Yeast-based magnetic bionanocomposite for the removal of Zn(II) in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

yeast based magnetic bionanocomposite for the removal of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Yeast-based magnetic bionanocomposite for the removal of Zn(II) in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Yeast-based magnetic bionanocomposite for the removal of Zn(II) in aqueous medium Julia C. Jos 1 , Thais E. Abilio 1 , Beatriz C. Soares 1 , Gergia Labuto 2 , Elma N.V.M. Carrilho 1,3 1 Laboratory of Polymeric Materials and Biosorbents,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Yeast-based magnetic bionanocomposite for the removal

  • f Zn(II) in aqueous medium

Julia C. José1, Thais E. Abilio1, Beatriz C. Soares1, Geórgia Labuto2, Elma N.V.M. Carrilho1,3

1 Laboratory of Polymeric Materials and Biosorbents, Federal

University of São Carlos, Brazil.

2 Department of Chemistry, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil. 3 Department of Natural Sciences, Mathematic and Education,

Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil.

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

An important field!!!

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Biosorption by yeast-based material

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The quality of water resources

5

impact

caused by human activities

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Biosorption

Adsorption using biological waste – Biomass Advantages Advantages

Favorable economic value Favorable economic value Renewable resources Renewable resources High capacity for the removal of contaminants High capacity for the removal of contaminants

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Yeast biomass

  • Rich in sorption sites (carboxylic,

phosphates, hydroxyls groups) for accumulation of contaminants;

  • Widely used in fermentative

process.

30 g for each L of alcohol

900,000 ton/year!!!

7

Source: Brazil, MAPA, 2017.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles (Fe3O4)

  • Superparamagnetics properties:
  • Smaller size;
  • Greater interaction;
  • Magnetized particles throughout

the struture with the same intensity.

  • It can improve the adsorption

capacity of biomass (hydroxyls groups);

  • It facilitates the removal from

the medium.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Goals

This work proposes to:

  • synthesize,

characterize, and evaluate a nanomodified yeast biosorbent for the sorption

  • f Zn(II) in aqueous environments;
  • to compare in natura biomass and synthesized

magnetite composite to investigate the effect of magnetization in the efficiency of sorption.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Synthesis of ferromagnetic nanoparticles (coprecipitation method)

Fe2+(aq) + 2 Fe3+(aq) + 8 OH-(aq) Fe3O4(s) + 4H2O(l)

Impregnation of nanoparticles to yeast biomass

Fe3O4(s) + YB(s) YB-Fe3O4(s)

30 min; 80 °C 30 min

Fe3O4 (MNP) Composite (YB-MNP) Yeast biomass (YB)

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Characterization of adsorbents

  • X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

Identification of crystalline structures of the materials;

  • Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

It is possible to obtain external images showing the surface of the materials;

  • Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

(FTIR)

Detects the absorption in a characteristic region, identifying the functional groups in the materials.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

12

YB – yeast biomass MNP – magnetic nanoparticles YB-MNP – magnetic composite amorphous YB Peaks attributed to characteristic magnetite planes YB-MNP MNP

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

13

Source: Debs et al., 2019.

MNP YB YB-MNP

YB – yeast biomass MNP – magnetic nanoparticles YB-MNP – magnetic composite

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Fe-O

14

N-H and O-H N-O C=O

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Point of zero charge (pHPZC)

Stirring at 185 rpm for 24 h

10 mg of YB or YB-MNP + 10 mL of NaCl 0.1 mol/L

pH 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Initial pH vs final pH

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Point of zero charge (pHPZC)

 Negative charges on the surface of the biosorbent (above pHPCZ)  Favors the adsorption of Zn(II)  Best adsorption is expected at pH higher than pHPCZ.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

pH assessment

500 mg of YB or YB-MNP 10 mL of 100 mg/L Zn(II)

Stirring at 185 rpm for 10 min

YB YB-MNP Zn determination by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

17

Nd magnet

pH 5.5 6.0 6.5

slide-18
SLIDE 18

pH assessment

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Kinetics studies

200 mg of YB or YB-MNP 10 mL of 100 mg/L Zn(II)

Stirring at 185 rpm at pH 6.0

YB YB- MNP

Zn determination by FAAS

t, min 5 10 30 60 90 120 150

19

Nd magnet centrifugation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Kinetic studies

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Kinect studies

21

Qe

Qexp YB = 4.26

YB-MNP = 4.70

Chemical nature!!!

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Sorption capacity tests

200 mg of YB, MNP or YB-MNP 10 mL of Zn(II) solutions Stirring at 185 rpm; pH 6.0; 5 and 30 min mg Zn/L 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

22

YB YB- MNP

Zn determination by FAAS

Nd magnet centrifugation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Non-linear isotherm models employed to fit Zn(II) adsorption by YB, MNP, and YB-MNP.

Foo and Hammed, 2010; Saadi et al., 2015; Ayawei et al., 2017.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conclusions

With characterization, it was possible to infer that, in fact, the

impregnation of the nanoparticles to the yeast biomass occurred;

The model that best fit the experimental data was Sips, considering

that chemical and physical phenomena contribute to the sorption process;

The magnetite, besides facilitating the removal of the biosorbent from the medium, increases the sorption capacity;

Thus, it is perceived that the synthesized material is environmentally

advantageous and functions as a good biosorbent for removal of Zn(II) in aqueous medium.

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The biosorption group

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Obrigada Thank you

ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ

28