11 th Annual Technical Forum GEOHAZARDS IMPACTING TRANSPORTATION IN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

11 th annual technical forum geohazards impacting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

11 th Annual Technical Forum GEOHAZARDS IMPACTING TRANSPORTATION IN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Filename and location 11 th Annual Technical Forum GEOHAZARDS IMPACTING TRANSPORTATION IN THE APPALACHIAN REGION GEO-DESIGN APPLICATIONS IN KARST ENVIRONMENTS William D. Spencer, P.G., Jaye Richardson, and Chris Ramsey, P.E. AMEC, Nashville


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1 Filename and location

11th Annual Technical Forum GEOHAZARDS IMPACTING TRANSPORTATION IN THE APPALACHIAN REGION

GEO-DESIGN APPLICATIONS IN KARST ENVIRONMENTS

William D. Spencer, P.G., Jaye Richardson, and Chris Ramsey, P.E. AMEC, Nashville TN August 3, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 Filename and location

KARST CAN OCCUR ANYTIME AND ANYWHERE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 Filename and location

KARST CAN OCCUR ANYTIME AND ANYWHERE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 Filename and location

NSC Mainline Track at MP 96.1A Morristown, Tennessee

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 Filename and location

NSC Mainline Track at MP 96.1A Morristown, Tennessee

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 Filename and location

NSC Mainline Track at MP 96.1A Morristown, Tennessee

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 Filename and location

NSC Mainline Track at MP 96.1A Morristown, Tennessee

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 Filename and location

NSC Mainline Track at MP 96.1A Morristown, Tennessee

SUMMARY OF DEEP FOUNDATION OPTIONS

  • Driven Piles

(H-Piles)

OPTIONS PERCEIVED ADVANTAGES Low cost PERCEIVED DISADVANTAGES Impossible to assess bearing strata

  • Drilled Piers

(Caissons)

High load capacity; low long term risk High cost; potentially large voids in bedrock might take large quantities of concrete to fill.

  • Small Diameter

Drilled Pipe Piles (Micro Piles) Low long-term risk; easy to make adjustments Moderate to high cost; smaller than “normal” pile size for bridge bents; requires real-time field engineering during construction to adjust.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 Filename and location

NSC Mainline Track at MP 96.1A Morristown, Tennessee

BEFORE Karst engulfing the soil and ballast AFTER Micro pile and structural land bridge REMOVES the karst from play and provides for surface drainage under the track.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

SO HOW DO WE BUILD A BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON EXTREMELY KARSTIC AND VARIABLY BEDROCK?? BY A COMBINATION OF INTEGRAL ABUTMENTS, SPREAD FOOTINGS, WHERE POSSIBLE, AND MICROPILES

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

WHY ? CAISSONS ARE DIFFICULT TO INSTALL IN IRREGULAR BEDROCK CONDITIONS THEY ARE COSTLY $$ HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL CONCRETE WILL BE USED TO FILL THE OPEN CAVITIES? HOW MUCH DOES IT COST TO USE PERMANENT CASING IN THE GROUND TO CONTROL CONCRETE PLACEMENT?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21 Filename and location

Mack Hatcher Parkway Franklin, Tennessee

HOW CLOSE IS THAT END BEARING H-PILE TO THE WEATHERED ROCK OR OPEN CAVITY? WE DON’T KNOW

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22 Filename and location

Micro-piles as a SOLUTION

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23 Filename and location

RECENT LOAD TESTING ON INSTALLED MICRO-PILES

DESIGN LOADS WERE 300 KIPS COMPRESSION AND 180 KIPS TENSION COMPRESSION LOADING EXCEEDED 200% OR 600 KIPS TENSION LOADING FAILED AT 200% OR 360 KIPS DUE TO FOLIATION OF WEATHERED ROCK FOLLOW-UP LOAD TESTING EXCEEDED 200% OF DESIGN FOR TENSION AND COMPRESSION

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24 Filename and location

QUESTIONS??

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25 Filename and location

THANK-YOU