A Proposal for a Norwegian Defence Conceptual Framework concept - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a proposal for a norwegian defence conceptual framework
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Proposal for a Norwegian Defence Conceptual Framework concept - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Proposal for a Norwegian Defence Conceptual Framework concept development and the relation to long-term defence planning. 26th August 2008 at ISMOR25 by Mr. Rune Stensrud Suggested format of the presentation Introduction to military


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Proposal for a Norwegian Defence Conceptual Framework

– concept development and the relation to long-term defence

planning.

26th August 2008 at ISMOR25 by Mr. Rune Stensrud

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Suggested format of the presentation

  • Introduction to military Concepts and Concept Development
  • A Proposal for a Norwegian Defence Conceptual Framework

(NDCF) – concept development and the relation to long-term defence planning.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Survey and Background

slide-4
SLIDE 4

FFI Project METEK

  • Scope of Work

Time frame 2 years (1.1.06–31.12.07) Project leader Rune Stensrud/FFI Analysis Total effort 3FiÅ Implementation: Co-operation with Industry (Teleplan); use of competence in the NoD community Steering Board: Norwegian MOD IV-1, FSS, FOL, KNM T, TRADOK, LUKS Scope of work: FFI Project METEK is proposing a Methodology of concept development

slide-5
SLIDE 5

FFI Project METEK

  • Background and Objectives
  • Norwegian Defence (NoD)

has introduced Concept Development as a supplement to traditional developmental activities.

  • Best practices of
  • perational experimentation

are well established in NoD ...

  • ... but the place of concepts

within the strategic planning process or the role of concepts within the acquisition process is not fully stated.

Assist Norwegian MOD in the process of linking concept development and experimentation Aid Norwegian MOD in the process of mapping concepts

  • nto the Defence Capabilities

Framework Present a proposal for a Norwegian Defence Conceptual Framework (focusing on

  • rganization, process descriptions,

enterprise-models and planning) Aid the Norwegian Defence Study (Forsvarsstudie 07)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Definitions and distinct views of concepts

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Definitions

  • A concept provides foundation for achievement of an effect; i.e

an idea of how to solve a problem or create a certain effect*.

  • A military concept is the description of a method or scheme

(ways) for employing specific military capabilities (means) in the achievement of a stated objective (ends).**

  • Concept development is a process to verify ideas of how to

create an effect, with a view to future realization.***

  • A capability can be defined as the ability to produce an effect.

* NATO Code of Best Practice Long Term Defence Planning **US Joint Capstone Concept, version3 *** NATO ACT dir 80-7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A Proposal for a Norwegian Conceptual Framework

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results (1 of 3)

Survey Method Marketing

FFI/Report-2006/03042 Survey of military concept- and doctrine-development in UK, Canada, Australia, Sweden, Denmark and Norway FFI/Report-2007/01722 Method for concept development Seminar 29.11.07 (FFI) Reports:

  • Visiting Development,

Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC), MOD Shrivenham, Swindon, UK,

  • 5. juli 2006
  • Visiting Högkvarteret,

Försvarsmakten, Stockholm, Sverige,

  • 6. september 2006
  • Participating on NTNU’s

“Concept Symposium 2006”

  • Visiting Forsvars-

kommandoen, København, Danmark, 9. oktober 2006

  • CDE conference, Athen

2006

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results (2 of 3)

METEK project has assisted main stakeholder Norwegian MOD ... and Norwegian Chief of Defence (Defence White Paper 07) FFI will continue to be a active part following up this process

FORSVARSSTUDIE 07 U Off § 5.2.b Styre og lede
  • Sentral styring og ledelse av alle
kapabilitetsrelaterte utviklings- aktiviteter i FMO
  • Motta og effektuere oppdrag og
føringer fra FD
  • Utøve styring og koordinering av
GIenes (tilsv) utviklingsaktiviteter
  • Styre og koordinere utviklings-
aktiviteter mot NATO og andre internasjonale aktører Nasjonal utvikling Utviklings- støtte Internasjonal utvikling Avdeling for utvikling Støtte gjennomføring
  • Støtte gjennomføringen av
utviklingsrelaterte aktiviteter i nivå 2- sjefenes kompetanse- og utviklingsmiljøer
  • metodestøtte
  • analysestøtte
  • ledelsesstøtte
  • Lede gjennomføringen av større
utviklingsaktiviteter som berører flere aktører Utviklingsaktiviteter Gjennomføre
  • Ansvar for gjennomføring av alle
utviklingsaktiviteter innen sine fagområder (innen rammer gitt av utviklingsavdelingen )
  • Ansvar for å lede (eller støtte) gjennomføring
av felles utviklingsaktiviteter etter oppdrag fra utviklingsavdelingen GIS SJ INI GIH GIL Sj LOG GIHV SJ FOL SJ … FSJ Nivå 2-sjef NOBLE

