2014 Dothan School Progress Report 2014 School Progress Report - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
2014 dothan school progress report
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2014 Dothan School Progress Report 2014 School Progress Report - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 07, 2024 114 likes •751 views

2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by

slide-1
SLIDE 1

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

2014 Dothan School Progress Report

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

Demographic and Financial Information

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 Enrollment Huntsville City Hoover City Tuscaloosa City Madison City Dothan City Decatur City Auburn City Phenix City Enterprise City Houston County Gadsden City Florence City Opelika City Alexander City Ozark City System Enrollment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Poverty Madison City System Hoover City System Auburn City System Enterprise City System Huntsville City System Dothan City System State of Alabama Alexander City System Florence City System Tuscaloosa City System Houston County System Opelika City System Decatur City System Phenix City System Ozark City System Gadsden City System Percentage of Students from Poverty Households by System

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2015 School Millage Rate Hoover City Phenix City Huntsville City Madison City Florence City Auburn City Opelika City Ozark City Decatur City Gadsden City Tuscumbia City Enterprise City Alexander City Dothan City Houston County Millage Rates

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000 $5,500 Hoover City Tuscaloosa City Decatur City Auburn City Huntsville City Florence City Opelika City Madison City State of Alabama Alexander City Dothan City Gadsden City Ozark City Houston County Enterprise City Phenix City Local Revenue per Student

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 Hoover City Tuscaloosa City Decatur City Huntsville City Florence City Opelika City Madison City Ozark City Gadsden City Auburn City State of Alabama Alexander City Dothan City Houston County Enterprise City Phenix City Core Academic Spending Per Student

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Auburn City Dothan City Hoover City Gadsden City Decatur City Houston County Alexander City Florence City Opelika City Madison City Phenix City Enterprise City State of Alabama Tuscaloosa City Huntsville City Ozark City Core Spending: Instructional vs Noninstructional % Instruction Related % Other

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2014 School Progress Report

Title Slide Demograqphic and Financial Comparison System Enrollm.. Systems by Percent Poverty.. Millage Rates by System Local Revenue By Student Core Spending by Amount Core Spending by Category Teacher Units Per Student by ..

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Tuscaloosa City Florence City Hoover City Huntsville City Decatur City Opelika City Gadsden City Alexander City Phenix City Dothan City Ozark City Auburn City Houston County Enterprise City Madison City Certified Professionals per 100 Students

State Federal Local

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2014 School Progress Report

2014 ACT Aspire Results Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math

2014 ACT Aspire Results Math

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2014 School Progress Report

2014 ACT Aspire Results Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math

03 04 05 06 07 08 All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan

Dothan vs. State of Alabama: Math Comparison System Poverty Percentage: 59%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2014 School Progress Report

2014 ACT Aspire Results Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2014 School Progress Report

2014 ACT Aspire Results Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math

Dothan Elementary Schools

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2014 School Progress Report

2014 ACT Aspire Results Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math

Heard Magnet School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 35.5% Math

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2014 School Progress Report

2014 ACT Aspire Results Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math

Montana Street Magnet School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 29.5% Math

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2014 School Progress Report

201 4 A.. Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grand view ..

Highlands Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 31.6% Math

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2014 School Progress Report

Doth an .. Results in Math Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math

Hidden Lake Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 56.2% Math

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2014 School Progress Report

Res ults.. Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Clover dale ..

Kelly Springs Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 58.0% Math

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2014 School Progress Report

Ele me.. Heard Magnet Math Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Scho..

Girard Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 67.0% Math

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2014 School Progress Report

Hear d M.. Montana Street Magnet Math Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magn..

Morris Slingluff Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 71.4% Math

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2014 School Progress Report

Mont ana.. Highlands Math Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverl ye M..

Selma Street Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 86.8% Math

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2014 School Progress Report

High lan.. Hidden Lake Math Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honey suckl..

Grandview Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 95.2% Math

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2014 School Progress Report

Hidd en .. Kelly Springs Math Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middl..

Faine Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students Poverty All Students Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 91.4% Math

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2014 School Progress Report

Kelly Spr.. Girard Elementary Math Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Readi ng

Cloverdale Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 75.8% Math

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2014 School Progress Report

Gira rd .. Morris Slingluff Math Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Resul..

Dothan Middle Schools

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2014 School Progress Report

Morr is S.. Selma Street Math Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dotha n v P..

Carver Magnet School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 34.9% Math

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2014 School Progress Report

Sel ma .. Grandview Math Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Eleme ntary ..

Beverlye Magnet School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 44.1% Math

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2014 School Progress Report

Gran dvi.. Faine Math Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magn..

Honeysuckle Middle School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 74.3% Math

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2014 School Progress Report

Fain e M.. Cloverdale Math Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Monta nta S..

Girard Middle School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 74.5% Math

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2014 School Progress Report

Clov erd.. Middle Schools Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highla nds ..

