3 correspondences
play

3. Correspondences Daisuke Oyama Mathematics II April 10, 2020 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3. Correspondences Daisuke Oyama Mathematics II April 10, 2020 Correspondences Let X and Y be nonempty subsets of R N and R K , respectively. A correspondence F : X Y is a rule that assigns a set F ( x ) Y to every x X .


  1. 3. Correspondences Daisuke Oyama Mathematics II April 10, 2020

  2. Correspondences Let X and Y be nonempty subsets of R N and R K , respectively. ▶ A correspondence F : X → Y is a rule that assigns a set F ( x ) ⊂ Y to every x ∈ X . ▶ “ F : X →→ Y ”, “ F : X ⇒ Y ”, and “ F : X ⇒ Y ” are also used. ▶ F is nonempty-valued if F ( x ) ̸ = ∅ for all x ∈ X . ▶ In Debreu, a correspondence is defined to be a nonempty-valued correspondence. ▶ F is compact-valued if F ( x ) is compact for all x ∈ X . ▶ F is convex-valued if F ( x ) is convex for all x ∈ X . ▶ F is closed-valued if F ( x ) is closed (relative to Y ) for all x ∈ X . ▶ F is singleton-valued if F ( x ) is a singleton set for all x ∈ X . 1 / 47

  3. ▶ The graph of F is the set Graph( F ) = { ( x, y ) ∈ X × Y | y ∈ F ( x ) } . ▶ F is locally bounded (or uniformly bounded ) near x ∈ X if there exists ε > 0 such that F ( B ε ( x ) ∩ X ) is bounded. F is locally bounded if for all x ∈ X , it is locally bounded near x . ▶ F ( A ) = { y ∈ Y | y ∈ F ( x ) for some x ∈ A } = ∪ x ∈ A F ( x ) · · · the image of A under F . 2 / 47

  4. Examples ▶ Define B : R L ++ × R ++ → R L + by B ( p, w ) = { x ∈ R L + | p · x ≤ w } . B is a nonempty- and compact-valued correspondence. ▶ Given a function u : R L + → R , define the correspondence x : R L ++ × R ++ → R L + by x ( p, w ) = { x ∈ R L + | x ∈ B ( p, w ) and u ( x ) ≥ u ( y ) for all y ∈ B ( p, w ) } (the Walrasian demand correspondence). If u is continuous, then x is ▶ nonempty-valued by the Extreme Value Theorem, and ▶ compact-valued. —Why? 3 / 47

  5. Continuous Correspondences: Notice ▶ Terminology: We use “upper/lower semi-continuous” instead of “upper/lower hemi-continuous”. ▶ Definition: We adopt general definitions using open sets. ▶ For lower semi-continuity, our definition is equivalent to that in MWG. ▶ For upper semi-continuity, under some additional assumption our definition is equivalent to that in MWG 4 / 47

  6. Continuous Functions: Review ▶ For a function f : X → Y , the following conditions are equivalent: 1. For any open neighborhood V of f (¯ x ) (relative to Y ), there exists an open neighborhood U of ¯ x (relative to X ) such that f ( U ) ⊂ V . 2. For any sequence { x m } ⊂ X such that x m → ¯ x as m → ∞ , we have f ( x m ) → f (¯ x ) as m → ∞ . ▶ For correspondences , these are no longer equivalent. 1. Condition 1 will be used to define upper semi-continuity . 2. (A generalized version of) Condition 2 will be equivalent to lower semi-continuity . 5 / 47

  7. ▶ 1. An upper semi-continuous correspondence ▶ may have a “downward jump”, but ▶ may not have an “upward jump”. 2. A lower semi-continuous correspondence ▶ may have an “upward jump”, but ▶ may not have a “downward jump”. 6 / 47

  8. Upper Semi-Continuity Let X and Y be nonempty subsets of R N and R K , respectively. Definition 3.1 ▶ A correspondence F : X → Y is upper semi-continuous at ¯ x ∈ X if for any open neighborhood V of F (¯ x ) (relative to Y ), there exists an open neighborhood U of ¯ x (relative to X ) such that F ( U ) ⊂ V . ▶ For A ⊂ X , F : X → Y is upper semi-continuous on A if it is upper semi-continuous at all ¯ x ∈ A . ▶ F : X → Y is upper semi-continuous if it is upper semi-continuous on X . ▶ F ( U ) = { y ∈ Y | y ∈ F ( x ) for some x ∈ U } · · · the image of U under F . 7 / 47

  9. Constant Correspondences ▶ Any correspondence F with F ( x ) = F ( x ′ ) for all x, x ′ ∈ X is upper semi-continuous according to our definition. 8 / 47

  10. Upper Semi-Continuity + Compact-Valuedness Proposition 3.1 F : X → Y is upper semi-continuous at ¯ x and F (¯ x ) is compact if and only if for any sequence { x m } ⊂ X such that x m → ¯ x , any sequence { y m } ⊂ Y such that y m ∈ F ( x m ) for all m ∈ N has a convergent subsequence whose limit is in F (¯ x ) . Proposition 3.2 If F : X → Y is upper semi-continuous and compact-valued, then F ( A ) is compact for any compact set A ⊂ X . ▶ F ( A ) = { y ∈ Y | y ∈ F ( x ) for some x ∈ A } · · · the image of A under F . 9 / 47

  11. Closed Graph Definition 3.2 F : X → Y has a closed graph if its graph, Graph( F ) = { ( x, y ) ∈ X × Y | y ∈ F ( x ) } , is closed (relative to X × Y ). Definition 3.3 ▶ F : X → Y is closed at ¯ x if x m → ¯ x, y m ∈ F ( x m ) for all m ∈ N , and y m → y ⇒ y ∈ F (¯ x ) . ▶ F : X → Y is closed if it is closed at all ¯ x ∈ X . Proposition 3.3 F : X → Y has a closed graph if and only if it is closed. 10 / 47

  12. Upper Semi-Continuity + Closed-Valuedness Proposition 3.4 If F is upper semi-continuous and closed-valued, then it has a closed graph. 11 / 47

  13. Proof ▶ Let y m ∈ F ( x m ) for all m ∈ N and ( x m , y m ) → (¯ x, ¯ y ) ∈ X × Y . ▶ Take any ε > 0 . ▶ B ε ( F (¯ x )) being an open neighborhood of F (¯ x ) , there exists an open neighborhood U of ¯ x such that F ( U ) ⊂ B ε ( F (¯ x )) by the upper semi-continuity of F at ¯ x . ▶ Since x m → ¯ x , there exists M such that for all m ≥ M , x m ∈ U and hence y m ∈ F ( U ) ⊂ B ε ( F (¯ x )) . y ∈ ¯ Therefore, we have ¯ B ε ( F (¯ x )) . ▶ Since ε > 0 has been taken arbitrarily and since F (¯ x ) is closed, we have ¯ y ∈ F (¯ x ) (by Proposition 2.8). 12 / 47

  14. Upper Semi-Continuity + Compact-Valuedness Proposition 3.5 For correspondences F : X → Y and G : X → Y , define the correspondence F ∩ G : X → Y by ( F ∩ G )( x ) = F ( x ) ∩ G ( x ) for all x ∈ X . If 1. F has a closed graph, and 2. G is upper semi-continuous and compact-valued, then F ∩ G is upper semi-continuous and compact-valued. 13 / 47

  15. Proof x ∈ X , and consider any sequence { x m } ⊂ X such ▶ Take any ¯ that x m → ¯ x . Let { y m } be any sequence such that y m ∈ ( F ∩ G )( x m ) = F ( x m ) ∩ G ( x m ) for all m . ▶ Since y m ∈ G ( x m ) for all m , and by the upper semi-continuity of G at ¯ x and the compactness of G (¯ x ) , there exist x ) such that y m ( k ) → ¯ a subsequence { y m ( k ) } and ¯ y ∈ G (¯ y . ▶ Since y m ∈ F ( x m ) for all m , we thus have a sequence { ( x m ( k ) , y m ( k ) ) } ⊂ Graph( F ) that converges to (¯ x, ¯ y ) . By the closedness of Graph( F ) , we have (¯ x, ¯ y ) ∈ Graph( F ) , y ∈ F (¯ i.e., ¯ x ) . ▶ Hence, we have ¯ y ∈ ( F ∩ G )(¯ x ) . The conclusion therefore follows from Proposition 3.1. 14 / 47

  16. Upper Semi-Continuity + Compact-Valuedness Proposition 3.6 For a correspondence F : X → Y , consider the following conditions: 1. F is upper semi-continuous and compact-valued. 2. F has a closed graph and the images of compact sets are compact. 3. F has a closed graph and the images of compact sets are bounded. 4. F has a closed graph and is locally bounded. We have the following: ▶ 1 ⇔ 2 ⇒ 3 ⇔ 4. ▶ If Y is closed, 3 ⇒ 2 (hence these conditions are equivalent). 15 / 47

  17. ▶ Thus, if Y is closed, then our definition is equivalent to that in MWG (condition 3) for compact-valued correspondences. 16 / 47

  18. Proof ▶ 1 ⇒ 2: By Propositions 3.2 and 3.4. ▶ 2 ⇒ 1: Take any sequence { x m } ⊂ X such that x m → ¯ x ∈ X and any sequence { y m } ⊂ Y such that y m ∈ F ( x m ) for all m ∈ N . Since A = { x m | m ∈ N } ∪ { ¯ x } is compact, { y m } ⊂ F ( A ) has a convergent subsequence with a limit ¯ y ∈ F ( A ) by the compactness of F ( A ) , where ¯ y ∈ F (¯ x ) by the closedness of the graph. Therefore, the conclusion follows by Proposition 3.1. ▶ 2 ⇒ 3: Immediate. 17 / 47

  19. Proof ▶ 3 ⇒ 4: Suppose that F is not locally bounded, x ∈ X such that F ( B ε (¯ x ) ∩ X ) is not i.e., there exists some ¯ bounded for every ε > 0 . For each m ∈ N , let y m ∈ F ( B 1 /m (¯ x ) ∩ X ) be such that ∥ y m ∥ > m , and let x m ∈ B 1 /m (¯ x ) ∩ X be such that y m ∈ F ( x m ) . By construction, x m → ¯ x . Thus we have found a compact set { x m | m ∈ N } ∪ { ¯ x } whose image is not bounded. 18 / 47

  20. Proof ▶ 4 ⇒ 3: Suppose that there exists a compact set A ⊂ X such that F ( A ) is not bounded. For each m ∈ N , let y m ∈ F ( A ) be such that ∥ y m ∥ > m , and let x m ∈ A be such that y m ∈ F ( x m ) . By the compactness of A , { x m } has a convergent subsequence { x m ( k ) } with a limit ¯ x ∈ A . x ) ∩ X ) contains { y m ( k ) } k ≥ K for For any ε > 0 , F ( B ε (¯ some K , which is unbounded. 19 / 47

  21. Proof ▶ 3 ⇒ 2 under the closedness of Y : Let A ⊂ X be a compact set. Take any { y m } ⊂ F ( A ) , and let { x m } ⊂ A be such that y m ∈ F ( x m ) for all m ∈ N . By the compactness of A and the boundedness of F ( A ) , { ( x m , y m ) } has a convergent subsequence { ( x m ( k ) , y m ( k ) ) } y ) ∈ A × R K . with a limit (¯ x, ¯ By the closedness of Y , ¯ y ∈ Y , and therefore, by the closedness of the graph of F , ¯ y ∈ F (¯ x ) ⊂ F ( A ) . This implies that F ( A ) is compact. 20 / 47

  22. Upper Semi-Continuity + Compact-Valuedness Corollary 3.7 Suppose that Y is compact. F : X → Y is upper semi-continuous and compact-valued if and only if it has a closed graph. ▶ Thus, if Y is compact, then our definition is equivalent to that in Debreu for compact-valued correspondences. 21 / 47

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend