Gr Gree een Mov
- vem
A McDonalds Sustainability Project Vin Sathyamoorthy Mitch Daar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Gr Gree een Mov ovem emen ent A McDonalds Sustainability Project Vin Sathyamoorthy Mitch Daar Yousef Shaban Sahand Sepehrnia November 14, 2012 Ch Challenge allenge Contents Clien ient and d Context ext Methodology Step 1:
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
It appears as if there is a fundamental disconnect between what McDonald’s can do well and what they can do sustainably.
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Visit McDonald’s and observe patrons Identify & define customer segments Target a segment and
further Develop a solution to address target’s needs
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Hourly Workers
Wi-Fi Users Families
Retirees
Teenagers
Teenagers Hourly Workers Families Wi-Fi Users Retirees Description
Teenagers on their way to/from school Workers (typically hourly) on their lunch break Parents and kids sitting down for a family meal, typically after an activity (e.g. soccer game) Customers who come to McD’s to use free Wi-Fi service 60 and older males who are retired from work
Core Attitude
Need inexpensive consistent food Need to escape the office to relax and eat an affordable meal Need an easy place to get a meal and sit down between activities Need a substitute for Starbucks; customers come alone to do work Need a spot to socialize with friends, as well as to casually read the newspaper
Order Type
Value menu Full meal (burger, fries, soft drink) Meal for parents; happy meal for kids McCafe McCafe, sometimes accompanied with salad
Time at Restaurant
30-45 minutes 30-40 minutes 30-40 minutes 45 – 60 minutes 60+ minutes
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
cups (McCafes, Smoothies, Soft Drinks)
with the liquid & ice (contaminates trash bag)
quickly – even people who have spent a large amount of time at McDonald’s (applies to retirees, kids, etc.)
% of total restaurant waste made up of plastic products (polystyrene, polypropylene)
% of total restaurant waste made up of paper products – translates to about 2.5 tons/month
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Anu Uzma Ayana
Age 7
Yuvan
Age 5
Armaan
Age 3
“Can I play with
your iPhone?”
“I want to show
you my new toys!”
“I want to do a
puzzle!”
“Use your
imagination … pretend we have it!”
“George needs his shots … you can be the doctor giving it to him.” “I like to play
tennis … and with my golf club.”
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Happy Meal Box
together in point)
“Wooosh!” Game
immediately drawn to its presence
cups
Cup gets sucked through pipe, traveling to top Kid inserts cup here; it enters pneumatic tube, similar to those at bank drive-thru windows Sucking motion removes liquid and dries out cup as it travels up Cup bounces around Happy Meal toys, awarding points (like a pinball machine) Cups Only, Please! Dump any remaining liquid here first
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Initial R&D and Machine Costs Cross-promote with Hi-C brands and happy meal toy manufacturers Break-even faster with constant revenue stream
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Initial R&D and Machine Costs Cross-promote with Hi-C brands and happy meal toy manufacturers Break-even faster with constant revenue stream Possibility of contamination Target only cups, liquid separation, upward “woosh” to eliminate residue liquid Reliable Recyclable Waste; Limit leakage of trash bags
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Initial R&D and Machine Costs Cross-promote with Hi-C brands and happy meal toy manufacturers Break-even faster with constant revenue stream Possibility of contamination Target only cups, liquid separation, upward “woosh” to eliminate residue liquid Reliable Recyclable Waste; Limit leakage of trash bags Trash Volume Compact cups by up to 8x Smaller trash volume = Fewer trips to empty trash; Reduce waste management pickups
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12 In-Store Revenues Revenues from Beverages $21,408 $21,496 $21,584 $21,673 $21,761 $21,850 $21,939 $22,028 $22,117 $22,207 $22,296 $22,386 Revenues from Non-Beverages 43,815 43,833 43,851 43,869 43,887 43,905 43,923 43,941 43,959 43,977 43,995 44,014 Total In-Store Revenues 65,222 65,328 65,435 65,541 65,648 65,755 65,862 65,969 66,077 66,184 66,292 66,399 Incremental Revenue (Total - Original)
213 319 426 533 640 747 854 962 1,069 1,177 Cross-Promotional Revenue with Coca-Cola 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Money from Recycled Paper 2 4 7 9 11 13 16 18 20 22 25 27 Total Incremental Revenue 1,002 1,111 1,219 1,328 1,437 1,546 1,655 1,765 1,874 1,984 2,094 2,204 Cumulative Incremental Revenue 1,002 2,113 3,332 4,660 6,097 7,644 9,299 11,064 12,938 14,922 17,016 19,220 Cumulative Incremental Revenue Excluding Sales Increase 1,002 2,007 3,013 4,022 5,033 6,047 7,063 8,080 9,100 10,123 11,147 12,174 Costs Machine Costs $3,000
356
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Incremental Utility Cost 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Reduction: in Waste Management Fees (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) Reduction: Employee Wages (4) (8) (12) (15) (19) (23) (27) (31) (35) (38) (42) (46) Total Costs 3,408 48 44 40 36 32 28 25 21 17 13 9 Cumulative Costs 3,408 3,455 3,499 3,539 3,575 3,607 3,636 3,660 3,681 3,698 3,711 3,720 Cumulative Gains (Revenues - Costs) (2,406) (1,342) (167) 1,121 2,522 4,036 5,663 7,404 9,257 11,225 13,306 15,501 Cumulative Gains Excluding Sales Increase (2,406) (1,449) (486) 483 1,458 2,440 3,427 4,420 5,420 6,425 7,437 8,454
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Assumes: (1) Beverage Rev. incr. by 3.8%/annum & (2) Non- Beverage Rev incr. 10% of Bev. Break-Even: Assuming No Increased Sales Revenue