Reading

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2014 School Progress Report

Midd le .. Carver Magnet Math Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidde n Lak..

03 04 05 06 07 08 All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan

Dothan vs. State of Alabama: Reading Comparison System Poverty Percentage: 59%

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2014 School Progress Report

Carv er .. Beverlye Magnet Math Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly S pring..

slide-33
SLIDE 33

2014 School Progress Report

Bev erly.. Honeysuckle Math Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elem..

Dothan Elementary Schools

slide-34
SLIDE 34

2014 School Progress Report

Hon eys.. Girard Middle Math Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingl..

Heard Magnet School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 35.5% Reading

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2014 School Progress Report

Gira rd .. Reading State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Stree..

Montana Street Magnet School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 29.5% Reading

slide-36
SLIDE 36

2014 School Progress Report

Rea ding State Results Reading Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Clover dale ..

Highlands Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 31.6% Reading

slide-37
SLIDE 37

2014 School Progress Report

Stat e R.. Dothan v Peers Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Read..

Hidden Lake Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 56.2% Reading

slide-38
SLIDE 38

2014 School Progress Report

Doth an .. Elementary Schools Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grand view ..

Kelly Springs Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 58.0% Reading

slide-39
SLIDE 39

2014 School Progress Report

Ele me.. Heard Magnet Reading Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Scho..

Girard Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 67.0% Reading

slide-40
SLIDE 40

2014 School Progress Report

Hear d M.. Montanta Street Magnet Reading Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magn..

Morris Slingluff Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 71.4% Reading

slide-41
SLIDE 41

2014 School Progress Report

Mont ant.. Highlands Reading Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverl ye M..

Selma Street Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 86.8% Reading

slide-42
SLIDE 42

2014 School Progress Report

High lan.. Hidden Lake Reading Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honey suckl..

Cloverdale Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 75.8% Reading

slide-43
SLIDE 43

2014 School Progress Report

Hidd en .. Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honeysuckle Reading Girard Middl..

Faine Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students Poverty All Students Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 91.4% Reading

slide-44
SLIDE 44

2014 School Progress Report

Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honeysuckle Reading Girard Middle Reading

Grandview Elementary School 03 04 05

All Students All Students All Students

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 95.2% Reading

slide-45
SLIDE 45

2014 School Progress Report

Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honeysuckle Reading Girard Middle Reading

Dothan Middle Schools

slide-46
SLIDE 46

2014 School Progress Report

Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honeysuckle Reading Girard Middle Reading

Carver Magnet School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 34.9% Reading

slide-47
SLIDE 47

2014 School Progress Report

Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honeysuckle Reading Girard Middle Reading

Beverlye Magnet School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 44.1% Reading

slide-48
SLIDE 48

2014 School Progress Report

Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honeysuckle Reading Girard Middle Reading

Honeysuckle Middle School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 74.3% Reading

slide-49
SLIDE 49

2014 School Progress Report

Kelly Springs Reading Girard Elementary Re.. Morris Slingluff Reading Selma Street Reading Cloverdale Reading Faine Reading Grandview Reading Middle Schools Carver Magnet Reading Beverlye Magnet Reading Honeysuckle Reading Girard Middle Reading

Girard Middle School 06 07 08

All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Proficient Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 74.5% Reading

slide-50
SLIDE 50

2014 School Progress Report

High School Title Slide Graduation Rates Over Time 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by Hi..

High School Results

slide-51
SLIDE 51

2014 School Progress Report

High School Title Slide Graduation Rates Over Time 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by Hi..

2011 2012 2013 2014 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% Graduation Rate

Dothan City: 90%

State of Alabama:

86% US: 81%

Graduation Rate Trends

slide-52
SLIDE 52

2014 School Progress Report

High School Title Slide Graduation Rates Over Time 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by Hi..

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Madison City System Enterprise City System Florence City System Hoover City System Opelika City System Houston County System Auburn City System Dothan City Alexander City System Huntsville City System Decatur City System State of Alabama Tuscaloosa City System Ozark City System Phenix City System Gadsden City System 85% 86% 81% 83% 92% 95% 87% 91% 95% 70% 95% 95% 90% 86% 90% 87% System Graduation Rates

slide-53
SLIDE 53

2014 School Progress Report

High School Title Slide Graduation Rates Over Time 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by Hi..

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 MADISON CITY HOOVER CITY AUBURN CITY HUNTSVILLE CITY ENTERPRISE CITY FLORENCE CITY US STATE OF ALABAMA ALEXANDER CITY DECATUR CITY DOTHAN CITY HOUSTON COUNTY GADSDEN CITY TUSCALOOSA CITY OPELIKA CITY OZARK CITY PHENIX CITY

20.3 20.6 21.0

Average Composite ACT Score by System

slide-54
SLIDE 54

2014 School Progress Report

High School Title Slide Graduation Rates Over Time 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by Hi..