”In my opinion this has been an exemplary project representing flexibility (and agility) according to the process i.e. good contact between FFI and main stakeholder, and regarding outcome” results from the user survey

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results (3 of 3)

The main elements of the

Norwegian Defence Conceptual Framework are:

  • Definitions
  • Concept Hierarchy
  • Capability Framework
  • Organization
  • Process descriptions
  • Management tools

Concept development Concept maturity Product (DOTMPLFI)

Concept idea

New capability

High risk/ uncertainty Low risk/ uncertainty

New organization New/changed material Skills development/training Prioritizing of R&D New/changed tactics/doctrine

Study Simulation Field experiment Demo knowledge about the concept Increasing Hypothesis

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Concepts and Time

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Concepts and Time

Requirements Acquisition Disposal In Service Capability Gap Solution Requirements Solution Sustainment Withdrawal Need Development concepts

  • Analytical concepts

(future) Established (applied) concepts

  • Current best practice
  • Doctrine
  • CONOPS
  • CONUSE

(current) Historical concepts (past) Trends ”Blue sky thinking”

References to P. Willis, P. Dortmans, N. Curtis, and N. Tri, "Army's Concept Framework – Exploiting Concepts as Agents for Change for Land Force Development,"2003, DSTO, AUSTRALIA.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Motivation for Concept Development

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Why military Concept Development?

A need for transformation of military forces to adapt to future Change – reduce uncertainty?

  • Rapid changes in military operations may have impact on which

methods are relevant and cause current solutions to be ineffective

  • Threats

– From static to dynamic threats – From episodes to continuous conflicts – ”The Missing Threat”

  • Missions and Tasks

– Counterinsurgency to Home Security – Increasing needs within Peace Keeping – The Need for flexible and adaptive capabilities

  • Relevant partners for co-operations

– Both nations and organizations (authority, IO, NGO, industry, local government)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Why military Concept Development? (contin.)

  • Strategic view (ends)

– Globalization -> Global focus, ”Out-of-area” – Economical, social and political arenas (PMESII) -> coordination and different instruments of power (DIME)

  • Technology (information and communication technologies)

– Increased possibilities to share information – Increased possibilities to interaction – Need of competence, expertise and skills – Procurement regime

  • Economics

– Balance – Need of increased efficiency

  • > Need for new/modified capabilities
  • > Request for a higher rate of Change – incremental processes to

slow, i.e. the result is increased risk or strategic gap

  • A need for Concept Development
slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Purpose of Concept development

  • Address processes of change
  • Reduce risk
  • Increase operating efficiency
  • Reduce cost
  • A concept is an idea!

– uncertainty connected to whether the idea is realizable,

practicable, feasible ...

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Process description

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Current operations

Result:

  • Support the fullfilment of Defence

essential tasks

Identify directives

Result:

  • Strategic guidance

Develope concepts

Result:

  • Directing basis (foundation) for

implementation of relevant capabilities

Implementing capability

Result:

  • Implement military capabilities

Lessons Learned

Visio

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Long Term Defence Planning (Defence Study) Concept Development

New Concept identified needing develop- ment New Concept identified needing develop- ment Master Questions identified Master Questions identified

Concept Development

A High-level Concept may be the directing basis (Strategic Guidance) for the NoD Defence Study A High-level Concept may be the directing basis (Strategic Guidance) for the NoD Defence Study

Capability

slide-21
SLIDE 21

$

Strategic gap or risk

WAYS MEANS ENDS

Based on ”The Military Budgeting Process: An Overview”, Le Roux, 2002

slide-22
SLIDE 22

FFI turns knowledge and ideas into an efficient defence

End of Presentation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Extra slides

slide-24
SLIDE 24 Identification of directives Results:
  • Strategic Guidance
Typical parameters:
  • High Level Concepts
  • Economics
  • Future Trends
  • Threats
  • Security policy assessments
  • Political Guidance
  • Defence Tasks and Missions
  • Ways, Ends and Means
  • Policy
Methods / techniques:
  • Long Term Defence Study
  • Research
  • Studies and Analysis
  • Scenario Generation
Develop concepts Results:
  • Directing basis for realization of capabilities
Typical tasks:
  • Identify and prioritize ideas and proposals
  • Recommend actions according to DOTMPLFI
  • Develop concepts
  • Methods / techniques:
  • Research
  • Lessons Learned
  • Studies and analysis
  • Table Top gaming
  • Experimenting
  • Modeling and simulation
  • Workshops
Realize capabilities Results: Implement capabilities in Defence Structure Typical areas of action: D – update and implement doctrine/tactics/procedures O – adapt organization
  • T – update program of training/practice/exercise
M – procure/modify material systems P – change personnel/workforce L – adapt and implement new methods of leadership F – implement and use new facilities I – implement new techniques/procedures for co-operation / interoperability Current operations Results:
  • Support the fulfillment of Defence essential tasks
Typical areas of action: :
  • Military types of operations (national / international)
Basis functions:
  • Command and control
  • Intelligence
  • Mobility
  • Force protection
  • Logistics
  • Effects
  • Force generation

