Coherent Phase Control of Electronic Transitions in Gallium - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Coherent Phase Control of Electronic Transitions in Gallium - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Coherent Phase Control of Electronic Transitions in Gallium Arsenide Robert J. Gordon, Sima Singha, and Zhan Hu Department of Chemistry University of Illinois at Chicago FRISNO 11 Aussois, France March 31, 2011 Passive Control F. Crim
SLIDE 1
SLIDE 2
- F. Crim
Passive Control
SLIDE 3
Active Control
SLIDE 4
SLIDE 5
Outline
- Motivation and methods
- Results from open loop experiments
- Results from closed loop experiments
- Proposed mechanism
- Conclusions
SLIDE 6
Cut in Decemet’s Membrane
6 ns, 1064 nm
30 ps, 1064 nm
Vogel, et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35, 3033 (1997)
SLIDE 7
Surface Modification with Ultrafast Pulses
Stoian, et al., Appl.Phys.
- Lett. 80, 353 (2002)
SLIDE 8
SEM images of the ablation craters on GaAs
1, 5 and 5+1 pulse trains
SLIDE 9
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11
Outline
- Motivation and methods
- Results from open loop experiments
- Results from closed loop experiments
- Proposed mechanism
- Conclusions
SLIDE 12
- Phys. Rev. B 82, 115205 (2010)
LIBS/Photoluminescence Spectrum
SLIDE 13
Effect of Laser Polarization
SLIDE 14
PL Signal at 450.8 nm
SLIDE 15
Control Landscape
SLIDE 16
Effects of Polarization and Incidence Angle
SLIDE 17
Effect of Laser Fluence
SLIDE 18
Effect of Laser Phase
SLIDE 19
Outline
- Motivation and methods
- Results from open loop experiments
- Results from closed loop experiments
- Proposed mechanism
- Conclusions
SLIDE 20
Closed Loop Control
Sine phase optimized for 390-450 nm sine phase optimized for 420-440 nm random phase optimized for 390-450 nm
- J. Phy. Chem. A (in press)
SLIDE 21
20100528-115537 PRB paper graph
Optimum Pulse Shapes for Open and Closed Loops
SLIDE 22
Effect of Laser Fluence
SLIDE 23
Effect of Laser Polarization on Optimized PL Spectrum
SLIDE 24
Effect of Laser Phase on Open-Loop Spectrum
SLIDE 25
Effect of Laser Phase on Closed-Loop Spectrum
SLIDE 26
Outline
- Motivation and methods
- Results from open loop experiments
- Results from closed loop experiments
- Proposed mechanism
- Conclusions
SLIDE 27
Mechanistic Questions
- Where does the new band come from?
- How is it possible to excite optical
phonons at fluences above the threshold for melting?
- How does light couple to the plasma?
- How does energy couple to the phonons?
- Where does the coherence come from?
SLIDE 28
SLIDE 29
Ratio of double pulse to single pulse fluorescence as a function of delay time and total energy
Si<111>
- App. Phys. Lett. 90, 131910 (2007), J. Appl. Phys. 104, 113520 (2008)
SLIDE 30
- Dispersion relation for
a light wave in a plasma:
- Critical density:
- Index of refraction:
- Total reflection:
pe L L pe L
c k ω ω ω ω ≥ ⇒ + =
2 2 2 2
2 2
4 e m n
L e cr
π ω =
2 2 2
1 1
L pe cr e
n n n ω ω ε − = − = =
θ θ ε
2 2
cos ; sin ) (
cr e
n n z = =
Light Propagation in a Plasma
SLIDE 31
Brunel or vacuum heating
SLIDE 32
Comparison of Closed and Open-Loop Pulses
SLIDE 33
Conclusions
- Coherent control of carrier recombination was achieved
at fluences well above the damage threshold.
- The primary mechanism for open loop control appears to
be phonon-hole scattering, with trapping of carriers in the L-valley.
- Brunel (ponderomotive) heating launches ballistic
electrons that excite the phonons.
- Effect of laser phase suggests a competition between
photoemission and phonon excitation.
- Random phase optimization appears to converge to a
different control pathway.
SLIDE 34
YaomingLu, Youbo Zhao, Slobodan Milasinovic John Penczak, SimaSingha, Zhan Hu
Supported by NSF, USAF Surgeon General, UIC
SLIDE 35
( ) ( )
[ ]
ϕ π ω ψ + − = T m m A / 2 sin
SLIDE 36
Time Delay Scans
SLIDE 37