67 Cu Production in Gallium Cu Production in Gallium 67 George - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

67 cu production in gallium cu production in gallium
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

67 Cu Production in Gallium Cu Production in Gallium 67 George - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

67 Cu Production in Gallium Cu Production in Gallium 67 George Kharashvili Radiation Physics, RadCon 4/14/17 Previous Test of 67 Cu Production in Ga 4D beamline Beam test plan described in ATLis 16434 RWP #2016-J004 Ga and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

67 67Cu Production in Gallium

Cu Production in Gallium


George Kharashvili Radiation Physics, RadCon 4/14/17

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Previous Test of 67Cu Production in Ga

  • 4D beamline
  • Beam test plan described

in ATLis 16434

  • RWP #2016-J004
  • Ga and Zn targets
  • 56 MeV, 89 nA, 5 min
  • Samples replaced

– No notable radiological concerns

  • 18.5 MeV, 2.5 µA, 1 h
  • 1 R/h on contact dose rate minutes after irradiation
  • Samples removed 20 hours after the irradiation
  • Tungsten radiator was the most radioactive item
  • Did not create notable radiological concernes, stored for decay
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Results of the Previous Test

  • Possible reasons causing the

Possible reasons causing the discrepancies: discrepancies: – Imperfect target alignment Imperfect target alignment – How well the beam energy and the beam How well the beam energy and the beam energy spread were known energy spread were known – Issues with the model Issues with the model

Target Measured 67Cu Yield [Bq/W-h] FLUKA 67Cu Yield [Bq/W-h] Ratio FLUKA/Meas. Ga 111 ± 18 228 ± 7 2.05 ± 0.33 Zn 103 ± 17 75.7 ± 3.3 0.73 ± 0.12

slide-4
SLIDE 4

New Experiment New Experiment

  • Produce enough

Produce enough 67

67Cu for

Cu for radiochemical separation radiochemical separation – 100s 100s

  • f µ
  • f µCi

Ci

  • Measure radiochemical separation

Measure radiochemical separation efficiency at VCU efficiency at VCU

  • Provide additional/more reliable

Provide additional/more reliable data point for validating the data point for validating the FLUKA and TALYS models FLUKA and TALYS models

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Irradiation Parameters Irradiation Parameters

  • Ee- = 18.5 to 18.65 MeV

= 18.5 to 18.65 MeV – Avoid incident photons above 18.59 MeV Avoid incident photons above 18.59 MeV in in Ga Ga ( (67

67Ga production threshold,

Ga production threshold, interfears interfears with measurement) with measurement)

  • Energy spread:

Energy spread: σE = 50 = 50 keV keV

  • Beam power: P = 1 kW

Beam power: P = 1 kW

  • Beam size:

Beam size: σ = 2.5 mm = 2.5 mm

  • Irradiation time

Irradiation time – Minimum: 48 hours Minimum: 48 hours – 42% of 42% of Asaturation

saturation

– Optimal: > 72 hours Optimal: > 72 hours – 55% of 55% of Asaturation

saturation

  • Radiator

Radiator 1 mm W 1 mm W

  • Target

Target 85 g natural gallium in 85 g natural gallium in hBN hBN capsule capsule

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Setup model

Be Window W radiator hBN Capsule Ga Target

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Prompt Radiation Field Prompt Radiation Field

  • 3/10/14 4D spectrometer dump shielding

3/10/14 4D spectrometer dump shielding commissioning test commissioning test

– ATLis ATLis 13446 13446 – Surveys during 123 MeV, 100 µA Surveys during 123 MeV, 100 µA – 5 µrem/h of neutron dose rate and 80 µrem/h 5 µrem/h of neutron dose rate and 80 µrem/h photon dose rate were measured in north photon dose rate were measured in north access building access building – Radiological conditions were found acceptable Radiological conditions were found acceptable – Neutron source term Neutron source term 85 ± 3 rem/h at 1m from the dump 85 ± 3 rem/h at 1m from the dump

  • 18.5 MeV test will produce the same neutron

18.5 MeV test will produce the same neutron sourceterm sourceterm if beam power equals if beam power equals 1.1 kW 1.1 kW

  • Additional shielding not required

Additional shielding not required

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Experimental Procedure

  • 1. Remove W radiator
  • 2. Position poly block (“dummy target”) with radiochromic

film on both ends

  • 3. Close side cooling plates
  • 4. Beam permit
  • 5. Tune beam for 5 minutes

– Observe with camera

  • 6. Controlled access
  • 7. Check position / align / repeat if necessary
  • 8. Install W radiator
  • 9. Beam Permit
  • 10. Run CW for 48 to 72 hours
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Power Deposition per kW of Beam

Part Power [W] Be Window 6 W Radiator 280 hBN Capsule 355 Ga Target 233 Cu Cooling 27 Total 901

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Induced Radioactivity Induced Radioactivity

Beam Energy 18.5 MeV 18.65 MeV Irradiation Time 48 h 380 µCi Ci 465 µCi Ci 72 h 510 µCi Ci 620 µCi Ci Expected 67Cu activities in Ga, 1 day after the irradiation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Post-Irradiation Dose Rates Post-Irradiation Dose Rates

Dose Rates [mrem/h] at 30 cm for E=18.6 MeV Decay time [h] 1 12 24 Full setup 3050 190 100 Target only (hBN capsule + Ga) 1770 6.2 2.4