Lessons Learned

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Stakeholders

Army Sea Air Home Guard MOD C4IS LOG Op Hq Intel

Questions

DLO

Functional components of a capability:
  • D – adapt doctrine/tactics/procedures
  • O – adapt organization / force structure elements
  • T – update program of training/practices/exercises
  • M – procure new/modify material systems
  • P – change/adapt competence/skills/program of education/force gen.
  • L – implement / adapt concepts of leadership/ education of leadership
  • F – implement and use new/mod. of buildings/ training facilities
  • I – implement new techniques/procedures for co-operation/
interoperability Methods
  • Research
  • Studies and (OR) analysis
  • Workshops
  • Table Top gaming
  • Modeling and simulation
  • Experimentation
  • Lessons Learned etc
Implementation/realization Adapt Develop Concept starting point may be an idea which possibly can contribute to increase the ability of Defence adapting to changed circumstances, whether based on a new threat or opportunity.

Staff

Concept development

Master Question list

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Experimentation Priorities High Level Experimentation Questions

Future Concepts of C2 HQ Orgs & Structures NEC MN C2 & Interop Information Exploitation Co-ord & C2 of ISR assets Co-ord of Joint Fires

What future concepts of command and control will achieve decision superiority and rapid effect in the Joint and Multinational battlespace? How can we better deliver optimal effect through evolving organisation and structures of HQs within the battlespace? How can decision superiority and tempo be enhanced through the application of Network Enabled Capability? How do we apply concepts for command and control to a multinational/coalition environment to ensure interoperability? How best do we develop operational information capabilities, in order to provide decision makers with timely and appropriate information? How do we co-ordinate and command ISR assets to best effect? How do we co-ordinate and command joint fires at our disposal in order to synchronise and concentrate the desired effects?

Airspace Management

How do we improve the co-ordination of joint airspace management and planning?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Combat ID Air Defence

What are the essential elements of SA, TTPs and target identification required to optimise CID and how are they to be incorporated into mil capability? What are the joint concepts, doctrine and capabilities for comprehensive AD for deployed/expeditionary forces?

Joint Logistics Capabilities Common Log Picture

What are the essential capabilities required for joint logistics, and how do we best deliver them?? How do we best portray the Joint Logistics Picture and what decision support tools are required?

Op Medical Care

What are the essential capabilities required to provide operational medical care, and how do we deliver them?

People Tracking

How do we improve the ability to locate and mange people and their skills in the battlespace?

Structure of Jt/ MN Battlespace

How are we to best organise forces and component HQ responsibilities to exploit emerging technologies and concepts for the conduct of future ops?

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Develop concepts

Identify and determine relevance
  • f concept proposals
Produce outline concept development plan Developing and writing military concepts Concept maturity assessment

The provenance, authority and coherence of concepts Support to the generation and exploration of concepts

Identify and determine relevance of concept proposals Identify concept proposals Determine relevance and give priority to concept proposals

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Identify and determine relevance of concept proposals

Identify concept proposals Determine relevance and give priority to concept proposals

Describe concept proposal (top-down) Describe concept proposal (bottom-up) MQL

Concept proposal

Increase

  • perational

utility

Feasibility / realization value

Execution of concept development Realization of the capability Cost Risk Cost Moral/ethics/ legality Measure of Effectiveness (MOE) 1 MOE 2 MOE 3 MOE n

Produce outline concept development plan

Approval of
  • utline plan for
next steps

Stop Further planning

Lessons learned

slide-29
SLIDE 29

High-level concepts

Operational concepts

C2 Intel Mobility Protection Logistics Op concept # 1 Op concept # 2 Op concept # 3 Op concept # 4 Op concept # 5 Op concept # 6 Op concept # n Effect

Strategic Guidance Operational feedback

Force Generation

Functional concepts

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Operational concepts Functional concepts

C2 Intel Mobility Protection Logistics Op concept # 1 Op concept # 2 Op concept # 3 Op concept # 4 Op concept # 5 Op concept # 6 Op concept # n

Force Generation Analytical- concept D e v e l

  • p

m e n t a l

  • c
  • n

c e p t Developmental- concept Developmental- concept Developmental- concept

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Command and control Intelligence Protection Mobility Effect Logistics Generation and maintenance of force components

Current Operations