- !""!!""#$%&
$%
'() '() '() '() * + * '
,& &&- ./!")"
- - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
&01&'2
$%
'() '() '() '() * + * '
,& &&- ./!")"
/ / - ;
?
3) 3)* * 4" 4"9 9 D D * *& &
3! 3!* * 4" 4" D D * *& & && &&
4 4 ) )* * 4"* 4"*0 0 D D & &
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 F0 (Hz)
Low tone High tone
4 4 ! !* * 4"* 4"*& & && &&
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 F0 (Hz)
Low tone High tone
Fig Fig 3: 3: Waveform Waveform spectrograph spectrograph, F0 and , F0 and intensity intensity curves curves of
d d! !a a vs vs d d! !a a
"
10 20 30 40 50 % isolation carrier sentence stimuli
isolation & in a carrier sentence
d’Étude sur la Parole (JEP) de l’Association Francophone de la Communication Parlée (AFCP), Avignon, pp. 273-276, 2007.
International Conference on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2006), La Rochelle,
système phonologique en français en vue d’une application didactique. Lille, Diffusion ANRT, 2004.
sons de tous les jours : le cas akan (TWI). Paris, l’Harmattan, 2002.
vowels: Phonological and phonetic effects of listeners’ native languages, 15th ICPhS Barcelona, 2003.
Speech Prosody, pp. 277-280, 2008.
? Dolphyne F. A. :04<%9 &% &&H*=)>//% ?
4% 4% 4%%H O* &&&9=&8 =3&&&
% #E(>)>/.% ? &% &% &% &% ''/ 9&=&%)#)/!""/% ? Tran D. D., Castelli E., Serignat J-F, Trinh V. L, Le X. H. Influence of F0 on
Vietnamese syllable perception. Interspeech'2005 – Eurospeech, Lisbon, 2005.
? + + + +Q Q Q Q%=&&&& R%&&& &7&%!!("!!E#)>>(%
? R%%0% R%%0% R%%0% R%%0% S 0 T 0& 3=%&& DM%%M29 &))>.(% ? %+% %+% %+% %+%
<%V #V&&*I &&6 3)>J#%