28 February 2015 Queen Alexandra College Part 1: The FE funding - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
28 February 2015 Queen Alexandra College Part 1: The FE funding - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
28 February 2015 Queen Alexandra College Part 1: The FE funding system: Public funding for learning and skills: how FE is funded The allocations process: how the money gets to colleges Financial planning and budgeting: how colleges
Part 1: The FE funding system:
Public funding for learning and skills: how FE is funded
The allocations process: how the money gets to colleges
Financial planning and budgeting: how colleges plan and manage finance
Financial performance and health: how performance is monitored and what happens when it goes wrong
Part 2: Funding and Governance
Funding challenges: how colleges can address funding issues in the current funding climate
Asking the right questions and using the right data to take a strategic view of college finances
Case study and discussion
Know the economic and financial context in which colleges are
- perating
Understand how colleges receive funding and the parameters which affect this
Understand how colleges undertake financial planning and budgeting
Know how financial performance is monitored and the process for intervention in instances of financial failure
Analyse basic college financial performance data as a starting point for assessing college financial health
Know the kinds of questions to ask in order to get a strategic view of college financial performance
Government funding for colleges broadly increased year on year during the 2000s
In 2009 the Learning and Skills Council, responsible for funding colleges since 2001, was abolished
Colleges now receive the majority of their Government-funded income from two separate departments:
- Department for Education (DfE) via the Education Funding Agency
(EFA)
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) via the Skills
Funding Agency (SFA)
The percentage of grant (public) funding has changed little over time
84.2% 8.2% 0.7% 6.6% 0.3% Funding body grants Fee income Research grants and contracts Other income Endowment and investment income
Source: Skills Funding Agency analysis of college financial records 2012/13
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 % SFC GFE All
A generally positive picture:
- Growth up
- Inflation down
- Employment up
But …
- Increased growth and employment are not generating the
anticipated level of tax receipts
- Debt continues at high levels so interest on debt remains high
- Borrowing is slow to fall
So …
- Continued austerity and cuts to public funding
- Political uncertainty
£5,620 School Grant Plus Pupil Premium £4,645 National rate £4,000 plus weightings £3,830 £3,300 rate plus weightings £8,500 Average Full-time Covered By Fee loan
11-16 16-17 18 19-21 in HE
22% funding dip 17.5% dip
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Actual Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Estimate Estimate 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 16-18 education 16-25 high needs 16-18 apprenticeships
500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 revised 13-14 revised 14-15 revised 15-16 revised Adult Skills Budget 24+ Advanced Learning Loans Adult Safeguarded Learning/Community Learning Apprenticeships European Social Fund Employer Ownership
86.9% 6.9% 0.7% 5.2% 0.3% Funding body grants Fee income Research grants and contracts Other income Endowment and investment income
Source: Skills Funding Agency analysis of college financial records 2012/13
53.4% 42.0% 3.1% 1.6% EFA SFA HEFCE Other funding grants
Source: Skills Funding Agency analysis of college financial records 2012/13
90.6% 9.2% 0.1% 0.1% EFA SFA HEFCE Other funding grants
Source: Skills Funding Agency analysis of college financial records 2012/13
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% General FE Colleges Sixth Form Colleges All Colleges
Dependency on Education Funding Agency income Dependency on Skills Funding Agency income Dependency on European income Dependency on Higher Education income
Current ingredients (2014-15)
Funding paid for each full time (540 hours) student at a basic rate
- f £4,000
Part-time students and those who are 18 paid less (% of full-time rate)
Extra weightings for costly programmes (20%, 50%, 60%)
Disadvantage = postcode + low GCSE Maths, English, Care (£480)
This year’s actual numbers determine next year’s funded numbers (lagged funding)
Colleges get provisional data by January, rate published in February, funding allocations known by March
Funding system
Same formula, same process, later data (after R06)
Basic rate for a full-time student aged 16 or 17 due to be £4,000
Basic rate for a full-time student aged 18 due to be £3,300
Cutting funding for 18 year olds saves DFE just under 2% Some important rules
English/Maths compulsory for those who lack GCSE grade C
Work experience must be partly external
Based on the notional costs of delivering a full study programme
Declining cohort 16-18 year olds but compulsory participation age rises to 18 in September 2015
Lagged funding
Competition from schools, academies and other post-16 providers
GCSE maths and English become conditions of funding
Government works on a financial year (Apr – Mar)
Colleges budget for and are funded on an academic year (Aug – Jul)
Potentially four months of uncertainty
No indicative figures this year
Apr Aug Mar (yr1) Jul Mar (Yr2) ???? ???? Indicative
The funding rate for the qualification studied
Multiplied where relevant by
- Disadvantage uplift based on postcode
- Area costs uplift (London and the South East)
But funding has to be ‘earned’
Rules and combinations apply – an earnings cap of £4,400
Not all qualifications or learners are fully funded
Apprenticeship funding reform involves major system overhaul
Employers expected to own and drive apprenticeships – and pay
Decisions on HE budget determine money available for FE
Possibility FE loans will be extended
Contest for Adult Skills Budget continues
Councils and LEPs both keen to have a larger role
If pockets of high unemployment remain, money may be targeted
Squeeze on adult skills funding – 35% reduction over four years
24% reduction in non-apprenticeship funding in 2015/16
Shift to direct funding to employers, local enterprise partnerships and combined authorities
Extension of loans to 19+
ESOL demand and the impact of continued immigration
Government focus on apprenticeships, traineeships and English and maths
Higher apprenticeships and higher vocational skills will be a priority area
System redesigned from 2013/14
A young person aged from 16 to 24 with additional support needs costing over £6000 or a Learning Disability Statement
A central role for local authorities
Comprises
- ‘Place’ funding
▪ Elements 1 and 2
- Top-up funding
▪ Element 3
Element 1
- Core funding allocated on the basis of the 16-18 funding
formula
Element 2
- Provides first £6000 to meet additional support costs
- Allocated on the basis of local authority forecasts
- Moving to allocation on a lagged basis from 2015/16
Element 3
- Additional funding to enable a high needs student to participate
fully
- Funding allocated to local authorities
- Funding rate and payment agreed between college and local
authority on an individual needs basis
Financial Planning and Budgeting: How colleges plan and manage finance
Peter Merry – Director of Finance, Walsall College
The College’s mission statement is:
Walsall College is uniquely and proudly vocational. Our greatest passion is unleashing the potential of individuals, communities and businesses; our greatest legacy is the talent
- f our students: skille
lled, p , profession
- nal
l an and d enterpr prisin ising.
