1 PUAINAKO STREET WIDENING SECOND PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 puainako street widening second public information
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

1 PUAINAKO STREET WIDENING SECOND PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 PUAINAKO STREET WIDENING SECOND PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING AUGUST 8, 2013 WAIAKEA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Purpose of This Meeting 2 Update the community on the status of the project and provide an overview of the progress since the first


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PUAINAKO STREET WIDENING

SECOND PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

AUGUST 8, 2013

WAIAKEA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Purpose of This Meeting

 Update the community on the status of the project and provide

an overview of the progress since the first public meeting

 Explain where we are now with the Environmental Impact

Statement re-evaluation process and steps moving forward

 Present the revisions made to the typical roadway sections

along various portions of the alignment

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose & Need For The Project

 This area is identified as a corridor

deficiency in the 1998 Hawaii Long Range Transportation Plan

 Address congestion  Improve vehicle and pedestrian

safety on existing Puainako Street

 Improve arterial traffic flows by

connecting the existing Puainako Street with Saddle Road

 Create a direct route between East

and West Hawaii

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project History

1993 State Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) completed 1992 Contract to design both widening and extension

  • f existing Puainako

Street initiated by County of Hawai‘i 2000 Federal EIS completed and Record of Decision signed – Selected Alignment 10 (Upper) and Alignment B (Lower) 2009 New Consultant hired under State Contract 2010 EIS Re- Evaluation and Roadway Design Initiated October 2012 Public Informational Meeting #1 2005 Due to procurement laws the County Design Contract for Lower Portion was terminated and the search for a new Consultant was initiated 2004 Upper Portion (Puainako Street Extension) Construction Complete

4

August 2013 Public Informational Meeting #2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project Location and Limits

Project Length: Approximately 1.5 miles

Waiakea Intermediate Waiakea Elementary

End Project Begin Project

5

Phase 1 Phase 2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Existing Concerns

Naniakea St. Intersection (Looking North) Kinoole St. Intersection (Looking West/Mauka)

Unsignalized intersections slow traffic flow and create potential conflicts

3 Intersections (North side) to Waiakea Schools

More than 20 existing driveway connections

7 side streets (south side) from subdivisions

 Sight distance

Intersection sight distance is not optimal at some locations.

Roadside obstructions present potential concerns for motorists and pedestrians.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Existing Concerns

Pedestrian access

No raised sidewalks (only intermittent asphalt curbing)

No bike lanes

Many roadside utilities including telephone poles and associated anchors are obstacles for pedestrians

Traffic

Congestion at Kinoole and Kilauea intersections during school drop

  • ff/pick up hours

Increase in thru traffic due to Saddle Road improvements

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Existing Concerns

Recent and Future Developments near and along Puainako:

Imiloa Astronomy Center

Expansion of University of Hawai‘i- Hilo

University Village – Phase 1

Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center

New University of Hawaii Community College Campus

Saddle Road

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

EIS Re-Evaluation

Initiated in 2010 to determine if the Final EIS and Record of Decision were adequate or if a Supplemental EIS would be needed for this

  • project. The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) and the Federal

Highway Administration (FHWA) require re-evaluation if “major steps to advance project” have not occurred within 3 years after issuance of EIS.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MAP OF ALIGNMENTS CONSIDERED IN FEIS

10

Portion Constructed In 2004

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EIS Re-Evaluation

 Considerations Include Changes Since 2000:

Project design

Project traffic

The physical, natural, and social environment

Legislative and regulatory requirements

 Evaluation is specific to the Lower Portion since the Upper Portion was

constructed in 2004.

 Mitigation measures identified in Final EIS and Record of Decision

must be followed in addition to those outlined in the Re-evaluation document.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Proposed Alignment & Design Features

 Improved segment will extend between Komohana St. and

Kekela Street (just east of Kilauea).

 Improvements:

 Crosswalks  Traffic Signals  Drainage enhancements  Noise barrier walls  Lighting Upgrades  Intersection Upgrades  ADA provisions  Improved sight distance  Retaining walls  Buffer Zones 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Design Changes Since Previous Public Information Meeting

 Revised Lane Width from 12’ to 11’  Increased Buffer Zone Between Properties and Travel Lanes  Potential Reduction in Noise  Retaining Wall Heights Reduced  Increased Area Available for Drainage Collection  Potential for Accommodating Utility Poles Outside of Sidewalk

Areas

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

DISPLAY DESCRIPTIONS

 STATION 1 – PROJECT LOCATION AND ROADWAY

PLAN VIEW EXHIBITS

Existing homes that will be displaced with project.

14

3 RESIDENTIAL DISPLACEMENTS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DISPLAY DESCRIPTIONS

STATION 2 – Section 106 Information

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DISPLAY DESCRIPTIONS

 STATION 3 – Roadway typical sections

incorporating revisions since last Public Information meeting

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

DISPLAY DESCRIPTIONS

STATION 4: Access Routes to and from Affected Areas

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Potential Impacts to Property Owners

Due to Widening and/or Realignment

 Some property frontages adjacent to the roadway improvements will be

impacted

 Partial loss of existing parking areas for businesses, schools, and churches along

the existing Puainako St.

 3 homes might be affected.  The back of 32 lots adjacent to the realignment may be impacted  Noise levels may increase along corridor for properties where improvements

move traffic lanes closer to homes/ businesses

 Access to Puainako Street will be altered for property owners adjacent to the

realigned roadway.

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Proposed Mitigation to Decrease Impacts

Land Issues:

Construct retaining walls (4’-10’) to reduce the size and number of easements and acquisitions

Optimize vertical alignment to limit impacts to property owner access to Puainako St.

Provide noise barriers where justified *Noise barriers are different than retaining walls in that their purpose is to decrease noise levels and not retain soil.

Potential Impacts During Construction:

Traffic (Mitigation: construction of section in front of Waiakea schools shall be scheduled for summer vacation as much as possible)

Noise (Mitigation: contractor to apply for noise permit which may include mitigation measures, such as restriction of equipment type during restricted hours)

Utilities (Mitigation: construction schedule to minimize length of time utility customers are inconvenienced)

Dust (Mitigation: wind screens, watering of active work areas, etc.)

Sediment pollution (Mitigation: time certain construction activities during periods of minimal rainfall)

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Section 106 Consultation

 Requires the federal agencies to take into account the effects of

undertakings on historic properties through consultation with parties with an interest in the effected historic properties.

 Recognizes Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) and requires

consultation with NHOs that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking

 Goals  Identify historic properties potentially affected by an undertaking  Assess the effects  Seek ways to AVOID, MINIMIZE or MITIGATE any adverse effects on

historic properties

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Section 106 Update

 A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was completed in 2000. It included

the following stipulations on existing historic sites:

 State Sites (50-10-35) 1814, 18915, and 18917 to be PRESERVED IN PLACE and

protected during construction with TEMPORARY FENCING.

 No further data recovery necessary for State Sites (50-10-35) 18911, 18912,

18916, 18919, 18921, 18922, 18923, and 20681.

 MOA signatories include FHWA, HDOT, SHPD, COH-DPW and HHF 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Historic Properties: All Plantation Era

18911 18912 18914 18915 18913 18916 18917 18922 18923 18918 20681 18919

Alignment A- Not Selected as Preferred Alignment to Avoid Archaeological Resources to be Preserved in Place (18914, 18915, 18917) Alignment B – Upper Segment Above Komohana Already Constructed and Mitigated Alignment B – Lower Segment to be Constructed in Current Project

Site Description Mitigation Proposed/Performed 18911 11 Features: Agricultural Rock Piles, terraces, mounds Data Recovery Completed 18912 Mound Data Recovery Completed 18913 Linear Mound in Poor Shape - No Longer Significant None 18914 8 Features: terraces, mounds, platforms, modified outcrops Avoid – Preserve 18915 9 Features: Enclosure, Railroad Bed, Mounds, Platforms Avoid – Preserve 18916 Platform and Wall Data Recovery Completed 18917 Two Mounds and Linear Rock Pile Avoid – Preserve 18918 Three modified Pahoehoe Outcrops and a Mound Data Recovery Completed 18919 36 Features: Mounds, Wall Segments, Platforms, modified Outcrops Data Recovery Completed 18922 Modified Outcrop No Further Work Needed 18923 Modified Outcrop No Further Work Needed 20681 16 Features: mounds, modified Outcrops, walls, Data Recovery Completed

Waiakea Elementary & Intermediate Schools

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Section 106 Update

 In 2012, Section 106 Consultation was re-opened to cover the extension of

the project from Kilauea Avenue to Kanoelehua Avenue (approx. 850 ft.)

 SHPD, OHA, and NHO’s were sent letters requesting comments and any knowledge

  • f historic, archaeological, or cultural properties in the project area.

 A Section 106 Consultation public meeting held in Hilo on October 16, 2012.  Following consultation with SHPD, OHA and NHO’s, NO historic, archaeological, or

cultural sites were identified.

 Next Steps:  Seek SHPD concurrence on the determination  Seek concurrence of the MOA signatories, either through extension in time of the

existing MOA, or by creating a new MOA

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

HISTORIC PROPERTIES ARE ADVERSELY AFFECTED UNDERTAKING MIGHT AFFECT HISTORIC PROPERTIES

Section 106 – 4 Step Process

Step 1

Initiate Section 106 Process Establish undertaking Plan to involve the public Identify other consulting parties

Public Involvement

NO UNDERTAKING/ NO POTENTIAL TO CAUSE EFFECTS Identify Historic Properties Determine scope of efforts Identify historic properties Evaluate historic significance

Public Involvement

Step 2

NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES AFFECTED HISTORIC PROPERTIES ARE AFFECTED Assess Adverse Effects Apply criteria of adverse effect

Public Involvement

Step 3

NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES ADVERSELY AFFECTED Resolve Adverse Effects Continue Consultation MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

Public Involvement

Step 4

FAILURE TO AGREE ADVISORY COUNCIL COMMENT 24

WE ARE HERE

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Construction Phasing

 Construction is currently being planned as two phases:  Phase 1  Waiakea Intermediate School to just east of Kilauea

Avenue (near Kekela Street)

 Widening of the existing two-lane Puainako Street to

four lanes.

 Phase 2  Komohana Street to Waiakea Intermediate School  New construction of a four-lane roadway on a new

alignment.

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Construction Phasing

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Project Schedule

 2013: Permits and Preliminary Design  2014/2015: Construction, Land Acquisition and Bid

Documents

 2016: Contract Award, Start Construction of Phase 1  2018: Complete Construction of Phase 1

Contract Award, Start Construction of Phase 2

 2020: Complete Construction of Phase 2

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Contact Information

State Department of Transportation Robert Sun, Project Manager (808) 692-7578 Robert.Sun@hawaii.gov Prime Consultant: SSFM International, Inc. Austen Drake, P.E., Engineer Cheryl Soon, Planning Group Manager

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Question and Answer Session

29