2016 Standards Exposure Survey Results Comment Period February 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2016 standards exposure survey results
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2016 Standards Exposure Survey Results Comment Period February 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2016 Standards Exposure Survey Results Comment Period February 1 to April 30, 2016 Standards Exposure: Timeline 90-day public exposure started on February 1, 2016 and ended April 30, 2016. Exposure draft was available in several languages via


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2016 Standards Exposure Survey Results

Comment Period February 1 to April 30, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Standards Exposure: Timeline

The IIA released revised Standards October 1, 2016. 90-day public exposure started on February 1, 2016 and ended April 30, 2016.

Exposure draft was available in several languages via online survey.

May—September, 2016 IIASB evaluated survey results and comments, considered modifications to the exposure draft, and approved the final revision of the Standards. The revised Standards become effective January 1, 2017.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Global Exposure

  • 16 languages
  • 3,000+ webinar

attendees

  • 8,000+

AuditChannel.tv video views

  • 35,000+ unique

web page visits

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Global Response

  • 1,144 survey

responses

  • 76 institutes

represented

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Overall Standards Exposure Results

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Agree/Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree 94.4% 4.2% 1.4%

Overwhelming agreement across 42 survey questions related to the revisions to the Standards

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Top Five Areas of Concern

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Proposed Changes to Introduction & Glossary

Proposed Change

Introduction 94.8% 5.2% Definition of IPPF 96.6% 3.4% Definition of CAE 92.6% 7.4% Definition of Core Principles 95.8% 4.2% Definition of Board 94% 6%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proposed Changes to 1000 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 1000 97.5% 2.5% Standard 1010 94.4% 5.6%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Proposed Changes to 1100 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 1110.A1 94.5% 5.5% Standard 1112 89.8% 10.2% Standard 1112 - Interpretation 86.2% 13.8% Standard 1130.A3 90.3% 9.7%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proposed Changes to 1200 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 1210 96.8% 3.2% Standard 1210 - Interpretation 94% 6%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Proposed Changes to 1300 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 1300 - Interpretation 95.1% 4.9% Standard 1311 - Interpretation 95.3% 4.7% Standard 1312 - Interpretation 91.6% 8.4% Standard 1320 94.8% 5.2% Standard 1320 - Interpretation 94.9% 5.1%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Proposed Changes to 1300 Series (continued)

Proposed Change

Standard 1321 94.2% 5.8% Standard 1321 - Interpretation 94.1% 5.9% Standard 1322 95.4% 4.6%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Proposed Changes to 2000 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 2000 - Interpretation 93.1% 6.9% Standard 2010 88.5% 11.5% Standard 2050 96.1% 3.9% Standard 2050 - Interpretation 95.3% 4.7% Standard 2060 94.4% 5.6% Standard 2060 - Interpretation 90.8% 9.2% Standard 2070 94.9% 5.1%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Proposed Changes to 2100 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 2100 94.4% 5.6% Standard 2110 92.9% 7.1%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proposed Changes to 2200 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 2200 96.4% 3.6% Standard 2201 96% 4% Standard 2210.A3 95.9% 4.1% Standard 2210.A3 - Interpretation 95.6% 4.4% Standard 2230 - Interpretation 97.9% 2.1%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Proposed Changes to 2300 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 2330 97.4% 2.6%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Proposed Changes to 2400 Series

Proposed Change

Standard 2410 95.9% 4.1% Standard 2410.A1 94.1% 5.9% Standard 2430 95.4% 4.6% Standard 2431 95.9% 4.1% Standard 2450 96.1% 3.9% Standard 2450 - Interpretation 94.8% 5.2%