Walsall College
- First GFE College to be graded outstanding under the
current Ofsted Inspection Framework
- Outstanding financial health in 2012/13 and
2013/14
- Two years of £1m+ surpluses (£1.3m and £1.7m)
- £11m capital project – Walsall Business and Sports
Hub due to open September 2015
Finance: Understanding the Objectives
- What are your objectives and
who is driving them?
– Bottom line profitability? – Skills funding agency and financial health? – Ofsted? – The bank and their covenants? – Cash?
Finance: Measuring performance
- Management accounts
– Timely? – Comprehensive? – Commentary? – KPIs?
Finance: Beyond just historical data
- Understanding the business drivers
– EFA income – SFA funding and achievements – Pay and headcount
- Forecasting
- Financial outlook for 15/16….
Financial outlook: planning Is there a seamless process?
- Curriculum plan?
- New project appraisal?
- Understanding pay and headcount?
Can it be measured against actuals? Are managers held to account?
Please contact: Peter Merry Walsall College Wisemore Campus Littleton Street Walsall West Midlands WS2 8ES 01922 657000
Thank you
Assessed by the funding agencies for performance monitoring and risk management purposes
Based on three indicators derived from the college’s financial plan and statement
Each indicator is given a score with scores aggregated to give a financial health grade:
- Outstanding
240 - 300 points
- Good
180 - 230
- Satisfactory
120 - 170
- Inadequate
110 or below
Solvency
- Assets v Liabilities
- Adjusted current ratio (Sector average in 12/13 = 1.47; GFE = 1.37)
Performance
- Income v Expenditure
- Cash based operating surplus (Sector in 11/12 = 6.66%; GFE = 6.17%)
Gearing
- Borrowing v Income
- Borrowing as % of net assets (Sector in 11/12 = 17.85%; GFE = 18.81%)
Staff costs
- Staff costs as a % of income (Sector in 12/13 = 65.0%; GFE = 63.9%)
Income dependency
- Funding Agency income as a % of all income (Sector in 12/13 = 84.2%;
GFE = 83.9%)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16
Financial Health Grades
Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Financial Health Grades
Sources: GFE Finance records 2010/11 to 2012/13; Financial plans 2013/14 to 2015/16
Finance Record Financial Plan 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 (final) (final) (auto) Outstanding 102 100 77 56 51 64 Good 80 81 68 75 96 107 Satisfactory 58 57 79 92 81 66 Inadequate 12 12 21 20 14 6 Total 252 250 245 243 242 243 Outstanding 40% 40% 31% 23% 21% 26% Good 32% 32% 28% 31% 40% 44% Satisfactory 23% 23% 32% 38% 33% 27% Inadequate 5% 5% 9% 8% 6% 2%
Triggers
- notification to the college or training organisation of failure to meet Minimum
Standards
- notification to the college or training organisation of failure to meet the Agency’s
criteria for financial health or control
- notification to the college or training organisation from Ofsted of an inadequate grade
at inspection
The FE and Sixth Form College Commissioners
- SFA and EFA can refer to the respective Commissioner where intervention is triggered
Options
- the organisation is allowed to attempt recovery by developing and implementing its
- wn recovery plan, or
- the organisation is placed into ‘Administered College / Administered Institution’ status
and that a Structure and Prospects Appraisal should be carried out by the Commissioner and his Advisers
Higher education (full-time and part-time)
International activity (here and overseas)
Pre-16 education (14-16, school partnerships/sponsorships)
High need pupils (16-25 or even younger age groups)
Back-to-work programmes (eg Work Programme)
Offender learning (prisons and probation)
Full-cost courses
Non-education revenue
On-line learning
The process through which colleges identify, evaluate and control risks
An essential management tool to support the implementation
- f the college strategic / business plan
Should not result in risk aversion but appetite for risk will vary
Internal and external risks
- Strategic
- Operational
- Project-based
Impact and probability
Mitigation and control
- Treat, tolerate, transfer, terminate, take
Risk Management Guide: College Finance Directors’ Group / PKF, 2011
Funding is only partly the issue… ...it’s what your College does with the money it has
Aligning the curriculum to LEP growth priorities and developing sound relationships with employers
More intense competition, new competitors (eg new sixth forms), and competition form work-based learning providers
Maximising income through growth and diversification
Managing costs particularly staff costs
Pensions and national insurance
Capital and borrowing
Restructuring – mergers, federations, shared services
Less support for Colleges but higher standards required
Changing curriculum / new technology
Teaching maths and English
General FE College on two main sites in county town
Income Profile
Within 20 mile radius – three other FE colleges, one sixth form college, three 11-16 schools including a new free school, three 11-18 schools (academies)
Some significant national employers based locally with a new logistics centre planned for a location 10 miles away
Currently Ofsted Grade 3 (requires improvement) with an inspection due in next 3 months