2018 GOVERNMENTAL LAW SEMINAR Regional Planning Commission and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2018 governmental
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2018 GOVERNMENTAL LAW SEMINAR Regional Planning Commission and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2018 GOVERNMENTAL LAW SEMINAR Regional Planning Commission and Health Department Grants Lynn Carlone, Stark County Regional Planning Jeff Dotson, Stark County Regional Planning Todd Paulus, Stark County Health Department 2018 GOVERNMENTAL


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2018 GOVERNMENTAL LAW SEMINAR

Regional Planning Commission and Health Department Grants

Lynn Carlone, Stark County Regional Planning Jeff Dotson, Stark County Regional Planning Todd Paulus, Stark County Health Department

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2018 GOVERNMENTAL LAW SEMINAR

CDBG and HOME Program

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CDBG PROGRAM

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Program provides annual grants on a formula basis to entitled

cities and counties to develop viable urban communities by

providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons.” Program has been in existence since 1974 with Urban Counties becoming eligible in 1975

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Stark County became an Urban Entitlement County in

1975 and since then has received approximately $71.4 million:

$70,046,619 – CDBG Entitlement Funding $50,000 - AHOP Bonus Funding $918,000 – 1983 Jobs Bill Funding $365,000 – CDBG R funding

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 All areas of Stark County participate in the Urban

County with the exceptions of:

The cities that are entitlement cities: Canton,

Massillon, and Alliance

The Village of Hills and Dales

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 Activities undertaken under the CDBG program

must meet one of the CDBG National Objectives:

 Benefit low-to moderate-income persons/families

(0 – 80% of Area Median Income);

 Aid in the prevention or elimination of slum & blight;

  • or-

 Undertake an urgent need in the community.

A minimum of 70% of the activities undertaken must meet the LMI objective

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Stark County received $1,209,286 during FY 2017.  It is still unknown what will happen to the CDBG

program during this current administration, but it is anticipated that the allocation will be similar in 2018

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Until 2015, applications were taken once every three years.  In 2015, the Board of Stark County Commissioners then

determined to accept applications every year, with public infrastructure projects being funded on a rolling 3 year cycle.

 Public service and economic development activities are now

  • nly funded for a 1 year period. Applicants must apply yearly

for funding.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Eligible types of activities that are undertaken under

CDBG:

 Acquisition  Disposition  Public Facilities Improvements  Clearance Activities  Public Services  Interim Assistance  Relocation  Privately Owned utilities  Construction of Housing  Homeownership Assistance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Eligible activities (continued)

 Economic Development  Technical Assistance  Rehabilitation  Creation of ADA Accessibility  Community Based Development Organizations  Code Enforcement  Historic Preservation  Renovation of Closed Buildings

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Activities that are not eligible for CDBG funding include:

 Governmental Buildings  General Government Expenses  Political Activities  Purchase of Equipment  Construction Equipment  Fire Equipment  Furnishings and Personal Property  Operating and Maintenance Expenses  Activities in support of development of new housing construction  Income payments  Religious activities  Religious property

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 Application workshop is held every fall – usually in late August

for CDBG projects.

 If you have a project that you think may be eligible, call and we

can discuss the project with you.

 Consider combining CDBG funding with another funding source

as CDBG funds are limited.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

HOME PROGRAM

slide-15
SLIDE 15

HOME Program

 “The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) provides

formula grants to states and localities that communities use - often in partnership with local nonprofit groups - to fund a wide range of activities including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or homeownership or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people. It is the largest Federal block grant to state and local governments designed exclusively to create affordable housing for low-income households.”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Stark County has formed a consortium with the cities of Alliance

and Massillon to become an eligible “PJ” known as a Designated Consortium.

 Since the first allocation in 1992, Stark County Consortium has

received a total of $22,436,991.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 FY 2017 HOME Distribution

 Stark County  City of Massillon  City of Alliance  Community Housing Development Organization

(CHDO)

 Administration  CONSORTIUM TOTAL

$210,399 $ 69,775 $ 65,123 $187,610 $59,211 $592,118

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 15% of each year’s allocation must go to a CHDO (Community

Housing Development Organization)

 Special type of non-profit with specific Board make-up Must be the owner, sponsor or developer of a project.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 In 2013 HUD made changes to the HOME program which make

it a little more difficult to do some of the large development projects, especially with CHDO

 HUD has also tightened up the commitment requirements

along with expenditure requirements

 Stark County has not had problems with commitments or

expenditures.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 Applications are taken each year for projects.

 Type of projects that have been funded include:

 Housing rehabilitation  Tenant Based Rental Assistance  New construction of rental units  New construction of homeowner units  Rehabilitation of rental units by non-profit owners  Down Payment Assistance

slide-21
SLIDE 21

 Ineligible activities include:

 Emergency Shelters  Non-housing related development  Rental Assistance in excess of 24 months

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Ohio Public Works Commission District 19

slide-23
SLIDE 23

OPWC Infrastructure Program

State Capital Improvement Program (SCIP)

 Revenues from State Bonds to support Debt  State issues up to $175,000,000 annually  Eligible projects include Roads, Bridges, Culverts,

Storm Water, Sanitary Sewer Collection, Water Distribution, Waste Water Treatment

Local Transportation Improvement Program (LTIP)

 Revenues from a portion of $0.28 State Gas Tax  Program receives 6.7% of the State Highway Fund  Eligible projects include Roads, Bridges & Culverts

slide-24
SLIDE 24

OPWC Infrastructure Program

Applying for Funding

 Eligible agencies include Counties, Cities, Villages,

Townships and Sanitary/Water Districts (SCIP only)

 Subdivisions apply directly to the District 19 Public

Works Integrating Committee

 Applications are evaluated and scored according to a

locally developed methodology based on criteria from the Ohio Revised Code

 A Prioritized list is sent to OPWC from the District

where it is reviewed and ultimately approved.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

http://www.pwc.state.oh.us/

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Selection Criteria

 Needs of the District (size of facility)  Age and Condition  Health and Safety  Local Match  Readiness to Proceed

slide-27
SLIDE 27

DISTRICT 19 PUBLIC WORKS INTEGRATING COMMITTEE OF STARK COUNTY PROGRAM YEAR SCHEDULE

JULY 1st Applications made available to all political subdivisions. SEPTEMBER Completed infrastructure applications due at SCRPC offices. NOVEMBER District 19 Committee meeting. JULY 1st Funds available for approved projects.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

District 19 OPWC Infrastructure Program

Estimated Allocations

State Capital Improvement Program (SCIP) $5,023,000

(Minimum Loan/Credit Enhancement - $502,300)

Local Transportation Improvement (LTIP) $1,997,000 Revolving Loan Program $ 887,000 TOTAL $7,907,000

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Other SCIP Funds

Emergency Funds

Preservation of health, safety, & welfare Maximum of $3.5 million per year Contact OPWC directly

Small Government

Communities with <5,000 population $17.5 million state-wide District submits up to 5 applications Small Government Commission makes recommendation to OPWC

slide-30
SLIDE 30

OPWC Small Government Projects

Applicant Project

Total OPWC East Sparta Main/Walnut Round-a-bout $239,579 $117,393 Beach City Sewer Lift Station Replacement $248,890 $227,900 Bethlehem Twp. Crestline/SR 21 Intersection $193,000 $141,500 Bethlehem Twp. Woodland Hill - Lawndell Intersection $203,000 $149,000 Hartville Sunnyside St./Park Lane Sanitary Line $523,900 $256,711 Hartville Sunnyside St. Paving $148,000 $ 72,961 Minerva Jackson St. Storm Sewer/Road $312,000 $100,000 Minerva Bonnieview Avenue Resurfacing $ 50,933 $ 25,000 East Canton South Wood Street Repaving $617,961 $ 74,000 Osn/Paris/Nim Twp Parks Avenue Rehabilitation $385,160 $192,580

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Cleveland/Mt. Pleasant

TOTAL – $1,285,650

Safety - $681,300 OPWC - $604,350

slide-32
SLIDE 32

East Sparta - Roundabout

TOTAL – $275,000

CDBG - $155,000 OPWC - $117,393

slide-33
SLIDE 33

District 19 Natural Resource Assistance Council

Clean Ohio Conservation Fund

slide-34
SLIDE 34

http://clean.ohio.gov/

slide-35
SLIDE 35

OPWC District 19 Natural Resources Assistance Council (NRAC)

 Funds from the Clean Ohio Program (State Bond

Program created in 2000 from State Issue 1)

 Assists in Financing Clean Ohio Conservation

Program Projects that protect Natural Areas, Streams and Wetlands

 Provides Grants for the acquisition of Open Space

and Riparian Corridors

 Stark County’s allocation has been about $1.1M  NRAC evaluates project applications and creates

Priority List for Submission to OPWC

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Selection Criteria

 Environmental Factors  Local Match (25% minimum)  Level of Coordination  Access and Operation  Readiness to Proceed

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Stark Parks

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Beech Creek Botanical Garden

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Fairhope Nature Preserve

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Tam O’ Shanter Golf Club

slide-41
SLIDE 41

District 19 Contacts

Jeff Dotson, District Administrator (330) 451-7402 jgdotson@co.stark.oh.us Jennifer Kline, Program Rep., OPWC (614) 752-8118 Jennifer.Kline@pwc.state.oh.us

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Community Transportation Planning Grants

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Example of studies include:

 Analyses of high accident intersections;  Safe Routes to School Travel Plans. ODOT requires an approved School Travel Plan in

  • rder to apply for grant funds;

 Development of multi-modal plans for assisting ADA, pedestrian, transit, and cyclist access;  Economic development planning to improve shipping access and/or to mitigate congestion;  Planning to modify roads to meet modern needs

slide-44
SLIDE 44

WPCLF Program

Water Pollution Control Loan Fund

slide-45
SLIDE 45

WPCLF – What is it?

  • Federal loan program for wastewater infrastructure

improvements, administered by Ohio EPA

  • Typically used for sewage treatment plant upgrades, but

recently added home sewage treatment systems

  • Program is a “principal forgiveness” loan, which equates to a

grant for those in the program

  • Since 2016 the program has been administered locally by the

Stark County Health Department

slide-46
SLIDE 46

WPCLF – Applicant Qualifications

  • Septic system serving the home must be failing or has already

failed

  • Household must meet financial guidelines to cover 50%, 85%,
  • r 100% of the total cost
  • Applicant must be the homeowner and occupy the dwelling
  • Must be current on property taxes (Stark County)
  • Must provide all appropriate documentation as required on

application forms

slide-47
SLIDE 47

WPLCF – Income Guidelines

# of people in home 100% of project costs paid if annual income at or below: 85% of project costs paid if annual income at or below: 50% of project costs paid if annual income at or below: 1-4 $24,300 $48,600 $72,900 5 $28,440 $56,880 $85,320 6 $32,580 $65,160 $97,740 7 $36,730 $73,460 $110,190 8 $40,890 $81,780 $122,670

Project costs not covered by the program must be paid in full prior to start of any work.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

WPCLF Applicant - Example

EXAMPLE OF PROJECT COSTS: (Property owner funded at 85% of the sewage treatment system replacement cost.)

  • Soil Tests

$500

  • Excavator for soil tests

$150

  • Design Plan

$600

  • Sewage treatment system bid, including permit

$12,550

  • TOTAL PROJECT COSTS

$13,800

  • 15% of project cost to be paid by owner

$2,070

  • Amount paid upon qualifying (except 100%’s)

$1,000

  • Remaining amount due before installation

$1,070

slide-49
SLIDE 49

WPCLF – Distribution of Applicants

slide-50
SLIDE 50

WPCLF, 2016 Funding Cycle

  • For the 2016 funding cycle which ended in November 2017, Stark County was awarded $300,000. Of

those funds, $299,692.37 was spent on repairing or replacing 32 septic systems for the homeowners in this county. ($307.63 unspent) – 7 homeowners were assessed at 50% – 15 homeowners were assessed at 85% – 10 homeowners had 100% of the cost covered for their systems.

  • $300,000 was awarded for 2017, and $200,000 for 2018
  • Types of Systems:

– 6 soil absorption – 23 NPDES – 1 repair – 1 tank – 1 replacement

slide-51
SLIDE 51