2017 Court judgments Conference on Trade Defence Instruments 26 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 court judgments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2017 Court judgments Conference on Trade Defence Instruments 26 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 Court judgments Conference on Trade Defence Instruments 26 October 2018 Disclaimer The views expressed are personal and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. 2017 Court


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2017 Court judgments

Conference on Trade Defence Instruments 26 October 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclaimer

The views expressed are personal and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2017 Court judgments on TDI cases – overview in numbers

  • Scope: judgments by the ECJ on TDI cases in

2017

  • Overall 27 cases and appeals
  • 15 before the General Court
  • 12 appeals
  • + 2 preliminary rulings
  • Commission won 17 out of 27
  • 10 of 15 before the General Court
  • 7 of 12 appeals
slide-4
SLIDE 4

2017 Court judgments on TDI cases – common threads

  • Right of defence
  • Clarifications & Interpretation of the anti-

dumping regulation

  • Circumvention cases
  • Rights of related or unrelated importers and

conditions for access to the European Courts

  • Other issues such as customs and severability of

trade defence measures

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2017 Court judgments on TDI cases – right of defence

  • Case T-442/12 Changmao Biochemical v Council
  • Case T-460/14 AETMD v Council
  • Case T-422/13 CPME v Council
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Right of defence (2) Case T-442/12 Changmao Biochemical v Council

  • Product: Tartaric acid
  • Country: China
  • Stage of the TD procedure: interim review
  • Action brought by: Chinese exporting producer
  • Contested act: Council Implementing Regulation
  • Legal question: sensitive commercial information

vs interested party’s right of defence of their substance

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Right of defence (1) Case T-460/14 AETMD v Council

  • Product: sweetcorn
  • Country: Thailand
  • Stage of the TD procedure: interim review
  • Action brought by: Union industry - association
  • Contested act: Council Implementing Regulation
  • Legal questions: genuine lasting change of

circumstances? Confidentiality of the evidence?

  • Of note – role of the hearing officer
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Right of defence (3) Case T-422/13 CPME v Council

  • Product: Polyethylene
  • Country: India, Thailand, Taiwan, Indonesia,

Malaysia

  • Stage of the TD procedure: expiry review
  • Action brought by: Union industry - committee
  • Contested act: Council Implementing Decision
  • Legal questions: manifest error of assessment in

the analysis of the likelihood of recurrence of injury? Claim for damages by the Union industry

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2017 Court judgments on TDI cases – interpretation of the basic regulation

  • Case C-61/16P EBMA v Giant (China)
  • Case T-512/09 RENV Armenal v Council
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Interpretation of the basic regulation (1) – Case C-61/16P EBMA v Giant

  • Product: Bicycles
  • Country: China
  • Stage of the TD procedure: whether an individual

ADD should be calculated for Giant

  • Appeal brought by: EBMA - Union industry

supported by Council and Commission

  • Contested act: Council Regulation
  • Legal questions: Article 18(1) of Regulation

1225/2009 – concept of ‘necessary information’

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Interpretation of the basic regulation (2) – Case T-512/09 RENV Rusal Armenal v Council

  • Product: Aluminium foil
  • Country: Armenia, Brazil, China
  • Stage TD procedure: MET claim - conditions
  • Appeal brought by: Commission
  • Contested act: Council Regulation of 2009
  • Legal questions: interpretation of Article 2(7) of

Regulation 384/96 –calculation of the normal value for non-market economies – compatibility with WTO ADA

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusion

  • Protection of rights of defence – procedural errors
  • ver correct substantive assessment – is it

(becoming) a trend?

  • Important clarifications of the interpretation of

the basic Regulation – first time interpretation of certain provisions

  • A rich year in terms of case-law in TD matters