1
play

1 Method Outline Fragment Matching Fragment Extraction Individual - PDF document

Overview (1) The major goal of image segmentation is to identify structures in the image that are likely to Class-Specific, Top-Down correspond to scene objects Classic image-based segmentation methods use Segmentation continuity of


  1. Overview (1) � The major goal of image segmentation is to identify structures in the image that are likely to Class-Specific, Top-Down correspond to scene objects � Classic image-based segmentation methods use Segmentation continuity of grey-level, texture, and bounding contours � Where is the object boundary? Eran Borenstein & Shimon Ullman Presented by Chia-Chih Chen Reference slides: www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/users/josephad/TopDownBottomUpSeg.ppt Overview (2) Method Overview Fragments Input � The class can help resolve ambiguities! � Segmentation is guided by a stored representation of the shape of objects within a general class Matching Cover Method Outline Fragment Extraction � Calculate the strength of responses S i of F i in C � Fragment Extraction and NC � Figure Ground Label � Decide θ i according to Neyman-Pearson � Reliability Value � Fragment Matching decision theory � Individual Correspondences � Select top K fragments according to � Consistency (hit rate), K decide size of fragment set � Reliability � Two more factors are added to each fragment: � Segmentation Figure-ground label Reliability � Optimal Cover 1

  2. Method Outline Fragment Matching � Fragment Extraction � Individual Correspondence � Figure Ground Label � Reliability Value � Fragment Matching Edge Detector Region Correlation � Individual Correspondences � Consistency � Consistency � Reliability � Segmentation � Reliability � Optimal Cover Method Outline Segmentation – Optimal Cover (1) � The best cover should maximize individual � Fragment Extraction match quality, consistency and reliability � Figure Ground Label � Thus the cover score is written: � Reliability Value � Fragment Matching � Individual Correspondences � Consistency Rewards for Penalizes for match quality � Reliability inconsistent and reliability overlapping � Segmentation fragments � Optimal Cover Interaction is zero for Constant that determines the non-overlapping pairs magnitude of the penalty for insufficient consistency Segmentation – Optimal Cover (2) Results � Initialize with a sub-window that has the maximal concentration of reliable fragments � Similarity of all the reliable fragments is examined at 5 scales at all possible locations � Iterative Algorithm: � Select a small number (M=15) of good candidate fragments � Add to cover a subset of the M fragments that maximally improve the score � Remove existing fragments inconsistent with new Paper algorithm: 0.71 cover (fragments with cumulative negative score) Normalized-cuts: 0.31 � Guaranteed to converge to a local maximum Random segmentation: 0.23 2

  3. Conclusions T h a n k y o u ! � Demonstrate the feasibility of using class-based Q u e s t i o n s ? criteria to generate segmentation corresponds to visual objects � The cover algorithm resembles solving jigsaw puzzle � (# of reliable fragments)(# of pixels in each scale)(# of scales) � Future work: 1) using pyramid of image segments 2) boundaries can be refined by image-based methods 3

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend