1 shapes and masses of nuclei
play

1. Shapes and Masses of Nuclei Or: Nuclear Phenomeology References: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I H. W. Griehammer INS Institute for Nuclear Studies The George Washington University Institute for Nuclear Studies Spring 2018 II. Phenomena 1. Shapes and Masses of Nuclei Or: Nuclear


  1. PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I H. W. Grießhammer INS Institute for Nuclear Studies The George Washington University Institute for Nuclear Studies Spring 2018 II. Phenomena 1. Shapes and Masses of Nuclei Or: Nuclear Phenomeology References: [PRSZR 5.4, 2.3, 3.1/3; HG 6.3/4, (14.5), 16.1; cursorily PRSZR 18, 19] PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.0

  2. (a) Getting Experimental Information ⇒ M ≫ E ′ ≈ E ≫ m e → 0 heavy, spinless, composite target = � � 2 � � � � E ′ d σ Z α cos 2 θ 2 � � � q 2 ) = � F ( � � (I.7.3) � lab 2 E sin 2 θ d Ω 2 E 2 � �� � Mott when nuclear recoil negligible: M ≫ E ≈ E ′ ⇒ q 2 = − q 2 = − 2 E 2 ( 1 − cos θ ) = � translate q 2 ⇐ ⇒ θ ⇐ ⇒ E max. mom. transfer: θ → 180 ◦ min. mom. transfer: θ → 0 ◦ For E = 800 MeV (MAMI-B), 12 C ( A = 12 ): � ∆ x = 1 − q 2 θ | � q | 180 ◦ 0 . 15 fm 1500 MeV 90 ◦ 0 . 2 fm 1000 MeV 30 ◦ 400 MeV 0 . 5 fm 10 ◦ 1 . 5 fm 130 MeV [PRSZR] PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.1

  3. “Typical” Example: 40 , 48 Ca measured over 12 orders 12 orders of magnitude. . . θ -dependence, multiplied by 10 , 0 . 1 !! [PRSZR] q | -dependence fm − 1 | � [HG 6.3] 40 Ca has less slope = ⇒ smaller size PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.2

  4. Characterising Charge Densities ∞ � q 2 ) : = 4 π d r r q 2 = 0 ) = 1 F ( � q sin ( qr ) ρ ( r ) , normalisation F ( � Ze 0 q 2 → ∞ ) : impossible In principle: Fourier transformation = ⇒ need F ( � = ⇒ Ways out: (i) Characterise just object size: sin qr � �� � � � ∞ � qr − ( qr ) 3 q 2 → 0 ) = 4 π d r r + O (( qr ) 5 ) F ( � ρ ( r ) Ze q 3! 0 ∞ ∞ � � − q 2 q 2 → 0 ) = 4 π 4 π d r r 2 ρ ( r ) d r r 2 × r 2 ρ ( r ) + O (( qr ) 5 ) F ( � Ze 3! Ze 0 0 � �� � � �� � = 1 mean of r 2 operator � � q 2 ) ⇒ � r 2 � = − 3! d F ( � � = (square of) root-mean-square (rms) radius � � q 2 d � q 2 = 0 PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.3

  5. Ways Out: (ii) Compare to FF of Assumed Charge Density Better parameterise as sum of a few Gauß’ians: b i exp − ( r − R i ) 2 ρ charge ( r ) = ∑ δ 2 i = ⇒ “line thickness” = parametrisation uncertainty [Mar] [PRSZR] ρ charge ( r = 0 ) decreases with A , but ρ N = A Z ρ charge ( r = 0 ) constant for large A : ρ N ≈ 0 . 17 nucleons 1 = 3 × 10 11 kg litre = 300 tons mm 3 = 3 space shuttles ≈ ( 1 . 4 × ( 2 × 0 . 7fm )) 3 � fm 3 mm 3 ρ N plateaus in heavy nuclei = ⇒ Saturation of Interaction : attraction long-range, repulsion up-close!?! Nucleons “separate but close”: Distance between nucleons in nucleus ≈ 1 . 4 × nucleon rms diameter. PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.4

  6. Matter Densities in Nuclei (ii) Assume a certain ρ N ( r ) , calculate its FF, fit. 1st min at qR ≈ 4 . 5 [Tho 7.5] Very simple form for heavy nuclei: Fermi Distribution ρ 0 = A ρ N ( r ) = Z ρ charge 1 + exp r − c a experiments: radius at half-density c ≈ A 1 / 3 × 1 . 07 fm : � 5 3 � r 2 � ≈ A 1 / 3 × 1 . 21 fm translate hard-sphere: R = experiments: a ≈ 0 . 5 fm : independent of A !; [PRSZR p. 68] related to surface/skin thickness t = a × 4ln3 ≈ 2 . 40 fm PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.5

  7. [HG 14.5; nucl-th/0608036; (b) Spin & Deformation: Deuteron nucl-th/0102049] q 2 ) angle-independent is the exception, not the rule. So far: no spin, no deformation = ⇒ F ( � Example Deuteron d ( np ) with J PC = 1 + − : � L = � J − � S , S = 1 L = 1 J ⊗ 1 S = 0 ⊕ 1 ⊕ 2 = ⇒ L = 0 (s-wave) or L = 2 d-wave – Parity forbids L = 1 . angular momentum = ⇒ mag. moment = ⇒ spin-spin interaction = ⇒ helicity transfer 1 G C ( q 2 ) = e � m J | J 0 | m J � ∑ avg. of hadron density, G C ( 0 ) = 1 Charge FF : 3 m J = − 1 G M ( 0 ) = : M d G M ( q 2 ) κ d , mag. moment κ d = 0 . 857 Magnetic FF : M N G Q ( q 2 ) Quadrupole FF : � d 3 r ( 3 z 2 − r 2 ) ρ charge ( r ) = 0 . 286 fm 2 quadrupole moment Q d : = G Q ( 0 ) = Ze �   � � 2 � � �   E ′ � M + 8 τ 2 M 4 d σ Z α cos 2 θ C + 2 τ 4 τ ( 1 + τ ) M tan 2 θ   � G 2 3 G 2 G 2 G 2 d = ×  +  � lab Q 2 E sin 2 θ d Ω   2 E 9 3 2 � �� � 2 � �� � spin = ⇒ helicity transfer Mott with τ = − q 2 as before 4 M 2 d = ⇒ Dis-entangle by θ & τ dependence. PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.6

  8. Deuteron Form Factors [Garçon/van Orden: nucl-th/0102049] does not include most recent data (JLab), but pedagogical plot high-accuracy data up to Q 2 � ( 1 . 4 GeV ) 2 Theory quite well understood: embed nucleon FFs into deuteron, add: deuteron bound by short-distance + tensor force: one-pion exchange N † � σ · � q π ( q ) N = ⇒ photon couples to charged meson-exchanges and many π ± π ± π ± more!! open issues: zero of G Q , form for Q � 3 fm − 1 ,. . . PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.7

  9. (c) Nuclear Binding Energies (per Nucleon) 100 Mean Field Models Densit y F un tional Shell Model(s) Effective Microscopic 10 Interactions Ab Initio Proton Number χ EFT, EFT( / π ) 3 He 4 QCD He 1 3 p d H QCD Vacuum Quark-Gluon QCD Interaction Vacuum n 50 1 5 10 100 Neutron Number B / A rapidly increases from deuteron ( A = 2 ): 1 . 1 MeV / A to about 12 C: 7 . 5 MeV / A for A � 16 (oxygen) remains around 7 . 5 ... 8 . 5 MeV / A maximal for 56 Fe– 60 Co– 62 Ni: 8 . 5 MeV / A small decrease to A ≈ 250 (U): 7 . 5 MeV / A = ⇒ “typically”, fusion gains (much) energy up to Fe; fission gains (some) energy after Fe. = ⇒ Fe has relatively large abundance: fusion and fission product. PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.8

  10. Bethe-Weizsäcker Mass Formula & Interpretation: Liquid Drop Model Know < 3000 nuclei = ⇒ roughly parametrise ground-state binding energies, not only for stable nuclei Z 2 ( N − Z ) 2 δ Total binding energy Semi-Empirical Mass Formula B = a V A − a s A 2 / 3 − a C A 1 / 3 − a a − A 1 / 2 (1935/36) 4 A cf. ρ N ≈ 0 . 17 fm − 3 = a V = 15 . 67 MeV ⇒ saturation volume term = ⇒ Well-separated, quasi-free nucleons, next-neighbour interactions like in liquid. a s = 17 . 23 MeV less neighbours on surface = ⇒ less B surface tension a C = 0 . 714 MeV of protons = ⇒ tilt to N > Z Coulomb repulsion a a = 93 . 15 MeV (a)symmetry/Pauli term Pauli principle = ⇒ tilt to N ∼ Z   − 11 . 2 MeV Z & N even opposite spins have net attraction δ = wf overlap decreases with A 0 Z or N odd pairing term  + 11 . 2 MeV = ⇒ A -dependence Z & N odd PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.9

  11. Valley of Stability around N � Z Z 2 ( A − 2 Z ) 2 δ B = a V A − a s A 2 / 3 − a C A 1 / 3 − a a − A 1 / 2 4 A 2 ( a a + a C A 2 / 3 ) � A a a A = ⇒ Parabola in Z at fixed A with Z min = 2 [HG 16.2/3] PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.10

  12. Valley of Stability Probe nuclear interactions A = 56 by pushing to ”drip-lines” : Facility for Rare Isotope Beams FRIB at MSU A = 150 PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.11

  13. (d) Application: Nuclear Fission [PRSZR 3.3] For A > 60 , fission can release energy, but must overcome fission barrier = ⇒ assume fission into 2 equal fragments Estimate: infinitesimal deformation into ellipsoid (egg) with excentricity ε at constant volume = ⇒ surface tension ր , Coulomb ց : E ( sphere ) − E ( ellipsoid ) � 2 a s A 2 / 3 − a C Z 2 A − 1 / 3 � ∼ ε 2 5 Fission barrier classically overcome when ≤ 0 : Z 2 A ∼ 2 a s ≈ 48 e.g. Z > 114 , A > 270 � a C � below: QM tunnel prob. ∝ exp − 2 2 M ( E − V ) between points with r ( E = V ) Induced Fission: importance of pairing energy n + 238 92 U → 239 92 U : even-even → even-odd ⇒ invest pairing E δ = δ = 11 . 2MeV = √ = 0 . 7 MeV 239 n + 235 92 U → 236 92 U : even-odd → even-even δ = ⇒ gain pairing energy √ = − 0 . 7 MeV = ⇒ can use thermal neutrons (higher σ !) 236 PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring 2018 H. W. Grießhammer, INS, George Washington University II.1.12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend