3/5/2019 1
Greater Kaweah GSA Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
Tuesday, March 5, 2019
www.GreaterKaweahGSA.org
3/5/2019 Greater Kaweah GSA Technical Advisory Committee Meeting - - PDF document
3/5/2019 Greater Kaweah GSA Technical Advisory Committee Meeting www.GreaterKaweahGSA.org Tuesday, March 5, 2019 ITEM 2: ANNOUNCEMENTS ITEM 3: MINUTES 1 3/5/2019 ITEM 4: Monitoring Network Chapter The Monitoring Network Chapter
Tuesday, March 5, 2019
www.GreaterKaweahGSA.org
Agency Frequency of Monitoring Period of Record for Monitoring Types of Wells Monitored Number of Wells (Approx.) Known Completion of Wells Monitored Number of Dual Completion Wells Automated Monitoring Alta ID Monthly to bi- annually 1921 – 2011 Ag/ Domestic 5 None None Unknown Bureau of Reclamation Monthly to bi- annually 1924 – 2008 Unknown 118 15 Unknown Unknown Cal Water (City of Visalia) Monthly 1971 – 2018 Municipal 104 None Unknown Unknown Dept of Water Resources Bi-annually 1930 – 2016 Various 182 7 Unknown Unknown Exeter ID Bi-annually 1963 – 2016 Agricultural 40 None Unknown Unknown KDWCD Monthly to Bi- Annually 1919 – 2018 Agricultural 425 30 4 Unknown Kings County Water District Bi-annually 2011 – 2018 Agricultural 6 3 Unknown Unknown Lakeside ID Bi-annually 2012 – 2017 Agricultural 33 2 Unknown Unknown
Water Quality Monitoring Program Participating Agencies Parameters Frequency AB 3030 and SB 1938 Exeter ID, KDWCD, Lakeside ID Ag suitability analysis (limited suite of general minerals) Annually to Once Every 3 Years CA SDWIS City of Exeter, City of Farmersville, Ivanhoe Public Utility District, City of Woodlake All Title 22 regulated constituents Title 22 General Minerals & Metals, every 3 years Nitrates, annually (quartertlyif ≥ 5 ppm) VOCs and SOCs, every 3 years Uranium, dependent on historical sampling. Varies between 1 sample every 3 (when ≥ 10 pCi/L), 6 (when < 10 pCi/L) or 9 (when no historical detection) years CV-SALTS Most constituents sampled monthly, quarterly General Minerals from source water and annual General Minerals from waste discharge. Kaweah is a Priority 1 Basin, meaning that management strategies will be initiated in 2019 Dept of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) City of Exeter, City of Farmersville, Ivanhoe Public Utility District, City of Woodlake Pesticides Annual GAMA SWRCB, Central Valley RWQCB, DWR, DPR, NWIS, LLNL Constituents sampled vary by Program Objectives USGS is typically the technical lead in conducting the studies and reporting data The Priority Basin Project performed baseline and trend assessments, sampling 2,900 public and domestic wells statewide. The Domestic Well Project sampled over 180 wells in Tulare County (29 wells were in the Kaweah Subbasin). Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program (IRLP) Kaweah River Watershed Coalition Static Water Level, temperature, pH, electrical conductance, Nitrate as Nitrogen, dissolved Oxygen (Annually) General Minerals suite (every 5 years) Varies; Annually to every 5 years (first samples collected in fall 2018)
Category Monitoring Entity (Entities) Period of Record Historical Monitoring National Geodetic Survey of benchmarks (repeat level surveys) 1926 – 1970 Recent Monitoring National Geodetic Survey of benchmarks (repeat level surveys). Installation and measurement of Deer Creek extensometer (8.5 miles south of Kaweah Subbasin, in the Tule Subbasin) KDWCD Land Surface Elevation Monitoring (local benchmark monitoring network) CGPS data from UNAVCO and CVSRN stations: P056, P566, CRCN, LEMA, and RAPT NASA (InSAR and UAVSAR programs) NGS: 1970 to present 2016 to present CGPS: 2006 to Present (depending on station) NASA: 2006 – 2017 (except for 2011 – 2014)
completed?
Vendor Product Accuracy Pros Cons Unit Cost Rosemount 8750 Mag Meter 0.25% - 0.5%
Capabilities for Remote Communication
add’l cost ~ $3000/unit PowWow +/- 4%
(< 10% error)
monitoring instruments to system $500/unit $200-$300/unit on bulk orders McCrometer
Meter
Meter 0.5% - 1.0% 0.5%
to individual fields/crops
applications
~$3100/unit LandiQ Remote Sensing
monitoring instruments
periods shorter than a year
– Consultant team is working on the agreed refinements to the report, to be delivered to the GSA managers by March 15th. – Model to be refined with water budget refinements.
Team Meeting.
the GSAs and with their respective TACs and legal counsel. – Consultants to use the “three buckets” approach to quantify the seepage volumes. – To be used in the Water Supply Accounting chapter for each of the GSPs in the subbasin, once agreed upon by the three GSAs.
– A Draft Contract was provided to the GSA Managers by DWR last week – The application is being reviewed in Sacramento to determine:
– Refinements requested by the Tech Team are underway, with an anticipated completion date of March 15th.
SMC Thresholds and Objectives – Iterative Process Developed by Stakeholders Informed by technical information including groundwater modeling Basin Setting/Water Budget Refinements Projects and Management Actions GSA Specific Model Simulations
SUBBASIN ACTIVITIES
Groundwater Model Refinement SMC Goal and SI Assessment Complete Basin Setting Chapter
Groundwater Model Simulations
GSA Deliverable
Define Management Areas Develop Thresholds and Objectives for MAs Water Level Projections Draft Monitoring Network Chapter Complete Monitoring Network Chapter Complete SMC Chapter Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Water Supply Accounting Framework Water Supply Accounting Chapter
– Review of Minimum Thresholds and Measurable Objectives