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% MADISON CITY HOOVER CITY ENTERPRISE CITY AUBURN CITY FLORENCE CITY HUNTSVILLE CITY HOUSTON COUNTY ALEXANDER CITY DECATUR CITY STATE OF ALABAMA US DOTHAN CITY GADSDEN CITY OPELIKA CITY TUSCALOOSA CITY OZARK CITY PHENIX CITY

65% 63% 64%

% College Ready-English

slide-55
SLIDE 55

2014 School Progress Report

High School Title Slide Graduation Rates Over Time 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by Hi..

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% MADISON CITY HOOVER CITY HUNTSVILLE CITY AUBURN CITY ENTERPRISE CITY FLORENCE CITY US STATE OF ALABAMA ALEXANDER CITY DECATUR CITY DOTHAN CITY HOUSTON COUNTY OZARK CITY GADSDEN CITY TUSCALOOSA CITY PHENIX CITY OPELIKA CITY

43% 41% 44%

% College Ready-Reading

slide-56
SLIDE 56

2014 School Progress Report

High Sc.. Graduation Rates Over Time 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by High School Final Slide

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% AUBURN CITY MADISON CITY HOOVER CITY HUNTSVILLE CITY US ENTERPRISE CITY FLORENCE CITY DECATUR CITY STATE OF ALABAMA ALEXANDER CITY DOTHAN CITY TUSCALOOSA CITY GADSDEN CITY HOUSTON COUNTY PHENIX CITY OPELIKA CITY OZARK CITY

31% 28% 43%

% College Ready-Math

slide-57
SLIDE 57

2014 School Progress Report

Graduation Rates Over .. 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by High School Final Slide

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% MADISON CITY HOOVER CITY AUBURN CITY HUNTSVILLE CITY FLORENCE CITY ENTERPRISE CITY US ALEXANDER CITY DECATUR CITY STATE OF ALABAMA GADSDEN CITY TUSCALOOSA CITY DOTHAN CITY HOUSTON COUNTY OZARK CITY OPELIKA CITY PHENIX CITY

26% 31% 37%

% College Ready-Science

slide-58
SLIDE 58

2014 School Progress Report

Graduation Rates Over .. 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by High School Final Slide

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% MADISON CITY HOOVER CITY AUBURN CITY HUNTSVILLE CITY FLORENCE CITY US ENTERPRISE CITY STATE OF ALABAMA DECATUR CITY TUSCALOOSA CITY ALEXANDER CITY DOTHAN CITY GADSDEN CITY OZARK CITY HOUSTON COUNTY OPELIKA CITY PHENIX CITY

26% 21% 18%

% College Ready All Subjects

slide-59
SLIDE 59

2014 School Progress Report

Graduation Rates Over .. 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by High School Final Slide

Dothan High School Northview High School

English Reading Math Science All Four English Reading Math Science All Four

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % College Ready by Subject Compared to State

slide-60
SLIDE 60

2014 School Progress Report

Graduation Rates Over .. 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by High School Final Slide

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Madison City Auburn City Hoover City Huntsville City Florence City Alexander City Enterprise City Opelika City Decatur City State of Alabama Tuscaloosa City Gadsden City Dothan City Houston County Phenix City Ozark City State of Alabama Needing Remediation: 32% Dothan City Needing Remediation: 39% Remedial Rates by System % Remedial English Only % Remedial Math Only % Both Remedial Math & English

slide-61
SLIDE 61

2014 School Progress Report

Graduation Rates Over .. 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by High School Final Slide

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% Virgil Grissom Huntsville City Huntsville Huntsville City Bob Jones Madison City Spain Park Hoover City New Century Technology Huntsville City James Clemens Madison City Auburn Auburn City Florence Florence City Hoover Hoover City Northridge Tuscaloosa City Benjamin Russell Alexander City Enterprise Enterprise City Ashford Houston County Opelika Opelika City Austin Decatur City State of Alabama State of Alabama Decatur Decatur City Wicksburg Houston County Northview High Dothan City Gadsden City Gadsden City Cottonwood Houston County Paul W Bryant Tuscaloosa City Columbia Huntsville City JO Johnson Huntsville City Dothan High Dothan City Lee Huntsville City Central Tuscaloosa City Rehobeth Houston County Central High Phenix City Carroll High Ozark City SR Butler High Huntsville City Houston County High Houston County

Dothan High Needing Remediation: 44% Northview High Needing Remediation: 37% State of Alabama Needing Remediation: 32% Remedial Rate by High School

% Remedial English Only % Remedial Math Only % Remedial Both

slide-62
SLIDE 62

2014 School Progress Report

Graduation Rates Over .. 2014 Graduation Rates by System Average 2014 ACT Score by .. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. % of 2014 Graduates Coll.. ACT Results by System High Sc.. % of Graduates in Need of Rem.. Remedial Rates by High School Final Slide

2014 Dothan School Progress Report