2014 dothan school progress report
play

2014 Dothan School Progress Report 2014 School Progress Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by


  1. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. 2014 Dothan School Progress Report

  2. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. Demographic and Financial Information

  3. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. System Enrollment Huntsville City Hoover City Tuscaloosa City Madison City Dothan City Decatur City Auburn City Phenix City Enterprise City Houston County Gadsden City Florence City Opelika City Alexander City Ozark City 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 Enrollment

  4. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. Percentage of Students from Poverty Households by System Madison City System Hoover City System Auburn City System Enterprise City System Huntsville City System Dothan City System State of Alabama Alexander City System Florence City System Tuscaloosa City System Houston County System Opelika City System Decatur City System Phenix City System Ozark City System Gadsden City System 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Poverty

  5. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. Millage Rates Hoover City Phenix City Huntsville City Madison City Florence City Auburn City Opelika City Ozark City Decatur City Gadsden City Tuscumbia City Enterprise City Alexander City Dothan City Houston County 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2015 School Millage Rate

  6. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. Local Revenue per Student Hoover City Tuscaloosa City Decatur City Auburn City Huntsville City Florence City Opelika City Madison City State of Alabama Alexander City Dothan City Gadsden City Ozark City Houston County Enterprise City Phenix City $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000 $5,500

  7. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. Core Academic Spending Per Student Hoover City Tuscaloosa City Decatur City Huntsville City Florence City Opelika City Madison City Ozark City Gadsden City Auburn City State of Alabama Alexander City Dothan City Houston County Enterprise City Phenix City $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000

  8. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. Core Spending: Instructional vs Noninstructional Auburn City Dothan City Hoover City Gadsden City Decatur City Houston County Alexander City Florence City Opelika City Madison City Phenix City Enterprise City State of Alabama Tuscaloosa City Huntsville City Ozark City 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % Instruction Related % Other

  9. 2014 School Progress Report Title Slide Demograqphic Comparison Systems by Millage Rates by Local Revenue Core Spending Core Spending Teacher Units and Financial System Enrollm.. Percent Poverty.. System By Student by Amount by Category Per Student by .. Certified Professionals per 100 Students Tuscaloosa City Florence City Hoover City Huntsville City Decatur City Opelika City Gadsden City Alexander City Phenix City Dothan City Ozark City Auburn City Houston County Enterprise City Madison City 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 State Federal Local

  10. 2014 School Progress Report 2014 ACT Aspire Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Results Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math 2014 ACT Aspire Results Math

  11. 2014 School Progress Report 2014 ACT Aspire Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Results Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math Dothan vs. State of Alabama: Math Comparison System Poverty Percentage: 59% 03 04 05 06 07 08 100% 90% 80% Dothan Dothan 70% Dothan Dothan 60% Dothan Dothan Dothan 50% Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan 40% Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan Dothan 30% Dothan 20% Dothan 10% 0% All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty All Students Nonpoverty Poverty

  12. 2014 School Progress Report 2014 ACT Aspire Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Results Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math

  13. 2014 School Progress Report 2014 ACT Aspire Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Results Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math Dothan Elementary Schools

  14. 2014 School Progress Report 2014 ACT Aspire Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Results Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 35.5% Math Heard Magnet School 03 04 05 90% 80% Percent Proficient 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% All Students All Students All Students Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty

  15. 2014 School Progress Report 2014 ACT Aspire Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Results Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 29.5% Math Montana Street Magnet School 03 04 05 90% 80% Percent Proficient 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% All Students All Students All Students Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty

  16. 2014 School Progress Report 201 Dothan v State Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Grand 4 A.. Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math view .. Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 31.6% Math Highlands Elementary School 03 04 05 90% 80% Percent Proficient 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% All Students All Students All Students Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty

  17. 2014 School Progress Report Doth Results in Math Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Grandview Math Faine an .. Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math Math Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 56.2% Math Hidden Lake Elementary School 03 04 05 90% 80% Percent Proficient 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% All Students All Students All Students Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty

  18. 2014 School Progress Report Res Elementary Heard Magnet Montana Street Highlands Math Hidden Lake Kelly Springs Girard Morris Slingluff Selma Street Grandview Math Faine Math Clover ults.. Schools Math Magnet Math Math Math Elementary Math Math Math dale .. Proficiency Compared to State (59% Poverty Statewide) Percent Poverty: 58.0% Math Kelly Springs Elementary School 03 04 05 90% 80% Percent Proficient 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% All Students All Students All Students Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty Nonpoverty Poverty

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend