2
• • • • • • • •
• • •
5
7
9
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • 12
14
• • • • . 16
• • • 17
• • • • 18
• • • • 19
• • • • • • 20
• • • ’ • 21
• • • • • 22
• •
25
• • •
• • • • • • • • • •
28
29
31
32
33
34
. 35
• • • • • • • 36
• • • • • 37
• • • • • •
• • • • • 39
40
41
” 42
43
• • • • • • • • 44
• • • • • 45
46
What are the hallmarks of ‘Close but critical, co - operative but never cosy’? When might the relationship be tested and what can be done to manage this? 47
48
Governance Structures Processes Meetings Behaviours Source: Compass Partnership &CASS CCE Delivering effective governance: insights from the boards of larger charities 2012 Frequency Use of skills Governance structure Succession planning Duration Listening Board size Recruitment processes Attendance Team work Terms of office Appointment Agenda planning Praise / challenge Term limits Diversity Quality of information Openness and trust Representation Induction and papers Strategic focus Committee structure Chair and Vice chair Consent items Chair & CEO Advisory groups selection CEO’s presence relationship Representation of Governance of risk People in the room Experience members and service CEO performance Away days users management Chair performance review Trustee performance 49
Governance Behaviours Meetings Processes Structures Source: Compass Partnership &CASS CCE Delivering effective governance: insights from the boards of larger charities 2012 50
• • • • • • 51
52
53
• • • • • • 54
• • 55
56
THANK YOU Dan.francis@ncvo.org.uk 57
Recommend
More recommend
