SLIDE 5 1/13/16 5
§
TAF group had smaller decline in eGFR (0·08 vs 0·12 mg/dL; p<0·0001)
§
TAF group had less proteinuria (median % change −3 vs 20; p<0·0001)
§
TAF group had smaller reductions in bone mineral density at the spine (mean % change −1·30 vs –2·86; p<0·0001) and hip (−0·66 vs –2·95; p<0·0001)
% Patients with HIV RNA <50 c/mm3 Δ +2.0% (95% CI: -0.7% to +4.7) Sax PE, et al. Lancet 2015;385;2606-2615.
92 4 4 90 4 6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Success Failure No Data E/C/F/TAF (n=866) E/C/F/TDF (n=867)
E = elvitegravir; C = cobicistat, F = emtricitabine; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide; TDF = tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
¡ One tablet once-a-day regimen § Approved by FDA November 2015 § DHHS Recommend Agent November 2015 ¡ Cobicistat booster § CYP3A4 inhibitor = drug-drug interactions § Avoid use in patients with ClCr <30 mL/
min
¡ Food increases absorption ¡ Avoid coadministration with polyvalent
cations
¡ Other ADEs: diarrhea, nephrotoxicity,
decreases in bone mineral density
§ TAF/emtricitabine – under review § Rilpivirine/TAF/emtricitabine – under
review
§ Darunavir/cobicistat/TAF/emtricitabine § GS-9883/emtricitabine/TAF
INSTI Advantages Disadvantages Dolutegravir • Once-daily dosing
- Single tablet with abacavir/
lamivudine
- High resistance barrier
- Activity against resistant virus
- Few drug interactions
- No food requirement
- No coformulation with
tenofovir/emtricitabine Elvitegravir
- Once-daily dosing
- Single tablet
- Requires boosting
- Drug-drug interactions
- Food requirement
- Avoid if ClCr <70 ml/min if given
with TDF
require PA Raltegravir
- First INSTI
- Fewest drug interactions
- Best ADE profile
- No food requirement
- BID dosing
- No single-tablet regimen
- Lower barrier to resistance
¡ NNRTI-based regimen § Efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine
▪ Baseline resistance1 ▪ Failures due to ADEs requiring switch2,3 ▪ CNS toxicity and suicidality4
¡ PI-based regimen § Atazanavir + ritonavir + tenofovir/emtricitabine
▪ Failures due to ADEs requiring switch5
¡ Regimens with HIV RNA or CD4 cell count
restrictions
- 1. Snedecor SJ et al. PLoS One 2013;8:e72784. 2. Walmsley SL et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1807-1818. 3.
Rockstroh JK et al J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013;63:77-85 4. Mollan KR et al. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:1-10. 5. Lennox JL, et al. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:461-71.
Atazanavir/ ritonavir Raltegravir Darunavir/ ritonavir ADE Resulting in Discontinuation 95 (15.7%) 8 (1.3%) 32 (5.3%) GI toxicity 25 2 14 Hyperbilirubinemia 47 Other hepatic toxicity 4 1 5 Rash 7 2 4 Metabolic toxicity 6 2 Renal toxicity 4 Abnormal chem/hem 2 Other 2 3 4
Lennox JL, et al. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:461-71 & supplemental material.
Results of study: Cumulative incidence of virologic and tolerability favored raltegravir and darunavir/ritonavir over atazanavir/ritonavir.