

10

Phase 1 Mill Expansion: On Schedule

  • GGI engaged JDS Energy and Mining Inc. (“JDS”) to complete Phase 1 of the mill

expansion on an EPCM basis.

  • Progress to date:
  • Commencement of detailed engineering including finalizing the process flow

diagrams and process design criteria,

  • Leach tank ring foundations are complete and thickener footings nearing

completion, and

  • Ordering of long lead time items.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.guygold.com

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 50 100 150 200 250 300 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036

Operating cash cost (incl royalty) Recovered Ounces Open Pit Underground Operating Cash Costs (incl. royalty) 11

LOM: Recovered Ounces

Source: February 2017 NI-43 101 Technical Report

slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.guygold.com

12

SITE LAYOUT: Aurora Gold Mine

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.guygold.com

13

MINING LOCATIONS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.guygold.com

14

RORY’S KNOLL: Pit

slide-15
SLIDE 15

www.guygold.com

15

AURORA GOLD MINE: Resource Growth Potential

Source: SRK, 2017

slide-16
SLIDE 16

www.guygold.com

16

  • Expected completion by end of Q1 2018

Phase 1 Mill Expansion

  • Expected completion by mid-2019

Phase 2 Mill Expansion

UPCOMING CATALYSTS

  • Multiple brownfield and greenfield targets

Exploration

slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.guygold.com

17

GUIANA SHIELD: Known Gold Region

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.guygold.com

18

CUYUNI BASIN: A TRUE MINING DISTRICT: Looking for Mine #2

  • 1 Operating Aurora Gold Mine
  • 1 Sulphur Rose secondary resource
  • Multiple near-mine saprolite targets
  • 1,200 square km land package
  • Long history of artisanal mining
  • Highly prospective greenstone belt

Looking for Mine #2

slide-19
SLIDE 19

www.guygold.com

19

BROWNFIELDS EXPLORATION: Gold Creek, Marupa & Iroma

Brownfields Exploration

  • Near Mine Saprolite Targets:
  • Gold Creek
  • Gold Creek Laterite Target
  • Marupa West:
  • Anomalous soils on intrusive target
  • Iroma:
  • Largest geochem anomaly
slide-20
SLIDE 20

www.guygold.com

20

SULPHUR ROSE: A Mine In the Making

  • 23 km from Aurora Mine in a straight line
  • Nine (9) trenches were excavated in Q2’17 to

test a ground IP (induced polarization) chargeability anomaly and airborne radiometric anomalies northwest of the Sulphur Rose

  • deposit. Two (2) diamond drill holes were

drilled to test these anomalies. Results are still pending.

  • A regional soil sampling program along the

Sulphur Rose corridor is underway which will cover an area of 36km² with a projected 3,400 samples to be collected. The soil program is currently 80% complete.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

www.guygold.com

21

GREENFIELDS EXPLORATION: Wynamu

A regional soil sampling program is ongoing and nearly complete covering a northeast trending corridor from Kalaloo to Wynamu.

Ten (10) trenches with a total length

  • f

1,500 meters are proposed for early Q3’17 to test a series of gold anomalies identified by deep auger sampling.

A ten (10) hole drill program is proposed to test a significant gold anomaly and trench sampling with best results of 58m @ 1.21 g/t Au. This work is expected to be commenced in Q3’17 after access is prepared.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

www.guygold.com

22

APPENDIX

slide-23
SLIDE 23

www.guygold.com

23 Symbol: TSX: GUY

Total Shares Outstanding 173,036,629 Options 6,371,684 Warrants 52 week: Hi/Lo C$9.68 / C$4.56 Market Cap (at C$ 5.10) C$882 million Cash Balance (June 30, 2017) US$65.4 million Debt (June 30, 2017) US$68.8 million

Top 10 Shareholders Shares % The Baupost Group 20.6M 12.0% Van Eck 20.2M 11.7% Rafferty Asset Management 8.3M 4.8% M&G Investment Mgmt 6.3M 3.6% Patrick Sheridan Jr. (Founder) 6.0M 3.5% Fiera Capital 5.4M 3.1% Fidelity Investments 4.9M 2.8% Franklin Resources (Templeton) 4.4M 2.5% Oppenheimer 3.3M 1.9% Sentry Investments 2.7M 1.5%

CORPORATE SNAPSHOT

slide-24
SLIDE 24

www.guygold.com

24

  • Guyana is the only English speaking country in South America
  • British common law and secure tenure - part of the Commonwealth
  • Democratically elected government under parliamentary system
  • Long history of significant gold production:
  • Gold was the largest export of the country
  • Royalty:
  • 5%: Gold price $1,000/oz or less
  • 8%: Gold price $1,000/oz +
  • Corporate income tax:
  • 27.5% with no withholding tax on interest payments

MINING FRIENDLY JURISDICTION & GOVERNMENT

slide-25
SLIDE 25

www.guygold.com

25

Road Access to Aurora

LOGISTICS & INFRASTRUCTURE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

www.guygold.com

26

Focus on health and safety of our employees, the well-being of our community and the protection of the natural environment Hiring in the region, giving priority to local communities:

  • 96% are Guyanese nationals
  • Scholarship and job/skills training

Supporting local communities

  • Local sourcing of goods and services
  • Business opportunities
  • Participation in municipal development
  • Sustainable development initiatives in community

CSR AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

slide-27
SLIDE 27

www.guygold.com

27

FEASIBILITY STUDY LOM HIGHLIGHTS: February 2017

Gold Price (base case) US $1,200/oz Total Gold Production (Recovered Gold) 3.3 Moz 15 Year Mine Life OP 2017-2024 UG 2024 – 2031 Average Annual Production (LOM) 220,000 oz Au Average Gold Grade (mill head) 3.02 g/t Au Mill Throughput 2017 + 1Q18 5,600 tpd 2Q18 onwards 8,000 tpd Gold Recovery 2017 91.3% 2018 (post Phase 1) 92.5% 2H19 onwards (post Phase 2) 94.0% Strip Ratio (waste to ore) 8.4:1 LOM Cash Costs (with royalty) $612/oz LOM AISC $747/oz Expansion Capital Cost Mill Phase 1 (2017 + 1Q18) $21 M Mill Phase 2 (2018 + 1H19) $27 M Mine Fleet (2018) $24 M Underground Development Cost (Year 2022 – 2024) $129 M Pre-Tax NPV (5% Discount Rate) $1,054 M After-Tax NPV (5% Discount Rate) $850 M

Source: February 2017 NI-43 101 Technical Report

slide-28
SLIDE 28

www.guygold.com

28 Gold Price $1,200/oz Quantity (kt) Grade (g/t) Contained Gold (koz) Proven Reserves O/P Saprolite 336 1.60 17 O/P Rock 4,864 2.99 467 Total Proven 5,200 2.90 485 Probable Reserves O/P Saprolite 2,934 1.91 180 O/P Rock 12,128 3.02 1,179 U/G Rock 16,519 3.19 1,694 Total Probable 31,580 3.01 3,053 Total P & P Reserves 36,781 2.99 3,538 Gold Price $1,300/oz Quantity (kt) Grade (g/t) Contained Gold (koz) Measured & Indicated Resources O/P 29,670 2.62 2,440 U/G 30,060 3.91 3,780 Total M&I Resources 59,730 3.25 6,250 Inferred Resource O/P 4,770 1.57 230 U/G 11,810 4.12 1,570 Total Inferred Resource 16,580 3.79 1,790

MINERAL RESERVES & RESOURCES

Source: February 2017 NI-43-101 Technical Report Source: February 2017 NI-43-101 Technical Report

1.Mineral Reserves are based on a gold price of US$1,200 per ounce, 8% royalty and an average metallurgical recovery of 96.0% for saprolite and 94.0% for fresh rock material. 2.Open pit saprolite and rock reserves are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.44 g/t Au and 0.42 g/t Au for vein and upper saprolite material respectively. Open pit rock reserves are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.76 g/t Au and 0.64 g/t Au for vein and Rory’s Knoll rock material respectively. 3.Underground fresh rock reserves are reported at a cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t Au. 4.Mineral Reserves are contained within Mineral Resources. 5.SRK is not aware of mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, or other factors that could materially affect the mineral reserve estimates.

  • 1. Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral
  • reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral

reserves and do not have demonstrated economic

  • viability. All figures have been rounded to reflect

the relative accuracy of the estimates. 2.Open pit mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.30 g/t for Saprolite and 0.40 g/t for Fresh rock respectively, and underground mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade

  • f 1.8 g/t. Cut-off grades are based on a price of

US$1,300 per

  • unce
  • f

gold and a gold recoveries of 97 percent for saprolite and 94.5 percent for fresh material. 3.Mineral resources have been adjusted using the 2016 EOY topography, to account for open pit mining to date, and include

  • re

stockpile inventories as of EOY 2016.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

www.guygold.com

29

FEASIBILITY HIGHLIGHTS: LOM Operating Costs

LOM Operating Costs Units January 2017 OP Mining US$/t $2.11 UG Mining (RK) US$/t $25.72 Processing cost per tonne US$/t $14.87 G&A cost per tonne US$/t $8.77 Cash Cost US$/oz $516 Cash Cost w/ Royalty US$/oz $612 All‐In Sustaining Cash Cost US$/oz $747

Source: February 2017 NI-43 101 Technical Report

slide-30
SLIDE 30

www.guygold.com

30 Geological Description

  • Rory's Knoll mineralization: disseminated pyrite and gold mineralization associated with intense silica-fuchsite-

sericite-carbonate alteration in tonalite intrusive probably emplaced at the hinge of the folded volcanic rock and metasediments.

  • Mad Kiss mineralization: disseminated pyrite and gold mineralization associated with intense silica-fuchsite-

sericite-carbonate alteration in a quartz feldspar porphyry dyke.

  • Aleck Hill mineralization: mesothermal gold veins hosted in the shear zones of metavolcanic and

metasedimentary rocks; occurs in a zone of pyrite-rich quartz-carbonate veins in volcanic rocks that are enclosed in an alteration envelope which reportedly includes silica-sericite and calcite cement filling fractures.

GEOLOGY

slide-31
SLIDE 31

www.guygold.com

31

BOARD & SENIOR OFFICERS

Alan Ferry Lead Director

  • Geologist that has been Involved in the investment industry for over 28 years as a mining

analyst and a mining corporate finance specialist. Patrick Sheridan Jr. Founder, Executive Chairman and Director

  • Over 25 years of experience in the mining industry
  • Has actively explored in Guyana since 1996 and is the founder of Guyana Goldfields and lead the

discovery of the Aurora and Sulphur Rose deposits Scott A. Caldwell President & CEO and Director

  • Mining engineer with 35+ years experience building and operating gold and base metal mines worldwide
  • Former President, CEO and Director of Allied Nevada Gold Corp. from 2006 - 2013

Michael Richings Director

  • 40+ years of development and operational experience in the resource sector. Mr. Richings is currently

the Chairman of the Board for Vista Gold, where he also served as CEO from 2007 to 2012 Rene Marion Director

  • 25+ years of diversified management and senior technical experience with resource industry expertise in
  • perations, mineral exploration, and mine development, along with a successful history of corporate

development. Wendy Kei Director

  • Chartered Professional Accountant and previously served as CFO of Dominion Diamond Corporation

(formerly Harry Winston). Jean-Pierre Chauvin Director

  • 40+ years of combined experience in mining operations and construction management.

David Beatty Director

  • 25+ years of financial capital markets and resource management experience.

Daniel Noone Director and VP, Exploration

  • Over 25 years of experience of international mineral exploration and development
  • Former VP of Peru for Aquiline Resources

Paul J. Murphy Executive VP, Finance & CFO

  • Over 40 years of financial experience and former Head of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Western’s

World Mining Practice

slide-32
SLIDE 32

www.guygold.com

32

Scientific and Technical Information The qualified person for the mineral resource and reserve estimates and other scientific and technical information herein are as follows: The compilation of the technical report in support of the 2017 feasibility study was completed by Tim Carew, PGeo, Robert McCarthy, PEng, and Christopher Elliott, FAusImm. By virtue of their education, membership to a recognized professional association and relevant work experience, Tim Carew, Robert McCarthy and Christopher Elliott are independent Qualified Persons as defined by National Instrument 43-101. Tim Carew, Robert McCarthy and Christopher Elliott have reviewed, approved and verified the technical content within this presentation. The qualified person for the other scientific and technical information in this presentation, is Daniel Noone, BApSci (Geo), MBA, and has approved the contents of this presentation. Technical and scientific information contained herein, including the mineral resource and reserve estimates relating to the Aurora Gold Project is derived from the ““Independent Technical Report Updated Feasibility Study, Aurora Gold Mine Project, Republic of Guyana” dated February 2, 2017 (the “Technical Report”). We have filed the Technical Report under our profile at www.sedar.com. For details of the data verification procedures employed by the QPs and the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, please see the Technical Report. For information about known legal, political, environmental, or

  • ther risks that could materially affect the potential development of the mineral resources or mineral reserves, please see the Technical

Report. Securities Laws This presentation does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities discussed herein in any jurisdiction where such would be prohibited. This presentation is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any securities in the United States. The securities referred to in this presentation will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state securities laws. The information contained in this presentation does not and is not intended to constitute a "valuation," "formal valuation," "appraisal," "prior valuation," or a "report, statement or opinion of an expert" for purposes of any securities legislation in Canada or otherwise. Currency Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in United States dollars.

SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND SECURITIES INFORMATION

slide-33
SLIDE 33

www.guygold.com

33

Jacqueline Wagenaar VP, IR & Corporate Communications Tel: (416) 628 5936 x.5295 Email: jwagenaar@guygold.com