2020 PROXY SEASON REVIEW & OTHER TOPICS
Hugessen TSX60 Webinar
2020 PROXY SEASON REVIEW & OTHER TOPICS Hugessen TSX60 Webinar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2020 PROXY SEASON REVIEW & OTHER TOPICS Hugessen TSX60 Webinar Speakers Toronto Agenda Camil Cam ille Jo Jovanovic Brian Lee Bria Lees Manager Manager 1 Welcome Hugessen Toronto Hugessen Calgary 2 Highlights from 2020
Hugessen TSX60 Webinar
2
Cam Camil ille Jo Jovanovic Manager Hugessen – Toronto
1 Welcome 2 Highlights from 2020 Proxy Season 3 Emerging Topics and Trends 4 Q&A 5 Closing Remarks
Bria Brian Lee Lees Manager Hugessen – Calgary Peter St Stephenson Partner Hugessen – Toronto Mic ichelle Tan Principal Hugessen – Toronto Kathry ryn Nee eel Managing Director Semler Brossy - NYC
If you have any questions, please submit them on Zoom. Questions will be addressed at the end of this presentation
3
Rea eanna Dor Dorscher Principal Hugessen – Calgary
1 Welcome 2 Highlights from 2020 Proxy Season 3 Emerging Topics and Trends 4 Q&A 5 Closing Remarks
Bria Brian Lee Lees Manager Hugessen – Calgary Peter St Stephenson Partner Hugessen – Toronto Sc Scott Munn Partner Hugessen – Calgary St Stephen Cha Charle lebois Principal Semler Brossy – L.A.
If you have any questions, please submit them on Zoom. Questions will be addressed at the end of this presentation
4
1 Welcome 2 Highlights from 2020 Proxy Season 3 Emerging Topics and Trends 4 Q&A 5 Closing Remarks
If you have any questions, please submit them on Zoom. Questions will be addressed at the end of this presentation
Mari ario Brin Brin Principal Hugessen – Montreal Jea Jean-Francois s Malo lo Manager Hugessen – Toronto Geor Georges Soa Soaré Partner Hugessen – Toronto
Sc Scop
Study: y:
6
0% 20% 40% 60%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index S&P/TSX 60 Index S&P/TSX Composite Index S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index End of 2019
Strong 2019 performance across most sectors, new reality in 2020
0% 75% 150% 225% 300% 375% 450%
TSX60 Index Constituents - 201 2019 Total Shareholder Return
0% 75% 150% 225% 300% 375% 450%
TSX60 Index Constituents - 201 2018 Total Shareholder Return
7
Resource Non-Resource
40%
A greater proportion of TSX60 constituents had positive TSRs in 2019 compared to 2018
8
27% 22% 12% 10%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Energy (n=1 =10) Materia ials ls ( (n=9) All ll TSX SX60 ( (n=59) Other ( (n=30) Fin inancia ials ls ( (n=10)
Yea ear-Over-Year Ch Change in n Med edian & Average TSX60 CE CEO TDC
Median Average (with TSX:BB) Average (excluding TSX:BB)
Compensation in the majority of sectors saw YoY increases in median and average (excluding TSX:BB) TDC
9
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 $11,000 $12,000
All ll TSX60 (n=59) Same Constituent (n=52) Same Incumbent (n=37)
Thousands
5 5 Yea ear Trend in n Med edian TSX 60 60 CE CEO TDC DC
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 3% 4-yr CAGR 4% 4-yr CAGR 4% 4-yr CAGR 12% YoY 6% YoY 3% YoY
Median TSX60 compensation has seen a relatively stable increase over the last five years
10
$0 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000
TDC TCC
Compensation (CAD '000s)
201 2018 vs.
2019 Cha Change in n Actu ctual l an and Tar arget Com Compensatio ion
2018 - Target 2019 - Target 2018 - Actual 2019 - Actual
Contrary to 2018, above target LTIP awards drive increase in median CEO pay
11
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000
2018 2019 Aggr gregate Top 5 5 Pay
Total top 5 pay increased year over year, CEO share of total remains stable
Le Legend P75 P50/ Median P25 Average
CE CEO Pay as as a a Multiple of
2018 2018 2019 2019 CF CFO 3.07x 2.88x NEO3 2.10x 2.28x NEO4 2.78x 3.09x NEO5 3.83x 3.68x
Sc Scop
Study: y:
13
Financial 69% Operational 13% Strategic 8% ESG 6% Other 4%
201 2019 Cor Corporate STIP Mix
Financial 67% Operational 16% Strategic 7% ESG 6% Other 3%
201 2018 Cor Corporate STIP Mix
2018 STIP IP Metrics 2019
5.4 Number of metrics used, on average 5.3 60% 60% Scorecards with an individual component 63% 63% 16% 16% Board exercised discretion 17% 17%
STIP design remains relatively stable year-over-year, ESG metrics may be focus in future.
PSUs 49% RSUs 22% Options 28% DSUs 1%
201 2018 Average Target LTIP Mix ix
PSUs 52% RSUs 18% Options 30% DSUs 1%
201 2019 Average Target LTIP Mix ix
14
2018 LTIP Metric ics 2019
2.1 Average number of metrics used in PSUs 2.4 65% 65% Relative TSR metric used 63% 63% 32% 32% Return metric used (e.g. ROE) 32% 32% 16% 16% Operational metric used (e.g. safety) 19% 19%
PSUs continued to increase in LTIP mix, with more performance metrics being added.
Sc Scop
Study: y:
16
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
>90% 80-90% 70-80% 50-70% Less than 50% Say-on-Pay Approval Rating
Canada Say-on-Pay Voting Results 2020 vs. 2019
2019 2020
The proportion of companies scoring below 90% decreased from 28% in 2019 to 20% in 2020
17
90.6% 89.8% 93.0% 91.0% 88.8% 91.4% 93.7% 91.3% 94.7% 85% 86% 87% 88% 89% 90% 91% 92% 93% 94% 95%
Materials Energy Financials Average Say-on-Pay Voting Result
Industry Say-on-Pay Voting Results 2018 to 2020
2018 2019 2020
Say on Pay results increased across all sectors in 2020 compared to mixed results in 2019
18
Incentive design changes, shareholder engagement drive improved results
Co Company Key Is Issue in in 2019 Response 2020 2020 SoP
lt
Pay an and per performance dis disconnect
transaction bonuses
58% → 92%
Pay an and per performance dis disconnect
72% → 95%
Pay an and per performance dis disconnect
77% → 96%
Two important topics related to the COVID-19 crisis, and how they impact compensation:
▪ Impacts of COVID-19 on 2020 compensation programs and how to think about the use
▪ Assessing organization and key executive performance in light of a challenging year ▪ Spotlight on Board effectiveness
▪ Prevalence of ESG metrics in incentive programs ▪ COVID-19 has put significant focus on the social aspects of businesses, including human capital management of the broader workforce ▪ Pay equity implications