a framework to evaluate environmental impact of
play

A Framework to Evaluate Environmental Impact of Engineered - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Framework to Evaluate Environmental Impact of Engineered Nanomaterials William K. Boyes October 9, 2018 Photo image area measures 2 H x 6.93 W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The


  1. A Framework to Evaluate Environmental Impact of Engineered Nanomaterials William K. Boyes October 9, 2018 Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left and 3.81” from top of page. Each image used in collage should be reduced or cropped to a maximum of 2” high, stroked with a 1.5 pt white frame and positioned edge-to-edge with accompanying images. Office of Research and Development

  2. What decisions do we need to make? • Narrow Sense : EPA Registration of Nanomaterials –TSCA – Toxics Substances Control Act • Chemicals are considered as “new” or “existing” based on molecular identity – not particle size • Reauthorized in 2016 as Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century –Expanded testing authority and promoted alternative testing approaches –Did not change consideration of nanomaterials –FIFRA – Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act • Chemicals are registered based on intended function as a biocide • Has greater authority than TSCA to require product testing for registration • Broad Sense: Become predictive of environmental behavior of nanomaterials 1

  3. Transformative Science • Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy (NRC, 2007) • Exposure Science in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy (NRC, 2012) • Growing number of ENM; can’t afford to test one-by-one • Need to become predictive: –Behavior of ENM depends complex interactions between chemical and physical properties and environmental and biological factors –Our approach: • Build a framework to help organize relevant information and identify key determining factors • Identify key factors and functional assays that will simplify assessments 2

  4. Aggregate Exposure Pathway (AEP) Teeguarden, et al. (2016), Environ Sci Technol; doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05311 Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Villeneuve, et al. Tox Sci., 2014, 142:312-320

  5. Comprehensive Framework Boyes et al., CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2017 4

  6. Release Across Product Life Cycle 5

  7. Functional Assays Along Framework Intrinsic NP Propertie Measure s Extrinsic NP Social & System Properties Engineere Propertie d s Properties Functional Measure Assays Exposure Fate & Forecast & Hazard Transport Biouptake RISK Hendren et al, 2015 6

  8. Conclusions • AOP/AEP approach to evaluate nanomaterial risks • A four-component framework with key decision points • Targeted functional assays for the decision points 7

  9. Thank you! 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend